| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
426
|
Arch Angel Video
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Ramster:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
You are going by DVDs? We release scenes too, not everything is on a DVD. We've have not gone a month "without a release". Sure DVDs but if you look at the site you will see scenes released and we've never gone a month. Paying members get new scenes on a regular basis, they get new updates.
|
07-10-16 03:30pm
|
Reply
427
|
Arch Angel Video
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Ramster:
Hey there, this is Rob, I manage the site. We have never gone 5 weeks without updating so not sure why you would say that?!? We went 2 weeks June 2 to June 19th but never 5 weeks and if you check the site you will see regular updates every week. We are still shooting and still updating the site, all exclusive, all high quality content! I appreciate the kind words, very much appreciated that you see the value in our production, thank you! We do put in an effort there. And yes we are newer with around 25-30 titles and 150+ scenes so we're still growing. IAFD shows our titles for 2016, our blog archangelblog shows the new releases and the site shows the recently updated scenes.
Thanks,
Rob
|
07-08-16 06:04am
|
Reply
428
|
Pornstar Platinum Network
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Stanky:
I joined this site based on the most recent review by thebestporn. Unfortunately this site did not live up to expectations. The download speeds were extremely slow and many of them stopped before they were done. The video quality is below average, I would give it a C+. Very frustrating and disappointing. Spend your hard earned money elsewhere.
|
06-29-16 11:23am
|
Reply
429
|
CFNM Show
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
On the PU page for BangBros there are several complaints about their billing practices. I suggest that PU/Rabbits look into the possibility of not doing business with them or at least have a talk about this possibility.
|
06-27-16 09:39am
|
Reply
430
|
Hookup Hotshot
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from xtb500:
A 5scene/month limit would be OK for me if it was high quality scenes i can enjoy on a big screen.
But this is not the case here.
I klick on 4k download but the video i get is 1280x720, thats 1/10th of 4k...
(File name ends with -01-4k-full.mp4, so not my mistake or just a bad link)
And even their actual "4k" resolution scenes have max. 6MBit, so look clearly worse than standard 1080p scenes on many other sites.
(And .... compared to true 4k scenes with 20-40Mbit on quality sites)
That explains why they have scene and not GB limit i guess, their files are so tiny that you could still grab all of them with a reasonable GB limit in a month.
(my 5 scenes have total 7,7GB, that's half of what i expect for one proper 4k scene)
I really hate sites that do that misleading spec thing.
If they want to limit traffic/provide only medium quality OK, but then stick to 720/1080 with decent bitrates or make a reasonable download limit for big files.
But don't advertise with "4k" if you only provide them with 25% of the needed bitrate or just rename 720p files.
|
05-26-16 10:44am
|
Reply
431
|
Hookup Hotshot
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from mcb80295:
Thanks for your stellar review as usual rearadmiral. I just joined today and can confirm you still only get 5 downloads per month if you sign up for a 1 month membership. The join page indicates you get more downloads with the 3 month membership and unlimited downloads with the year membership. I might go for the year after this first month since it's only $99.95. The material is great if you enjoy very sloppy throat fucking and innocent looking girls. Wish there was a little more anal, but still love this site!
|
05-25-16 09:48pm
|
Reply
432
|
Lubed
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mcb80295:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
This site is great - some of the hottest anal scenes released lately are 2 from this site - Alice March and Angel Smalls. Both are petite, completely shaved, oiled up and assfucked by a big cock. But yes, until they have more updates it will be hard for some to join.
|
05-14-16 01:55pm
|
Reply
433
|
Broke Straight Boys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from merc77:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Thank you for your kind welcome. I hope to add some good reviews to the many sites I have been a member of. I also like the forum as I can see how the other side thinks. It turns out, the concerns are the same as with all sites out there.
With the untold thousands of sites out there, we need a place that is real when it comes to reviews. So many sites read like shills for the site owners and this one does not. It also allows us users to write our own opinions.
And they are the ones which really matter.
Merc77
|
04-21-16 12:30pm
|
Reply
434
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from RustyJ:
Top review! I find myself agreeing with most you wrote. I'd love to see the 90's to 00's stuff re encoded too. Some of the old stuff is sized like meant for some deacade old mobile phones.
Added cons: Rocco's stuff must be running out soon. Too much Mike Adriano films that you cannot tell from each other.
|
04-18-16 05:33am
|
Reply
435
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Monahan:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I agree. These guys will be out of business reasonably soon.
|
04-03-16 10:03pm
|
Reply
436
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Monahan:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Ditto that. I first joined back when they started up at $10 per month and generally liked what they offered. I'd rejoin periodically even at higher prices. I do recall that they've always had the lousy check crap because so many sites do that so it didn't frost my cookies.
However with the plethora of really great stuff out there I haven't re-up'd in at least 2 years so if they are streaming only, I'm done.
Remember back in the day where porn moved from slimy porn theatres where you'd run into folks like PeeWee Herman to video rental shops where you could rent (or buy) VHS porn? Back in those days you could easily copy stuff by using 2 VCR's hooked up with each other and almost never run into copy protection as compared with main stream movies which always had copy protection.
At least the porn producers back then understood that their market insisted on a "download" capability. Mofos will be changing policy back to permitting downloading or will be shutting down.
|
04-03-16 09:58pm
|
Reply
437
|
Hookup Hotshot
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from oldfart:
I prefer to see the stars swap into different positions like you, instead of cut to scenes.
If you like this site, you may want to try facefucking.com, formally facialabuse.com I visited it over ten years ago and there is one scene where the actress gets really pissed off at a comment someone made. But like a trooper she continued on and got a good spraying in the end.
You'll get a good idea of the content with the site previews - you'll get prompted to join in a minute or less, but you can continue the same preview to see more. A bit too much vomiting for me.
|
04-02-16 08:56pm
|
Reply
438
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from elephant:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Yeah its one of those sites that I've always respected, they always or nearly always get the girls to look their out most hottest makeup wise and the everyday dresses as opposed to plastered on makeup and porn attire. Here's hoping the site is a network site and you get both, I'd join much more often, it's the right step forward for the site I think as watching that style of video like FTVgirls in a B/g scenario will be great, I know on ftvgirls there was a couple of b/g but certainly not many.
|
04-02-16 09:06am
|
Reply
439
|
Club Met Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from elephant:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Yeah its a very odd site, when I clicked on it it went to a site but no way of joining that I could see just login link buttons, I couldn't see a join button. Maybe I'm going blind in my old age lol.
|
03-27-16 07:16am
|
Reply
440
|
Club Met Art
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from elephant:
Yeah this does seem very strange to have another site more expensive and much less content, not sure I really understand the logic behind it but I guess there must be something.
Metart for me is perhaps too big, it does take up lots of your time finding photos I actually like, I'm much more a random type of photo guy and erotic fashion photography especially, I also like girls in clothes to begin with which metart does do but not too often. One thing though you cannot deny is the quality of beautiful girls they have on the site.
|
03-27-16 02:24am
|
Reply
441
|
Club Met Art
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Monahan:
Great review. It matches my own current evaluation of Met Art except I would give it a score closer to the high 80's.
The Met Art site has excellent navigation and its advanced search function is the best in the business.
BUT, until I saw this review, I was totally unaware that Club Met Art even existed. The site makes no sense unless they've got something up their sleeve such as making it a network with other sites or are thinking of expanding into heavier stuff like insertions or bg shots.
|
03-25-16 08:53pm
|
Reply
442
|
Club Met Art
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from lk2fireone:
Excellent review.
I am not a member of Club MetArt.
I am a member of MetArt.
The preview page for Club MetArt gives very little information.
But what the preview page appears to show includes the 4 galleries for today's update at Club MetArt.
Those 4 galleries are the same 4 galleries for today's update at MetArt.
So I don't understand what the reason is for Club MetArt to exist.
Or why anyone would join the site - because the membership price for Club MetArt is higher than for MetArt, and Club MetArt gives you far less content.
Separately, what is your normal download speed? Just curious to compare it to my download speed.
I know you told me before, but my brain has trouble retaining facts (and ideas).
Just one of the benefits of growing older, I guess.
Still more separately: You state in your review you scored MetArt high.
You gave it a score of 88.
In my last review of MetArt, I gave it a score of 99.
In my first review of MetArt, which was also my first review at PU, I gave it a score of 97.
I've said that, in my opinion, MetArt is the best softcore photo site on the internet.
I paid for a lifetime membership to MetArt. Because I was tired of paying a monthly or yearly fee to join.
But you gave an excellent review of MetArt, and I can certainly understand why you scored it 88. And you were being generous, because, as you explained very clearly, the site contents did not appeal to your tastes. But your review of MetArt was detailed and informative, and clearly spelled out its strengths and weaknesses.
|
03-25-16 09:59am
|
Reply
443
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Drooler:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
"When the moment is right, will you be ready to watch Spaceballs?"
NOT!
|
03-25-16 07:28am
|
Reply
444
|
Hookup Hotshot
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from bibo:
Great review as usual, Sir!
I would like to add, that the quality of the scenes have increased over the last months. While the earlier scenes did not look as sharp as you would expect from a 1080p video, the later ones are quite ok. However, it is worth noticing, that the lighting could be better, since all the scenes seem to have some sort of sepia hue, meaning they look a bit too yellow-ish for my tastes.
|
03-20-16 07:09am
|
Reply
445
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from jook:
Thanks for another in-depth review. As a result, I re-upped after a 2-year absence.
In your remarks about bonuses, were you referring to the "bonus updates?" I can't download, only stream.
All in all, it's a great bargain and feel that I got more than my $10's worth, or whatever it was. However, I found the scenes so repetitious that I got bored fast. I know there's just so much you can do in offering variety and it's an issue I have with many sites.
Having said that, I am not a big collector. These days, I subscribe to a site for a month every few months or so. When I first started subscribing, it was all so new and exciting and I'd join several sites at the same time. Either porn has lost it's thrill for me due to lack of variety, or my libido ain't what it used to be. ;) Probably a little of both.
|
03-19-16 03:38pm
|
Reply
446
|
Hookup Hotshot
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from lk2fireone:
A maximum of five downloads per month seems like a deal-breaker to me.
The truth is, I download a lot of scenes from different sites that I am a member of, but hardly ever watch my downloaded videos.
So I don't know why I think that downloading is so important.
But I guess I am a packrat, who like to collect videos and galleries.
|
03-19-16 10:56am
|
Reply
447
|
Tiny Teens 18
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from elephant:
Don't they all buy from the same provider, you see lots of these videos on loads of sites now as it must be cheaper than filming their own, its quite annoying cause you think you've stumbled on a new site then only to find you may of got lots of them.
But it doesn't explain the watermark, that is weird.
|
03-18-16 02:03am
|
Reply
448
|
Assylum.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from bibo:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Done that, got the t-shirt. Take a look and let me know if you agree.
Also, since you were asking for similar sites, one rather new site is hookuphotshot.com, which is not as creative as assylum, but still quite interesting. Note, however, that they have a download limit of 5 scenes per month! A number of the scenes are available via evilangel though.
|
03-14-16 10:58pm
|
Reply
449
|
Tiny Teens 18
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from lk2fireone:
I'm not a member of Tiny Teens 18.
If you are a member of Teen Mega World, you don't have access to Tiny Teens 18.
However, my impression is that the videos at Tiny Teens 18 are available in the Teen Mega World network.
For example:
Looking at the "Schoolgirl Fucking" from Tiny Teens 18, you have the same thumbnail, same title "Schoolgirl Fucking", at the Teen Sex Movs site (part of Teen Mega World network).
"Elegant Anal Threesome" video from Tiny Teens 18, same scene, same title, at First BGG (part of the Teen Mega World network).
I'm not going to bother searching for other matching videos, but I suspect that all the videos at Tiny Teens 18 were first posted to Teen Mega World.
The MetArt network has done a similar move. They started a site called "Love Hairy", which features models who have pubic hair. Their sets and videos were and are featured on the MetArt sites, but some of the same content is also featured at the "Love Hairy" site.
So you can call this a marketing move.
So if you are willing to take the time to search, joining Teen Mega World is probably the better choice, since for a few dollars more, you get access to a huge amount of good hardcore teen videos, versus joining Tiny Teens 18.
|
03-14-16 04:50pm
|
Reply
450
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from clubseventeen:
Hello,
Thank you for the in depth review.
2 things I would like to explain:
- Mostly non-exclusive
This is correct. Due to the large scale of piracy ClubSeventeen produced less and less exclusive content as it was simply costing too much. The last 2 years we worked hard on a lot and our aim is to update with at least 80% exclusive scenes (compared to 60% right now) at the end of the year.
- Model names are often incorrect
This is correct too. Not sure how this is actually decided on but our content guy does seem to make up a lot of names. In his defense we DO get a lot of content where we simply don't know the stage name. But yeah I do agree that this should be done better. Or we could at least work with an alias so you can always find your favorite girl.
A question about the bonus content I don't fully understand. What I think is that you are talking about our portal content? Cause our bonus scenes are completely free to stream full videos from various partners. Now the portal scenes are paid for scenes. So I do think you are mixing these up.
Overall great to see you took the time to write the review. We will take everything into account and of course will act when possible.
Cheers!
Roald
|
03-14-16 05:33am
|
