| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from badandy400:
(asmith12's Reply)
Well, they say admitting to having a problem is the first step. :)
|
03-26-08 11:17am
|
Reply
177
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from williamj:
Excellent...I wish more people would 'go to war' with criminal overbilling. I know I do!
|
03-26-08 08:35am
|
Reply
178
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from Lionheart:
This happen to me, what I did was I called my bank I canceled my card right away, then I asked to get a new card with different numbers, just to make sure no other charges will be made on the card, then asked for an investigation on the rouge charge. If you don't keep a close eye on your accounts you will never know when I new membership will show up.
|
03-25-08 11:48pm
|
Reply
179
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from jd1961:
Excellent advice. I only had to do this once, sometimes it's the only way these kind of sites will learn.
|
03-25-08 09:25pm
|
Reply
180
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from badandy400:
That is a very good point that I forgot about. Credit card processors only allow a certain number of charge backs per month to a vendor before they either fine them or boot them off. This is to prevent people from consistent ripping people off. This is why more vendors want to refund your money rather than make you fight it. They hate to see the money go, but it is better than having a large number of charge backs. It is a mechanism to help protect customers.
The issue here is that I am not sure if all the charges come from the same company. The cross sales could come from different account to protect the company from the results of fraud prevention.
Thank you asmith for this comment post. I am glad it has been said, only sorry I did not think to post it earlier.
|
03-25-08 08:47pm
|
Reply
181
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from jd1961:
(asmith12's Reply)
Go to this site's PU page, and read all the comments and you'll get the gist of it.
|
03-21-08 08:50pm
|
Reply
182
|
Fucked And Bound
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from cerebral:
(asmith12's Reply)
You are right on target. A few of the older segments are really very good, but the quality of the videos is not very good. Too bad the downloading issues have not been resolved.
|
02-23-08 11:07am
|
Reply
183
|
Funny BDSM
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Marianna:
(asmith12's Reply)
:)
|
02-20-08 02:50pm
|
Reply
184
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from ace of aces:
(asmith12's Reply)
lol...that are tan lines...taning sun brown...ah! ...still i don`t care about if the girls have it or don`t :)
|
02-14-08 03:47am
|
Reply
185
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#23
from Pinche Kankun:
(asmith12's Reply)
Good comparison, bro!!
|
02-11-08 11:14pm
|
Reply
186
|
Three Pillows
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from AverageJose:
I agree with the review of this site. It's a nice site but the video quality is average to poor; depending on where it came from.
I also wish there was more content per update. It doesn't seem to be worth maintaining a subscription continually but rather come back every six months to see what's been added.
|
02-08-08 08:47am
|
Reply
187
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Goldfish:
(asmith12's Reply)
Exactly! Does anyone really get a rise out of being on a movie set naked if front of some camera guys? I can see wanting to be in the scenes sans the camera.
|
02-07-08 04:50am
|
Reply
188
|
3D Sex Games
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Toadsith:
(asmith12's Reply)
I haven't read anything about them using mo-cap for their movements, however they are pretty damn good. Sometimes you will some clipping issues, an elbow passing through the floor or if using two female models with large breasts, the breasts sometimes will pass through each other. But the actually movements are very smooth and even have a bit of variability built in to give the illusion of random movement. It as natural as most Anime - so not really human exactly, but smooth enough to make it interesting to watch.
The clipping problems can be an issue, but generally they don't show up too much, and its better than the other programs I've used. They often don't transition between positions because the models will have to move to a different part of the room, or flip over. So there's definitely room for improvement, but the movement is pretty good. I believe you can download a demo try out the program and see what you think.
I wish they upgraded the textures for high resolution machines and ironed out all of the clipping issues and maybe added threesomes - but hey, one step at a time I guess.
Cheers!
|
02-03-08 12:22pm
|
Reply
189
|
3D Sex Games
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from Toadsith:
Sorry, I would have responded to this earlier had I noticed.
I've tried PlaySexGame, 3D Playmate, Virtual Hottie 2, eGirl and Dream Stripper - as well as 3D Sex Games of course. 3D Sex Games is by far and above the best - the only games that I've seen rival or best them come out of japan - and they have to be heavily modified by users to make them uncensored.
3D Playmate is really awkward to use and falls easily unto the "Uncanny Valley" as certain motions are very unnatural (Virtual Hottie 2 has this problem too with a characters jaw moving or other strange movements) - 3D Sex Games avoids this problem with better movement and an approximated Anime look that makes the models easily attractive.
PlaySexGame is a great start but the graphics are quite low res and use basically no 3D acceleration as it takes place all in browser. Plus there is only one model that you simply drop into various situations - though you can change clothes, hair, et cetera. If they made a stand-alone program that took advantage of the powerful gaming machines out there - then they'd have something.
Virtual Hottie 2 tries and fails miserably - the user interface is terrible and it really isn't efficient in its code - I had trouble running it and my computer can crush games like COD4. I had high hopes for this game, but alas it was really just a test of your patience using it. Plus the login system was a pain in the ass.
Dream Stripper - amazing graphics, simply the best. But it is just a stripping game, plus the transitions between moves can be rough - the model will sometimes slide along the floor without moving her feet to get over to the pole, or sometimes instantly appear in a different position. Some of this has been fixed in the new version I've heard, plus they have more than one model now.
eGirl is a wonderful idea, mo-cap (Dream Stripper uses mo-cap too) capable of super high-res graphics, advanced textures and lighting and so on. It basically featured one model stripping and masturbating, with plans for multiple models later. They have been stuck in development forever - who knows if they'll ever make significant progress.
So 3D Sex Games provides semi-regular updates, isn't creepy as hell, runs relatively well (that had some bugs a while back, but it is out of Beta now), has multiple models and so on. The only sad thing is they got rid of their super cheap price so now it is back to $30 a month, which makes it a bit harder to justify.
Cheers,
Toadsith
|
02-02-08 05:57pm
|
Reply
190
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Jay G:
(asmith12's Reply)
Thanks, really appreciate your feedback.
|
01-29-08 05:48pm
|
Reply
191
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from Jay G:
Appreciate your review. I was a member of the site, but got bored because, back then, most matches went on and on, even though the winner was obvious after the first 60 seconds. I liked the sex at the end, but would have appreciated shorter fights and more domination sex after someone lost.
Your review tempts me to try the site again. Thanks!
|
01-29-08 09:02am
|
Reply
192
|
Funny BDSM
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from PinkPanther:
I remember being turned onto this site when it was called "Brutal Violence" - that's putting it out there. I've never been a member, so I've only seen clips here and there. The price has kept me away. I've been attracted by how attractive a lot of the women on the site are, unusual, in my opinion, for such a determinedly rough sex site.
|
01-28-08 09:09pm
|
Reply
193
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from Toadsith:
Agreed - the new login system is much nicer. Plus it is network wide, so if you are a member of multiple sites on the Kink Network, you only login once for the network, not for each site as some networks still require.
|
01-28-08 04:07pm
|
Reply
194
|
Funny BDSM
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Jay G:
(asmith12's Reply)
Really apprecate your feedback. I'll keep an eye out for more of your rerviews. Thanks!
|
01-28-08 07:37am
|
Reply
195
|
Funny BDSM
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from Marianna:
what a site :)
|
01-20-08 04:21am
|
Reply
196
|
Nikki Jackson
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from mistake62:
(asmith12's Reply)
" quite cooperative " possible but in my case they won't get along with me. however, thanks again!
|
01-16-08 02:26pm
|
Reply
197
|
Nikki Jackson
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mistake62:
(asmith12's Reply)
ok! thanks for assistance asmith. For, ccbill do not want help me ( very dissapointed for them).
|
01-16-08 11:06am
|
Reply
198
|
Diabolic
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from DiacolicChris:
This is called a cross sale, and it's a special offer on the signup page, if you don't want it just uncheck the box, it very clear and not misleading at any point. The word "Swindling" in over the top for sure, as this practice is used on most all big websites to offer other sites at the point of sale.
Diabolic.com Webmaster
|
01-09-08 09:25am
|
Reply
199
|
Hairy Undies
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Toadsith:
(asmith12's Reply)
To be honest, I've probably only subscribed to about 5 sites that use Epoch - and probably damn near a hundred that use CCBill (far and above my favorite), so my experience with checkout deals has probably been rather rosy by comparison. Still - I'm going to start checking closer on all the trial offers I see on checkouts (up-sells or unsavory swindles) and I'll try to determine the owners. I'm hoping this opt-out trials trend will die out soon when more and more customers start complaining about it online - but I'll report any sketchy ones I see so both users and webmasters alike can be aware of what is happening on the checkout screens.
|
01-08-08 03:17pm
|
Reply
200
|
Hairy Undies
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Toadsith:
(asmith12's Reply)
I too have seen it on Epoch billing pages, but in this case it was BillFame.com, though interestingly enough the trial fee was billed through a different site called PABill.com. They are both owned by Dream Invest Ltd. So I guess they choose whatever name they like, I dunno.
If the billing companies are doing this without the consent of the webmasters that is extremely unsavory, but generally the trial sites seem to be owned by the same owner of the sites that I'm subscribing too, so I'm guessing it is an option the webmaster chooses. I would love for the webmaster to chime in and explain the mechanics of practice - but I'm guessing that probably isn't going to happen.
|
01-08-08 02:16pm
|
