| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from WeeWillyWinky:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I say good on ya, rearadmiral. I wish I had the confidence to give it a try. It's a new age, and I believe you when you give testimony to the overall goodness of the experience. I'd NEVER be with a "bargain-basement" type person, I don't care how horny I was, or how loaded I was (pun intended).
I had an "almost" with a beautiful lady in Nevada with whom I had a brief but pleasant email exchange. I searched around and around, and finally picked her because of her stunning beauty and her apparent intelligence and charm. I almost worked up the nerve to seal the deal until she told me the charge for an overnight, with the whole shebang. I told her I wanted an evening with a woman, not just a body for relieving tension. It was far too steep for me, but I almost did it anyway.
|
05-06-17 09:02pm
|
Reply
27
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Monahan:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Ditto that. Been with VideoBox continuously since 2004. Agree with RA that they post a lot of pure crap but perhaps 3 or 4 times a week they post some really superb HD videos...which makes it worthwhile.
I was also a very long term First Time Videos member (about 5 years) but finally got tired of their download issues and the excessively long and boring scenes and no loyalty price discounts. I miss it just a little.
|
03-26-17 10:51pm
|
Reply
28
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from lk2fireone:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
QUOTE:
(As an aside, I wish more sites gave the discounted price month after month rather than recurring at a much high rate. It seems to me that sites could make a lot more money with having more people stay longer at a lower price than they would in hoping a few people would forget to cancel and they got a smaller number of higher-priced subscriptions.)
END OF QUOTE:
I AGREE COMPLETELY.
BUT THE BUSINESS MODEL MOST FOLLOWED IS OFFERING NEW MEMBERS A LOWER PRICE THAN OFFERED TO RECURRING MEMBERS.
IN OTHER WORDS, LOYALTY IS FOOLISH, AND YOU PAY A HIGHER PRICE WHEN YOU CONTINUE YOUR MEMBERSHIP.
IT'S NOT JUST FOR PORN SITES, BUT MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPTIONS, NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTIONS, ETC.
WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO THE IDEA OF LOYALTY IS REWARDED?
|
02-05-17 06:55am
|
Reply
29
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from superjank:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Exactly how I feel.
|
01-08-17 09:57pm
|
Reply
30
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Monahan:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Me too. Not only is on line easier to manage and store it's a whole lot cheaper. I still have my collection of VHS tapes and DVD's...and some really old magazines, but I haven't looked at them in over a decade.
|
12-17-16 09:14am
|
Reply
31
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Thank You for that one. You made me laugh.
|
10-20-16 05:52pm
|
Reply
32
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Drooler:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
"When the moment is right, will you be ready to watch Spaceballs?"
NOT!
|
03-25-16 07:28am
|
Reply
33
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from badandy400:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
This was one of my all time favorite replies on this site.
|
12-23-15 03:16pm
|
Reply
34
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Pyrenees:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Ok so Los Angeles (And some of California) decided to make it impossible to produce porn without condoms. Also Body fluids were classified at hazerdous materials. Basically killing pee and facials. So basically they killed porn in california and lost 300M in tax revenue a year ... in a state that is so far underwater they might as well be Atlantis.
So porn had to move. Most have chosen Las Vegas but they are still in a nebulous grey area on some things. So uncertainty has tremendously impacted over 300 US porn studios. Setting back more than a year of porn and revenue. Really it was a huge blow. Imagine 5,000 people having to move to make a living. It is what happened.
|
10-17-15 09:53am
|
Reply
35
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Pyrenees:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Indeed that is not at all how I meant it lol. It is so hard to show the proper attitude in text. Quite the opposite. I am very grateful for TBP and PU. Many times I wanted to join a site and a very relevant post kept me from doing so. I take the word of my fellow reviewers very seriously. The main exception being if there is a scene I HAVE to own. For example there was a Kelsi Monro scene on Bangbros I HAD to have. I never liked bangbros I had joined them years ago and was not happy with their quality standards. Despite many so so and lack luster reviews I simply had to join to get the scene I wanted. I think we are all doing our best.
|
10-11-15 06:42pm
|
Reply
36
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Pyrenees:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
That is huge news!
|
08-15-15 09:13am
|
Reply
37
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Pyrenees:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Excellent replies thank you so much!
|
08-11-15 03:01pm
|
Reply
38
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Pyrenees:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
lol I KNEW you were going to say that since you collect first time anal's. Speaking of which here are some questions for you.
Top 3 most painful First Time anals?
Top 3 anal scenes of all time (Your opinion).
Your Top 3 Favorite anal scenes of all time.
Would love to hear your input as this is certainly your area =)
|
08-10-15 11:18am
|
Reply
39
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from LPee23:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
In order to spare the system drive the burden of IDM, you not only have to point your downloads to an external, but you also have to change the location of the temporary folder for IDM downloads. Under the Options menu go to the 'Save To' tab, and change the location of the temporary folder.
|
05-13-15 06:43pm
|
Reply
40
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from LPee23:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
That's right. IDM makes extensive use of the hard drive, which is the bottleneck for the speed of most operations on most systems.
|
05-13-15 06:23pm
|
Reply
41
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from LPee23:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
IDM was slowing down my dv7 a lot when I first started using it. Then I moved the download folder off of the system drive, and the issue resolved. It makes extensive use of the hard drive when it downloads files in chunks and reassembles them, so if you run it on your system drive, it can really slow down your OS.
Now that I upgraded to an SSD, I deliberately put the download folder on the SSD, which of course also hosts the OS. IDM doesn't slow down the response time in the slightest now, but IDM downloads are actually a lot faster since the chunks are reassembled very fast.
|
05-12-15 04:18pm
|
Reply
42
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from LPee23:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I use Bulk Image Downloader for photo sets that aren't in zips. I haven't tried IDM yet. Does it let you queue up all the downloads you want, then basically just walk away while it does the work?
|
01-15-15 06:31pm
|
Reply
43
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Yosemite:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Right on target. If there is no buildup that one can relate to almost everything that follows has no context. Gonzo fans will completely disagree and I understand that but that is how I favor my porn.
|
11-02-14 11:18pm
|
Reply
44
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Monahan:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Ditto. The only aftermarket installation I have ever found appealing were with Memphis Monroe's. They were done by someone who understood the appeal of nat mams.
An old controversy was whether Carmella Bing's mams were all natural but since she has decided to add a lot of weight (I gotta believe she's way over 200 lbs) it no longer matters.
|
09-21-14 10:40am
|
Reply
45
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Monahan:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Ditto that. I see PU as the Consumer Reports of porn and want to know about the bad apples in the biz.
|
06-21-14 02:31pm
|
Reply
46
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Monahan:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Ditto that. The only exception is one DVD I rented back in 2006 or 2007.
|
06-08-14 12:23am
|
Reply
47
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Monahan:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
That's my approach as well. I have afile for each babe, and a sub file by source so I can go back and check the source site for any new stuff.
This approach makes it very easy to use the search function.
|
06-02-14 05:24pm
|
Reply
48
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Loki:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Well said. I don't mind paying more than I normally budget for porn if the content is exceptional in some way, or if I can get an exceptional value for the price. If you're looking for run-of-the-mill hardcore there are great values out there, but if you're looking for something else, you might have to pay more for good quality content.
It's a fine balance between "you get what you pay for" and "caveat emptor." That's why reading reviews of sites by others here at PU is so useful.
|
04-09-14 11:04pm
|
Reply
49
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from jberryl69:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
lol -- I thought you'd like that concept.
|
03-27-14 03:07pm
|
Reply
50
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from jberryl69:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Yeppers! I've seen one where some girls head was inserted.
|
03-26-14 03:07pm
|
