| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
251
|
Just Teens Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Twotails:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I'm now having a close look into TeenMegaWorld. Of course, I found some of the same models there (some are in many sites), but not one set is on both. So my supposition of exclusiveness is confirmed.
About quality I've written a comment in the TMW page. JustTeensPorn delivers the same video quality (throughout HD720) but ways better photo quality.
|
07-28-14 02:45am
|
Reply
252
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from anyonebutme:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Yes, you're right, used to be more exclusive in the past, not quite as exclusive anymore.
|
10-13-11 09:53pm
|
Reply
253
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from hardog:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
http://www.pcreview.co.uk/forums/thread-2979331.php
http://www.sophos.com/security/threat-sp...otlight.html#threat2
http://www.softpedia.com/get/Security/Se...eBinder.shtmlhttp://
Karups first reply was "just had a couple guys in the office scan using malwarebytes and Avira Anti virus and we got nothing found in those 3 images."
Second reply was, "We absolutely do not put keylogger programs into your images or zips. That said I am sending your finds onto our tech department to make sure that nothing has been compromised on our side. I just loaded up those images you mentioned, as well as the zip file for them and my scanner did not report anything back.
I will let you know when I hear back."
_______
Apparently the technology to embed malware in zip files, jpgs, pdf, xls, etc has been available for some time now...
:(
|
11-08-10 06:19pm
|
Reply
254
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from badandy400:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Let me know if you have nay questions about them, or many of the others on this forum could answer many of your questions. Once you start using them you will wonder how you every got by with out them, they make life so much easier, plus you will download more, faster!
|
04-04-08 09:44am
|
Reply
255
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from badandy400:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Well there is a lot of things to choose from. It really would depend on if you are willing o pay for a program or want a freebie. My thinking is that if you are willing to pay $30 for a website you better be willing to pay that for a manager to download it. Also, it is sites like Karups that the managers are extremely useful, they can save you a lot of time and the need to babysit the computer while you are downloading. I let mine run 24/7 now! Using a manager it is possible for me download about 1 TB per month on a 3 MBit/s internet connection since they keep the downloads going all the time without me needing to be there.
What it breaks down to is personal preference. Go to download.com and look for a download manager. Try a few of them out, most let you try them out for free for a few weeks. Some will download and reconstruct entire website, scan for certain file types (videos, zips, etc.) and accelerate downloads by splitting downloads into several connects. Personal I use Internet Download Manager which has a free trial. I like it because it can schedule downloads. For example I am downloading from Bang Bros right now. It has been running with me watching it for more than a day, and downloading 4 videos at a time. When one is done it begins the next. I usually manually queue my downloads so that i get everything and do not end up missing things or downloading the same video twice. Some sites can be queued up in a matter of minutes, others take hours by manually grabbing the links, or I can let the program do all the work.
Keep in mind though that the managers are not intelligent. They will only do what you tell them to do. If you say download all the WMVs that is exactly what it will do. It will grab the full video and the chunks. Or can say all WMVs larger than say 300 MB, but if a video you want is 299.99 MB it will skip over it. So, they have their ups and downs. Another plus though is that most will allow you to pause the downloads and resume them later on, even days later.
If you have any specific questions please let me know. I would be glad to try to answer! :) Good luck!
|
04-01-08 04:52pm
|
Reply
256
|
Kavya Sharma
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
This needs to be deleted.
|
04-24-19 11:55am
|
Reply
257
|
Leg Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from Khan:
I aksed our editors and here's what they said ...
Our update of 12/27 shows that they've eliminated the trial option, so you wouldn't be able to get a trial membership anyway now. However, our notes from when a trial was offered indicate that "Trial membership allows access to the first four clips of the most recent 'showing' video and the first page of model photos."
So if you had been able to get a trial, only the first page of model photos would have been available.
Hope that helps
|
12-28-08 06:35am
|
Reply
258
|
Lietuva Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
My score is higher than I what I felt about the videos alone. I liked the photos and their presentation enoough to raise my score by 5 to 10 points. If I get flack, so be it. I write what I honestly feel without any animosity towards the webmaster or anyone else.
I feel a responsibility to be fair with what I see regarding sites.
|
04-30-09 03:47pm
|
Reply
259
|
Lifetime Anal Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from apoctom:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I basically came to the same conclusion. I'm sticking with more reputable companies, too.
|
10-17-08 07:43am
|
Reply
260
|
Lolly Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from mr jam:
Some good advice by lk2fireone to sign up via teen mega world for $19.95. However like you Wittguy i signed up for the $1.00 trial on lolly hardcore because it said full trial on pornusers. Couldn't get any access to the videos whatsoever. Just had links to upgrade to full price for lolly hardcore (which was $29.95, $10 more than teen mega world and the same group of sites). It was only $1.00 and is obviously an admin error (be it PU or the company who owns the web site) but that small error just put me off continuing my membership. shame.
|
04-25-11 08:17am
|
Reply
261
|
Lolly Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Lolly is a cute girl.
But last update to the site was apparently 2010-08-20.
And like you wrote, it's cheaper to get this site by joining one of the other network sites. I'm a member of Teen Mega World for $19.95/month, which includes full access to the Lolly site and over 20 other sites (with the PU discount).
Joining through Lolly Hardcore directly costs $29.95.
|
04-04-11 03:11pm
|
Reply
262
|
Mature Mega Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Jutti24:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
It *is* pricy.
I guess if the dollar improves again the price might drop again.
Though they do have a huge amount of content.
I can't comment on the two websites you mentioned as I haven't tried them yet.
|
02-10-09 05:03am
|
Reply
263
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from asmith12:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Good comparison with Playboy, but you know, Playboy IMHO wins this comparison hands down. For me, Playboy models feel SO MUCH more "alive" then MetArts' "dead fish" ones.
|
08-18-09 05:02am
|
Reply
264
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from littlejoe:
great site, thx for the link!
|
02-07-09 01:13pm
|
Reply
265
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from jd1961:
Same thing at thenude eu
|
01-03-09 01:16pm
|
Reply
266
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Does the TBP staff feel a lot of chagrin when these kind of price specials are pointed out? I haven't seen them express any.
Met Art's a great site - and this is a really nice one-month price. They just posted a new (to me anyway) pre-boob-job Nella set the other day - beautiful!
|
01-03-09 12:39pm
|
Reply
267
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from Drooler:
Wow. Now that got bookmarked. Hats off, m'man! NICE find!
|
01-03-09 12:51am
|
Reply
268
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from jd1961:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
They would have to use the same high quality girls for me to join.
|
12-06-08 05:57pm
|
Reply
269
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from hondaman:
Yeah I do agree before they had the bios for the models it really annoyed me. Now that they do I am suprised at how many are from the Ukraine that is funny to me because I used to go on "dates" with some of the Ukrainian girls that worked at my air base in Germany damn good times those where!
|
11-13-08 11:34pm
|
Reply
270
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from hondaman:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
yeah thanks. I have been a member of MET-ART since Jan. 2007 and always get annoyed when people ding them for stuff that isnt really relavent like the "lack of hardcore" of course MET-ART is not a hardcore site.
|
11-13-08 04:46pm
|
Reply
271
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from Denner:
Fine review, there...
Just my problem with this in many ways great site - the vids are far from the quality/erotica-feeling of the photosets.
And as a video-freak, it's too bad - because the photos are no less than GREAT.
BTW: Gave you a new trust....
|
05-30-08 05:27am
|
Reply
272
|
MILF Hunter
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Khan:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
FYI ... a spot check shows the newest pics to be 600x900 and 900x600
|
07-16-08 09:52am
|
Reply
273
|
Mobile Teens Like It Big
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from jd1961:
So you're saying that some porno companies are targeting kids as customers? I don't discount the notion, as you say, tobacco companies did that (remember candy cigarettes).
Your connection between internet porn and government invasion of privacy is something I've wondered about for years. Some people have said that the government is using child porn hysteria as a means of completely controlling the internet and those that use it.
So I agree that this all is probably not a good idea at this time.
|
06-05-09 12:41am
|
Reply
274
|
Mobile Teens Like It Big
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from badandy400:
I had not thought of the cell phone download legal age issues. I do agree though that cell porn will be a short lived fad. At least I hope it is!
|
06-04-09 11:19pm
|
Reply
275
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mediafan:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
agreed 100%, they should have just added the site to Brazzers sites, and I would think they would have a lot more sign ups. Maybe someone at Brazzers had a second party who was the co owner and wanted his own site? Who knows, but who ever is in charge at MOFOS should be FIRED, if I did that at my job you better believe I would have been let go after the first few mistakes and they would have hired someone more dependable.
|
05-06-09 02:23am
|
