Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
Score Videos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from fiou:
(malikstarks's Reply)
If you google via paxton videos, you'll find that she did make videos. Wearing a Score T-shirt
|
10-30-16 09:49am
|
Reply
127
|
Scoreland
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from BubbaGump:
(malikstarks's Reply)
Hi. Thanks for the info.
Just an FYI:
I have not heard a reply from Scoreland regarding my questions. The form said they would respond within 24 hours. Maybe they are just busy or maybe they don't want to reply, or maybe they just don't care. Either of these could be true. I will just leave it there. Readers can draw their own conclusions.
I did notice that I got a truckload of promos from Scoreland yesterday in my E-Mail box, offering me an additional site if I stick around, and special deals on other sites. I signed up for one month, non-renewing. I also noticed something odd. Twice now, I have received emails telling me my password was reset as they have noticed suspiscious activity on my account. This happened the week after I signed up and also yesterday. My guess is they do this to make password sharing on the net more difficult and make sure it is the person who signed up that is using the account. I haven't used the site in a week.
I have no interest in renewing--not because of the HD issue itself, but I have seen what I wanted to and downloaded the photo sets I liked.
|
01-28-12 02:37pm
|
Reply
128
|
Scoreland
(0)
|
Reply of
malikstarks's Comment
from NMC2008:
I am sorry but they can still kiss my ass.
|
08-16-08 06:43pm
|
Reply
129
|
Scoreland
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from mistake62:
(malikstarks's Reply)
ok thanks malikstars i confirm, now all their content( videos,pics, old and update material) is disperse in different websites( personnal acessible with the membership and even scorevideo then extra cost) then the navigation is still more difficult.
|
04-20-08 03:54am
|
Reply
130
|
Scoreland
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mistake62:
(malikstarks's Reply)
ok malikstarks thank for your answer. I subscribe yesterday and indeed this content is become very very limited but you talk of discount and a PU link? however it seem that always cost 29,95£ per month?
|
04-19-08 04:23pm
|
Reply
131
|
Shemale Strokers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from GCode:
(malikstarks's Reply)
I appreciate the compliments and thoughts about joining sites based on reviews I've done. If you have any questions or details that would help you on any sites I've reviewed, don't hestitate to respond and I'll whip out the old hard drives to look at shit for you. After writing my response I did go to the site and noticed it looks exactly the same. What a poor site design, lol? Stinks that the Rodney Moore site is still $19.95 and this site jacked the price up, ughh.
On a side not totally off the subject of Shemale Strokers, but did you check out the bonus site for Shemale Club (Private Transsexual)? Honestly, with the combo of both of those sites together for one price I honestly think it's the best site for TS content from the Americas.
Brazzers is quite wishy washy for me. I do think that's a great price just to check out a site, I just dunno if I can do it. I've been back to an asian TS streak lately and have joined a few sites in that realm that I have never joined. Brazzers is something I may do down the road (may be a long one) because I can and will always love a big tittied (even fake) real chick!
|
12-30-09 07:22pm
|
Reply
132
|
Shemale Strokers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from GCode:
(malikstarks's Reply)
Oh my, I totally misunderstood you I think. Plus, I want to add that I was not trying to argue and I know I stated that term in my response; I think I should have used debate instead. Also, I was just typing out a really long reply because I was extremely bored at that time and after re-reading it I think I came off as a bit harsh.
In regards to the price change, I am quite mad considering the site is maintained and shot by only one videographer/photographer and the site design is strictly amateur. However, I guess that's the huge advantage to the site as well because if you love Sammy Mancini's work then you will love the site, hands down. This is because a lot of other sites in this realm feature work done by a lot of videographers/photographers and you may only like 1 or 2's work.
You are right that both of these sites you mentioned probably do have more solo content available. I actually like Shemale Club a bit more when it comes to TS content because of the great ratio.
Don't get it twisted as far as knowledge, it appears that you have quite a bit yourself and I would not take what you say with a grain a salt :) One of my favorite things about Shemale Strokers is that he is revamping old videos and making them better which a lot of sites don't do. On top of this, he is adding new ones in better quality as well. However, I would never go so far to say that even his best videos that are considered 'HD' can compete with the two sites you mentioned in terms of video clarity. Sammy really needs to learn to encode cleaner or get a better camera. I think if he could get videos to look like Club or Yum, he could compete a lot more.
You mentioned Rodney Moore sites, is this a in the TS niche? I am always looking for suggestions these days on some sites to join. Be the way, thanks for your insight and replies! I love discussions with other PU's and I apologize again if I came off as arrogant or malicious :(
|
12-30-09 06:36pm
|
Reply
133
|
Shemale Strokers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from GCode:
(malikstarks's Reply)
Yes but the price was at $24.95 which means this site was $10 less than those sites for a long time. However, being $5 less is still better than going up to the price that the other two sites that you mentioned. But, there is something one has to realize when it comes to this site and both Shemale Club and Shemale-Yum.
Shemale Club specializes in all aspects of content and therefore should be a site that has a large variety of content when it comes to overall types of scenes. Argument: Shemale Strokers (please read the name of the site?) is a solo shemale site only featuring full masturbation to cumshot scenes and any other content you are getting from this site is considered bonus material. Therefore, of course Shemale Club is going to have hardcore and more/better of it. So, basically there is no basis for an argument when even comparing these two sites. Yes, both contain TS models but the vision of the sites are completely different. Basically, that's like going to a site like Met-Art and expecting hardcore scenes.
Shemale-Yum: The guys at grooby bring TS models from mostly the Americas and that is what basically Shemale Strokers does. Plus, I can see where many would like to compare this site and Strokers because of this. However, Shemale-Yum has a different vision as well. This site features TS models but attempts to range the material by including many different types of shoots which may include masturbation scenes but also just stripping, hardcore, lesbian, and fetish. But, Shemale Strokers is once again a site dedicated to just solo masturbation scenes. However, I think Shemale Strokers is one of the only sites featuring these types of models that does it right. You know you will get interviews, stripping, masturbation, and a climax (cumshot) during each video while Shemale-Yums solo scenes are a lot more scattered. So, I see where the sites are more closely related to each other but I'd say they are still different in many ways.
I do understand in a way where you are coming from and I agree the price going up is a bit unsettling. However, the site is still cheaper than both those sites. Plus, the new videos are like 100% better than what was offered before and the director gets these models to do a lot of kinky shit that most sites featuring solo material do not do which is probably the largest reason to join this site. But, I'd say both Shemale Club and Shemale-Yum are definitely premier sites in the TS niche; I just think all these sites being in the TS niche is the only major comparison one can make.
|
12-30-09 02:49pm
|
Reply
134
|
Silverstone DVD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(malikstarks's Reply)
Thanks, Malikstarks! I actually did go to White Ghetto and all the network sites were still being offered there but as you can tell by the present tour of Silverstone, nothing points to other sites, that's why my comment. In any case, when I am ready to re-subscribe (was there not too long ago) I will probably do it through White Ghetto that way I'll be sure. Thanks again.
|
12-02-10 04:18pm
|
Reply
135
|
Silverstone DVD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(malikstarks's Reply)
Hey malikstarks, I know it is still part of the network if you join through White Ghetto, see my BTW but when I take a tour of Silverstone the network is no longer mentioned. Do you mean I could still get the whole network even if I signed up through Silverstone DVD?
|
12-02-10 03:53pm
|
Reply
136
|
Sock Blocked
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from ace of aces:
(malikstarks's Reply)
if you don`t see the scares of the breast implants, i don`t mind them either.
|
08-26-10 08:19am
|
Reply
137
|
Sock Blocked
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from ace of aces:
(malikstarks's Reply)
as i leanred out of the past, there are some pornusers who are realy a fan of the newest sites.--therfore always a possibility to get to know something from them.
i probably don`t know if the site is launched last month or only listed since then. could be a difference :)
|
08-11-10 06:49am
|
Reply
138
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from PinkPanther:
(malikstarks's Reply)
The $60 upgrade did not give me SisLovesMe or FamilyStrokes. Do not pay $60 to upgrade expecting to get those sites or you will be quite disappointed.
|
05-15-20 04:57am
|
Reply
139
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(malikstarks's Reply)
Thanks!
|
05-14-20 03:52am
|
Reply
140
|
Trans Angels
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Shen:
(malikstarks's Reply)
On TBP: "A monthly membership to TransAngels only includes streaming videos. You'll need to pay an extra $14.99/month to get downloads. Signing up to for 90-day or yearly plan, or switching to one of these multi-month options, will also provide access to downloads."
On RR: "Downloads are only included with a 90 or 365-day membership or a $14.99/month upgrade."
I purchased a "365-day membership" deal yesterday but didn't get downloads. Granted, the two reviews were published in May 2019. Either they got it wrong, or TransAngels have changed it since to make it even worse! I'm betting on the latter.
This is really unfortunate, as I relied on those two reviews but was - unintentionally - misguided by them. I use their reviews to avoid this annoying no downloads enclosed malpractice in the first place. I feel let down.
TransAngels or whoever run their multitude of sites have gotten greedier, for a "yearly download add-on" they like to label it they have the audacity to charge a sum similar to the initial price on top just for downloads! I was unusually angry and took this to support and asked why but to no avail, just "the way it is".
I managed to knock off 30 bucks off their "yearly downloads package" to agree a deal, though reluctantly.
I will make this apparent in my review once I've used the site enough, in any case I am still not happy about this at all as I was really looking forward to joining up. Still will be with them for a year, let's see how that goes.
Though getting 30 bucks off the downloads package has softened the blow, this blunder will certainly knock a good amount of points once I roll it out.
|
09-01-19 08:30pm
|
Reply
141
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(malikstarks's Reply)
Probably the Playboy, Penthouse factor that makes many prefer the artificiality (over processing) of the pictures. I prefer natural flesh tones and a bit less glamor. As to the amount of contents, the site is huge all right but after the few times I did browse and download, mostly pictures, I did not keep one single set. I would still give the site high ratings, it delivers what it promises: glamor. I fully accept the blame for straying into something that was wrong for me. I should have had a thorough look at their preview first! I have been much more careful since then.
|
04-13-08 11:00am
|
Reply
142
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from messmer:
(malikstarks's Reply)
No, I only subscribe to VideoBox at the moment but did subscribe to VideosZ in the past. I think I prefer VideoBox for one reason .. VideoBox has the easiest log-in. :-) Picture quality appears to be the same.
|
10-07-10 10:05am
|
Reply
143
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from RagingBuddhist:
(malikstarks's Reply)
I don't give scores like that at random. Along with what you said (and something I somehow failed to include in my review) about how cliché and repetitive the site is, one of the main reasons I felt the need to subtract points was because of the "in your face" upsells and the way the site wants to set so many cookies. I'm used to all that when I'm surfing for freebies - not when I've paid for the content.
I just honestly think Brazzer's has enough issues that made the experience less than pleasant. It seems a lot of the popular sites kind of sit back and rest on their laurels. By that I mean they don't keep up with the times. Things like picture/video resolution and site navigation should always be a concern to a site. If I can ever figure out how to put it into words that make sense, you'll see what I mean (if and when) I get my review of Overdeveloped Amateurs together.
(He laughs) And just how did we get into a mini review of Brazzer's here?
|
03-09-08 07:48pm
|
Reply
144
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(malikstarks's Reply)
Hi, no need to be confused, malikstarks. I do prefer mature women, preferably mature women wearing erotic and exciting lingerie but haven't given up on other contents altogether. :-) I've subscribed to BDSM (Kink), BBW sites, Nubiles, Hairy sites, AO30, Anilos, Aunt Judy's/Older Women etc. etc. I just wish there were more mature sites that feature a leisurely strip but expecting this is unrealistic because most modern women and photographers have never heard of slips and camisoles and pretty nighties and garter belts etc. The trend is utilitarian, that's what most have grown up with and it appears to be here to stay. Sheesh, this is turning into a book and platform!
Now in connection with two other points you raised: I did not subscribe to 21st Sextury for one year for Lusty Grandmas alone, I subscribed for one year hoping to get all the mature sites from the start rather than receive them in dribs and drabs as loyalty bonuses over a period of time. Only problem was, three out of the four mature sites of interest to me were dead and no longer updating, which left a Grandpa site, of no interest to me, and Lusty Grandmas. I had no idea at the time of subscription that this would be the case.
In the case of Reality Kings I liked the fact that there was finally a site whose videos had a prolonged leading up to the actual sex act. And I still like this even though this, too, can become monotonous at times.
Bangbros, I only subscribed to so that I could make a comparison to RK but after all the enhanced breasts I found in their most recent updates I would never go back. So, there you have it! Nice chatting with you.
|
09-25-10 07:33pm
|
Reply
145
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(malikstarks's Reply)
What you say makes sense for those who enjoy main stream contents, malikstarks but for me it was sheer aggravation to go to the site on a daily basis and only find something that appealed to me maybe once a month. There's not too much demand for mature (not Milfs in their thirties) and it was almost like Christmas when the occasional DVD catering to my niche showed up! So, the best thing for me would be to subscribe once a year, find the five DVDs or so that I will probably like, and be done. I have the same problem with 21Sextury, I took a subscription for a year and get one weekly update for my efforts. I dislike both Videosz and 21Sextury for this but don't blame them. Catering to "seniors" is not very profitable. :-)
|
09-25-10 09:17am
|
Reply
146
|
Virtual Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(malikstarks's Reply)
Thanks for the tip! I'd never heard of browser hijack (though my old Win98 box got the auto-shutdown-restart thing a couple of years ago, even though I had virus software up to date on it). But that's total system hijack, then crash.
|
02-18-08 02:37pm
|
Reply
147
|
Wild On Cam
(0)
|
Reply of
malikstarks's Comment
from uscue:
"It's really a shame but indicative of many sites that go away from what made them stand out and provide an essential value."
Ever think of the possibility that they transitioned to what they are now because that's what's getting them more subscriptions?
|
05-28-17 07:56pm
|
Reply
148
|
Your Mom Loves Anal
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(malikstarks's Reply)
I am willing to give them prop for remastering some of their older videos. I would even be fine if they were using these remastered videos as part of their update schedule but the problem is that they have a very expensive site (or group of sites) offering less content than some of their less expensive sites and worse the other site has better stuff as well.
|
12-31-16 08:20pm
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
