| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Review
from williamj:
I agree with cons. The very older videos are poor. But the overall newer content going back two years is very good. It’s worth a peek if you want to see girls getting fucked silly with machines. They do get fuck good and hard. Enjoyable site overall. Worth a one month peek. Their previews tell pretty much what to expect.
|
05-25-10 09:19pm
|
Reply
27
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Review
from RagingBuddhist:
Thanks for the review - this is a site I'd had on the back burner for a long time. I saw the name in the list of new reviews, liked what you had to say about it and now it's a soon-to-join site
|
05-25-10 03:24pm
|
Reply
28
|
The Upper Floor
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(mr smut's Reply)
Thanks. I'll be patient and wait for the review. Are you going to review device bondage as well?
|
05-23-10 06:21pm
|
Reply
29
|
The Upper Floor
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Comment
from pat362:
Are you goingf to do a review of the site. I'm kind of curious about this site but the preview is very vague about what you get.
|
05-23-10 11:22am
|
Reply
30
|
All Over 30
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Review
from messmer:
I definitely agree with the score, this site is the best of the three mature sites mentioned by GCode. My only beef is that there are not enough updates under the "Lacey Ladies" niche. Today's update with Erin L and Andie is an exception more than the rule and made my day. BTW, I also like their new rating system for the individual sets and videos.
|
04-02-10 09:27am
|
Reply
31
|
All Over 30
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(mr smut's Reply)
Mr. Smut wrote:
Here's a quote from a new model at AllOver30 :-)
"I am an exhibitionist and my day job requires me to look prim and proper all day but i sometime rebel and dont wear knickers under my work clothes that keeps me feeling randy all day."
My response to the model: "But .. but .. darling, we'd love to see knickers under your clothes and then watch you take them off slowly. You may be excited about being so daring but some of us like you fully wrapped and then have you gradually reveal yourself."
I always feel badly that "Village Ladies" is such a gawd-awful site when it comes to quality. The models are often too plain, the pictures are too small and outdated, I'm not sure if they have videos, but their emphasis on featuring ordinary woman dressed in ordinary clothes (complete with some old fashioned ordinary undies) push my buttons every time. How I dream of a site that contains High Res pictures and videos along those lines!
|
01-04-10 03:49pm
|
Reply
32
|
Zoe Fuck Puppet
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Comment
from Capn:
As soon as I see any regional pricing shit, I'm gone.
For good.
Cap'n. :0E
|
01-03-10 03:20am
|
Reply
33
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Nick C:
(mr smut's Reply)
Hey Guys, All sets with 1000px will be updated with the larger sizes as soon as I get the hardrive delivered (its currently stuck at UK customs with some issues!) - Thanks for your support!
|
12-29-09 06:47am
|
Reply
34
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from turboshaft:
(mr smut's Reply)
Thanks, mr smut.
Clearly Alex knows this is new ground for ALS and thus the "fair warning" comment. As much as I don't want to see boy-girl shit on their site they make it up with the no more lollipop promise. Hooray! They have left the candy store! No more lollipops for 2010 (though the sex toy stores will still get their business apparently). I wonder if any other site would have the guts to say goodbye to their lollipop fetishes. I sort of liked the strap-on scenes ALS did so I don't care too much whether they keep them or not, but I always hated the damn lollipops so this is good news.
|
12-28-09 02:31pm
|
Reply
35
|
Day Dreams.eu
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Khan:
(mr smut's Reply)
Yes, we did notice two brand new users creared acct's to rave about this little site. We're keeping an eye on it for now.
|
12-28-09 07:50am
|
Reply
36
|
Day Dreams.eu
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(mr smut's Reply)
Hi Smut
Yes, your're right about Khan - guess he's going to enjoy dealing with this, anyway....do not know if it stinks - but something like that...
Cheers, bro!
|
12-28-09 07:34am
|
Reply
37
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Comment
from turboshaft:
I just saw this the other day when I was checking around their tour pages. I was thinking of rejoining but now I don't know--I find all this BTS shit to get irritating, plus the last thing I want to see on ALS is boy-girl material. I always trusted them to be reliably boner-free, but now I have to look somewhere else.
Did Alex say anything in his blog about why they are putting this on their site? On the preview page for the release they said "Trust me, you don't want to miss this one of a kind treat!" but I bet there are more than a few members who could care less. It seems that by now they would have more than enough of their own material to not have any reason to post this stuff from a Club Sandy shoot.
|
12-27-09 08:35pm
|
Reply
38
|
Anilos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from messmer:
(mr smut's Reply)
Can't go wrong with Anilos, smut. One of my favorite sites even though it's relatively young.
|
12-16-09 02:11pm
|
Reply
39
|
Anilos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from GCode:
(mr smut's Reply)
I'm glad you found Messmer and I's review useful in making a decision to join a site that I'm sure you will enjoy as a fellow PU who enjoys mature content. Can't wait to see your thoughts on the site as well!
|
12-13-09 06:18pm
|
Reply
40
|
40 Something Mag
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(mr smut's Reply)
If they don't want to change I think it would be more tolerable if they shifted the watermark to the bottom right, at least that way they wouldn't get into the model's face and hair. BTW, Andie is one of my favorites as well. I have quite a few sets of hers from various mature sites. :-)
|
12-13-09 09:22am
|
Reply
41
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from messmer:
(mr smut's Reply)
Hi, mr. smut, for me the divide is at the age of fifty. Before that they are MILFS after that they are G(rannies)ILFS. :-)
|
12-11-09 04:33pm
|
Reply
42
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Comment
from PinkPanther:
It's far from my fave ALS Scan material (that would be their Caribbean trip stuff), but I love Tanner and she looks great here. I'm glad that they are doing more different stuff and it's fun to get a BTS of a glamour-porn site shoot (Tanner's doing a shoot for ClubSandy.com in this scene).
|
12-09-09 09:28pm
|
Reply
43
|
Humiliation POV
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from submale2:
(mr smut's Reply)
Not speaking the truth with regards to what?
|
12-05-09 02:20pm
|
Reply
44
|
Humiliation POV
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from micdy:
(mr smut's Reply)
i see, you don't like my review, it's your opinion and i respect it, but i did my best to make a good one...
maybe you just don't like my writing skill?
well, my first language is french and it's dificult for me to express myself in english.
i really like this website and wanted to make a positive review, that's all. oh, yes, maybe i'm not a pro at making review, but i wanted to post one! maybe , with some practice i'll become better?
i do not understand why you attempt to demolish the opinion of others?
|
12-04-09 11:18pm
|
Reply
45
|
Humiliation POV
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from submale2:
(mr smut's Reply)
Interesting commentary smut, and one that unfortunately for you is particularly revealing. What strikes me as a joke, is that you find utility in reviewing a review on pornusers.com. On a friday night.
Perhaps you fancy yourself as the gatekeeper who identifies the standard by which reviews need live up to- to that end i suggest you are taking your "role" far too seriously. But.... The alternative conclusion is that you are just a loser with nothing better to do.
"cheers"
|
12-04-09 11:03pm
|
Reply
46
|
Aunt Judy's
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(mr smut's Reply)
Probably not then. :0)
If they are giving you good value that has to be a plus. :0)
|
12-03-09 02:08pm
|
Reply
47
|
Aunt Judy's
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Comment
from Capn:
If that is anything like their simply awful Archive site I would certainly give it a miss.
The Archive site is like stepping back to 1995 ;0/
|
12-03-09 01:36pm
|
Reply
48
|
Lusty Grandmas
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Review
from uscue:
Looking through the preview I see a lot of g/g scenes. Can you estimate about what percentage of the content is b/g?
|
12-03-09 09:53am
|
Reply
49
|
All Over 30
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Review
from GCode:
mehh, I find the rate of finding daily updates a burden for mature sites with this site as no exception. The true 'mature' niche calls for a discrepancy amongst models and the need to update daily has put a damper on this site. With that said, this is true for the other two 'big' sites of the niche, anilos and karups mature women. As stated before amongst other convos in the forums and replies, I do see the 'plus' of daily updates for most users. However, in a niche like this where models appear to be scarce, in my opinion; the update scheme dampers the content. Don't get me wrong, I have reviewed and agreed that this site is superior in its niche but the need for such quick updates seems to create poor material in my opinion. This includes model selection and actual scene footage. I just wish that this niche would not want to update so damn quick and focus on good, quality mature models that are not only great looking but stay true to the niche. This meaning, as a member, I found a lot of these models here to be a bit unattractive. I do not believe these models are bad looking to age but I can imagine them not even be attractive while they were in their younger years. Why? because the need to update so quickly and not discriminate.
Anyways, I feel I'm ranting a bit and I want to aknowledge that this review is well founded. I can totally see why the score is as high as you gave it but I just felt as a member that the model selection could be a bit more regulated. Thanks for the review and believe me, I am a lover of mature content as well!
|
11-30-09 11:26pm
|
Reply
50
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Comment
from pat362:
Hi smut.
I've been a member of lez cuties a couple of times.
I was not disapointed. You will notice that there ones were last year and before. The most recent was such a low score that it skews the overall rating. This is a good lesbian site, but be warned that anal is the main theme. Another important thing is that in the past you did not know which site you got access with your membership. This is something that has been available only in the last year or two.
|
11-29-09 06:05pm
|
