| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
Nikki Benz
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from roseman:
(Toadsith's Reply)
lol, something like that.
I am one of Nikki's biggest fans.
|
09-11-08 03:09pm
|
Reply
202
|
Pissing Stars
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from badandy400:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Not a bad call. Hopefully in time they will be worth more attention. Glad I could help! :)
|
04-07-08 08:34pm
|
Reply
203
|
Pissing Stars
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from badandy400:
(Toadsith's Reply)
The dimensions are 720x540 for the 1024 kbps, but they do not look as good as ALS for example at that same resolution. They look more like zoomed in 320x240.
There only a view models, hell there is only like 10 videos! A few of them look okay, others are not as good. I have seen much better looking. Also worth mentioning, they do not speak English, i dont know if that would bother you or not.
A few of the videos have girl on girl peeing. These parts can be fairly hot actually. However, they are not long enough. They also have girls pissing on guys, guys pissing on them....well one guy, and he is ugly! They also have girls peeing in a glass and drinking it. They do not always swallow it when it is someone else's, but they pretty much always swallow their own.
Personally I think this site needs to drop the price and do a lot of growing. They do not have a lot, but what they do have is not bad at all.
Hope this helps.
|
04-07-08 08:19pm
|
Reply
204
|
Porn Pass For All
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
from Denner:
Well, you can't always be sure what sites you get - been there a couple of times and it's like one big lotto...
jd1961 just reviewed the Sophie Moone-site - and here's his reply to my repeated question:
REPLY TO #1 - Denner :
Yes I do get access to other sites Denner. It's one of those progessive deals---you get the bad sites right away, and the longer you stay (and pay) you get progressively better sites.
I didn't think this was even worth mentioning, so I didn't.
........
That's ONE thing about this pass or 21 sextury - the other is the lack of quality in their videos - 1ByDay has outrunned these guys there...
Finally: 21 Sextury seems to be lacking new models - too much reuse.
|
04-30-08 12:43pm
|
Reply
205
|
Porn Pass For All
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from apoctom:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Thanks for the time and effort. I really appreciate it.
|
12-20-07 12:39pm
|
Reply
206
|
Porn Pass For All
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
from apoctom:
Thanks for the info. Could you list some of the sites that are $24.99 from the beginning? Thanks.
|
12-19-07 05:13pm
|
Reply
207
|
Porn Pass For All
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
from doughboy:
You make some great points. Thanks for sharing
|
12-16-07 01:33pm
|
Reply
208
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply from Toadsith:
Btw, I just wanted to note, in message #4, I meant to say "they aren't jutting out..."
Also, more points about their site design, they have in fact just completely redesigned the site. I'm sort of mixed about it - it is easier to browse a scene, but a little more difficult to browse for a model after finding her in a scene. Still, these folks obviously care about the site design quite a bit, that is why the advertising really boggles me.
|
01-13-09 09:03pm
|
Reply
209
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Review
from Wittyguy:
I was trolling for new sites to hit and found that 18yearsold (part of the network) is available along with 5 other sites for $18 on a TBP offer. The TBP stats say there are no hi rez pics so I was wondering if the hi rez pics you noted apply throughout the site (including 18yearsold) or just on some sites and roughly how far back in time the high rez pics go back to. Thanks.
|
01-13-09 03:24pm
|
Reply
210
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Review
from jd1961:
This site seems to be obtaining sites from other companies and improving on them.
|
11-28-08 05:13am
|
Reply
211
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Tree Rodent:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Yeah I have to say it's the sound of those ads which I think would annoy me the most. I'm figuring if I'm paying for something, I don't want to have a ton of annoying ads in there. That would really piss me off, and give the impression of a really cheap and nasty site run by cheap and nasty people.
|
11-26-08 09:30am
|
Reply
212
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Review
from Tree Rodent:
Great review. The positives make me want to check the site out, but the negatives sound so annoying it makes me want to not waste my money.
|
11-26-08 07:16am
|
Reply
213
|
POV Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Wittyguy:
(Toadsith's Reply)
This guy's excuses really do take the cake. I only had limited space in my review but this guy also came up with the lines that his support guy in charge of updates was trapped in a snowstorm in Canada; that a hosting service took him for $30,0000 and abandoned him; and, a month or two later, had the audacity to claim that all the problems were now fixed. All I can say is that his ego seems a lot bigger and better than his site.
|
04-21-08 07:52pm
|
Reply
214
|
Real Wife Stories
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from roseman:
(Toadsith's Reply)
;-) content is very interesting.
|
09-20-08 02:45am
|
Reply
215
|
Real Wife Stories
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from roseman:
(Toadsith's Reply)
lol, dunno about you, but I am downloading few files from upskirttimes.com and upskirtmania.org, will add a review soon of those two as soon as I find some free time.
|
09-20-08 01:53am
|
Reply
216
|
Real Wife Stories
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from roseman:
(Toadsith's Reply)
One sure thing is that Brazzers Network definitely need new blood and more natural breasts models.
|
09-20-08 01:44am
|
Reply
217
|
Real Wife Stories
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from roseman:
(Toadsith's Reply)
hahahahaha, I got your point.
But BTW I don't think that Brazzers seperate models as natural or as fake '' implants '' (as you named it).
|
09-20-08 01:05am
|
Reply
218
|
Real Wife Stories
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Review
from roseman:
Helpful review,
according to one of your cons: '' Most models fit the classic porn star look (84% silicon implants and 44% blondes), not much variation '' I am a bit confused honestly.
Statistics is a very useful science but I never seen a connection with porn.
How did you count that 84% of site's models implants are silicon?
|
09-19-08 09:51pm
|
Reply
219
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Cybertoad:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Thanks for the heads up on that.
I am not a huge photo guy only have about 27,000 photos but still be nice to see what I could downloads files being so small on photos wonder why they do that.
Its a good site just a couple small annoyances. The price though is pretty darn cool.
|
11-04-16 12:30pm
|
Reply
220
|
Rocco Siffredi European
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from exotics4me:
(Toadsith's Reply)
I have heard this from others about Rocco as well. Most of the stuff I had seen with him, he was this overly passionate, kissing type. My wife doesn't go for most hardcore because of the rough play, but she had liked several of the older Rocco videos we got on the porn access network, they have a site on their network that is only older Rocco content. I had seen some newer content of him a few months back where the rougher side was showing, but thought since this is a Rocco solo site that it would have more of those less rough ones.
On the Bi part, the problem I have there is that the previews have nothing about Bi content, I'm also Italian, but not really into Bi content. I really didn't know much about him and his older stuff. I think the first thing I remember seeing with him was a movie review in Hustler back in the 90s, and I remember in it, seems like the woman was Tory something and they were kissing in it, so I guess I just hadn't been exposed to much of his material.
I did know though that he had some content with trannies. I didn't know that Nacho was that bad either! All I have seen of him is on the New Sensations site. Last, I think it was the video quality that frustrated me more than anything in the end. For that price, it should have been much better.
|
05-05-08 11:01pm
|
Reply
221
|
Rocco Siffredi European
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from JBDICK:
(Toadsith's Reply)
I just did a quick tally and it seems that there are approx 10 films per page and 15 pages, and approx 5 scenes per movie that works out at approx 750 scenes. Subject to the quality, and assuming an average of 250 MB per scene that works out to be approx 190GB.
There are some POV, 5 i think and 3 extras...
Now if the quality is good then this is worth it. what would be nice is to get him linked in with his old friend buttman...
now that would be a unique network arrangement
|
04-21-08 02:20pm
|
Reply
222
|
Rodney Moore
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Review
from jd1961:
Thanks. At least he allows downloads now. Mov files can be downloaded if you are willing to purchase Quicktime Pro, but that would be an added expense on top of the monthly fee here.
|
03-06-08 02:35am
|
Reply
223
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from badandy400:
(Toadsith's Reply)
WOW!!! That is amazing. I have been thinking the same thing! At least it could browse the site and download the zips and the videos for you. But ever notice how so photo sets have high and low def? Or a site that uses .wmv and then a few scenes are only in .mpg for example. Or the fact that I spend a great deal of time renaming the zips or videos because the webmaster was too lazy and named them all 1,2,3.... AIs are not hard to teach, simply have it watch you as you do your normal thing, and they pick up on what you do.
Any one who can come up with an AI that does these things for you could become a very rich person, be loved by the porn users and hated by the webmasters!
And yes! I want it all! The reason I like that is because I have spent a great deal of time downloading from a 100 MBit LAN connection. So, there are times when the connection can out run me! Batch downloading is handy for smaller files since I can queue up a 1000 files in a matter of minutes. I can sort through them when I get home. It is actually more efficient this way since I can not spend all day on this network. It was not uncommon for me to download 18 GB per hour there, and that can be hard to queue up when the files are only 20 MB a piece!
|
03-18-08 10:52pm
|
Reply
224
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from badandy400:
(Toadsith's Reply)
Indeed! If you want to try out IDM you can get it at downloads.com. They give a 30 day trial I believe, and it is 30 or 35 bucks to buy, but i have definitely got my money's worth out of it. It also allows for atch downloading if you know a pattern to the URLs. Teendreams is a prime example of this. I just copied a link in the the batch and told it which characters were variables and the range, and bam! with in seconds I had queued up 90% of their site. It also allows for multiply download queues and other things. The only negative I can think of is if you go to myspace.com it will beat the shit out of you because it auto-graps the mp3s people have on those pages. But this is good because it also graps the streaming videos :) But all this can be turned off. Porn is more important than myspace anyway!
|
03-18-08 10:23pm
|
Reply
225
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from badandy400:
(Toadsith's Reply)
I just tried to download the latest video form them with Download Them All, it would not allow me to pause the download, it would only allow me to cancel it. If you use Internet Download Manager you integrate the manager into Firefox or whatever internet browser you would be using and it work perfectly with site with the goofy letter picture sign in pages that so may people are using know. Aaron's Web Vacuum and Web Cow will not work on these site which can be annoying. IDM allows you to manually log the manager in if you want to run a total site download as well. I guess this is all personal preference and whether or not you want to pay for a manager. You get what yo pay for usually.
But to give Download Them All credit, it is the only manager I have found so far that can get into Playboy's stuff. But the manager can not filter based on size, so you end up downloading both sizes of the same image.
|
03-18-08 08:31pm
|
