Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
HardRide's Comment
from qvtta:
I guess I am glad I haven't joined this then because I have eyed it few times since it's similar to sites like Suze.net and Twistys, or atleast I thought it's similar..
|
11-17-15 01:09am
|
Reply
2
|
Gloryhole Secrets
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(HardRide's Reply)
That would be amazing and would provide the site with a lot of good updates. Maybe they'll read your suggestion and give it a try...
|
04-20-15 04:41pm
|
Reply
3
|
Gloryhole Secrets
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(HardRide's Reply)
We're definitely on the same page when it come to glory hole sites.
When I first joined GH Secrets the previews made it look exactly like GH Swallow (I was worried it might even be a clone) but I was only slightly disappointed to learn that they use a mock GH. But it sound like you and I share a trait: the fact that GH Swallow is recorded in an actual adult theatre adds a whole different layer of heat to the scenes.
|
04-18-15 05:07am
|
Reply
4
|
Gloryhole Secrets
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(HardRide's Reply)
Definitely one of the advantages that Glory Hole Swallow has is the realism from using a real glory hole in a real adult theatre. For me, and it sound like for you too, that adds a lot to the scene. Obviously there are a lot less risks going with a staged setting, and the staged booth here is better than the fake bathrooms that most other sites use.
You're likely right about the male talent too. At Glory Hole Swallow they have a forum where the members can sign up to be one of the guys getting a blowjob. Glory Hole Secrets has an FAQ page and I expected to see something to that effect too but didn't. The absence of that tells me that they use known talent.
Still, it's a good site even if they are trying to copy Glory Hole Swallow - at least they've chosen a great site to emulate.
|
04-13-15 02:14pm
|
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|