| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
226
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#27
from asmith12:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
48" is way too large to fit into my laptop, so I don't think I'll have one, EVER :-). And also there are several other issues related to 4000px today, see my reply to turboshaft.
|
05-29-09 11:57pm
|
Reply
227
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from nunya:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I was not comparing Videobox with any other site,and yes,I do have issues with some of the content-as a member I feel as if I have some room to comment on that.And frankly,if a review is not a place for opinions then I am at a loss.
|
05-29-09 07:14pm
|
Reply
228
|
Glossy Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from Drooler:
I click "Instant Access" and then immediately noticed that it said it was for "Beauty and the Senior"! Glossy Angels and Crotchety Farts! Yikes! Wrong turn!
|
05-29-09 01:28pm
|
Reply
229
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from james4096:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
yes. It's so simple to do. It's 2009 and everybody has broadband. Give us hi res photos.
|
05-29-09 12:55am
|
Reply
230
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Drooler:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Here, here! Well said! Bigger pics are probably the EASIEST thing a site could do.
But noooooooooo! And you get this, "Why would anyone want pictures that are bigger than the screen?" (Answer: Details, for one thing.)
Reminds me of Bill Gates being quoted as saying that 640K is more memory than anyone would ever need.
|
05-28-09 12:41pm
|
Reply
231
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Drooler:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
OK, pal, smell this! I managed to look up a few titles I'd come up with. Mostly puns, some from song titles.
BTW I don't have an organization issue because I do it by model name --> source --> name of video or gallery. It's the last piece there that gets the treatment every long once in a while. Some titles just need ... help!
AtmosphREAR, Balcony Bonerooni, Beach Blanket Boingo. Bone Jour Happiness is a Warm Bum, If You Want It REAR It Is, In the Bone Zone, My Shroom Needs a Room, Out REAR in the Fields, PanoRAMic, Rear Dear, Sexy CarREAR Moves, Simply MarbleASS, So Funny Couch Bunny, Splatty Lay in the Park, Summer Sleaze, This Bums for You
Just a little humor there, for what it's worth. Maybe it will cheer up some of you miserable buggers, and maybe it won't. Either way, don't blame me.
|
05-22-09 03:59pm
|
Reply
232
|
Fully Clothed Sex
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from asmith12:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
> Thanks for the technical specs too (sorry if I was giving you a hard time in the forum about that stuff). 05-21-09 12:22pm
As you see, I don't mind providing SOME technical details (though don't expect me to make ALL details from your cheatsheet - I'm too lazy for it :-)). On the other hand, I'm sure that it is MUCH MORE important to provide information like types of actions involved or subjective feelings about the technical stuff (like "pictures are 1024, but VERY clear" or "HD vids are 3MBit/s, but blurry").
|
05-21-09 10:14pm
|
Reply
233
|
Party Hardcore
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from asmith12:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Thanks :-).
|
05-20-09 09:17pm
|
Reply
234
|
My XXX Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from wiild1:
good review, thanks! I will try the trial...next weekend, to get full value: 1 dollar for 3 days of downloading hardcore porn, good deal! :-)
|
05-17-09 03:12am
|
Reply
235
|
iPink Visual Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from Drooler:
Your comment reminds me of how much things have been scaled down and accepted as such. It parallels with music and sound. I grew up in the "loud 'n proud" '70's, and if your stereo didn't kick ass, it became an object of some derision.
I know two people who have recently bought PCs with attachable speakers that are so weak I wonder, well, why? And to think I felt embarrassed about my own small ones I got 10 years ago. At least they have some wattage to them.
|
05-17-09 01:04am
|
Reply
236
|
iPink Visual Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from atrapat:
I just checked the tutorial on their site (reachable from the Support page) and it looks they have made an effort to optimize the layout for the iPhone. I don't see the point in watching porn over such a small screen either but iPhone has a 480x320 resolution already and I've enjoyed sites that have videos at that maximum resolution; if someone wants to grab some quick porn this site doesn't seem so bad. I like some of the Pink Visual content, anyway.
For completeness, here's the forum thread you mentioned:
https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...ad.html?threadid=520
|
05-15-09 11:41pm
|
Reply
237
|
My XXX Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from Drooler:
A dollar for some doggy-style? Deal!
They've really changed. Used to be very much American girls; now they've gone Euro a lot with stuff produced there. Nice to see Lucy Lee, the Czech darling, back again. She's the kind of girl it's easy to form an attachment to.
But I don't like the sites as much as I used to. I miss the American girls doing the "belly-down flat." They did have a nice one of Kina Kai in that position (1000 Facials). She's scrumptious.
|
05-15-09 05:22pm
|
Reply
238
|
My XXX Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from mbaya:
Very nice review. For only $1 it sounds interesting.
|
05-14-09 06:26pm
|
Reply
239
|
Club Red Light
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from wiild1:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
The newer sets I downloaded had good quality: around 800kb/pic, the older were only 150kb/pic, but still better than Brazzers and Realitykings.com which are my benchmarks.
The zips did only contain 100-200pics though, much less than what I am used to.
Don't know exactly how many sets there are but less than Brazzers etc.
But hey, the trial is only 2bucks so try it and then cancel as I did!?
|
05-14-09 11:59am
|
Reply
240
|
Virtual 3D Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from GCode:
After reading your comments and visiting the site, I have to be honest that I am quite impressed with the animation. They have all sorts of strange fetish things going on (I saw an alien probbing a girl). I am a lover of anime and I do see the resemblance. Thanks for bringing this place up, I actually bookmarked it and am a bit interested for a month.
|
05-14-09 11:58am
|
Reply
241
|
Virtual 3D Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from lk2fireone:
I'm not a member, but from looking at the preview, the girls look yummy, not like cartoons at all. Almost, but not quite, as good as the real thing.
The guys look huge or large and threatening. But even the guys are smooth-shaven. What happened to the traditional "big, hairy monster" type? Or did that fade away back in the 1960s with the era of the bikers?
Did you notice, they even have gorgeous she-males? Yikes.
|
05-14-09 05:02am
|
Reply
242
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mediafan:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
agreed 100%, they should have just added the site to Brazzers sites, and I would think they would have a lot more sign ups. Maybe someone at Brazzers had a second party who was the co owner and wanted his own site? Who knows, but who ever is in charge at MOFOS should be FIRED, if I did that at my job you better believe I would have been let go after the first few mistakes and they would have hired someone more dependable.
|
05-06-09 02:23am
|
Reply
243
|
Lietuva Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
My score is higher than I what I felt about the videos alone. I liked the photos and their presentation enoough to raise my score by 5 to 10 points. If I get flack, so be it. I write what I honestly feel without any animosity towards the webmaster or anyone else.
I feel a responsibility to be fair with what I see regarding sites.
|
04-30-09 03:47pm
|
Reply
244
|
Playboy's CyberClub
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Jeffrey99:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I never have had any problem cancelling online. Once you log in, you can go to member services and it'll give you a list of all active & cancelled services and you can cancel from there. And so far, I see no difference between the free month and the access I had before when I was a member.
|
04-28-09 06:13pm
|
Reply
245
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from badandy400:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Had not thought of that. I wounder if bubble printed image of nude women would sell well with blind people. This way they could feel the picture, hell I would like that myself.
|
04-24-09 10:39pm
|
Reply
246
|
Humiliatrix
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from billyinc1:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Well my friend 100 implies that everything is Perfect there is no such thing in my opinion. Even if I do not see anything myself someone might and who knows I might agree with them on the point they brought up.
|
04-22-09 12:59pm
|
Reply
247
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Balibalo:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I guess 1By-Day is now updated once a day to bankroll the new ddf site EuroTeenErotica.
|
04-16-09 01:44pm
|
Reply
248
|
Secret Virgin
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
The first reply to nygiants review is from me; I just re-read it. The girl shown as "most recent" is "Shanty" (aka Bonni, Cindy, Jessika, Nika, Niki depending on the site), that thin Russian brunette. It WAS the last update near the end of 2007, and it is the last update currently, regardless of what dates they show.
I think they just have script running that keeps changing the dates.
|
04-16-09 12:01pm
|
Reply
249
|
Secret Virgin
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from Drooler:
I took a look at the updates. The dates keep changing, but the content hasn't. The most recent one is always of the same girl -- that thin Russian brunette you can see at AvErotica, Rigin Studio, Nuilbes, etc. as well -- albeit with different names.
|
04-15-09 01:04pm
|
Reply
250
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from GCode:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Hmm, I took this as just women in general. However, I have to agree with you about in porn. Less talking = better. The worse is the camera man asking questions during a shoot but not before or after the shoot and the model has to stop being in to the scene and answer some stupid shit like, "oh, does that feel good?".
|
04-10-09 03:43pm
|
