| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
Club Jana Jordan
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from pat362:
Hi jd1961. Does she do anal on her site? I read somewhere that she did but I didn't trust the source.
|
08-08-09 05:08pm
|
Reply
177
|
Club Julia Bond
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from atrapat:
(jd1961's Reply)
The problem in this case (and many others) is that there's no way to tell whether the model has retired from the industry and the site is just some extra cash she gets monthly from uncautious surfers or she is actively shooting new updates for a site she has a real interest in.
Updates have been appearing recently but: is it something that was shot last month or two years ago? Other sites in the network have (or used to have) a diary by the model; I don't think it would be so difficult to add one here and create an entry from time to time saying that she has shot some new scenes for her site or that she is, in fact, alive and kicking in the industry.
|
05-13-08 11:54am
|
Reply
178
|
Club Red Light
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from audrina69:
I totally agree. I joined cause they sent me an offer to join for $5.95/month. and even at the discount price, its a rip off. None of the new scenes are available for download, drm or not....and the old scenes are drm protected. Which makes no sense cause all of them are available to stream for free on virtually every tube site. And you can download most of their scenes with no drm protection at pornstar.com or porn.com.
So they give their scenes away at competitor sites, but on their own site, you cant have it? Dumbest thing I've ever seen. I can join pornstar.com for $2.95, download tons of redlight scenes, but if I buy a full membership to clubredlight...I cant download anything. Freakin joke. Well, the joke is on me cause I wasted $5.95. I hope everyone reads this and avoids this stupid site. They advertise 15 bonus sites. False....its the same content from the main site, just broken down by niche....you can accomplish the same sorting by using the categories feature....I hate clubredlight!
|
05-10-10 01:55pm
|
Reply
179
|
Club Red Light
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from nostromo:
(jd1961's Reply)
LOL
Thanks for your reply jd1961.
|
03-08-08 02:45pm
|
Reply
180
|
Club Red Light
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from llaurell:
Hello,
Our drm is set-up to manage our content and to make sure it's not on any peer to peer, torrent, websites. Occasionally, we may insert an html message before the videos to let users know about any new websites or videos that we think users may want to see. For example, we do plan to display an html message in the beginning of each video to let users know that the www.amyfishercaughtontape.com is now available. I'm interested to hear if you find that to be informative or intrusive.
Thank you,
Laurel
|
11-26-07 12:59pm
|
Reply
181
|
Club Red Light
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from User:
(jd1961's Reply)
While I agree that DRM sites are the bane of our porn perusal, I joined this one for a month because I admire their productions. I had read that the streaming was friendlier than most...and it is.
Now, I cancelled before my month was up because I am not going to show continued support to DRM sites. They need to catch up with the sites who once had DRM and are now removing them.
|
08-22-07 08:14am
|
Reply
182
|
Club Sandy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from PinkPanther:
(jd1961's Reply)
Yep - that's the main rub with this site
The other thing is that it is not state-of-the-art when it comes to size of pics or quality of vids. One-By-Day has left it in the dust in those important areas, not to mention frequency of updates.
I don't know - this site needs to do something pretty massive to challenge the quality of what DDF is doing these days, and if they can't even keep the site up and running.......
|
03-10-08 07:09pm
|
Reply
183
|
Club Sandy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
And yet ClubSandy is the #4 all-time rated site here, and PixAndVideo is #7. I guess it takes time for enough people to be frustrated with them to vent (as we have here) about them -- only to be replaced by another group of dedazzled 21st Sextury newbie subscribers who might keep them in the Top 10.
Oh, well. At least we know better. I sure don't miss that sinking feeling that I blew $30-$45 on these sites anymore.
|
02-25-08 12:18pm
|
Reply
184
|
Club Silvia Saint
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(jd1961's Reply)
Just one thing, though...
For videos those bonus-sites are just average in amount of content - better for photo-sets...
|
02-13-08 11:53am
|
Reply
185
|
Club Silvia Saint
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Denner:
(jd1961's Reply)
Go for it, jd1961....
or maybe we'll end up in a barroom fight over her (he,he)
|
08-27-07 07:46am
|
Reply
186
|
Club Silvia Saint
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Tom Veller:
(jd1961's Reply)
Hallo,
she isn't married - this is incorrect info. She only finished HC work.
|
08-26-07 12:08pm
|
Reply
187
|
Cock For Two
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from Tree Rodent:
Nice job of reporting JD. That's the beauty of it - you can let everyone know what a bunch of shits they are, and that this sort of behaviour will cost them customers, and so it should. They sound like a typical shady bunch of rip off artists, with customer service that is just there to con you, and once they've done that they tell you to go screw yourself. There's no way I'd touch that site with a barge pole. Hope everyone reads this and it costs the site money. This means that PU improves porn quality in the long run as it helps to send money to the better sites.
|
11-29-08 03:20pm
|
Reply
188
|
Cock For Two
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Tree Rodent:
(jd1961's Reply)
Very annoying. It's all supposed to be so easy, but the amount of time you spend trying to iron out all the various crap that happens on the internet is very frustrating. You give your credit card and username plus password, what could be simpler? Yeah right!
|
11-29-08 10:33am
|
Reply
189
|
Cock For Two
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment from jd1961:
A Little update!
I did try to enter again, and this time received the message: "Username blocked" !
I joined this site 20 minutes ago!
Needless to say, I recommend you avoid this site.
|
11-29-08 09:34am
|
Reply
190
|
Cock Rocking Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from jjj5:
I agree completely. I went in for the two day "trial", which is a joke itself. You only get the latest update of the pictures. You are promised bonus sites, but once you click on the site, you are charged for it. I also had to email CCbill and ask for a refund. What a scam.
|
08-28-10 07:10pm
|
Reply
191
|
Cocksuck Cumshot
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from Alive:
Dear visitor! Our site is new amd as you can se there are 9 video and photo set at start. All sets are exclusive. The site will be updated 2 times a month, but the first month we planned that it will gather new costumers.
|
10-29-09 12:08am
|
Reply
192
|
Color Climax
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from exotics4me:
(jd1961's Reply)
Hey jd1961, my family is from Italy, and I guess, I have always had some old-fashioned values about sex, mainly the rough stuff and facials, also not really into anal porn. So they are speaking Danish? I speak English, Spanish and Italian, so I was trying to think what their language is!
I don't think hardcore has advanced any whatsoever, just the equipment used to film it has advanced. I notice a very warm tint to the colors of the 70s scenes they have, what I would call "fuzzy" look, but outside of that, I much prefer the older stuff to the newer stuff. I've been really impressed with Videobox lately, as they have been releasing a lot of older porns that I hadn't seen, like the Deep Throat series, which was a little before my time.
Thanks for the reply.
|
01-21-08 07:11am
|
Reply
193
|
Color Climax
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(jd1961's Reply)
Thanks JD, I just joined a few days ago and have been very happy with the site. One of my biggest pet peeves with new porn is the insane amount of facials. I loved the 90s and earlier porn of the belly, butt, back, boobs cumshot. Everytime I am on videobox or any of the other DVD sites, the first thing I go to is "classic" section. Thanks for the reply, so far so good!
|
12-24-07 01:24pm
|
Reply
194
|
Cover My Face
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from jake07621:
(jd1961's Reply)
I know. It seems really lame to me.
|
09-11-07 07:04am
|
Reply
195
|
Creampie Thais
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from IKnoPorn:
(jd1961's Reply)
Thanks, this is good info. I'll probably move this near the bottom of my list of "sites of interest".
|
11-25-07 11:15am
|
Reply
196
|
Creampie Thais
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from IKnoPorn:
Hey JD - thanks for the comment, that's disappointing. I've had my eye on this one for a while, never joined, there seem to be some really hot Thai girls though. So the video samples on the site are the same quality as the actual videos? What about the bonus network sites (Hennessie, Asian Suck Dolls, others), do those make the price more worth it ?
|
11-25-07 12:07am
|
Reply
197
|
Crush Photo
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from Drooler:
I was just checking in at Crush (Twyla aka Adel Sharp has me entralled) and noticed that there are no new updates since March 11th. There's a note on the update page that says, "Upon securing of additional capital, Crush will resume regular update schedule."
Whew, my last day was March 10th, so I'm lucky with that at least! ;)
And as for that notice, I guess there's a first time for everything. I'd think that KEEPING the regular update schedule might actually be a little less discouraging for the old cash flow, but hey ... whatever!
|
03-28-08 10:24am
|
Reply
198
|
Crush Photo
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from Drooler:
Well, jd, I joined the empire. Gotta say there are some hot pics here. The ones of Twyla (aka Adel) are really hot, for instance. Also found some Carrie Starr (as Persephone) that ko'd my ass. I love that girl.
Just the same, this site has some problems and weirdness. For one thing, I can't find any galley thumbs save those little ones floating in a "galaxy" somewhere, so I just went for the zips. Download, open, and see.
And they have problems. Sometimes a subfile is missing from the "mass" zips on the left hand side. And sometimes the names don't even match: on the table of zips, the mass zip of Hisella "Illumine" (left side) is matched with smaller "Lipstick" zips on the right. (There are others, too.) And I got two of the same sets of pics from different zips of her. It's getting confusing.
For weirdness, using "flimstrip" mode in XP, a thumb at the bottom doesn't match the pic in the larger view. It happens a LOT. Means you have to use filmstrip to see what's actually there, which slows things down even more.
It's still a good deal for $20, but one thing leads to another and there are dues to pay for the enjoyment.
Whoops! This is a kind of ancillary review, but I think people should know. These guys need to sharpen up their archiving skills.
Or they could have just made it simpler to begin with. All of this complexity (and piecemealing!) is too hard for them to manage.
|
02-10-08 11:46am
|
Reply
199
|
Crush Photo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
Thanks, JD, for both.
|
02-09-08 03:55pm
|
Reply
200
|
Crush Photo
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from Drooler:
Hey JD, I've been looking forward to this review. I do have a question or two.
Are all of the photos about 2240px, or just more recent ones?
How much in archives does the site have?
Your response and the trouble it will take is of course much appreciated.
|
02-09-08 02:10pm
|
