Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
251
|
Sexy Goa
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(asmith12's Reply)
Sorry, don't know much about bitrates - just freaked out about the sizes of those files.
But, yes - when pointing at one of the the files I get the info:
10178 kbps.
|
11-20-07 03:59pm
|
Reply
252
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Apple:
(asmith12's Reply)
just so you know, NN is pretty sensitive to the same thing that's bugging you here. the folks pretty much flock all over anybody who tries to advertise their paid sites and the like. one of the things that is totally incorrect about the information on the NN profile at thebestporn.com is that there is a mandatory charge. actually, you can fully participate without paying a dime. there is just a restriction on # of pics you can post, and on PMs you can send in one day. oh, and you can't watch vids. the pics are all yours, though, as is chat, forum, PMs, etc.
|
11-20-07 02:48pm
|
Reply
253
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Rick:
(asmith12's Reply)
I should have mentioned that nothing is ever set in stone and we always look for ways to improve on things.
I do like to see brainstorming like this from users, even if it's unlikely we'll be able to make such upgrades anytime soon. Upgrading something of that magnitude would take weeks (maybe months), and it would be lower on our priority list while we work on higher priority items. Still though, worthy of discussion. I know everyone is not asking us to change anything, it's more or less interesting conversation. Either way, we're always listening. :)
I'll consider adding the "search niche" feature on PU. I can't guarantee this will be added. Maybe a convenient link to the TBP niche search would suffice though.
Keep in mind too, you can sort the niches by # of Sites (or Reviews, etc) at TBP. The PornUsers Categories default sorting is by # sites, versus A-Z.
|
11-19-07 03:02pm
|
Reply
254
|
Super Glam
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Drooler:
(asmith12's Reply)
I understand where you're coming from, and that's where I used to be, but I'm still at a "burnout" point. I've been through LOTS of sites. And the SuperGlam experience, being one of several recent ripoffs, just broke the proverbial camel's back.
And actually, I'm looking forward to a nice buildup of content on my favorite sites after my being away for a good, good long while.
Anyway, I dropped in to keep my membership at PU alive (don't know the actual terms on login frequency to do that but whatever). Thought I ought to at least answer my "mail."
Thanks again.
|
11-19-07 01:32pm
|
Reply
255
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Monahan:
(asmith12's Reply)
I agree with your suggested approach (niches and subniches). It simplifies searches and makes them much more effective.
Let's face it. The Porn Site business is booming and will only get bigger. Niche websites are growing far faster than broadly general sites (how many more "teen" sites can be added successfully?).
|
11-19-07 07:14am
|
Reply
256
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from ace of aces:
(asmith12's Reply)
deal! :o)
|
11-19-07 05:26am
|
Reply
257
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from ace of aces:
(asmith12's Reply)
you are maybe right if you say it`s to much to read, but e.g. solo models and mastrubating isn`t everytime the same e.g. Karup's Hometown Amateurs have mastrubating and dildo content but there are to some model sites with mostly/only naked content e.g. Amour Angels or Nakedby (ok this are not only solo model sites but there are much in the net either)
and the same with nylon sites...most of them have only hose content and no stocking content.
but you are defenetly right if you say it`s easier to have subcategories. :)
|
11-19-07 05:08am
|
Reply
258
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from ace of aces:
(asmith12's Reply)
hehe ...ok balloon is strange but when i look for other things like mastrubating women or stocking e. g. you can`t find that in those niches :)
|
11-19-07 04:46am
|
Reply
259
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Distant Lover:
(asmith12's Reply)
IDoctor99 mentioned this web site in a thread posted to the Forum on NewbieNudes.
|
11-19-07 02:16am
|
Reply
260
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Apple:
(asmith12's Reply)
sooooooo... aside from the fact that some of you may think this review is biased (which occurs to me is an inherent feature of a "review"), IDoctor is right about everything at the site. something he failed to mention, though, is the community that forms at newbienudes.
there is a very active message board, a couple of different chatrooms, and detailed profiles on the users, including little morsels like the ability to put a song in your profile voice greeting. occasionally we have competitions, there's a thorough verification process that allows you to know that the folks you are looking at are real and have consented. it's kind of like voyeurism/exhibitionism meets myspace.
there are some really foxy folks there, too: females, males, and couples. i'm not including my screenname here, so that you don't think i'm just trying to promote myself, but i'm happy to reveal it if you want another example of the members of NN.
i hope that even through your animosity over a perceived faux pas, you will all check out the site. asmith, i am guessing you already did... and if it's not for you that's fine. but a shill gets paid for posing as a customer. IDoctor is the one paying. that's how good the community is. thanks! -ms.apple
|
11-18-07 05:41pm
|
Reply
261
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from IDoctor99:
(asmith12's Reply)
Ok, I'll make one more reply and then I'm going to stop because you are obviously not understanding the site and what it is for, nor do you have the capacity to understand what I'm saying in my review. Also, it is obvious you are set in your resolve just to bash me for whatever reason so it serves no purpose to attempt to communicate with you any further because you are so plainly not worth talking to.
This site was created to let people post their own homemade movies and private nude photographs. You seem to be having a problem understanding that. I can't say it any other way, this site has ONLY content submitted by members.
I'm not reviewing my own content. I can't lie; I'm only being honest when I say hundreds of members at the site love my material, but I reviewed the site here, NOT MY OWN MATERIAL as you acused me of. Originally, I did ask readers of my review here to stop in and say hi if they visited the site, but that is the nature of that particular site. Members post their own material because they want others to see it. What is the harm in asking visitors to leave a little note saying they stopped by and liked what they saw? That is a large part of what the site is about; it is a voting and rating site. If you see something you like, vote favorably on it and chances are you can influence what sort of material posters put out in the future. If you post material, the voter response will let you know what they liked and what they didn't like.
There are two types of members at this site. One is the sort that is a member only to look at other member's content. The other type is the member who uploads photos and videos for other members to look at. That is the very essence of this site; it exists as a venue to showcase your own material so that others may appreciate it.
Guys across the world share their toys with friends. "Hey, I got a new Corvette, hop behind the wheel man, you've got to drive this thing!" This site does the same for men and women everywhere, but it lets them share their sexuality with people around the world instead of their material toys. In my case, I think my wife gives wonderful blowjobs. I can't very well run around in my professional world telling my cohorts about it, but I can use the anonymous nature of the internet to post a video of it and get feedback from members on how good they think she is.
That is what this site is for, but obviously you can't seem to get your mind around the idea. I'll say it one last time, and this is all I've wanted to do from the start -- (but I've been dealing with your unceasing nitpicking) -- if readers enjoy REAL amateur porn, they need to check the site out, plain and simple. It is my firm and honest belief that there are few, if any, porn sites offering a better experience on the web for anyone interested in such material.
|
11-18-07 01:59pm
|
Reply
262
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from IDoctor99:
(asmith12's Reply)
Whats the problem with finding a good thing and wanting to spread the word? If I found a tool that made changing my oil easier and more fun, I'd want to tell everyone about it so I could spread the happiness. This is the same thing.
I genuinely feel that this is the best porn site I have encountered in 10 years of online porn surfing and I want to tell the world about how awesome it is.
I personally don't buy anything or invest any energy into something unless I have reviewed a lot of first hand accounts of what its like. The same thing goes for porn. I value the reviews at TBP and thought I would do a good thing for interested parties by offering a user review of my favorite site, as I noticed there were none.
Sheesh! Can you guys be any more rude to somebody wanting to help out fellow porn watchers?
|
11-18-07 01:01pm
|
Reply
263
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from IDoctor99:
(asmith12's Reply)
I could understand your observation if I was affiliated with a regular porn site in the capacity that I administrated it or something to that effect, but this particular porn site is a site full of member content and the members don't make money or anything of that nature.
I read through the rules about writing reviews and don't think that I violated any guidelines, but apparantly you guys think I have.
If it suits you, I'll remove the part that seems to offend you. Still, you guys should really check out the site. I've stopped going to other sites I used to pay for simply because they can not top this particular one.
|
11-18-07 11:46am
|
Reply
264
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from IDoctor99:
(asmith12's Reply)
Sorry to offend if that is what I did. I'm not "shilling" for the site, I'm interested in getting as many people as possible to view my wife naked and having sex. I suppose if I'm "shilling", its for myself. On the other hand, after years of surfing internet porn, I do believe completely that this is the best site I've ever been a member of, so of course I want to promote it to others.
I would love to include other members who's content is spectacular in my review, but I can't know if they would appreciate that. I think it would be a good idea though. This is the type of site where people are exibitionists - everyone naturally wants as many people as possible to look at them.
I'll contact my favorite posters on the site and ask permission to include thier member names in my review. If I get some to say yes and I include them in the review, would that seem less biased?
About my own content; my videos usually premier at the top of the pile as far as ratings go. They will hover near the top five for several days, and then gradually drop down into the top 100 or so as the typical rude low voters do their thing. I have a large following on the site, it is no lie when I say I am one of the better posters there. If you would only check this out to confirm, I'm sure you would agree.
|
11-18-07 08:07am
|
Reply
265
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from kkman112:
(asmith12's Reply)
I don't have a link offhand. Most video sites use Flash today and other than that most of them are either pay sites or bittorrent (a la Vuze). If you use bitTorrent, Vuze.com has a lot of DIVX and MOV files.
I cannot try Quicktime because I use linux, but I do have a codec that can decode MOV files on my system. Back when I used Windows I never installed Quicktime cause it was always EXTREMELY SLOW, slower than any other player and the codec was only installed for use IN THEIR PLAYER ONLY. Sorry, but I don't oblige companies that restrict use like that. I don't know if it is any different today, but I might not find out for a while. I have no interest in reinstalling XP, no interest in Vista. I MAY (and I stress MAY) install Windows 7 when it is released, but that is speculative at this point. If it turns out to be another Vista then that is not going to happen.
|
11-18-07 07:18am
|
Reply
266
|
Nude in Public
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from elephant:
(asmith12's Reply)
Yeah you could be right, certainly look similar, content wise. Shame there isn't someone with a website doing that over here, it would be great watching naked girls walk the street. I see on Alscan website they must of got Sophie Moone to walk the streets naked.
|
11-18-07 12:26am
|
Reply
267
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from kkman112:
(asmith12's Reply)
You are missing out with XviD. A LOT of videos now-a-days are encoded using it and it is a really good file format. I know DivX installs a whole bunch of c-r-a-p with their codec, but you should look at XviD ( http://www.xvid.org/ ). It is essentially an open-source version of DivX minus the "menus" feature (never used it anyway -- and DVDs aren't going to use the format). XviD doesn't come with any spyware, just the codec, install/uninstall, and settings/prefs program.
I use Linux so DivX isn't an option. XviD plays all the DivX vids though. There is a Windows (and I think Mac) version.
|
11-17-07 02:37pm
|
Reply
268
|
Eyes On The Straight Guy
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from Khan:
I've passed this to the TBP Editors
Thx for the heads up
|
11-17-07 05:29am
|
Reply
269
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from DivBZero:
(asmith12's Reply)
Asmith
Check out:
http://www.apple.com/displays/specs.html
I have the 30" (sounds a bit rude doesn't it)
There are higher resolution monitors about:
http://www.mondale-its.com/products/Tech...olution_Monitors.htm
However I'll leave those until they are just expensive rather than ridculous!
Cheers
DivB
|
11-17-07 02:59am
|
Reply
270
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from jd1961:
This is becoming an unfortunate trend :(
|
11-16-07 07:15pm
|
Reply
271
|
Nude in Public
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(asmith12's Reply)
Remember, you can usually find what other sites are owned by the same company by looking in the lower right hand corner of a site's listing page here at PornUsers.com
|
11-16-07 07:59am
|
Reply
272
|
Nude in Public
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from elephant:
Not that I know, I think the company owns
1. Euro Nudes
2. Nude in Russia
3. Flash In Public
4. Nude in Public
sadly they don't do many vids of the girls in the streets flashing and being naked which is a shame.
|
11-16-07 07:12am
|
Reply
273
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from DivBZero:
(asmith12's Reply)
Well, Sir,
As an image fan I would say that I've spent more on my monitor than my system and disks put together. I run at 2560x1600, and quite frankly if I thought there was a better monitor out there, I'd start saving!
Div
|
11-15-07 12:24pm
|
Reply
274
|
Shemale Club
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from boredsurfer:
(asmith12's Reply)
Yeah, I looked at that review, and it is weird the way the caps come in about the same places....I guess he looked at my review first...
As for the time frame, I think they just put this dl limit in, so any new member would be kinda taken by surprise.
It took me a while to figure out what the heck you were talking about. My first thought was, "Why is this guy so hung up on the fact that I used Caps?" Then I saw the other review.
Happy surfing!
|
11-14-07 09:23pm
|
Reply
275
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from jd1961:
(asmith12's Reply)
With a hi-res image, you can enlarge without dimishiment of quality. For instance, if there is a long range view of a model, you can enlarge it to show her completely in the frame without her getting fuzzy! Of course, other people use this technique for more devious reasons! BTW, this is why body part close ups in high-res photography is so dumb. For those gynecologically inclined, the zoom suffices. But we are way off subject here.
|
11-14-07 08:04pm
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
