| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
651
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from Denner:
It is a Diesel site ....see my earlier comment:
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=71269
Some material seems kind of exclusive for Wow Girls, but then again there seems to be some shared with other Diesel Media-sites....and again in general: I feel those Diesel Media sites speculate in opening new sites again and again where you get a little here and a little there - but if you want all ....you'll turn out poor....
|
04-29-12 09:57am
|
Reply
652
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from tboy:
yeah someone else asked this recently, wowgirls isn't part of the current diesel access network :(
|
04-29-12 06:35am
|
Reply
653
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from Drooler:
I have the same question as Slutty does, but "Wow" is right about the girls. They're simply AWESOME. Guerlain (Raisa at Errotica-Archives), who is currently the covergirl, is another extremely hot babe there -- among others!
|
04-29-12 02:40am
|
Reply
654
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from slutty:
Is this a Deisel site? It looks really similar, why isn't it listed with their others?
|
04-29-12 02:33am
|
Reply
655
|
WTF Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(elephant's Reply)
My fear is that it's the opposite or at least for their exclusif sites. Too many of their updates are now for dolls porn and that's the stuff you get with teenmegaworld, smackmybitch, 18xgirls to name but a few.
|
06-10-12 12:28pm
|
Reply
656
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from Divinx:
Looks like they have also fallen to the epidemic curse of the web designers.
|
03-18-16 01:06pm
|
Reply
657
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from otoh:
(elephant's Reply)
Seeing as over 30 js regarded as mature (and I don't feel remotely mature!) I guess we have to go elsewhere for them - I'd be tempted to join Pure mature if there were more natural girls there.
Meantime, I'd be happy with more girls in the 22-30 range; there are a few more at Joymii and perhaps at Babes network.
|
09-02-12 03:12pm
|
Reply
658
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
from slutty:
Nice review elephant, agree with all your points. I also think this an excellent site. I agree with others points that the models are quite common, but somehow I always think they look better here for some reason. There are a few that I didn't even realize were the same models I already had gotten elsewhere until I looked on EBI.
|
08-27-12 10:56pm
|
Reply
659
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from rearadmiral:
(elephant's Reply)
I agree. I've never been a fan of 'couples' oriented porn. Stuff marketed like that seems to be too much of a compromise for both people, but X-Art's quality and stunning models make a huge difference.
|
08-27-12 04:29pm
|
Reply
660
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
from rearadmiral:
Great review! Like you, I was amazed at this site. They do everything right and the models are INCREDIBLE! This site is definitely on my list of sites to rejoin regularly, which is surprising since the material here is more tame than I'd normally look for. But the quality here is the deciding factor.
|
08-26-12 06:12pm
|
Reply
661
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from pat362:
(elephant's Reply)
I like their more gentle approach to hardcore porn. It's a nice change from the hyper gonzo stuff most studios put out these days.
|
08-25-12 06:09pm
|
Reply
662
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
from otoh:
Great review, elephant - your findings are similar to mine, so I'm not sure what I can add in my forthcoming review :| But interesting that some of your cons are my pros and vice versa. Glad you liked the site!
|
08-25-12 03:55pm
|
Reply
663
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
from Denner:
Great review - and I agree with the score. Apart from the "classy" picking of models, I really like the sensitive hc-scenes that is so far from the wham-bam-thank-you-mam as can be (that's why I really hate the stupid Brazzers-scenes, sorry fans)
|
08-25-12 11:54am
|
Reply
664
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
from pat362:
Great review as always. I wasn't too sure about this site at first but it's definetely on my radar and I know that I'll have to join it sooner than later. How many anal scenes are there at the moment?
I don't know if you have already done this but in case you haven't then here is a link to EBI's page on the performer who appeared on X-Art.
http://www.eurobabeindex.com/modules/search.py?showtitle=x-art.com%20%28web%29
|
08-25-12 09:02am
|
Reply
665
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Claypaws:
(elephant's Reply)
Hi Elephant
Thanks for the gracious reply. Small sites like this must find it hard to compete for memberships nowadays. They will never compete with the big sites on volume - hundreds or thousands of models - so one way is to be very selective on the model type and have some kind of brand feel, such as dreamy video. Looks like they are succeeding if one can judge by the numbers of votes submitted against their models. Good luck to them. Their few models that I do not recognise are intriguing. I feel I must have seen them before but cannot place where. Very frustrating!
|
08-25-12 05:25am
|
Reply
666
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
from Claypaws:
"but there are so many gorgeous girls here it's unreal, where do they find them"
The models here are mostly rather well known US and Euro models though they choose unusual names for them. e.g Carmen for Jessie Rogers, Star for Zoey Kush, Mary for Marry Queen (aka Miela), Leila for Angel Blue. There are hardly any models in the tour that I do not instantly recognise. They are some of the world's easiest models to find, though they might well be too busy to book!
Interesting review that gives a good feel for the site. Much more oriented towards video and sex scenes than I like but you make clear that it does well in what it sets out to do.
|
08-25-12 04:56am
|
Reply
667
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from lk2fireone:
(elephant's Reply)
Arty style is sometimes more a matter of production value instead of actual content.
I've seen videos and photosets posted on the Teen Mega World network that were later posted on the Diesel network. The same videos and photosets. But at the Diesel network, the videos and photosets were much more appealing because of better lighting, more vivid colors, and maybe other factors.
|
08-21-12 03:27pm
|
Reply
668
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from slutty:
(elephant's Reply)
There are a few anal scenes on X-Art, but they tend to get a lot of people complaining about them in the comments, so I don't know that they will do many. The only ones I have are with Caprice and Kristen, but there may be more. It is sort of difficult to search for these types of niches there.
|
08-21-12 12:15am
|
Reply
669
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from lk2fireone:
(elephant's Reply)
I mentioned in my site review that the videos would be better without the music.
I believe a few porn models are able to transition to fashion modelling, but it's pretty rare.
The Teen Mega World network has a boy-girl-girl site, firstbgg. It only has 25 videos, and is no longer updating. And the videos are presented at a slightly lower quality than at Diesel or X-art.
But if you belong to the Teen Mega World network, which has a ton of hardcore teen videos, their boy-girl-girl site is worth checking out.
|
08-20-12 05:46pm
|
Reply
670
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from lk2fireone:
(elephant's Reply)
I think Joymii and Sexart are going for a similar "arty" erotic style. But I don't think any of those sites puts much emphasis on anal.
|
08-19-12 06:11pm
|
Reply
671
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from otoh:
Likewise - I am subscribed at the moment and enjoying it. A few niggles and a few things I don't like, but overall it's good. A review will follow - it compares very well to Joymii - which I think borrows heavily from it - although I suspect JM will score higher for me since it doesn't focus as heavily on 18-21 year old models as X-Art - I prefer a broader range.
|
08-19-12 11:16am
|
Reply
672
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Glad you like it so far.
For soft hardcore, or erotic porn. I think it's one of the better sites available.
And many of the models are drop-dead gorgeous.
|
08-19-12 10:18am
|
Reply
673
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from messmer:
(elephant's Reply)
You're welcome, elephant! I wouldn't stick around for three months either just to get the whole package, or pay a big amount up front to get them now. But let me emphasize at the same time that I don't find the price of subscription for the two sites one gets now unreasonable, it just seemed strange that everyone's (or just about everyone's) review seemed to indicate there were more than two sites included. Something I didn't get. Thanks for the reply.
|
06-09-12 10:40am
|
Reply
674
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Claypaws:
(elephant's Reply)
Thanks for commenting, elephant. That is a good clarification.
My original comment might not have been entirely to Dieselman's liking, but the discussion has, I think, been very useful as it has helped to clarify the strengths and weaknesses of the network. Anyone reading all of it would get a very good idea of them.
It seems that video enthusiasts would find the network exceptionally good whereas photo enthusiasts would find it disappointing.
You are quite right that very few, if any, sites or networks are excellent in both media types.
|
05-21-12 04:09am
|
Reply
675
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Jent:
(elephant's Reply)
I got the acess codes yesterday. Took about 8 hours. Lot of good videos. But my browser tends to lock up when I try to go past page 20.
|
01-13-12 06:20am
|
