| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from mr smut:
Hi badandy400,
customer service plus marketing I'd say. Would be nice to know if you are now satisfied with this site.
Cheers,
Smut
|
06-25-11 01:16pm
|
Reply
27
|
Queen Snake
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Queensnake BDSM:
(badandy400's Reply)
This is not an idea, this is the fact which it is in the Epoch's system. I sent you an email anyway, here is the message I sent you:
"Hi,
I saw your negative feedback about my site at https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=61495 and I don't want you to think that your account is blocked instantly when you cancel your membership.
It does not work this way, your membership is alive during the whole period you paid for, in your case you would have had access to the website until 7/12/2011.
But you made a cancellation and a refund at the same time - you asked your money back from Epoch - that is why your account were suspended instantly. It works this way on every website.
Now it seems that you just wanted to cancel your subscription and not make a refund, probably you made the refund accidentally :(
I am sorry for your trouble and your negative opinion about my website and I am sad that you didn't ask help from me first when you had issues but I am always here to help my members.
I can offer you 2 weeks gratis membership to cheer you up - during that time you will probably get your 29.95 USD back from Epoch - and if you have any issues in the future please contact me.
We are not a big porn company with a support team, this is a one-person website and I am doing everything on my own so you can contact me directly. I am always trying to do my best to make my members happy and satisfied.
Please send me a reply if you accept my offer.
Have a nice week.
Yours,
Queensnake"
If you don't believe me I can send you the scanned copy of the Epoch's database or you can ask them directly about the refund.
|
06-20-11 04:06am
|
Reply
28
|
Queen Snake
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from Queensnake BDSM:
Dear bandandy400,
You made a refund not a cancellation - probably accidentally - that is why your account is blocked.
Of course when you cancel your subscription, your account will be alive until the date you paid for and you are not blocked instantly as you said.
So the above information is completely wrong.
If you have any issues with your subscription, I help you with pleasure, just send me a message.
Kind regards,
Queensnake
|
06-20-11 01:49am
|
Reply
29
|
Wank It Now
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Drooler:
(badandy400's Reply)
It's one of the main reasons why we don't want to deal with sites that give us unexpected trouble (no access, broken promises, suprise billings): All of that judgmental subtext going on with the inevitable female rep at the credit card company.
|
05-31-11 02:55am
|
Reply
30
|
Wank It Now
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Drooler:
(badandy400's Reply)
Oh, yeah, that's the site that gets by at the bottom of the page, the one with the 3-day, $5 trial that, if not cancelled, turns into $40 per month! Ahhhhhhh!!!
Imagine the fun writing the letter to the credit card company ...
At least it's all just a nightmare.
|
05-30-11 05:23pm
|
Reply
31
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from james4096:
(badandy400's Reply)
"Incredible Fraud" lol
At least they have released their stuff on DVD and started to licensed it out. Videobox has 54 DVDs. The only safe way to deal with them is to not deal with them.
|
04-05-11 04:18pm
|
Reply
32
|
Curvy Kitty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Curvy Kitty:
(badandy400's Reply)
That is very much your choice to believe or not. It's hard for one to take up a majority of the first 10 pages of google search engine under an form or version of curvykity and not be known.
The member that posted, I will be honest is quite well a friend and perhaps was not fair for him to post. I have been on contact with the people that run TBP and PU... I have discussed it with them before he attempted this again for the 3rd time.... at least that I've managed to catch. They know he's real, he's been pointed out the review points page and the like.
I haven't nor will I ever have '100s' of review as I am one of the low amateur BBW solo sites. That has a LOT of difference then say a pro granny site or any skinny girl site amateur or not. I'm not a slut/gangbang type girl either that has a couple dozen different men on her site to help ether. These things make a huge different in my thoughts.
I do carry HD video but only just as of around the last mmmm 6month maybe. I also carry high res photos as well. My video archive is not top notch I admit that. I started with a pretty low end camcorder that sucked in low light, switched to a Digital Flip which was far more superior and then from there changed to a Ultra HD Digital Flip which is even more superior to it's older counter part. I can't see how you expect a 6yr old site to carry nothing but HD quality. HD equipment 6yrs ago was almost unheard of much less expecting a site such as mine to carry nothing but. Do you know how expensive HD would have been when I first started this? Remember home 100% home-grown. I started with almost nothing but a good husband, computer knowledge, a good host and a 1.3 pixel HP digital.
And if that is not enough, I have at least *2* ways for someone that wants to know more about my site in all of it's glory. 1 a mega tour (100% free) that includes video samples & photo samples as well as weekly update noticed that include a snap from the most recent video/s as well clickable full size (800x600pixel) photos each time I update with them. The tour holds at least 4weeks worth up updates to explore. Then there is the limited access trial for $3.95... it gives access to see what my site is behind the member's area.
How much harder can it be to 'trust' someone as you put it. All of my reviews were done YEARS ago with exception of Turbo's... nothin' I can do about that and that was when PU was VERY new. Things change and do people. I'm sure there will be other reviews in time... from those that have other sites to compare to that do fit my niche and that are amateur.
|
04-02-11 12:37am
|
Reply
33
|
Curvy Kitty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Curvy Kitty:
(badandy400's Reply)
As for your comment, it is unjust. Turbo is new to reviews and doesn't have a decent idea of what or how he should be doing it. I have been here for a LONG time and so has my site. He's a sweetie as are the rest that have made reviews of my site.
I personally have not been here in year but I have been a member of TheBestPorn site for many many years. My site is not 'unknown' and far from it. It's been running now with as good as weekly (if not more) updates. You don't get a site with over 12,000 photos in 175 galleries or over 250 videos with LOTS of extras by 'not being known'.
I am the webmaster and model of my site. I have been for the almost 6yrs it's been running. I am one of the THE longest running BBW sites on the net now. I do everything that you see or experience with it from design to content to everything in between.
Turbo happens to be a long time member and a more the avid fan... perhaps a bit too avid but hey that is what you end up with when people get to know the person behind the content rather then just some webmaster.
|
03-31-11 12:38am
|
Reply
34
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from turboshaft:
(badandy400's Reply)
"While I can live with hair now and then and even a landing strip, all assholes should be shaved clean! It is not that I am interested in see it, it just seems dirty when it is hairy as well. Perhaps this is just me..."
Totally agree here! Yes, they should absolutely shave them, hell, zap it with electrolysis so it never grows hair again!
My guess is it looks too close to that hairy man mess we all inevitably see (come on, admit it) when we watch hardcore scenes and it gets to a closeup. The stuff nightmares are made of...
|
02-01-11 11:29am
|
Reply
35
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from james4096:
(badandy400's Reply)
I think hairless assholes are something we all can agree with. Anybody feel differently?
|
02-01-11 09:41am
|
Reply
36
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from Shap:
This was actually a screwup on our part. We had always intended to have full update list. I've had that corrected. The updates page goes all the way back. It doesn't go back to when we started the site but goes back to 2002 :)
|
01-19-11 08:17am
|
Reply
37
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Rotterdam854:
(badandy400's Reply)
True HD renders absolutely no confusion & shouldn't as only certain formats can lay claim to the same like 1080i & H264. Even borderline HD cannot qualify as the real thing
|
01-02-11 11:32am
|
Reply
38
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from turboshaft:
(badandy400's Reply)
Lol! Also, see the 40-Year-Old Virgin.
"break your jaw" Hmm...I feel sorry for your girlfriend. : - (
|
12-21-10 04:22pm
|
Reply
39
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from anyonebutme:
(badandy400's Reply)
You're correct on the new videos - I was looking through the tour today and there are many scenes listed with the HD tag on them, like for example:
http://www.youngbusty.com/s/98/m/busty_t..._monique2/index.html
But inside the site all those videos are max 640x480@2mbps.
|
12-19-10 10:20pm
|
Reply
40
|
Kayden 420
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Ricky D Product:
(badandy400's Reply)
You say you didn't put down the site, but then follow it up with "I was looking for something other than a bunch of webcam recording and POV content. It comes off as very amateur, something anyone could do with a HD camera from bestbuy a guy and a girl."
We shoot on a high-end Canon DSLR, Rode mic, professional lighting, and I've been personally been doing this since 2003. Nothing you can buy at "Bestbuy". I've directed for the top video companies before launching this; they include Anabolic, Diabolic, Red Light, and others. I've even been nominated as a director by both AVN and XBIZ. We took our professional touch and put it into an amateur reality style site. Again, you came to our site expecting more than "POV" footage, what would you expect for amateur site? Would you like for us to put the camera on a tripod? If that's the only thing keeping us from looking professional in your eyes, I'll gladly shoot the next video update as so.
You speak in your post as if you're a creator or developer of the site. You're a reviewer with obvious bias towards pretty-girl porn (your reviews list Prime Cups and Twistys as tops) and shouldn't have joined Kayden420.com. I really can't believe people are tit-for-tat when getting a trial to a site that gives you full access to they have. Reviewers like you are the reason sites do limited trials and why the smaller producers are nearly gone.
I've never posted back to any reviews from users, but yours was so out of the blue that I had to reply. A user such as yourself is not in our demographic. You said yourself tattoos turn you off, we're more Suicide Girls while you're more Twistys. Good thing it was a trial, wouldn't have wanted you to pay too much money for our site that shouldn't be "taken too seriously".
There's a reason why Kayden420 is nominated year in and year out since launching by both XBIZ and AVN for Web Babe of the Year. You're not in our demographic and that's unfortunate, but this review you posted should've been kept to yourself. Better yet, maybe even sent to the company owner so he could fix your issues.
|
12-19-10 02:30am
|
Reply
41
|
Kayden 420
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from Ricky D Product:
Kayden420.com has been up since 2007, I highly doubt updating since then is considered having a small amount of content. If you're looking for multiple updates per day you're better off with Brazzers or Bang Bros, the small companies obviously can't keep up with their free content distribution.
We've never had any issues with members canceling their memberships, both links are clearly posted on every page's footer. Also, we have someone attending to our customers emails 24/7, an actual real human rather than the automated email reply. We strive to update and keep on the cutting edge, but with false reviews like these makes it even harder to compete with the companies who own tubes.
Kayden420 does weekly webcam shows, fully interactive and 100% hardcore. Again, maybe I'm just talking to someone who is spoiled by the big boys, but we try very hard to make our members happy. Tell some of this stuff to members who have been subscribers since the day we launched in 2007, Kayden's level of accessibility and interaction is second to none.
|
12-18-10 07:43pm
|
Reply
42
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Denner:
(badandy400's Reply)
Thanks for the reply - think I got it now - looks like it's worth to seriously consider once more!
|
12-02-10 08:38am
|
Reply
43
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from tangub:
(badandy400's Reply)
Thanks for the info....I really need to become a bit more technical and learn how to use a download manager.
|
12-02-10 08:24am
|
Reply
44
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Review
from Denner:
Thanks for a fine update in review for this site, badandy...
It seems like it's been around forever - or rather a long time.
And it seems like the quality is getting better compared to early 2009/late 2008 - back then the main cons was the quality of both vids and pix.
Guess from this review where bandandy states:
"-Not HD, a little behind par on quality of media" ......... that the site still have not got the top vids viewing quality?
But nice to read that they got good updates now.
|
12-02-10 05:39am
|
Reply
45
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Review
from tangub:
Thanks for a fine review. I'm quite interested in this site but the lack of photo zips has always put me off before. Any idea what percentage of the photos is zipped now roughly?....thanks.
|
12-02-10 12:29am
|
Reply
46
|
Kelly Madison
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from Monahan:
Any news yet? I'm ready to sign on but if there's a ridiculously low D/L limit, I will look elsewhere.
|
08-12-10 04:14pm
|
Reply
47
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from mistresskent:
(badandy400's Reply)
lol.. cool!
|
07-26-10 06:02am
|
Reply
48
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment from badandy400:
The " " in the middle of the url is not actually there. I had to break the link up because the posting kept trying to put ... in the middle of it to make it look shorter. The trouble was that it was cutting out the important part that you needed to be able to see. Other wise it looked like this "http://sb8x6261.members.twistys.com/updates?offset=-30&offsetmode=2" which is no good!
|
07-05-10 01:50pm
|
Reply
49
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from turboshaft:
(badandy400's Reply)
Lol! I bet you would volunteer! I wonder if it could ever be considered community service, because if it's on the Internet it serves the global community...of loyal perverts. : - )
|
06-15-10 12:38pm
|
Reply
50
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from james4096:
(badandy400's Reply)
LOL.
Yeah, I'm with you. In porn the asshole should be "entrance only." Just the opposite of what people expect in everyday life.
|
06-11-10 11:39am
|
