| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
226
|
3D Sex Games
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from asmith12:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Wow, thanks a lot for an extremely detailed answer. Just one thing which is unclear - does 3D Sex Games use motion capture or not? How natural are movements there?
|
02-03-08 10:21am
|
Reply
227
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from Pinche Kankun:
(Toadsith's Reply)
So that's why I can't get a woman!!! They are not attracted enough to my face!! :)
Fuck That!! Green Tea, Melatonin, Vitamin E, MORE SLEEP AND LESS PORN (ESPECIALLY PHUCK UP PORN!!), and Vitamin C, man!! I am on it!!
|
01-30-08 11:41pm
|
Reply
228
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from RagingBuddhist:
(Toadsith's Reply)
That's a nice heads up, Toadsith. I don't burn much anymore, but it's nice to know there's a brand of disc out there worth looking into if I decide to.
|
01-29-08 12:49pm
|
Reply
229
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Drooler:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Add to that, I think, is that the majority of consumers of b/g porn are male, and the only "fresh faces" we're interested in anyway are the ones with no hair follicles on them.
|
01-24-08 01:04pm
|
Reply
230
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from jd1961:
(Toadsith's Reply)
And the clever part is they put "Devils Film" in their email address, but it's only part of the address! It got me to open it!
|
01-17-08 11:13pm
|
Reply
231
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from jd1961:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Because it said so in the mail! "Hi,
You have been a past member of devilsfilm.com (your username was xxxxxx), and we are contacting you because we have a special promo available for a re-launched site. " I checked to see if the site was affiliated with Devil's Film, but it is not. I have a separate e-mail account for paysites, so it doesn't bother me really. Bur I thought I would put the word out.
|
01-17-08 11:11pm
|
Reply
232
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
from asmith12:
Thanks. A nice change in the world where things tend to change from bad to worse.
|
01-16-08 06:37am
|
Reply
233
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
from Thaeral:
That settles that! Well done, Toadsith! Thanks.
|
01-14-08 11:04pm
|
Reply
234
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
from jd1961:
Thanks for the update!
|
01-14-08 06:51pm
|
Reply
235
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#22
from Pinche Kankun:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Seeing a girl swallow cum damages my digestive system! :)
|
01-09-08 06:55pm
|
Reply
236
|
Hairy Undies
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from asmith12:
(Toadsith's Reply)
> I'll report any sketchy ones I see
Thanks in advance; this is what this site is for :-).
|
01-08-08 03:19pm
|
Reply
237
|
Hairy Undies
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from asmith12:
(Toadsith's Reply)
I see, thanks. Things are much worse than, with CCBill probably being the only trustworthy processor to date (at least it wasn't caught doing it - I think they're doing almost the same thing but with checkbox unchecked, and it IMHO changes things dramatically from swindling to not so annoying upsell) :-(.
> generally the trial sites seem to be owned by the same owner of the sites that I'm subscribing too
I used to think so too until I've run into Epoch using the same technique on purchase of Diabolic site selling PornStarsTop, and these 2 sites don't seem to be related (I'd even say they're from very different leagues).
|
01-08-08 03:08pm
|
Reply
238
|
Hairy Undies
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
from asmith12:
Thanks for warning.
Do you remember what was their credit card processor? Wasn't it Epoch by any chance? I've seen such thing (which I think is nothing short of swindling) a few times recently, and I think it was Epoch all (or at least most of) the time.
Moreover, I'm not even sure if webmasters of original sites get anything from such "trials"; it would be very interesting to see a comment from one of them here (and if Epoch is doing it without consent of webmasters, it can easily find themselves in a DEEP TROUBLE; such company as Diabolic won't hesitate to sue Epoch in such case).
|
01-08-08 02:04pm
|
Reply
239
|
The Hardcore Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from SnowDude:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Hey Toadsith dude!
Thanks for the reply and I imagine a lot of it is a workload issue. As for the content I agree it doesn't look as high quality as some other networks, but finding that amount of variety without much in the way of silicone is pretty rare. Plus, they just added a vintage 70s & 80s porn site that put it over the top for me...at least in terms of giving it a try. After joining a couple of well known networks with nothing but glam girls and fake tits, I'm very ready for something else.
Thanks,
SD
|
01-06-08 04:16pm
|
Reply
240
|
Adam Cruise
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Denner:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Hey, Bro - splendid reply, thanks.....I also think about an earlier reply to the same matter from our fellow PU, jd1961:
"I think it may be a case of running out of new sites to review. Sometimes I wonder where they find some of these sites."
Cheers, mate.
|
01-05-08 10:41am
|
Reply
241
|
Brain Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Davit:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Great tip about turning off the web accelerator. I kind of figured it out the hard way (after numerous problems with various websites and then discovering by accident that the problems disappear when the accelerator is off!).
|
01-05-08 07:49am
|
Reply
242
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from asmith12:
(Toadsith's Reply)
About ACDsee - thanks for suggestion. About Windows viewer - sorry, not good enough for my eyes :-). But the most important thing for me personally is that I'm mostly viewing pictures in-browser only and quite rarely outside browser (I'm more of video fan than picture fan :-)).
As a side observation: if there are lots of people like me, some kind of plugin with decent downsize algorithm can have a business case :-).
|
01-05-08 06:38am
|
Reply
243
|
Adam Cruise
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Denner:
(Toadsith's Reply)
I see your point - no problem. Hoped for some debate on the matter, so thats great.
What struck me was, that almost half of the sites in New Listings have been gay lately - maybe a coincidence. In that context I found it a bit odd because some 99% of all reviews are in some way hetero...so maybe most PU's would like to see more non-gay sites in New Listing.
|
01-05-08 02:28am
|
Reply
244
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#42
from Davit:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Hi Toadsith
No, I never said I'd only seen 6 movies, and I never said I based my opinion on just 6 movies. I was saying that I had just - at that time - sat through 6 movies that all had the same range of problems.
As I said earlier, I originally downloaded over 100GB of movies (although have deleted many now as they are just not very good, IMO). I have seen substantially more than 6 movies that I consider to be badly produced/filmed. Some are excellent. But far far too many are just bad (having no decent angles, and suffering constant shaky wobbly jerky camera movements).
Check out the one example I gave - and then check out others. There are MANY more. It's an issue for me (although I acknowledge, it's not an issue for most on this site so far). Kind regards. Davit
|
01-05-08 02:24am
|
Reply
245
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#37
from Bela:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Wise words Toadsith - I guess I'm going to have to learn to do the same before jumping to conclusions.
I'm aware that there have been problems on Pornusers in the past and perhaps I was a little fast to assume that Davit was being slightly dishonest.
I agree with you 100% that "recommendations" of the kind Davit made should be kept for comments and forum discussion and that the reviews should be kept as unbiased as possible, reflecting what the site offers and all the information that a visitor may need to be able to decide if it's worth visiting/joining, rather than a place for the poster to put forward solely his/her own feelings while possibly disregarding many positive elements of the site in question.
It's a pity 1by-day happened to have been the guinea-pig and Davit has only later stated that he'll perhaps try to be a little more lenient in his reviews in the future. Won't help 1by-day's average score too much of course.
In fact he has since also lowered the score to 70 - the site has of course lost the last remnants of quality over the past 2 days and this has nothing to do with my comments...
Keep having fun!
Bela
|
01-04-08 02:03pm
|
Reply
246
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from mr smut:
(Toadsith's Reply)
And besides resizing down is no problem at all because you give away some or better say reduce the information but to sample a pic up to a larger size always gives a lousy quality. It's like trying to create matter from nothing which only works in SciFi stories.
ACDSee is quite cool and it supports ZIP-files internally which is working quite fast on old machines as well but if any of you knows a freeware program that can do the same please let me know. Thanks!
|
01-04-08 02:03pm
|
Reply
247
|
Dirty Orientals
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Denner:
(Toadsith's Reply)
You are right - I found it, but did NOT join and review it - just took a close look at the preview and put it in some reply. A preview where the real thai-girl thing is very clear.
Well, buddy - let's see who hits it first down the road....
|
01-03-08 11:43am
|
Reply
248
|
Dirty Orientals
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Denner:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Hey again
Yeah, I posted some comments about Asian Apple Seed - only from the preview - have NOT been there myself - but the preview sure has somethings to it.
Guess, I'm going there too, soon - let's see how we're doing
|
01-03-08 10:49am
|
Reply
249
|
Dirty Orientals
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Denner:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Good point, Toadsith
Let's get some filipino girls!
Guess you have the same way about the "asian-sites". And I guess you've been at Asian Suck Dolls and the creampie-ditto site. The real thai-stuff, but those sites still lack something in quality.
Give me a tip, if you find some fine thai-sites - and I'll certainly do likewise.
Denner
|
01-03-08 09:52am
|
Reply
250
|
Dirty Orientals
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Hey Toadsith
Thanks for a fine reply.
When I was a member, they only had 20 or some sites in the package - but this is good news - maybe this PASS is turning to the better...
And another thing: You're quite right about the genuine thai-girls. A lot of sites state "thai", but have girls from Japan, US-based asians and what not.
Thanks to your comment, I consider joining again....
|
01-03-08 08:06am
|
