| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Life Selector
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Wraith0711:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Thank you for your reply sir. I hate token based systems as they are a freakin ripoff.
|
02-09-19 02:57pm
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Amanda:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Ha ha, this poll was a bit of a stretch. After almost 10 years of polls, it's gettin' tough, let me tell ya! And no one seems to want to submit any polls anymore. :(
|
11-14-16 07:17am
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from pat362:
(Toadsith's Reply)
They don't even have to do that because I seem to remember reading somewhere that Daniel lamented the fact that her wished he could have appeared in a Bond movie more like those older ones. Thank God for dvd and Blu-Ray because I watch at least one JB movie per month and I'm not too picky on which one except for License to Kill, Octopussy and a View to a Kill. Sadly those I have a hard time watching.
|
11-07-16 02:13pm
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from pat362:
(Toadsith's Reply)
I was okay with Dench and I think that the reason why she was phoning it in is that she quickly realised that her role as "M" would be even less important to the story to the point where they could have cut it out and I'm not sure that it would have been much of an issue. That and she in in her 70's so the enthusiasm may no longer be there.
I can't stress how much I liked the Brosnan Bond films. For one thing you can see that he really wanted to play the role and the producers made sure that everything that made the Connery and Moore films fun to watch was in those movies. Die Another day budget 143 millions, box office 431 millions. The World is not enough budget 135 millions, box office: 361 millions and Goldeneye budget 58 millions, box office 352 millions. The rule of thumb is that you double production cost to include cost of promotion and each movie made over 100 million in profit except for World is not Enough which only made 90+. That of course does not include profits from dvd, blu-ray and tv deals.
My perfect world would include remakes of some of the classic Bond films but with better effects, a different take on the story. Of course they can't all be remade but I would love to see a remake of the the Spy who Loved me, Thunderball(I know Never say Never is a remake) but those two can easily be adapted to the modern time and still be fun.
|
11-06-16 10:44am
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(Toadsith's Reply)
I didn't realise that Roger was in his 40's when he started playing Bond. He looked younger but he played the role for way too long because by the time he did Moonraker. He looked too old and the age difference between him and his female co-stars was a little too creepy for my taste. That's why as much as I like the concept for A View to a Kill. I get shivers looking at a man nearly 60 pretending to be a sex magnet to a 30 years old woman.
I liked Lazemby's versions of Bond but the critics didn't and they were quite cruel to him at the time. I think it also didn't help that he was a Bond who was mostly not working for the British government and got married.
Timothy's first Bond movie was amazing but his second one is best forgotten. Bond fights the drug Cartels for the US government was not just a bad idea but a ridiculous one as well. It was also the first time that I did not like the Bond song.
Pierce was great in all of his Bond movies and should have been the template to make the Craig bond movies but the powers that be stuck their heads up their asses thinking they could re-invent the wheel.
Casino Royale is a decent movie but the death of the Bond girl leaves a bad taste in the mouth. His second foray is a continuation of the previous movie and worse he doesn't get a Bond girl except the one destined to die a la Goldfinger. I know Skyfall is the most profitable Bond movie of all time and the title song is really good but I detest the level of stupidity through out the film to the point where I refuse to watch Specter.
I'm not alone in detesting the Craig Bond movies because he refused to do more. Mind you I know they offered him 150 million to do another one so not sure if he will choose to do another one. I certainly won't watch it.
|
11-04-16 03:41pm
|
Reply
6
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Cybertoad:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Thanks for the heads up on that.
I am not a huge photo guy only have about 27,000 photos but still be nice to see what I could downloads files being so small on photos wonder why they do that.
Its a good site just a couple small annoyances. The price though is pretty darn cool.
|
11-04-16 12:30pm
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from merc77:
(Toadsith's Reply)
I live alone and just keep them in a certain order. I don't like the gaudy porn cases for DVDs.
|
09-21-16 09:05am
|
Reply
8
|
Stripper Facials
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Glad I could help. I still watch a couple of scenes from the site but otherwise it really isn't worth the fee.
|
03-02-16 05:40pm
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Claypaws:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Exactly as Toadsith. So far, I never had a problem with un-reviewed sites. Reviews are just one factor in deciding whether or not to join.
|
11-10-12 06:58am
|
Reply
10
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#27
from jberryl69:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Well since it has an oral piece to it, Spit Roast would keep the spirit of the food association. I tend to get lost with acronyms so I'd be a little confuse my self as to the proper location of the letters.
Would MMF be a vag/anal 3 some and MFM a vag/anal -> mouth 3 some?
Or:
Would MMF be a DP & MFM be a SR?
Or:
... well you get the picture.
|
11-08-12 09:25pm
|
Reply
11
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#25
from jberryl69:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Well, it does fit with my niche though I knew someone would object and I'm surprised it was only you. One of my favorite little French tarts, Tiffany Hopkins, always did such a nice job handling that.
|
11-08-12 01:11pm
|
Reply
12
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from marcdc1:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Here, here!
I agree the performance makes the scene. Doesn't matter who the girl is, or what is being done if there isn't that spark - I'm not interested.
If that spark is there I don't care if its a masturbation shoot or a full on gangbang, it's gonna be great!
|
11-06-12 05:29pm
|
Reply
13
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#20
from hodayathink:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Word does a good job with basic spelling and grammar typos, but I always find at least a couple times where I type in a word that may be grammatically correct, but was not the word I meant to say in that place at all. Which is why even with that I have to read my reviews three or four times, and at least once a day or two after I originally wrote it.
|
11-05-12 10:16am
|
Reply
14
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from mojododo:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Sorry and to answer your question, no it's not a special satellite connection. It's just a regular ISP who also sells me cable TV services.
|
11-02-12 11:05am
|
Reply
15
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from mojododo:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Nope, the proxy server thing didn't work. I can't get dropdowns to work, so basically can't download anything again. I have an issue with having to pay more (like for a VPN) to get a paid service to work. They're a business that delivers content over the Internet, for crying out loud, certainly they would have thought about this?
What's more infuriating is that I get absolutely no response since from their customer service, be it in terms technical help or on my request for a refund. I've paid good money and got nothing in return, nothing works. Their high-tech, IP-detecting server would be able to tell I downloaded nothing from the site, so I should get my refund.
Does anyone have any idea who I can write to? Like the site owner or someone who will address this?
|
11-02-12 11:03am
|
Reply
16
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from mojododo:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Thanks for trying to help, my response below.
Have you tried clearing your browser(s) cache and cookies?
A: Check!
Their site uses a lot of Adobe® Flash, are you running the latest version? Is your browser up-to-date? Is your Virus Protection up-to-date? (I recommend Avast!, it is free.)
A: Yes, yes, and yes!
Have you got a software firewall? It might have incorrectly deemed 21 Sextury as a dangerous site.
A: Nope, no firewall
I'm not sure what country you are hailing from, but is it possible your country or ISP is blocking the site? If so, a anonymous proxy server could solve your problem.
A: Nope, the site works and I can log-in. But any attempts to download or view anything gets me a session error, then I have to log-in again. Sometimes I get randomly booted out to the log-in screen even just clicking things like search or the tabs on top. If the site is blocked in my country or by my ISP I wouldn't have gotten that far.
This one will sound stupid, unless it works: Have you completely shut down your computer, let it rest for a few minutes, and then restarted it?
A: Just did this, same problems.
Basically tried all the steps above, still no help. 21sextury wrote back, saying it's basically my problem because my IP address keeps changing and that's my problem. I explained there's nothing I can do about my IP address, and if he can't help me then I should get a full refund. No word yet.
|
11-01-12 07:17am
|
Reply
17
|
Martha's Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
from otoh:
Thanks for pointing this site out - a new one to me so although no longer updating, I'll definitely add it to my list - pinup girls, and other retro-themed smut is very much my thing!
|
10-28-12 12:54am
|
Reply
18
|
Martha's Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Now, I did not know that Martha's Girls covered such a wide area of content. That did not come across to me from the tour.
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-27-12 03:28pm
|
Reply
19
|
Martha's Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
from Capn:
I took another look, prompted by your comment, TS.
A few years back I visited & was generally impressed by the tour presentation, but did not join, so I don't really know what the composition of the member area was. Interesting as it was, it really failed to tell you much about the actual content supplied.
If you like the idea of this site, which I do too, you may find pinupwow floats your boat.
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-27-12 03:24am
|
Reply
20
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from jberryl69:
(Toadsith's Reply)
As I mentioned to Graymane recently, my motivation for porn and masturbation has waned somewhat this past month. I have pills for it but even that didn't help my head - got the woody but not the eroticism needed to push me over the edge. And for some reason it doesn't bother me all that much. I figure there is always tomorrow. I can't totally blame it on ED since I've got other physical issues which I find at best distracting (and sometimes painful). But then, isn't that life?
|
10-25-12 08:42pm
|
Reply
21
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from jberryl69:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Sorry Toadsith, I am by nature sarcastic but it wasn't a dismissal as much as I wanted him to expound as you have done. So if you read this GPL, I apologize if you were offended by my one word question.
As far as your marginally good, sometime around 1950 my tonsils grew back and the medical remedy at that time was to zap them with massive dosages of X-rays. Opps - turns out that treatment is highly carcinogenic.
DISCLAIMER: I have no objections to masturbation by either sex, either manually or with an instrument of choice. I, in fact, do so even with my ED (frustrating), so please lets everyone whack away - it might even be good for you.
|
10-25-12 01:43pm
|
Reply
22
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from Cybertoad:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Id agree, besides why not? I mean if I had any questions or hangups about this gender question. Go hang out and get to know a person.
One being Transvestite / Pre-Op Transgender does make them a leper.
The are just different then me.
|
10-25-12 01:09pm
|
Reply
23
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from gaypornolover:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Indeed! Well it brought a whole new outlook on life to me! Though one of the gentlemen made a very improper suggestion which would have simply ruined my beautiful makeup!
|
10-25-12 08:37am
|
Reply
24
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from jberryl69:
(Toadsith's Reply)
No offense intended, but "need" is a pretty definitive word, your cited "study" notwithstanding. I'm sure Congressman Akin could find a "study" which cites that women don't get pregnant from rape. Or that drinking too much water causes cancer.
And what I got most from the article was that it's okay to whack off and there were things to learn from it that can play a role in your sex life.
It's just that masturbation is a pleasure act, not a medical act. In fact, a man's orgasm is not the same as his ejaculation. Though you cannot have an ejaculation without an orgasm, it is possible to have an orgasm without the ejaculation.
And no physician I have ever talked to has told me I need to ejaculate ever X days (or hours or anything) for the health of my body. Yes it feels good and like everyone else I like to spill the seed, but "need"?
|
10-25-12 05:26am
|
Reply
25
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#27
from Drooler:
(Toadsith's Reply)
It's pronounced with the "oo" of "good," not that of "moon," though the second one does sound cuter.
|
10-20-12 02:52pm
|
