| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
401
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from gaypornolover:
I HATE that, thanks for warning everyone. We've got to stop using sites that treat their customers so badly so we can raise standards across the industry. Porn consumers are like any other comsumer, we are paying customers and entitled to great service and respect, not to be ripped off!
Who handles their billing? I'd complain to them and demand a full refund on the basis you were misled. If enough people do that it might have an effect, as well as warnings like yours on sites like this!
|
09-19-11 04:43pm
|
Reply
402
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from elephant:
Thanks for the heads up on this one, yeah not a fan of sites that don't say clearly this isn't a full trial you can and only sampled content. If you piss people off they tend to not go back.
|
09-19-11 03:14pm
|
Reply
403
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from badandy400:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I was afraid that was the situation. I never liked that in the bast and it will make it much harder to know what has been downloaded previously and what is new. Oh well. Thank you both for the heads up.
I rename stuff on many sites, but at times it is not needed. Anymore I rename them as they are downloaded while the information is fresh, if I wait i will never remember what I wanted to name it! I have been using "D-System's Keyboard Remapper" for a while now and it greatly helps with this. It saves me a lot of typing, basically by pressing two keys I can copy the model's name and add to or overwrite the file the name of the site and the model name. This is godsend to being a very heavy downloader.I used it on every zip file from Nubiles and and every zip and video from Reality Kings.
|
07-27-08 08:15pm
|
Reply
404
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from Monahan:
Twistys has a third bonus site, Anette Dawn.com, which is not a clone.
Blue Fantasies is a very well populated site with tons of good stuff. Naughty Staff is a brand new site with excellent stuff, but not much of it yet.
Thus there are 3 clones and 3 separate content sites in addition to the mother lode called Twistys.
|
07-25-08 07:08pm
|
Reply
405
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from badandy400:
I have been wanting to know if the zip files are still named weird. I was a member there for a long time but ended over a year ago and have been wanting to rejoin. I never liked how stuff was named there because it was hard to tell exactly what it was after downloading.
|
07-25-08 06:05pm
|
Reply
406
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from TheRizzo:
Nice review, but I do think that a lot of the content from the past couple years is mainly exclusive content. I know the first few years of the site was based on licensed stuff though. Though a lot of the same girls are on other sites, I do believe the actual sets for a lot of the girls are exclusive to them.
Nice to know they have bonus sites now too, but that does kinda suck if they are pretty much clones.
|
07-25-08 05:54pm
|
Reply
407
|
Twistys Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from LPee23:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I'll check it out the next time I'm at Twistys. Someone once told me their older peeing shoots were amazing, so my curiosity is piqued. Also, I think all of Twistys' peeing shoots were pre-2007, including Justine Joli and Amber Michaels.
|
01-10-15 06:08pm
|
Reply
408
|
Twistys Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from LPee23:
"You need to upgrade to see all the older / oldest content they have." (Wittyguy)
Can you give more details on this please? I recently joined Twistys for two reasons - Justine Joli and Amber Michaels peeing. I found what I was looking for. I also heard that Twistys had more peeing content than this in the past, but I could not find it. Support blew off my request for help.
|
01-09-15 03:44pm
|
Reply
409
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from nunya:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I was not comparing Videobox with any other site,and yes,I do have issues with some of the content-as a member I feel as if I have some room to comment on that.And frankly,if a review is not a place for opinions then I am at a loss.
|
05-29-09 07:14pm
|
Reply
410
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from atrapat:
Let me friendly disagree on most of the content being years or decades old. There is a fair amount of 90s porn and you aren't getting the scenes the day after the studio releases the original DVD. But, looking at this last week updates alone, I saw more than a handful of DVDs released in 2007-2008 and just a couple of 90s porn. And I wouldn't mind if they had more than the current 15 Jeanna Fine scenes (she's listed in 400+ titles at iafd).
As further proof, if you look at the stars with the most scenes you find mainly still active performers (Trina Micahels, Jenna Haze, Tory Lane, etc). If you go to the bottom of the list, you will find models who started last year with some movies (Missy Stone and Stephanie Cane already have at least 4 each one and they currently have only 20-30 movies at iafd).
The site has flaws (for instance, adding the DVD production date and the name of the male performers to the movies would be a nice touch) and it certainly would be nice if they could add the promo stills companies usually shoot for their movies (Wicked Pictures and Vivid are a couple of examples of companies which I believe that offer a good amount of picture content). But, as it currently is, I believe I'm not the only one who feels it's a dream come true.
|
11-04-08 12:02pm
|
Reply
411
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from Drooler:
I'm also a pics guy. Fortunately for those of us who are, some good things have come through of even older (but still great) material. DDF and ALS Scan have been reissuing older sets in larger sizes and better quality. (Do wish they'd do that with ALS Angels, too, and I asked about it but didn't get an answer.) And TeenDreams has been releasing what has to be some earlier material of Mia Stone in over 2100 pixels, and it looks pretty good.
I really appreciate this from those sites.
|
11-04-08 01:26am
|
Reply
412
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Khan:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I see a post by him so I'm guessing he found the forum ok. Thanks for helping to point him in the right direction though.
|
08-04-08 06:08pm
|
Reply
413
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lurifax:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Thanks Wittyguy.
I do not spend much time in this club and am therefore not well versed in moving around.
Could you let me know how I reach "Sites that Charge More in Eur than US"?
|
08-04-08 02:15pm
|
Reply
414
|
Virtual 3D Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from GCode:
In light of the recent poll and my interest in this site from before, did you ever get around to joining this site and can you give me any details? If not, that's alright but I am quite interested in the site for something different.
|
07-23-09 09:28pm
|
Reply
415
|
Virtual 3D Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from GCode:
After reading your comments and visiting the site, I have to be honest that I am quite impressed with the animation. They have all sorts of strange fetish things going on (I saw an alien probbing a girl). I am a lover of anime and I do see the resemblance. Thanks for bringing this place up, I actually bookmarked it and am a bit interested for a month.
|
05-14-09 11:58am
|
Reply
416
|
Virtual 3D Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from lk2fireone:
I'm not a member, but from looking at the preview, the girls look yummy, not like cartoons at all. Almost, but not quite, as good as the real thing.
The guys look huge or large and threatening. But even the guys are smooth-shaven. What happened to the traditional "big, hairy monster" type? Or did that fade away back in the 1960s with the era of the bikers?
Did you notice, they even have gorgeous she-males? Yikes.
|
05-14-09 05:02am
|
Reply
417
|
Virtual Fem
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Yes, I have never been 'mainstream' in anything, really. :0)
To answer your question. Yes,the software still works after membership expires.
That custom request you mention, is probably viable as it stands at the moment.
As I said the webmaster takes on board member suggestions and requests.
Sure, there is room for improvement, there always is.
The video quality is pretty good now & the software is improving too.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-29-10 02:01pm
|
Reply
418
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Could be a case of people getting Viv Thomas and Viv Thomas Video mixed up. I don't remember Viv Thomas (that Met Art bought) having much hardcore on it, but Viv Thomas Video (that I don't think Met Art bought) having lots of hardcore on it. I joined Viv Thomas Video a few months ago to pick up some scenes I've lost or misplaced and it was "updating" with recycled videos from 6 years ago, but it did have a lot of hardcore still on it.
As for Viv Thomas that Met Art bought, it still has some hardcore, but it's a very small percentage (maybe 10%), so there is still some hardcore on it, but nothing like Viv Thomas Video had.
|
02-09-16 02:31pm
|
Reply
419
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from SelenaMetArt:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I just wanted to clarify that the site is not recycling old content.
I do agree that the VivThomas approach is more traditional hardcore than what is found on SexArt. :)
Otherwise, it's a matter of taste, and I love seeing users give feedback and assistance to other users!
|
07-31-13 12:42pm
|
Reply
420
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RLane:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Yes, it did help and thanks! I'll put this site on the bottom of my sign up list for now.
|
07-31-13 12:19pm
|
Reply
421
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from exotics4me:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Hey Wittyguy, I meant to reply back to this but got seriously caught in work and let a lot of replies pile up.
I didn't think you were picking on my score. I posted that thread mainly because a lot of members don't notice that I rarely rank a site very low unless it is terrible or a gimmick or rip-off.
I like to call my scoring system a curved one. Really bad porn pun there. Since I usually won't review a site that is below a 70, instead posting a comment to warn others, my ratings range between 70-100, so 85 is the middle. I know that Toadsith also talked about this. I had reviewed other things as well like he was talking with netflix. Mine usually pertain to weight lifting equipment, where we gave "dumbbells" as ratings, 1-5. So, the larger scoring scale gives me some problems.
Just wanted to clear that up so you didn't think I took it personally.
|
08-10-08 12:21am
|
Reply
422
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from exotics4me:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Hey Wittyguy,
I've found that the best place to find the full Viv sets are on Teen Dreams. I think I noted that in a reply to Drooler, a set that has Eve Angel and Mona Lisa, on Viv's site it has around 80 pictures in it, on Teen Dreams it has 220 or so. My understanding of that was that Viv considers his sets to have a flow to them. Meaning, you won't see nearly the same exact pose two or three times in the same set.
As for the scoring system. I probably should start a thread in the forum area about that, since we've had a lot of members that question scores. One thing I will note here is always check the reviewers average score. My average site that I've reviewed is 84.7, in comparison yours is 82.1 and Drooler's is 78.3. I generally rate sites higher and will, as I said, start a thread to discuss that since I have several trust ratings that say, "Trusted but his scores are too high". Be sure to check out the thread in the forum, maybe other members could also chime in about it.
|
07-21-08 01:18pm
|
Reply
423
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from Pyrenees:
I loved your review, I too joined recently. I feel like Wicked has lost some of its hotness over time. It has to be a direction thing because their production values are fine. Your score is totally warranted IMO this site is still far superior to VideoBox.
|
05-16-16 09:41pm
|
Reply
424
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from rearadmiral:
I agree with what you say about Wicked. I joined a couple of years ago and while the site was okay (but definitely flawed as you note) the porn itself wasn't all that hot. I thought that was mostly because I prefer harder-edged stuff but it may be that it really just isn't all that hot.
|
10-09-15 04:36am
|
Reply
425
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
There are 200 casting pic sets and they average about a dozen pics per sets. There are also 55 photosets but these vary greatly in the number of pics per sets. Some have has little as 16 pics and it can go to over 100. All photosets sets can be downloaded as a single RAR file. I don'tnow if any of the pics are exclusive but I would doubt if most are.
|
05-03-10 07:13pm
|
