| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
451
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
from Toadsith:
Their entire network was DRM based when I was a member, I'd be surprised if that changes anytime soon, but there are ways around it. My favorite is a program called TuneBite. It simply records the copy protected video while it is playing. Do be sure to have turned off your screen saver and any programs that might make noise - as it'll record those noises as well. Plus it is a super processor hog - but once its done, you've got yourself the content without the DRM. It can also queue up the video files - I generally would start it recording when I went to bed, easy way to convert 10 videos.
|
03-11-08 02:02pm
|
Reply
452
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
from jd1961:
From the site: "Depending if the video is DRM protected or not, you will need an active username and password before a video can be watched. When your membership is cancelled or expires you will still have 30 days to watch the video for free. Unprotected videos can be watched for free as long as you want.
How do you know if a video is DRM protected?
Answer: When you first open a downloaded video and you are asked to enter a username and password, then this video is DRM protected.
You only have to enter your username and password for the first DRM video you open. All other DRM videos will work without having to enter the username and password again."
|
03-11-08 11:30am
|
Reply
453
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#28
from messmer:
(ace of aces's Reply)
Thanks. That makes sense!
|
03-05-08 03:27pm
|
Reply
454
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#26
from messmer:
(ace of aces's Reply)
I belong to the "I wish they'd shut up" crowd but wonder if you have something against all music or just against music that is loud and intrusive? I prefer soft music playing in the background to total silence. Just curious!
|
03-04-08 07:35pm
|
Reply
455
|
Lonnie Waters
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
from Drooler:
I last joined this one in late '06. The updates of Lonnie material was very infrequent, perhaps only two per month in photo galleries, and it was a mix of non-exclusive stuff found at sites like MatrixNudes with some exclusive stuff that wasn't that professionally done in image quality.
I wouldn't recommend spending $24.95 just for the Lonnie site, but if it still offers access as well to AmateursGoneBad and GlamourModelsGoneBad you might find that worth it if you don't mind stuff that might show up elsewhere in memberships to other sites. They did make some nice improvements to the navigation in AGB and GMGB, but the pics and videos were unpredictable in size and quality. Like some pics were up past 1280px and others were only 1000px, even near the end of 2006. But the archives were very substantial. I found pic sets of Marketa Belonoha I've not seen anywhere else. And there were some nice "legacy" vids of Tera Patrick and Brianna Banks there.
I think it's safe to assume that AGB and GMGB would keep a first-timer pretty busy for awhile. Mind you, this is all rather dated info. And I just tried to access the Lonnie site but it wouldn't show.
|
03-03-08 02:19pm
|
Reply
456
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from jd1961:
(ace of aces's Reply)
That's the way it's supposed to be. And yet most of these porn producers don't get it. Andrew Blake once said "The men are just props". That all they should be...stay out of the way as much as possible. Keep their hands off the girls face, keep their mouths shut, and most of all, don't stand their and wank themselves!! I for one like the concept of the mask site, put bags on their heads! For crying out loud, most of these guys act like these expensive videos are being made for their own personal pleasure. it's gotten so bad, that I can only stomach sites with solo girls now.
|
02-29-08 04:01am
|
Reply
457
|
18 Closeup
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
from homer:
I'm a member at 18closeup.com and have been a member at onlycuties. Well at this time (and I counted just for you :) at 18closeup they have 48 HD videos and 30+ movies in normal res). I suppose its more than onlycuties because 18closeup started HD in july 2007. Of course at onlycuties they have moore videos but with a large portion of them in lower res. If you like High Definition, you should definitely consider 18closeup because of the 1080p format (FULL HD). Personnaly, I find the girls of onlycuties not so cute but that's just my opinion. And if I'm not mistaken, I believe onlycuties hd vids are not in full hd (I didn't check but it think they are in 1220x720 or something). Onlycuties is great if you like solo action + hardcore. (There's no hardcore at 18closeup). But personaly, I like to watch girls masturbating, I like to see their orgasm without having a dick or a guys butt ruining the view. And for that, I like the way 18closeup explores a girl's pussy in closeup when she cums. I suppose it's just a matter a taste at this point.
|
02-25-08 11:27am
|
Reply
458
|
18 Closeup
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
from PDXguy:
The quality on these videos is pretty nice. The audio sucks. The girls are limited and not that attractive. I'd recommend OnlyCuties.com if you're looking for HD content.
|
02-25-08 08:32am
|
Reply
459
|
Jelena Jensen
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Jay G:
(ace of aces's Reply)
I really appreciate the info I get from Porn Users and appreciate all the great sharing. I enjoy your stuff. I don't ever like even the idea of "anonymous" because that means there can be no discussion about diffeerent points of view.
|
02-25-08 08:28am
|
Reply
460
|
Jelena Jensen
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Review
from Jay G:
I always appreciate the reliability of your information! Keep up the good work.
|
02-24-08 11:23am
|
Reply
461
|
Jelena Jensen
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Review
from roseman:
Very good review, thanks for the info.
|
02-24-08 04:36am
|
Reply
462
|
Busty Alli
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
from exotics4me:
720 on high end, 2000k bitrate on videos. I was on this site about 3 months ago, but joined Lana's Fantasies and got this one as a bonus site. The videos were very good quality, the biggest problem was that there isn't a lot of content, not for sure about now, but 3 months ago, there was maybe 15 videos for each model. Some also were broken into pieces. The pictures were around 1500 on high end and are in zip files. I just forgot to review them. I would say that with the bonus sites, if you like the way the models look, it was worth a one month membership.
|
02-23-08 09:06am
|
Reply
463
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
from Nick C:
Hi.
As of today we have just under 300 videos and a good portion of these are in HD.
The quality is available in the following :
Standard Video
2000 kbps (640x480)
1000 kbps (480x360)
High Definition
3000 kbps (1280x720)
2000 kbps (640x360)
Also each of these files are available in one file, and also split into multiple sizes @ 25mb per chunk
I'm sure you will be happy with our videos :D
(You actually get access to over 1000+ vids if you include the bonus sites that are included with your membership)
Let me know if you have any other questions.
Best Regards
Nick
Webmaster
|
02-20-08 08:41am
|
Reply
464
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from King:
(ace of aces's Reply)
FPS = Frames Per Second
Everything lower than 24 looks awfull
|
02-17-08 04:45pm
|
Reply
465
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
from littlejoe:
ive never been a member of 1byday, but i have of pmt. pmt has more petite teens, while 1byday looks to have fake glamor women. wouldnt really compare them
|
02-15-08 08:32pm
|
Reply
466
|
Club Niki V
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
from Jay G:
Your comment reminded me of a great number of web-sites that seem to have no support at all. My membership in the Drilled Mouths network was so frustrating. A good network that lasted two days, stopped allowing me to enter with my password and gave no help in re-connecting to the network. Fotunately the 3rd party biller epoch.com was good about refunding my money, but I still don't understand sites and networks that refuse to spend a very small amount of money to provide good support for members who only want good service.
|
02-14-08 06:11am
|
Reply
467
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from asmith12:
(ace of aces's Reply)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tan_lines
Enjoy :-)
|
02-13-08 02:20pm
|
Reply
468
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#26
from Davit:
(ace of aces's Reply)
Ace, STD means 'Sexually Transmitted Diseases'.
|
02-12-08 02:44pm
|
Reply
469
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from paulmarkham:
(ace of aces's Reply)
Always willing to listen, not always willing to change though. LOL
I honestly wished more members would talk to site owners and tell us what they think. We can only supply the product you want if we talk to each other. We might say no, that's something you have to consider.
Some sites do allow more DL speed and hope the members who don't DL it are going to pay for those who do. As you will see I shoot a lot for Sapphic, they just installed a DL limiter.
With surfers and members being offered higher connections, computer hard drives getting bigger and site hosting not get cheaper expect more big sites to limit DL. It's got to happen. Unless it's a smaller site.
|
02-11-08 05:53am
|
Reply
470
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#21
from Khan:
(ace of aces's Reply)
STD = Sexually Transmitted Disease
|
02-11-08 05:23am
|
Reply
471
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from paulmarkham:
(ace of aces's Reply)
Sorry if this sounds a bit tough but it's how the higher user connections are effecting us all. The more people who can surfer faster means the more load on sites servers. And more cost to the site owners.
With some connections and auto downloaders the amount some people will suck down in three days makes it impossible not to limit the DL for ALL members on sites of a certain size. To limit people paying $3 for 72 hours of downloading is common sense. It is set at 2.5 GB per hour and 5GB a day. That 20 to 15 scenes of the high quality per day for a $.
I can see why you don't like my present limits. Would you like it higher?
A message to all surfers and members.
Hosting costs money, most pay from 5 cents to 10 cents a GB. The more you pay the faster it runs. This is after you've bought the servers, paid for the housing of the servers at an ISP. Now site owners could spend more money on server speeds, relax download limits and allow people to get more content in less time.
Who will pay for it? And don't say more sign ups because each extra sign up costs money. Or we reduce the market of large sites to a few and members have less choice.
Sorry but I feel at $ a day 5 GB is excellent value.
I did a test when we installed the download limits and it was fine.
|
02-11-08 05:20am
|
Reply
472
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
from paulmarkham:
Yes we limit what you can download for $3, guilty as charged. Would you like a site with 500 videos for $3? So would I. LOL
|
02-11-08 04:44am
|
Reply
473
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
from paulmarkham:
Have to be honest and agree with you. They did start a lot sooner than I did, so I'm still playing catch up.
|
02-11-08 04:23am
|
Reply
474
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
from nygiants03:
Thats true, this site is not in 1byday's league. But it is a solid site with good content nonetheless.
|
02-10-08 10:51am
|
Reply
475
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Davit:
(ace of aces's Reply)
Gotta say in response to that comment, Ace, if you think dying of some STD is a fair price for a fuck on a porn movie set, then it's probably just as well that, like most of us, you'll never get the opportunity!
|
02-07-08 10:41am
|
