| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
Czech Chicks HD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from ace of aces:
(jd1961's Reply)
seems so :)
|
01-19-09 06:10am
|
Reply
202
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Drooler:
(jd1961's Reply)
The breast-size obsession reminds me of the joke in which an attractive woman, a 32, finds out that by going to this witch doctor's house and asking him to marry her that her breasts will grow.
So she tries it once, and he says,"No!" and the next morning she's a 34.
After a few weeks, she thinks, "Why not be a 36?"
"Will you marry me?"
"No!"
And the next morning, she wakes up a 36. Now, she's really getting attention!
Soon enough: "Why not be a 38 and be set for life?"
"Will you marry me?"
"No! No! A thousand times, no!"
|
04-26-08 01:12pm
|
Reply
203
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from Drooler:
The Pontoon Pretties never did much for me, either.
Another thing (as I'm currently on a month of it): They stopped their regular updates of pics. There have been just two pic set updates in the past two weeks or so, and that's what I really joined for. (Fortunately, I still scooped up some recently archived numbers.)
Are they going to switch into being a vid site?
Wouldn't it be nice if they would update, all the older pics to larger sizes, something like 2000 pix or better, that would up the membership again. (BTW, this can be sung to the tune of "Wouldn't It Be Nice?" by Brian Wilson. ;)
|
04-26-08 04:32am
|
Reply
204
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from JBDICK:
jd1961...good review....thanks.
regarding the major turnoffs of water balloons, there are some examples I'd be prepared to endure...run a trial on...
Tiffany Towers...fantastic tan lines. what she can do with her legs is amazing, the most welcoming split...
(5ft 4in 55GG-21-36)
Wendy Whoppers...ridiculous proportions but I've see her doing some scary stuff with her muff & chuff
(5ft 1in 55EE-21-34)
Pandora Peaks...gorgeous, light and tight
(5ft 4in 72HHH-22-36)
like all crazy trends, you should always try it once, twice or three times and these 3 girls would be my water ballon specials...
All Plastic...Gymnastically Elastic...Jubberly Fantastic
|
04-25-08 10:46am
|
Reply
205
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from Denner:
Man, I dig the "blah"-thing - 'cause thats also how I'm beginning to feel about the site.
Like PinkPanther I joined again and again for two reasons:
Fine deal at TBP
And the hope for something NEW - not just "updates" but NEW!
But it's the same old story - again and again
And like JD says: "models sporting water balloon implants"
I once really liked that site.
But:
JD: Thanks for the input - I'll pass.
At least You did not waste too much money here.
|
04-25-08 10:42am
|
Reply
206
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from PinkPanther:
I have tried this site repeatedly because of the TBP discount. I like it more than Twisty's for a few reasons
While they have their own photoshop addiction, they don't mangle the models as Twisty's has at times, such as with their Andi Valentino photo sets
I like the fun campiness of their satirical vids
I like the low-key personality-filled event vids.
The downside - for a site that has so much video, they don't have a lot of vids that are high on sexual heat.
Twisty's vids are better strip vids, in my opinion
Brazzers does much hotter campy vids, in my opinion
|
04-25-08 06:44am
|
Reply
207
|
Deep Throat Frenzy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lespaul76:
(jd1961's Reply)
Unfortunately, porn producers don't understand that we would rather watch the woman in the video finish off the guy than see him jerk off for the final 3 minutes of a scene.
|
11-13-07 07:55pm
|
Reply
208
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Toadsith:
(jd1961's Reply)
Woah - fast reply, lol
Ah yes - I know what you mean. Those sorts of e-mails don't bother me as long as the site that is advertising is affiliated with the site I was (or am) a member of and as long as they have an unsubscribe link that works if I get tired of them. But networks advertising new sites have often gotten me to rejoin with those emails, so I often like them - you know, if they aren't emailing more than once a month.
Anywho - thanks for the clarification :-)
Cheers!
|
01-17-08 11:26pm
|
Reply
209
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from Toadsith:
How do you know it was Devils Films that sold your e-mail address? Was it a matter of the most-likely candidate or are you one of those careful users that has a new email address for each sign-up?
I just realized I joined this network (through a different site) so you might say I have a vested interest in this. Though I doubt my inbox could get all that much worse, I still nuke about 60 spam a day.
In any case, thanks for the warning :-)
|
01-17-08 10:39pm
|
Reply
210
|
Diabolic
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(jd1961's Reply)
I wish I was that lucky! Porn shops in my area seem to have stopped carrying Diabolic stuff. Many other top studios too. It may be that the Canadian Border Services is being run by a bunch of Baptist women who deem Diabolic's stuff too offensive, but for now, the website is my only means of getting Diabolic.
|
12-14-07 05:50am
|
Reply
211
|
Diabolic
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(jd1961's Reply)
I think it's all relative. I agree that many may think that this site is just a big expensive advertisement, but that would only happen if you had reasonable access to Diabolic DVDs. Diabolic is a great studio and this site gives access to a lot of their stuff. I think it's a decent value.
It's great to have these debates though since different perspectives always help.
|
12-13-07 06:16pm
|
Reply
212
|
Diabolic Web
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from DiacolicChris:
No DRM now guys, and a low trial.. Check it out
|
12-07-07 11:08am
|
Reply
213
|
Diabolic Web
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from wiild1:
(jd1961's Reply)
OK, I see. thanks for the feedback, I will keep searching for my next site to try or join!
|
09-08-07 02:59pm
|
Reply
214
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from zachvenice:
(jd1961's Reply)
Our DRM is removed! Wah-la!
|
04-23-08 03:31pm
|
Reply
215
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from zachvenice:
We do have bandwidth governing in place but its set so high, most people will never notice it. Basically, the max speed is set to somewhere between 500 and 750KB/s which is really fast. Please let me know what kind of speeds you were getting.
|
04-23-08 03:10pm
|
Reply
216
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
from zachvenice:
As noted in our other replies, our speed has since increased 50% above what you experienced. We estimate anywhere between 500-750KB/s when user-bandwidth allows it. We also have tons of models with natural boobs. We invite you all to take a look at our tour and judge for yourselves.
|
04-23-08 02:26pm
|
Reply
217
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(jd1961's Reply)
Well, jd - maybe I have the same thing about the site as you do:
"it's OK it seems to be missing something though I can't put my finger on it."
Precisely - I cannot put my finger at anything in particular myself - but it's not fun, great, really sexy or whatever, anymore - things at DD keeps repeating themselves without any real innowation.
Or maybe it's just us veterans in this game - newcommers might be happy?
|
12-06-07 11:26am
|
Reply
218
|
Divine Breasts
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from badandy400:
(jd1961's Reply)
500 megs a day might as well wipe my ass with my $20 bills. This download limit might have been appropriate 15 years ago whe a large site was 10 GB and that was huge. Any more it pisses me off when a single video is less than 500 megs. Thanks for the warning on this RB
|
03-20-08 09:18pm
|
Reply
219
|
Divine Breasts
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RagingBuddhist:
(jd1961's Reply)
Lame. Ridiculous. Sinful. Preposterous. Ludicrous. Unbelievable. Sneaky. Devious. Underhanded. Trickery. Shifty. Unfair. Insidious. Foul. Con. Scam. Racket. Shady. Deceptive. Swindling. Hustle. Thievery. Unprincipled. Unconscionable. Unscrupulous. Subterfuge.
IMO.
|
03-14-08 02:47pm
|
Reply
220
|
Dollar Act
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
from asmith12:
To make a change in a pattern of our recent disagreements :-), I should agree with you here - it does look suspicious. There is also just one thing that puzzles me - how one of these guys managed to get "trust" rating by Marianna? Maybe she should check if her password was stolen/guessed?
|
12-18-07 12:54pm
|
Reply
221
|
DVD Rack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(jd1961's Reply)
Glad to hear that the TBP review agrees, jd. :-) That way I don't come across as a chronic whiner when it comes to those snail paced sites. I seem to run into a lot of them lately and most tend to blame their users or their users' ISPs. Thanks for the appreciation! :-)
|
06-25-09 11:26am
|
Reply
222
|
Ed Powers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from littlejoe:
(jd1961's Reply)
i see a 3-day membership for $5
|
01-18-09 12:10pm
|
Reply
223
|
Ed Powers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Jay G:
(jd1961's Reply)
I used to watch Ed on rented videos and the nostalgia MIGHT be worth $9.95, but certainly NOT $35!
|
01-18-09 07:24am
|
Reply
224
|
Ed Powers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Monahan:
(jd1961's Reply)
Wow! jd, you nailed it. Before Internet porn developed to where it is today, Ed Powers seemed to get a whole lot of undeserved shelf space in the video stores and always did a lousy job on his vids...but he seemed to stay on top.
I really learned`to dislike that smelly looking scumbag but thought it was just me. Glad to see I'm not alone.
|
10-14-07 10:11pm
|
Reply
225
|
Enter Nautica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from atrapat:
(jd1961's Reply)
There are exceptions but you are right that most porn star sites are a letdown.
In this case, Nautica Thorn is for sure still involved with the site but updates are so erratic and the site is so unusable that only die-hard fans will appreciate it.
|
03-02-09 11:01am
|
