| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#25
from Monahan:
(williamj's Reply)
Yep. I voted for "other" because all of the above was not an option.
|
12-04-10 09:46pm
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from james4096:
(williamj's Reply)
I do love going back an looking at stuff I haven't seen in years. I love those trips down memory lane.
|
04-14-09 07:17pm
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Denner:
(williamj's Reply)
Agree with both - so it's just a waste of time - and besides, the main issue for this user: lack of security.
|
03-27-09 07:32am
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Monahan:
(williamj's Reply)
Considering how much computers have changed in the 30 years since 1979 (remember the TRS 80? The "PC clones?" the IBM 360 and 370?, DOS 2.1, 4.0 and 6;12? remember WordStar and Multimate? remember when the Internet really only became available to the general public in the early 1990's?) and considering that high quality porn on the web is a whole lot less than 10 years old, my answer to your question is, NO. I really can't imagine what will be happening with porn in 10 years, much less 30 years. (Perhaps someone will invent VC (virtual copulation) in the next decade. ;)
|
01-19-09 05:46pm
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#28
from pat362:
(williamj's Reply)
I don't think so, because they would be sticking their unshaved, sweat soaked armpits right under his nose.
|
01-15-09 07:15pm
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#26
from pat362:
(williamj's Reply)
If he was calling on an all girls school gym then that would be great, but because this is a lezzie gym then you know that at best he's just a watcher and at worst is likely to be tied up and sodomized by the butch of the gang.
|
01-15-09 07:08pm
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#24
from pat362:
(williamj's Reply)
That's not a bad one. How about the lady who can't pay the plumber so she offers to clean his pipe for him.
|
01-15-09 06:44pm
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from jamey786:
(williamj's Reply)
Hey williamj same here man in the holidays I surf porn more than in normal days.
|
12-29-08 09:12am
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#70
from Pinche Kankun:
(williamj's Reply)
Williamj, look man, I didn't do that shit, man!! :( I just fucked up real bad!! Just check it out, man:
Homemade Uncensored - Subscription ID # 208342701000000889 Signup Date: 12/07/08 CCBILL ICQ MAIL
Little Liana - Subscription ID # 208305501000009792 Signup Date: 10/31/08 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
Little Lupe - Subscription ID # 107265601000014297 Signup Date: 09/22/2007 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
Raven Riley - Subscription ID # 107241301000002418 Signup Date: 08/29/2007 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
Pacino's Adventures - Subscription ID # 108271601000039085 Signup Date: 09/27/2008 CCBILL AOL MAIL
Nubiles - Subscription ID # 108202701000003673 Signup Date: 07/20/2008 CCBILL AOL MAIL
Best Teens.com - Subscription ID # 107147701000005429 Signup Date: 05/27/2007 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
8th Street Latinas - Subscription ID # 107147701000002410 Signup Date: 05/27/2007 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
Exploited College Girls - Subscription ID # 107131501000001937 Signup Date: 05/11/2007 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
Night Invasion - Member ID # 1267666873 Order Date: 11/22/2008 EPOCH BILLING
Manila Amateurs - Member ID # 1270044479 Order Date: 12/05/2008 EPOCH BILLING
Real Ex Girlfriends, Nasty Angels and Karup's Hometown Amateurs might have changed their billing provider, HOWEVER WILL FIND OUT MY INFORMATION AND YOU WILL SEE!!
(KHAN, PLEASE DO NOT DELETE THIS INFORMATION!! I MUST DO THIS!! THIS IS IMPORTANT!!) >:D
|
12-10-08 12:52pm
|
Reply
10
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#24
from TheRizzo:
(williamj's Reply)
LOL yeah we are getting a little to probing here!
|
11-18-08 06:26pm
|
Reply
11
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#21
from Khan:
(williamj's Reply)
>> "What next, what kind of fake vagina are you fucking?"
ROFL ... actually, we already had a poll question along those lines submitted:
Have you ever used the fleshlight?
|
11-18-08 10:24am
|
Reply
12
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Toadsith:
(williamj's Reply)
lol - Max Hardcore, yes I couldn't have picked a better suggestion myself. That would be perfect. America watched them grow up, now it wants to see them degraded :-P
|
05-09-08 08:35am
|
Reply
13
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Toadsith:
(williamj's Reply)
I'm curious by your definition of plenty - I've researched on the web about female ejaculation quite a bit - and while there is a lot of material written up about it, I find very little of it is based in actual scientific fact. It isn't hugely surprising as it is an area of study that isn't going to be real easy to get funding.
It wasn't more than 80 years ago when people were going on about the "Myth of the Female Orgasm" - so getting an organization to donate money for research into Female Ejaculation is going to be a bit difficult. If you do find those links, I would be interested - but as far as everything I've read on it - the medical community isn't at all settled on the topic. Some people believe it to be real, others believe it to be fake, and most simply aren't decided or care.
|
04-15-08 01:06pm
|
Reply
14
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Toadsith:
(williamj's Reply)
Indeed - all the material I've read about it has stated that it is not pee, any amounts of urine detected are such trace amounts that it rules that out. I did read about lab that did a chemical analysis of several samples of ejaculate - it was interesting but mostly what they said was - it isn't urine and it is basically water. Interesting but not wildly helpful.
|
04-15-08 01:02pm
|
Reply
15
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Khan:
(williamj's Reply)
Yes you can. See the "+ Add Rating" button on any site's listing page.
Our FAQ also covers it:
https://www.pornusers.com/faqs.html#faq_33
|
04-11-08 07:29am
|
Reply
16
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Kevin:
(williamj's Reply)
Hi William,
We haven't had any complaints from other users about the site speed, and it seems to be pretty fast from our end. Nonetheless I don't want anyone having a difficult time browsing the site. Have you noticed any specific pages being slower than others? Maybe certain times of the day? Any information you can give us will help track down potential problems.
Thanks,
Kevin
|
03-28-08 09:09am
|
Reply
17
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from badandy400:
(williamj's Reply)
That does not sound like a bad plan. Less expensive, plus it would give time to actually watch what you have downloaded over the months.
|
03-19-08 11:04am
|
Reply
18
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Pinche Kankun:
(williamj's Reply)
My homeboy said out loud that his dick is always hard!! :D
Something similar to what you said!!
I told him that it is good to ALWAYS HAVE AN ERECTION!!! :D
|
03-17-08 10:59pm
|
Reply
19
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Pinche Kankun:
(williamj's Reply)
I told somone this once: It's never good to always have an erection!! :D
What if some gay guy gets turned on and decides to walk by and slap your knob hard enough?! It'll break off!!!
You are Shit out of luck, MAN!!! :D
|
03-15-08 09:05pm
|
Reply
20
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Davit:
(williamj's Reply)
Absolutely right - if it's another girl doing the talkover, I can see that actually being a positive thing potentially. But this is so rare.
I think the guys who are calling the shots just have massive egos and just want some part of them to feature on the film, even if it's only their voice.
|
03-02-08 09:59am
|
Reply
21
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from nygiants03:
(williamj's Reply)
with their schedules? that should hinder there ability to produce female lubrication?
|
11-14-07 05:56pm
|
Reply
22
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from jd1961:
(williamj's Reply)
One good reason is free porn!
|
10-26-07 06:16am
|
Reply
23
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from PinkPanther:
(williamj's Reply)
This decrease in updates wouldn't be as bad if a) they stopped advertising 2 updates per day, b) they added an extra update when one of their "Jokes" sets was the set posted, or c) they added an extra update when they posted an ALS Scan set posted - I've got to give props once again to ALS Scan - when they post a set from 1 By Day, it's an extra - it's not a replacement to the ALS Scan material that would be posted that day. In my view if a site is going to a flag-ship site - as ALS Scan is - as One By Day is - and if they're going to charge premium prices - you have to join One-By-Day for a full year to bring the monthly price below $20/month - then they ought to be held to quite a high standard of performance.
If they've got one main guy as they photographer, and he's stretched doing work on their other sites, they ought to do what Suze Randall did and cultivate a group of contributing photographers - have those others fill out the updates on the site to give more value to the members.
|
04-17-09 07:30pm
|
Reply
24
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Balibalo:
(williamj's Reply)
Precisely I'm not a newbie and what you say doesn't explain the issue.
|
04-16-09 06:51am
|
Reply
25
|
18 Closeup
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
from 18closeup:
We moved our servers in 2013 (2 servers with a 1GBps line). We would love to know your download speed now. Here at the office, we're at 5.5 MB/s (which is the max for our ISP).
|
08-13-14 02:46pm
|
