| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
626
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from jd1961:
I did some googling, but so far I haven't come up with anything.
|
12-06-08 11:00am
|
Reply
627
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from Monahan:
I doubt that they'll go hardcore. MetArt is at the top of the softcore game and have a huge subscriber base staying soft.
Now that's not to say they may start a hardcore site but I doubt they'll do any kind of tie-in with MetArt. They will want to protect their brand.
[Now that I've said that, watch 'em do exactly that. ;-) ]
|
12-06-08 10:54am
|
Reply
628
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from jd1961:
"Hardcore" means Male/Female doesn't it?
With the prissy Met-Art models ?!
|
12-06-08 10:53am
|
Reply
629
|
Teen Sex Mania
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from Pinche Kankun:
I will definitely be checking out this website cause it looks like it don't have too much of that cock sucking shit I keep complaining about!!
|
11-30-08 07:42pm
|
Reply
630
|
Teen Sex Mania
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Tree Rodent:
(elephant's Reply)
This site looks to be totally new and separate from all the other sites on the network, so I don't know what the deal is. It would be strange if this site alone, out of all the network sites, does not gain you access to all the others, but at first glance it appears that it doesn't.
|
11-30-08 02:55pm
|
Reply
631
|
Teen Sex Mania
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Tree Rodent:
(elephant's Reply)
Hmm good question. I'll check it - No it doesn't look as though you do.
|
11-30-08 10:53am
|
Reply
632
|
Teen Sex Mania
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from Tom22:
Thanks for the heads-up, this does look like a great site. It needs top grow a bit of course but WOW their girls are great!!
|
11-30-08 10:11am
|
Reply
633
|
Teen Sex Mania
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from Tree Rodent:
This is part of the network which includes "Gag N Gape" that Pat362 reviewd 3 weeks ago. The network looks quite good.
|
11-30-08 08:47am
|
Reply
634
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from MargulisAZ:
(elephant's Reply)
Yeah, I understand that the site is probably great for anal lovers such as yourself, but for people who are not fans of anal it is a bit overbearing. You make a good point that it is probably the only lesbian site that is catered to the anal crowd, and I agree. The only thing that is disappointing to me is that the site which I think has the best looking girls (Lez Cuties) is extremely focused on a niche that I don't enjoy. I wouldn't expect them to drop anal entirely, but it would be nice to see it toned down. On the other hand, like you said, as an anal lover you probably can't get enough. And I'm the same way with sites that cater to the niches I enjoy.
|
08-16-08 02:41pm
|
Reply
635
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Davit:
(elephant's Reply)
Hi Elephant, just seen your comment, been away for a while (using a girl on girl torrent site!)
Yeah, I completely agree. There's something cold and soulless about using dildos. It's so much hotter to see flesh on flesh. S.E. went through a crap period where the girls just weren't up to standard, but now there are loads of fantastic threesomes and foursomes starring Eufrat (for example) with lots of anilingus, and some tribbing too. The occasional turkey still gets through, but there's definitely enough A-One stuff to justify getting your annual update. :)
|
07-12-08 02:26am
|
Reply
636
|
Virtua Girl HD
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from jd1961:
I like it, Eufrat is dancing over your post! But it can be very distracting, so I don't have it turned on all the time.
|
03-28-08 12:39pm
|
Reply
637
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Pinche Kankun:
(elephant's Reply)
Just like it annoys me that women nowadays in the industry have to take a cumshot in the face!!!
It can't be anywhere else, it has to be on the face!!!
Staff: This is NOT a duplicate of a previous reply (which was approved). :) :) :)
|
03-06-08 08:59am
|
Reply
638
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(elephant's Reply)
Hey, Buddy
See the reply to Margulis....
|
03-01-08 04:19pm
|
Reply
639
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from Davit:
Some good points about Les Cuties. But I would disagree about featuring older girls. Don't get me wrong - I LOVE older girls. They can be even sexier and hornier than the younger ones. But this is a niche site that is focusing sharply onto one area - and that's in the title. Lesbians, and 'cuties' (and that means teens, or thereabouts, basically).
Agree too that higher def movies would be nice - although in all honesty, I don't mind these average-quality ones so much, as long as they continue to have such good quality content as they do (how many times have you seen a technically excellent HD movie and been bored to death? I know I have).
Completely agree about 'more fingers, less dildos'. That seems to be a commonly reflected comment on PU and I support it.
Your wish for lez orgies and peeing? Who could argue with that!
As it stands, there is only this site and the inferior Tushy Lickers that offer lesbian anal as standard that I know of. If you know of any others - or even solo girl anal with no guys - I would be interested to hear.
Regards
Davit
|
02-27-08 04:04pm
|
Reply
640
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from Davit:
I agree with your comment, Elephant. I joined OC a couple of weeks ago, and it really can't compare with Sapphic Erotica can it? The performances are much more run-of-the-mill, as you say. I lost count of the number of times a video features a girl faking multiple orgasms from another girl just sticking her forefinger up her pussy for 15 minutes. Just dull. Very little full on hot cunnilingus and analingus. Too much boring dildo action.
|
02-26-08 12:15pm
|
Reply
641
|
Dana Lightspeed
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(elephant's Reply)
That really is too bad about Ashanti. She's one-of-a-kind and didn't need the job done! You're probably right about the pressure of business, putting it that way.
Here at PornUsers there's been a fair amount of complaining about tats, piercings, and tit jobs. They're all pretty unpopular. Somehow it seems that the consumer is not part of the conversation!
Now I understand that if by personal choice a woman wants enhanced breasts, that's her business. Sandy (the famous Hungarian Sandy) had one done and it looks nice. But as we know, bigger tits aren't what a lot of us are after.
|
02-03-08 02:06pm
|
Reply
642
|
Dana Lightspeed
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from Drooler:
I've been seeing that tatoo down her back -- looks like paw prints -- for some time at several sites, so I'm sure it's not a temporary.
And I agree that it's a cryin' shame. It's weird how some beautiful women just can't leave well enough alone!
When I first saw it, I also was hoping it was just a temporary one. Too bad.
|
02-03-08 09:33am
|
Reply
643
|
18 Years Old
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from jd1961:
You have no problem with your connection it is slow. They have no zip files, and every time I would download a photo, the whole page would load again slowly. It was very frustrating. Needs improvement.
|
01-25-08 09:38am
|
Reply
644
|
18 Years Old
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#28
from Drooler:
(elephant's Reply)
Hey, thanks a bunch! It's nice having the Kacey "buffet" all in one place. Much appreciated!
|
01-20-08 02:07pm
|
Reply
645
|
18 Years Old
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#26
from Drooler:
(elephant's Reply)
Well, you might be interested in her on StuffedPetite, which I just did a review of. It's some of the most prolonged belly flat fucking I've seen anywhere, on a bed, on a couch, and then at the bed edge. There's a good 4 and a half minutes of it, all told, in concentrated form.
Kacey also has a cute face and a sexy mouth.
|
01-20-08 04:02am
|
Reply
646
|
18 Years Old
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#24
from Drooler:
(elephant's Reply)
I agree, they're not unwatchable, and if the vid really gets to me, the dimensions matter less. I would like sites these days to do at least 640x480, but as Mick Jagger once said ...
|
01-20-08 03:36am
|
Reply
647
|
18 Years Old
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#22
from Drooler:
(elephant's Reply)
Thanks for the add'l info. The info you get on hovering are the dimensions of the vids and the bitrate. Those dimensions are small and certainly not up to current baseline standards, IMHO. 640x480 or near that is as small as I can take.
|
01-20-08 03:22am
|
Reply
648
|
18 Years Old
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from jd1961:
On google, I found a sign up page for Playboy Cyber Club with this billing company. I found it on a search. When I did a mock sign up with PCC, I didn't get this billing company. However, when I did a fraud check on the local billing Playboy sign up page, it did show it as "trusted" and secure. Well...good night !!
|
01-20-08 02:56am
|
Reply
649
|
18 Years Old
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from jd1961:
I checked it out, and this billing company comes out of MALTA!
|
01-20-08 02:44am
|
Reply
650
|
18 Years Old
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#15
from jd1961:
(elephant's Reply)
I did a google search on the new billing company, and i haven't found anything negative about it.
|
01-20-08 02:39am
|
