| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
451
|
Assylum.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from bibo:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I was thinking about that, but I guess your review covered all the important things already. But now that you're asking, I will give it a try.
|
03-13-16 06:37am
|
Reply
452
|
Yonitale
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Vito:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Thank you RR.
I finally got to the end. There are 369 photo sets and 215 videos. 8 updates per click and it really slows down toward the earlier updates.
|
03-11-16 01:09pm
|
Reply
453
|
Net Video Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from creepingdeath84:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Yeah, I feel the opposite about the Back Room and Exploited College sites. Sadly, as you pointed out, the quality and dates of the older videos are disappointing. But I think as far as directing, editing and length, Net Video Girls is better and more interesting to watch.
It just seemed to me that the girls in NVG were more into it and more interesting than Exploited College Girls. Some of those girls were even silent during parts of a scene (ExCoGi).
|
02-29-16 08:01pm
|
Reply
454
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from exotics4me:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Not much has changed there. There is a more recent public one titled, "In Plain View", but it's minimal in public content. Towards the end of the scene the model (still nude) jogs down to the intersection and waves at a few cars. The tags make it more frustrating since they have a "public nudity" tag, but some of those sets are around the pool with no one else around. They do have a couple of hitchhiking scenes that could be seen as public nudity, but there's not as much public content as there used to be and the beach trips are even hard to tell on. There's a few in 2012, but I'm thinking they're remastered from old scenes since Sandy from Club Sandy is in one of them.
|
02-27-16 10:13pm
|
Reply
455
|
Stripper Facials
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Toadsith:
I think you just saved me $10. Thank you.
|
02-26-16 09:45pm
|
Reply
456
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from lk2fireone:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Thanks for the reply.
It sounds like you are paying a very low rate for your services.
I'm paying $40/month for 5 MB/sec download access.
That is not a bundle:
That does not include TV access or landline access or cell phone access.
And that is a low rate in California, because other service providers I checked wanted much higher rates.
But everyone seems to want to sell bundled services.
|
02-23-16 03:09pm
|
Reply
457
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from rooka:
Good job. Just wish his camera work was better than one on a tripod.....
|
02-23-16 07:43am
|
Reply
458
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from lk2fireone:
Excellent review.
I'm curious what you pay for your internet access.
I pay $40/month, which is a discounted rate, to Time Warner Cable, in California.
When I download files (photo sets, videos) from the internet, my max speed is about 5 MB/sec.
That would be equivalent to 8 * 5 = 40 Mbps.
A capital B stands for Byte.
A small b stands for bit.
1 byte = 8 bits
Are you really getting 22 to 25 MB/sec?
Or are you getting (22 to 25 Mb/sec) divided by 8 = 2.75 to 3.125 MB/sec?
Also, how much are you paying for internet access?
I'm paying $40/month, for internet access only. That does not include TV or phone access.
What I'm asking is, are the rates so much cheaper in Canada, that you can afford very high speed internet access?
If I paid more, I could have a faster internet connection, but 5 MB/sec speed is OK for me.
|
02-22-16 05:03pm
|
Reply
459
|
Wake Up N Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review from rearadmiral:
I ran out of space in my review and forgot to mention a few key details:
- There are 178 scenes here
- The site updates regularly
- Some newer scenes have 4K as the top resolution. File sizes are over 10GB so I haven’t downloaded any of those. (These file sizes make the need for a 720p option more acute.)
|
02-13-16 05:08am
|
Reply
460
|
Wank Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from LPee23:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I'll check it out anyways. They have a Nina Hartley squirting scene in their tour, so the probably have more along the same line inside.
|
02-11-16 01:54pm
|
Reply
461
|
Wank Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from LPee23:
Got some inside info that this network will be closing for good in a month. Trying to decide if I should have a look before it's gone. Rearadmiral, do you remember if the femdom content on this site had any pee scenes?
|
02-10-16 01:21pm
|
Reply
462
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from exotics4me:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I actually thought of you when I saw all those anal scenes. My membership is still going thanks to accumulated credits and still have enough to go for 3 more months. If the credit counter hadn't refreshed on me I don't think I would have ever had to pay for 21 Sextury again. When I first signed up it said I had 56,000 credits, but when I went to the updates page it refreshed the credits to 16,000, still enough to join four or five times.
|
02-09-16 02:35pm
|
Reply
463
|
My Babysitters Club
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from papermarvin:
Once again your reviews are much much appreciated- Thank you!
|
02-09-16 06:10am
|
Reply
464
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from LPee23:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Nice review. While some of their sites have some great content, they did a poor job maintaining it over the years. For example, I once checked out KinkyCarmen.com, and noticed that some of the pee scenes they released to MGP's were not available in the member's area. I asked the webmaster about this, actually got a reply, sent him copies of the scenes I was looking for, then never heard anything back again...
Edit: This was supposed to be a reply to the review, as much as I like your comment too rearadmiral!
|
02-06-16 02:16pm
|
Reply
465
|
Teens Love Anal
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from rooka:
Great review as always and its hard keeping up with you. Your on a tear lol Curious though, any thoughts on Woodmans Casting ? I would think that would be right up ally with what your looking for....
|
02-04-16 01:00pm
|
Reply
466
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from jook:
RA, your reviews are so right on target and thorough beyond the call of duty. Once again, I appreciate it.
I rejoined Skeet after a 2 year absence. I don't know why I waited so long. The site is even better.
One thing I found curious - the ratings for the videos. It's a great idea but one never knows if they should be taken seriously. That is, if they come from subscribers or site personnel. The curious thing was that consistently over the past year, every video (I think) that I downloaded had a rating over 9 (out of 10). However, go back a bit over a year and virtually every video seemed to have a rating between 8 and 9. What's up with that?
Edit to add:
I checked out a video that was uploaded 2/1/16. It has 9,396 reviews for a score 9.87. I guess I answered my question.
|
02-03-16 04:06pm
|
Reply
467
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from papermarvin:
Thank you Thank you Thank you! This review made my Monday! Getting great feedback from our team is hugely important for us. We also noted the not so great things you mentioned and our goal is to improve on them as well.
your most humble and obedient servant;
TeamSkeet
|
01-25-16 03:24pm
|
Reply
468
|
Dark X
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from pat362:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Sadly IR is still taboo in 2016 because way too many people are still racist and therefore that's why many performers who are not racist themselves will avoid doing for fear that it will make them pariah with many fans.
|
01-23-16 06:08pm
|
Reply
469
|
Dark X
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I don't know if this makes me weird(or weirder) but one of the main reasons why I like IR is because I like the contrast in skin color between the performers. I don't care if it's a black woman with a black man or vice versa. As long as there is a contrast than I'm happy. Not sure if this is one of the appeals of IR or if like anal and other sexual fetishes. It is still a taboo subject. In fact it would quite easy to argue that IR is in many ways more taboo than almost any other fetish(baring the illegal ones).
I'm sure that at some point I will join Dark X but unless they get an exclusive scene that I must have than it will be many months before I even consider joining.
|
01-22-16 03:20pm
|
Reply
470
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from rooka:
I don't participate on here but I have to say that your reviews are the best and it pretty much determines what i subscribe to next . We pretty much have similar interests and i appreciate all the work that you put into it. Thanks again.....
|
01-22-16 07:34am
|
Reply
471
|
Dark X
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I completely understand your reason and I see nothing wrong with it. I do wonder if you would have been as magnanimous if you had to pay full price instead of the TBP/PU discount. Don't get wrong. I joined Tushy and paid the full price all the while knowing that there wasn't a lot of content and updates were once a week so cost isn't always an issue but in this case I think what Dark X and in many ways what Hard X has done is borderline reprehensible because Dark is not really going to be a true stand alone site so much as a site that the owners of Hard X will now upload the IR content they would have once used on their own site. Instead of having a much bigger site with more updates. I think you will now have two smaller sites with fewer updates.
Of course I may be all wrong and this is just the beginning of them shooting way more content to update both sites.
|
01-21-16 05:56pm
|
Reply
472
|
Dark X
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from pat362:
Another excellent review. I agree with you that IR in porn term is somewhat different than IR in real life. In porn IR tends to always mean a black man or woman with a white man or woman. As much as I enjoy IR porn.
This is one of those sites that I classify under not going to join for a very long time because it's going to take them a long time to accumulate content. Worse it actually penalizes it's sister site Hard X because the people behind Dark X didn't so much create a brand stand alone new site as they stole the content that would have once gone to Hard X and used it to supply a IR only site. It's not like Hard X has already a huge library of content but now they will either have to share the same content or see some scenes that would have once been on their site get used on Dark X.
|
01-18-16 06:04pm
|
Reply
473
|
Pissing.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from LPee23:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Yeah, I also get a kick out of it when I stumble across pee scenes from unexpected sites. Brazzers is up there because I remember a few years ago one of their employees posted on their forum that they do not have any pee scenes because it is "not sexy." I guess things have changed with that Maddy O'Reilly scene.
There's also a Brazzers trailer floating around the tubes with Riley Reid pissing into a pool. It's from the scene "A Day With Riley" on Pornstars Like it Big. Not sure if the peeing made it into the final cut, but it's in the trailer, and I'll check it out next time I join.
|
01-10-16 10:23am
|
Reply
474
|
Pissing.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from LPee23:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I think many people tend to have narrow or pretty specific interests within the niche, even though the niche itself is extremely broad with dozens of sub-niches each with their own fans. As for myself, I'm not so particular, and I like almost everything. M2F peeing is the only thing that doesn't really do anything for me, but I save some of those scenes anyway. The most perplexing thing about people within this niche is that many prefer "genuine" amateur content and turn their noses up at anything professionally produced. They want to believe that the model actually has a pee fetish herself, and not that she was just paid to do a scene.
Self-censorship has been in vogue for years. I think it's easier to sneak a bit of peeing into a more mainstream site than it is to have a dedicated pee site. Kink.com continues to make and post occasional pee scenes on many of their other sites, including M2F peeing, which the billers are supposedly so opposed to.
I am actually hopeful that the tide will turn the other direction soon and self-censorship may decrease. With alternative payment options like Bitcoin springing up left and right and becoming more practical, it is only a matter of time before the CC processors lose their leverage.
|
01-09-16 08:06am
|
Reply
475
|
Pissing.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from LPee23:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I think it's the push further towards mainstream that motivated them to stop shooting for WaterBondage.com. They were talking about going mainstream back in 2013.
Yeah, those Pissing.com scenes are definitely gems to hold on to.
I never want to see a site close, except for the worst of the worst scam sites, but I don't feel too bad about Pissing.com. For one thing, I've got all the content. Also, the site was kind of a monument to failure. They had without a doubt the best domain in the niche, they were well known, yet they only managed to turn out 31 scenes before grinding to a halt and staying around on life support for almost a decade. Anyone contemplating a new pee site only had to consider the fate of Pissing.com to be deterred. Maybe Pissing.com closing will help clear the air a bit. It is encouraging that many of the new pee sites this last year seem to be off to a much better start than Pissing.com.
|
01-07-16 05:08am
|
