| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
Be The Mask
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from nygiants03:
I think its fake, have you ever watched a video by them? The guys always seem to never be nervous. Also no way a normal guy that walks into a pornset for the first time, and sees a sexy pornstar is going to last 15 minutes during sex.
|
01-08-08 01:03pm
|
Reply
202
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Toadsith:
(asmith12's Reply)
The in browser comment is a good point - off hand I don't know of any image programs that take over to resize images for the browser. But outside the browser is a different matter - I find there are a ton of good ones - that resize down on the fly as well as Adobe Photoshop does using bi-cubic filtering.
One of the oldest and best is a program called ACDSee. It pulls up images extremely fast and resizes them flawlessly - used to be one program, now has expanded to a family of programs, with different versions for the users specific needs. If I recall correctly Abby Winters uses ACDSee to sort through their own archives of photos. It is pretty powerful program.
Personally, if I like a photoset - I download it and view the whole set on the hard drive because it gets annoying quickly to have to wait for each image to download. I actually usually use just standard old Windows Picture and Fax Viewer - it is pretty quick and quite good at resizing down.
|
01-04-08 01:53pm
|
Reply
203
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#28
from Toadsith:
(asmith12's Reply)
Indeed, multi-month memberships do frequently hit that price range. It was more of an illustrative example as a lot of people won't drop a single payment of over $100 for porn, but yes it was slightly deceptive and done a bit for shock value (muhahaha). None the less, if I think a website is going to have the most freaking awesome porn ever (For example: Audrey Hepburn's secret hedonistic sex orgy parties filmed use Cinerama™ and presented to us in HD 1080p) I would indeed pay $150 per month for it. I really think that an individual user's perspective toward a monthly price very much demands on their financial situation and how much they value the potential product.
As a reviewer - I try to describe the quality of the service provided by the porn site. A general description of the content, the resolution of the content, how much of it there is, if can you see the content well (in focus, good lighting, good camera work), if the site is easy to navigate - so on. I try not to put personal tastes into the review too much other than the basic fact that I join sites I'm interested in rather than just plowing through a list in alphabetical order.
Cheers and happy a New Years to all of PornUsers.com tonight!
|
12-31-07 01:44pm
|
Reply
204
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#25
from Toadsith:
(asmith12's Reply)
MET Art actually - it wasn't for just one month (though I have paid $50 for one month - I can't remember what site that was off hand though), but I did pay it one solid chunk. I got a much better deal when I paid that price - I think it was for 9 months or something - I don't recall exactly - it was years ago. I was really really into glamour photography back then - I paid $100 for a multi-month membership to Hegre Art too - though his stuff wasn't as good as it is now - kinda wish I had waited a few years, oh well.
|
12-31-07 11:34am
|
Reply
205
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#46
from pat362:
(asmith12's Reply)
I'm like you, in that I don't think studios will ever require their performers to wear a condom during penetration. That said, if half or more of them do. Then, I think many performers would rather shoot for those studios. It's a money game. A performer who gets an STD, and is sideline for "X" amount of time cannot make money. Since most female performers have at best a six month window to make their money before the next girl takes her place. It stands that you do not want to be off for 2 months with an STD.
|
12-26-07 08:22am
|
Reply
206
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#41
from pat362:
(asmith12's Reply)
I see you point, and you are right that if all porn was condom only, then any teen/young person who saw that would probably think that it's a good idea for him to wear a condom or her to ask that her partner does as well.
|
12-21-07 07:14pm
|
Reply
207
|
Dirty Babysitter
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(asmith12's Reply)
They are scenes taken from their library, but if you enjoy what they offer and can dowload them to you computer. Then that's great. I can't complain because they don't advertise the exclusiveness of their stuff. On a side note. I notice the joining price is almost 30$, but if you press the back button it opens a special 19.95$ price for a 20 days membership.
|
12-20-07 08:03pm
|
Reply
208
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#39
from pat362:
(asmith12's Reply)
I'm 100% with you on not finding teenage pregnacy cute, nor do I find any reference to the positiveness of single mothers be they teenagers or adult women any better. Let's say that you are right about making educational sex/porn videos available to teenagers. You and I both know that since the hardcore porn exist most will bypass the mild stuff, and go for the hardcore one. Think about it. When is the last time you heard the mention of young people trying regular sports. It's all extreme, all the time. We have a generation of teenagers who live for the now and cannot or choose not to think of the future. Having been 13 once upon a time. We know everything at that age, and our parents are the ignorant ones. When it comes to teenagers and parents. It boils down to 2 things respect and fear. You have to respect their decisions and fear the consequences of breaking their rules. You don't have to agree, or think that they are right. These you discover much later on. I did stupid things when I was a teenager, but there are few that I can say my parents would have been disapointed in.
|
12-20-07 07:56pm
|
Reply
209
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#37
from pat362:
(asmith12's Reply)
Here's my view on what influences early sexual relations between todays teenagers. Sex is everywhere. It's in the music you hear, the main stream magazines you read, on tv, in movies (even the PG rated ones), and less we forget the internet which includes all of the previous. In fact, I'd say we are seeing an oversaturation of sexuality in every form possible 24 hrs a day. How can teenagers not get mixed messages. Society says one thing, but promotes another. Now do I think Playboy is pornography. Yes it is, because we aren't seeing real women. We are seeing a fantasy. The reason I say that is that most, if not all modern photos are 40% real, and 60% photoshop. Of course, I don't think you can equal Playboy to a softcore sex movie let alone an hardcore one. Because these take the fantasy to a new level. Although your idea of making a movie with a love/educational theme is interesting. I don't think that teenagers would get it. The perfect example is 16 yrs old Jamie Lynn Spears. I'll be honest and say that I was truly disturbed to read that she was pregnant, and had been living with her 19 yrs old boyfriend. When exactly was it acceptable let alone legal to have a minor living with an adult. It isn't, but the States won't intervene and more importantly shouldn't intervene. This is the job of PARENTS. Where were Jamie Lynn's (you could put any other teenagers name here) parents??? If you haven't had a talk about sex and consequences before your child is old enough to have sex, then chances are he/she will and everyone will regret it. Sorry If I got on my high horse, but I'm really tired of reading about teenagers having babies and how cute it all is.
|
12-19-07 06:57pm
|
Reply
210
|
White Box Black Cocks
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Pinche Kankun:
(asmith12's Reply)
Okay, that's understandable. I am a SUPER BIG FAN of coitus!! I need to see dick inside pussy and I need to see her love hole make him splatter... NOT HIS HAND!!! Jerk your meat off when you pull out of the hole to spray your solution all over her gorgeous body!!
|
12-19-07 05:24pm
|
Reply
211
|
White Box Black Cocks
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Pinche Kankun:
(asmith12's Reply)
My bad, Bro. It was supposed to be a joke about guys liking big blacks dicks!! Let's hope no natural man likes big black dicks!
|
12-19-07 04:32pm
|
Reply
212
|
White Box Black Cocks
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Pinche Kankun:
(asmith12's Reply)
No, I wasn't asking if their dicks were big!! I was getting paranoid at the fact that someone was paying attention to the size of men's dicks and the fact that there will be more than one dude on one chick!! :O
|
12-19-07 10:59am
|
Reply
213
|
White Box Black Cocks
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from Pinche Kankun:
Dicks are big and black?!! :O
Gangland Victims?! :O
:O...
Umm...
:O...
Jesus.
|
12-18-07 10:42pm
|
Reply
214
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#33
from jd1961:
(asmith12's Reply)
I think you're replying to the wrong person
|
12-18-07 06:35pm
|
Reply
215
|
Fucked And Bound
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from cerebral:
Very thoughtful review, with important comparisons noted. Like the attention to detail in this review.
Relationship to sister sites is important, as they share facilities, photographers and models.
Overall, a valuable review.
|
12-16-07 11:45am
|
Reply
216
|
Jerk-Off Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from Khan:
FOLLOWUP:
These have now been added.
See
Small Tits Hunter
https://www.pornusers.com/review/smalltitshunter/
and
White Box Black Cocks
https://www.pornusers.com/review/whiteboxblackcocks/
|
12-15-07 02:47pm
|
Reply
217
|
Jerk-Off Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from Khan:
I've asked the tech folks to look into this one. Hopefully, they'll get it fixed in just a bit.
Thx for the heads up
|
12-15-07 07:06am
|
Reply
218
|
Jerk-Off Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from Khan:
I've passed this over to the TBP Editors. They should have them added w/in the next few days.
Thx for the heads up.
|
12-15-07 05:29am
|
Reply
219
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from jd1961:
(asmith12's Reply)
ASMITH 12 WILL BE UNHAPPY BECAUSE THE COCK IS COVERED BY A SQUIGLY MOSAIC
|
12-14-07 05:11am
|
Reply
220
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from jd1961:
(asmith12's Reply)
How about this? Those who don't like when cocks are covered by mosaics don't bother joining? Deal?
|
12-14-07 05:04am
|
Reply
221
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from jd1961:
(asmith12's Reply)
I'll try this one more time...Authentic Japanese erotica is what you would view if you lived in Japan. It is what it is. All the best girls are in authentic Japanese erotica. If you were Japanese and lived in Japan, this would be your porn. This is a site that provides authentic Japanese porn. If you do not like authentic Japanese porn, don't join. If you like authentic Japanese porn, this is the best site I have seen.
|
12-13-07 08:52pm
|
Reply
222
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from jd1961:
(asmith12's Reply)
That's fine that you don't like mosaics, I don't like lesbianism. But if I review a lesbian site, I'm not going to give it a negative because it has lesbianism in it !
|
12-13-07 05:31am
|
Reply
223
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from jd1961:
(asmith12's Reply)
Exactly....Japanese are blocked from such sites. This site provides authentic Japanese porn, which is censored. You can't give a negative for what is. It would be like reviewing a BJ site, and giving it a negative for only having BJ's. That would be illogical.
|
12-13-07 05:26am
|
Reply
224
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from jd1961:
(asmith12's Reply)
I guess for the genitally obsessed, this would not be a good site. But my point is, it can't be counted as a minus, because it is the law. That's the culture, that's what you are getting here, it deserves respect for what it is. Material such as you mention, if produced in Japan, is a crime.
|
12-12-07 01:23pm
|
Reply
225
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#21
from RagingBuddhist:
(asmith12's Reply)
Yeah - I'll have to be done on this train of thought - you're tapping into more of the rage when you talk about ol' Bill. On to the porn!!!
|
12-06-07 03:10pm
|
