| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
676
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from rome476:
(elephant's Reply)
A belated thanks for the reply; I think I may give it a try.
|
12-24-11 07:20am
|
Reply
677
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
from rome476:
Regarding the comparsion with TMW, I found that the models in TMW were presented in a way that made them look too young for my taste; is there any difference in this respect with YLP?
|
12-07-11 07:34pm
|
Reply
678
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
from rearadmiral:
Great review, and I'm glad to read that you liked this site as much as I did. That makes me think I wasn't just dreaming how good the network really is. I know that a lot of people would be skeptical when you say that the site is near perfection, but that's an accurate way to describe it. If someone likes young, beautiful and petite models they will definitely like this site. And as you say, they really have the technical things done well too. Like you, this is definitely a site that I'll go back to over and over.
|
12-06-11 06:01pm
|
Reply
679
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from rearadmiral:
(elephant's Reply)
Amen to that!
|
11-20-11 01:11pm
|
Reply
680
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from rearadmiral:
(elephant's Reply)
I'll look forward to reading them and seeing your opinion. I suspect from your comments that you're as impressed as I am. This collection of sites is definitely in my top three favourites of all time. But prospective members should be warned: generic porn will be pretty bland after you spend some time with Diesel Access!
|
11-20-11 06:40am
|
Reply
681
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#17
from dieselman:
(elephant's Reply)
I dont see Stasha getting her own site but I can see it with Guerlain and couple of more hit girls we got on board.
And, we are filming now a nice new niche content with Gloria. He fans will have their jaw dropping down to the floor!
|
11-15-11 11:02am
|
Reply
682
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from dieselman:
I am glad it was solved quick! Enjoy our sites!
|
11-15-11 10:57am
|
Reply
683
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from dracken:
Did you actually contact them or did they do it automatically?
In my experience they were responsive, but you had to reach out to them, curious if they have a more pro-active approach...
|
11-13-11 09:45pm
|
Reply
684
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from rearadmiral:
I'll look forward to seeing how you like the sites. I'd never heard of them before a few months ago, but now they're definitely in my top three favourites and might even be number one. The Diesel team know how to make some excellent porn.
|
11-13-11 03:09pm
|
Reply
685
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#16
from rearadmiral:
(elephant's Reply)
Gloria is a goddess!
I have a group of sites that I go back to every few months. These ones are on that list.
When you do join, do that through Young Legal Porn because that site offers the TBP/PU discount. And I STRONGLY recommend paying for the full access. With models like Gloria, Beata and Ivana you'll leave too much material behind by not paying the extra $10. I'll look forward to reading your review.
|
10-30-11 05:51am
|
Reply
686
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from rearadmiral:
(elephant's Reply)
Elephant - as you've read here, the webmaster reported that the file names would change on a go-forward basis to include the model name. That's in effect now. The updates I've downloaded in the past week now all have the model name.
And I definitely agree that it's a big plas to know that the site owners/staff listen to customer input. That support converted me from an unsatisfied customer to a very satisfied customer who'll encourage anyone to get a membership. These really are amazing sites!
|
10-30-11 05:12am
|
Reply
687
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from rearadmiral:
(elephant's Reply)
My wife spent some time in London this past summer and was surprised at how expensive everything was. The other thing that was quite different was that in North America (at least in the U.S. and Canada) many shops, restaurants and bars, and almost all hotels, offer free WiFi service. She had trouble finding that in the U.K. and I'm sure that's a reflection of the costs.
|
10-09-11 10:18am
|
Reply
688
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from rearadmiral:
(elephant's Reply)
Ouch! That is bad and it sounds worse than what I have. Maybe I'll stop whining!
|
10-09-11 07:45am
|
Reply
689
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from rearadmiral:
(elephant's Reply)
Thanks for the tip. I actually do have a list in a Word doc and I've added Teen Mega World to the top of that list. Lately I've been buying memberships and downloading porn like a mad idiot because I've learned that my ISP isn't even monitoring download limits now but that could change. A fact of life in Canada is that we have some of the worst internet and cell service at the highest prices in the world. Seriously, if I told you what I pay for a landline, cell, internet and 3G service for iPhone/iPad you'd think I was lying. Download caps are the norm so I'm taking advantage of not having one while I can.
|
10-09-11 06:45am
|
Reply
690
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from rearadmiral:
(elephant's Reply)
Teen Mega World is something I've just learned about here too. Since the recommendation for YLP was perfect I'll probably check out Teen Mega World too. One of the big advantages to being a member here at Pornusers is getting recommendations for sites. Since signing up here I no longer stumble around the net hoping to find decent sites.
|
10-09-11 05:37am
|
Reply
691
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(elephant's Reply)
This is an excellent network and one I'm glad that I learned about here at PU. I'm not normally a fan of Eastern European / Russian models because I just don't know them well enough, but I'll definitely make an exception for this network. Many of the models are absolutely stunning. YLP has a great variety too - some solo girl, some masturbation, some girl/girl, some boy/girl. This is a really well done network and I'd certainly recommend it highly.
|
10-09-11 05:26am
|
Reply
692
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(elephant's Reply)
No answer to my question yet, but it is Sunday so I'm willing to wait until tomorrow. I had an issue with a site once and the staff at TBP stepped in to help resolve it. If I don't get an answer from the site I may try that route. If Diesel told TBP that they'll offer a discount and then don't do it, I suspect the TBP staff will want to know that.
|
10-02-11 08:37am
|
Reply
693
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(elephant's Reply)
I'd definitely hold off for now. Their customer service seems to be willing to help and I'll certainly report how this gets resolved. What bugs me is that I joined specifically from a page that offered the discount. So their position now seems to be that the option I had was to joing the single YLP site and pay either $20 or $30 for it. Some option! My guess is that the customer service department just wasn't aware that there is the TBP/PU discount and since I paid $30 that means that I only have single site access since that's what they're used to seeing. Having specifically mentioned TBP/PU that might trigger something.
One other issue that I'm having is that Free Download Manager seems to work with video files and some picture files, but with other picture files the site denies access. If I get that sorted out I'll let you know that too.
|
10-02-11 07:16am
|
Reply
694
|
Young Sex Parties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from someyoungguy:
(elephant's Reply)
Yes completely agree! You summed it up perfectly.
|
05-28-16 01:29am
|
Reply
695
|
Young Sex Parties
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from someyoungguy:
I just came to the end - no pun intended ;) - of a membership here. I felt the newer material wasn't as strong, more threesomes and seemed to have models more practiced at porn rather than the amateurish approach in the earlier content. But the majority of it was great, plenty of foursomes of two couples going at it together. Sure the format was perhaps a bit formulaic, but damn it was hot and it was great to see these hot young Russians just getting right into it, some seriously wild sex in places. I didn't check out the rest of the network that much but the membership definitely gave you access to a lot of material. I hope they keep going, there doesn't seem to be much else around that's quite the same, maybe with more couples, e.g. the three couple combo's in a few scenes.
|
05-27-16 11:44pm
|
Reply
696
|
Zishy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from LKLK:
(elephant's Reply)
Thanks for the confirmation.
Sometimes I think the PU/TBP sites are so dead, it's hardly worth posting here any more.
PU used to be so much more active, where it seemed, to me at least, that the members were a community.
Now we're living in the Zombieland, LOL.
|
07-09-23 04:52am
|
Reply
697
|
Zishy
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from Kody:
I absolutely agree. It's also way hotter that they look like actual girls that cross your path every day. While many of the major stars look a bit "out of my reality"
|
03-06-20 07:31am
|
Reply
698
|
Zishy
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from pat362:
It's not that I don't think you are correct but more that these aren't necessarily good examples to use to compare with other porn sites. I mean Zishy is a site dedicated to fans of non-nude and semi-nude only models. That isn't porn to me and while FTV is a site that is pornographic in nature. It is still a primarily solo model site where the models basically masturbate.
That doesn't mean that producers shouldn't try to emulate them as much as possible because I often complain that a scene was made unwatchable because they didn't properly use makeup on the model.
|
02-25-20 06:08am
|
Reply
699
|
Zishy
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
from RagingBuddhist:
I share your idealism. People putting out the vast majority of porn these days seem to like churning out whatever formula brings in the most signups. I've always been an amateur fan, mostly because of the lack of makeup and glammed up settings.
|
02-23-20 08:49pm
|
Reply
700
|
Zishy
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
from Monahan:
I signed up about a year ago for a full year and enjoy it as a breather. There's more PTA* shots these days than when I joined last November. The review by Elephant says just about everything I would say in a review including the score. At $28 per year it's not a bad buy.
The only addition I would make would be a comment that the videos are very short (120 seconds at best) but still quite cute.
One interesting point is that several of the babes also appear in FTV sets so if you want to see a lot more of a babe, there are likely other sites with more explicit stuff.
*PTA = Pussy Tits and Ass
|
11-06-16 01:10pm
|
