| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
from Drooler:
I definitely agree it's worth checking out. I only wish they'd reissue their older photosets in larger sizes and better quality -- as they're doing with ALSscans. I'd especially like to see that for models such as Carrie Starr and Breanne, though the list is a lot longer than that!
Putting all of the pics of a set into one zip would be helpful, too, instead of "zip by the page" as they're still doing.
I'm not into the insertion stuff there, nor the peeing, but even someone who's just into beautiful women will find a lot in the collection. I'd say it's worth a month of "raiding."
|
03-29-08 04:55am
|
Reply
102
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Kevin:
(williamj's Reply)
Hi William,
We haven't had any complaints from other users about the site speed, and it seems to be pretty fast from our end. Nonetheless I don't want anyone having a difficult time browsing the site. Have you noticed any specific pages being slower than others? Maybe certain times of the day? Any information you can give us will help track down potential problems.
Thanks,
Kevin
|
03-28-08 09:09am
|
Reply
103
|
Rigin Studio
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(williamj's Reply)
You said it. Since I've already paid and want some of the content, I've taken to putting the site into a multitasking regime of "click next, switch to this document I'm working on, type-type, check back and get image or foward to next," and so on.
"This document" at the moment is this reply, btw. ;)
Besides, I had a similar experience with another flawed site, also billed through ccbill, and those people at ccbill did their darnest to keep me from getting a refund. There was a lot of email going back and forth. A real hassle!
Anyway, maybe the site will finally get some get up 'n go on this server business, but until then, happy (snail) trails ...
|
03-28-08 08:19am
|
Reply
104
|
Cum Brushers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(williamj's Reply)
Thanks..!
I'll do that.
|
03-26-08 03:35pm
|
Reply
105
|
Cum Brushers
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
from Denner:
Fine warning...!!!
Can you be more specific on how you might get lured/overbilled?
Had my eyes on this pass earlier.
|
03-26-08 12:28pm
|
Reply
106
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#15
from badandy400:
(williamj's Reply)
I hope so too. I did not notice the warning until after I join, stupid me. But I am glad people said something about i because I was begining to wonder about a few emails I had received, so this site gave confirmation to what I was suspecting.
I also hope that they had to pay a premium on the 150 GB I downloaded, maybe it put them over their usage for the month or something.
|
03-22-08 09:37pm
|
Reply
107
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
from badandy400:
I must say that it is not true anyway. I did not do my homework on this site before joining, though this site by the way. I was charged extra for joining this site, and that was this past Sunday night. The site is very large and runs very fast and easy, but I do agree with avoiding it based on principal. The do rip people off, and it is fraud. The only reason I download from the site was to at least make them pay for the bandwidth usage, I am sure that 150 GB in 6 hours is not cheap to maintain. I felt a need to rip them off just as they did to me and many others now. It is too bad this site could not be bought out by an honest porn lover, instead it is run by people as evil as the oil executives who rape us every time we drive to work.
They need to clean up their act. There are good things to say about this site, but I do not want to say them without saying "DONT JOIN!"
|
03-21-08 09:32pm
|
Reply
108
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
from asmith12:
I think I've missed something :-). Could somebody tell what's all this whole story is about?
|
03-21-08 12:03pm
|
Reply
109
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Rick:
(williamj's Reply)
Cool. Your welcome man. Here's my reply to that...
Regarding our sister site (at this time only being TheBestPorn.com), it uses the same outgoing links as PornUsers, so anything we do on either site will apply for both. I can't speak for other review sites and have no control over their links.
The fact that we did something about this, should say how we disapprove of that billing method. In my last reply I spelled out clearly how I thought it was misleading as well. If we did approve of this type of practice, we would do nothing about it. We post warnings when we see something that's unusual or shady all the time also.
I could go on about what we warn people about, especially the details we try to provide with trial information (which no other site has tackled yet). We have a lot of plans to expand on thse warnings in our site facts also, but it's down the road a bit (one thing at time, forum is next).
You say you want us to boycott the site, but you also say "you're not looking for some police on what adult sites to join". I'm not in the business to structure boycotts and blacklists, that would be a nightmare and probably result in disaster. If there's proof of something going down, we'll expose the facts. You guys decide who to boycott and who not to. Our job is to provide you with the means to do so.
|
03-20-08 08:01pm
|
Reply
110
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
from jd1961:
It is much better for TBP and PU to leave this site up in the listings. because I can tell you , after reading the warnings and comments here, that there is no way i would ever join this site. And it's because it is listed. If it weren't listed, how would I know? When I consider joining a site, I look at all the input here. And I'm not the only one looking---the webmaster is also. let him see all the warnings.
|
03-20-08 07:37pm
|
Reply
111
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Rick:
(williamj's Reply)
Hey William,
Thought I would add another point of view from the staff here at Pornusers.
Our entire goal behind TheBestPorn and PornUsers is to expose everything, good and bad. Consider us as the fact checkers. We absolutely work with both sides here... the consumers and the vendors. Our goal is to bring good consumers together with good products/services. Sometimes it's not always easy to do.
When I saw the join page from an e-mail we initially had received, I went straight to Ken (who's job is to work with webmasters on getting special deals, assist on issues such as this, etc.) to help resolve this. The cross-sells to me were extremely misleading. We hate seeing tactics like that and our consumers NEED to be aware of them at the very least. Be very clear, we DO NOT endorse this practice. We went to them and straight up told them how we felt. We were getting ready to add warning messages on our pages like we normally would, but it was surprising that they actually resolved this for our consumers as quickly as they did (we honestly didn't expect they would) and removed such cross-sells from the join page.
The point of my post is to illustrate our position and where we stand and what to expect from us. Expect us to have your back, but not always in the way you want. Either way, we still have your back. You might think we should remove the Incredible Pass sites completely. It sure would be a lot easier for us, but we have always believed in giving the users all the information (warnings) and letting them choose. Users can then decide whether it's worth the risk to continue or not. Who are we to say they shouldn't be given the choice.
These type of things do come up quite a bit and we have to make the decision we think is best for that situation. In this situation, the fact that our links now provide no crosss-sells and still maintain a discounted price, means we've done a damn good job with this one. If yer looking for us to be the porn police, unfortunately that's just not the business we want to be in.
|
03-20-08 06:19pm
|
Reply
112
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from RagingBuddhist:
(williamj's Reply)
Okay - I guess it was easy enough to have missed Ken's explanation. But there are still more diplomatic ways to get a point across without screaming accusations about criminal activity and leaving the forum.
Maybe I have to say that I take this somewhat personally because I am a member of this site and, by your original post, I felt like I was being told I was also guilty by association. I think the people at PornUsers do a great service to it's members and will defend it when I feel the need to.
And thank you for your response. : - )
|
03-20-08 05:20pm
|
Reply
113
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
from RagingBuddhist:
Wow.
Drama time.
williamj -
At first, I wasn't too happy about what Ken's announcement appeared to say either. But, if you'd bother to read what he had to say to Denner in his comment about this issue, there would be no need for all this yelling, and kicking. He said:
"I was not trying to present this as an "offer". I think that my excitement cam thru the wrong way in my previous post. For that I appologize."
No one is forcing you to associate yourself with PornUsers. If it really meant all you said it did, that it was enough to make you think that PornUser's is run by people who condone criminal activity, why bother posting a separate comment on something that was already addressed? You are certainly free to leave us if you so choose. But do it with a little grace - not by screaming about respect, disgrace and criminals...
|
03-20-08 04:32pm
|
Reply
114
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
from Denner:
Apart from my earlier answer to both williamj and Vegas Ken on this matter, just this:
I totally agree with williamj: BOYCUTT ALL SITES FROM THIS COMPANY!
Just see the troubles and problems these people have caused other PUs......It could have been you!
But bottom line, Vegas Ken of TBP admitted the input about the socalled improvement from the pass-site was a slip.
I still have confidence in TBP and PU.
|
03-20-08 03:01pm
|
Reply
115
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Denner:
(williamj's Reply)
Hey williamj...
Please see my answer to Vegas Ken - AND also his answer.
I still believe in this PU and TBP. Even if I had the same worries you have...
Our friends at TBP is doing a hell of a job here - not only for our blue eyes, of course. But still: the coordination of fellow PUs and the TBP putting up this PU-thing is maybe the best way for us pornsite consumers to get good tips and good warnings. And this kind of slip, I have not seen before. I regard it as a mistake.
Let's all move on from here....and enjoy fine tips and good warnings from both TBP and fellow users at PU.
Swell reply, thanks, williamj
|
03-20-08 02:28pm
|
Reply
116
|
Foot Worship Studios
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Lionheart:
(williamj's Reply)
yes, in the movies are the girls are wearing clothes, underwear or lingerie (so it is a non-nude site) all the focus is on the feet, toes and heels. No, there no zip files for the pics or movies. If you have anymore questions let me know!
|
03-20-08 01:12pm
|
Reply
117
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from badandy400:
(williamj's Reply)
That does not sound like a bad plan. Less expensive, plus it would give time to actually watch what you have downloaded over the months.
|
03-19-08 11:04am
|
Reply
118
|
Brutal Dildos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from MargulisAZ:
(williamj's Reply)
If you haven't joined the site before I would definitely recommend it. The logo isn't annoying in every scene and there have been enough updates over the years to provide plenty of material to someone new.
|
03-18-08 02:37pm
|
Reply
119
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Pinche Kankun:
(williamj's Reply)
My homeboy said out loud that his dick is always hard!! :D
Something similar to what you said!!
I told him that it is good to ALWAYS HAVE AN ERECTION!!! :D
|
03-17-08 10:59pm
|
Reply
120
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Pinche Kankun:
(williamj's Reply)
I told somone this once: It's never good to always have an erection!! :D
What if some gay guy gets turned on and decides to walk by and slap your knob hard enough?! It'll break off!!!
You are Shit out of luck, MAN!!! :D
|
03-15-08 09:05pm
|
Reply
121
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from badandy400:
(williamj's Reply)
I could agree with that. This was my first time downloading from them, but I would be willing to go back in the future. Some of the videos are pretty hot, but they need to show in HD as I believe everyone should. It is easy to downgrade quality, but it is hard to upgrade poor quality!
|
03-10-08 05:39pm
|
Reply
122
|
Her Sweet Hand
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
from RagingBuddhist:
I'd signed up to Her Sweet Hand a while back so, when I saw Goldfish's review yesterday, I went to the site to see if there had been any major changes to the site. I also just went again after seeing your comment. Both times I was able to access the home page. So... not sure what happened on your end - but I wouldn't exactly say they're down and not worrying about it. Also, despite the slightly high price, I think it's a damn good network - definitely one not to be missed by handjob aficionados!
|
03-02-08 03:52pm
|
Reply
123
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Davit:
(williamj's Reply)
Absolutely right - if it's another girl doing the talkover, I can see that actually being a positive thing potentially. But this is so rare.
I think the guys who are calling the shots just have massive egos and just want some part of them to feature on the film, even if it's only their voice.
|
03-02-08 09:59am
|
Reply
124
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from MargulisAZ:
(williamj's Reply)
Yeah, if you go to thebestporn.com and search for only cuties, then follow the link to the site from there, then go to the "join now" on the site, there is a special discount 19.95 per month option. TBP has a lot of deals like that.
|
03-02-08 08:48am
|
Reply
125
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Review
from Davit:
I'm not sure that your review - with all its valid cons - really equates to an 87 score, but I respect your opinion, and enjoyed reading your review. :)
|
02-29-08 07:21pm
|
