| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Monahan:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
I like the site and the quality of the content but I am with Squirrel on this one.
Navigation is everything and as he says it sucks big time on the 21Sextury sites.
That said I would not go as low as a 50 because in my evaluations I give quality and variety of content and frequency of updates as much weight as navigation. But if one of those elements is just awful, I will never give the site a score higher than 70, and then only if the other elements are high quality. I just joined 21Sextury and am not ready to post a review or post a rating.
But Rusty J's right click suggestion may well help me be more generous just because it greatly reduces the frustration of wading through the swamp to find the good stuff.
|
10-23-10 07:46pm
|
Reply
52
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from messmer:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
I saw two names I hadn't seen before. One is "Sex with Kathia Nobili" and the other "Aletta Ocean Empire." There must be two more new sites because my total sites count increased to 44 from 40, but since I seldom venture into the more youth oriented section I couldn't say for sure what else was added.
|
10-23-10 06:36pm
|
Reply
53
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
from RustyJ:
I've been member only for few months but I've noticed the update count has gone down since summer. There has been even zero update days. However there's still so much I haven't even had a quick glance at that I guess I'll stay for at least couple more months.
Just another reminder that everything gets boring after a while and it's time to try something else.
|
09-23-10 11:18pm
|
Reply
54
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from messmer:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
LOL. I took no offense because I realized long ago that tastes differ and that my favorite niches (Grandmas and Lingerie) might very well be found disturbing or boring by someone else. Same as I hope no one takes offense if I don't praise glamor sites to the highest because they are not my cup of tea. :-)
|
09-23-10 02:53pm
|
Reply
55
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
from messmer:
I, too, am a member and have the same complaints. Never have I regretted more subscribing to a site long term than I do with this one.
My reasons are different from yours, though. I have no interest in Sophie Moon and Club Sandy etc. but rely on your "disturbing and uninteresting sites" for MY amusement. If it's any consolation, most of my groups of interest are dead (I exhausted their archives in previous subscriptions) and I have to be content with one update a week that might or might not be good! Most of the time lately, it isn't.
|
09-23-10 01:40pm
|
Reply
56
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
from nostromo:
I'm a current member of the site and i have to say that i completely agree with you. Uninteresting updates without a doubt.
|
09-23-10 08:07am
|
Reply
57
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Review
from lk2fireone:
Great review. A well-known site, but you give a wonderfully clear and informative summary that is a pleasure to read. I also agree that Sophie M. is probably an easy to remember variation of Sophie Moone. Lol.
|
09-21-10 10:22am
|
Reply
58
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from artnoir:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
Classic sets or not, ALS is always worth joining. At least once in your life. You won't regret it.
|
09-17-10 04:48pm
|
Reply
59
|
Sweet Sophie Moone
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
I think it's too bad when performers don't want to do porn but still
go through the motion of pretending that they do. If Sophie truly wanted to comeback then she would be willing to offer her fans more than what she has up to now. As it is I can't imagine her most rabid fan is pleased with the new content.
You might have joined her site if it was a stand alone but I think you would have felt cheated out of your money.
|
09-05-10 07:50am
|
Reply
60
|
Sweet Sophie Moone
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
from pat362:
I'm not suprised about the updates on her site. When she left porn, she said it was to start her own business. That was her version but I got the feeling that she was tired of performing in front of the camera. I can't imagine that has changed. I think that either her business simply didn't happen and she needs money or the people at 21sextury offered her a lot of money and told her she wouldn't have to do much of anything. I can appreciate her feelings when she has been performing for almost a decade.
If her site was a stand alone one. Would many of her fans join it knowing that you mostly get a few mild g/g scenes and some backstage stuff?
|
09-04-10 06:28am
|
Reply
61
|
Sweet Sophie Moone
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
from Denner:
Thanks to nadiencendia for this informative update...very usefull!
|
09-04-10 05:56am
|
Reply
62
|
Footsie Babes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RustyJ:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
It could be that it's not very good at it's own foot niche but surprisingly what it does well is the stuff I like...
|
09-03-10 05:12am
|
Reply
63
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Sevrin:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
Thanks for the link. I liked the Eve's Spell one a lot. Looks like there's a fair bit there to hold my interest. :)
|
08-29-10 07:54am
|
Reply
64
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Sevrin:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
I really wish there was a decent hypnosis/mind control site. I agree that the stories are usually much better than anything that's currently on adult sites.
Back when Usenet was all that, I used to spend a lot of time on ASSM (Alt.Sex.Stories.Moderated) and RAE (Rec.Arts.Erotica). Some of the stuff was of the nasty CP variety, but there was a lot of quality, too. The best stuff is archived on the web, so I still visit assm.asstr.org occasionally.
Writing decent erotic stories is a lot harder than it looks. Back when I was a know-nothing, no-money teen, my primary source of porn was stuff I wrote myself involving my more attractive classmates, and it was the beginning of my fascination with girl/girl sex. I still, uh, enjoy, creating scenarios in my head involving my favourite models.
I don't go out of my way to read much anymore, though. These days, what I really like are porn scenes and photo sets that have a little story behind them. Viv Thomas is an example of a studio that strikes a good balance by not only having hot action, but establishing a relationship between the characters.
|
08-29-10 06:40am
|
Reply
65
|
Filth Freaks
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from audrina69:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
another problem I noticed as I went thru some of the sites. For many scenes, there is no streaming option at all. The scene is chopped into small clips and you must download to view. Like you said, no updates. I really like pussyfoot girls and was disappointed to find, not one of the scenes is available for full wmv download. All small clips on the entire site. Horrendous. I will never come back to this garbage.
|
08-28-10 06:28am
|
Reply
66
|
Flashy Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
from lk2fireone:
The same sort of thing happened to me a few days ago.
I joined the Devils Film network, and was signed up for a separate trial membership to Porn Access. The Porn Acess membership was only $1.95 for 3 days, but it would renew at around $30 after 3 days unless cancelled. I looked for, but did not see, any pre-checked agreement for a trial membership.
But I was lucky that I was only charged $1.95 for the trial membership I did not want. I called customer service immediately, told them I did not want the trial membership, did not see the pre-checked agreement. Customer service would not cancel my charge of $1.95 for the trial, but they did cancel my trial membership.
I never used the trial membership.
But it was only $1.95.
I got a message from my credit card company to contact the credit card company. They wanted to know if the charge for $1.95 was valid, or if there was fraud (evidently, they have a program flagging charges by the billing company Porn Access uses). I told them the charge was valid, because I didn't want to get a new credit card number and whatever else I would have to explain about the charge.
You would think that we would be experts about these pre-checked agreements. But I sometimes wonder that sometimes the agreement might not even be shown on the sign-up page, because I was looking for the pre-checked line, and did not see it.
Live and learn. But what can we learn if we honestly don't see the pre-checked agreement?
|
08-27-10 07:43am
|
Reply
67
|
Flashy Babes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
Yes: if anything goes wrong - I hate that possibility - can you expect one or more extra bills? Because you cannot rely on these people.
And yes - the site is not that good, so guess I'll skip it in the future...again: a fine warning.
|
08-27-10 07:25am
|
Reply
68
|
Flashy Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
from Denner:
Been a member - twice - some years ago. Always liked that soft style they deal with - as a variation.
It's a little bit like Babespotting.tv, a little bit.
But the deal here now sounds not good.
Thanks for the warning....
|
08-27-10 06:34am
|
Reply
69
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from PinkPanther:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
I'm not sure how you can say that with the vast amount of girl/girl content they have on this site - especially from their annual Caribbean trips.
|
08-24-10 09:30pm
|
Reply
70
|
Euro Teen Erotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from lk2fireone:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
Very well said.
And that's why PU is such a valuable site. The members are intelligent, courteous, and helpful.
|
08-24-10 03:28am
|
Reply
71
|
Euro Teen Erotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
I made a similar type comment in my review of Femjoy, saying that I preferred the Met-art look over the Femjoy look in the photosets. And I got a couple of responses that preferred the Femjoy look as more natural. So taste is very much a matter of personal opinion.
Nobody agreed with me that the Met-art look is better than the Femjoy look. :)
So I can't dictate what other people prefer. I was just making a comment that this site is more of a "natural" style than a "glamor" style.
I definitely do prefer a more glamorized style. Not ultra glamor, but some glamor.
|
08-24-10 03:21am
|
Reply
72
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Monahan:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
That is my answer, too, but with a slight variation.
I still d/l pictures in a few cases where the babe is especially gorgeous and the pix are high quality. I used to grab some screenshots of especially memorable scenes using VLC but now with most sites providing high quality pictures along with their videos, I stopped with the screenshots.
|
08-23-10 08:24am
|
Reply
73
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Monahan:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
Ditto. 2 'puters; one for serious and one for fun plus several external hard drives.
|
08-15-10 10:38pm
|
Reply
74
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
from RustyJ:
I noticed the same. It appears that the special price was added in 2008 so it might have expired. Good looking site, I agree but too steep price. I hope they get another offer soon!
|
08-14-10 05:34am
|
Reply
75
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Sevrin:
(nadiencendia's Reply)
It's not hard to figure out whether the site is for you. There are previews, and Sapphic Erotica themselves post 5-minute promotional clips on the tube sites.
I'm one of those g/g fans and found lots to like there. Of course not everything is a keeper, but with the sheer quantity of content you'll find on the site, there's something for every "mid/hardcore" g/g fan. I subbed for a couple of months this past spring and I plan to return in the future.
|
08-13-10 03:20pm
|
