| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#20
from pat362:
(turboshaft's Reply)
I think that it's women who find breast milk discusting. At least that's what I got from a conversation up with a pregnant co-worker. Her general attitude was more of discuss than anything else. I'd be of the opinion that most guys would have no problem with sharing momma's milk with their baby or any baby for that matter.
|
01-27-11 07:12pm
|
Reply
77
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from graymane:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Touch, my fellow poll-dweller. Head's up call.
Indeed, "hands-down" is an incompatable term. But if you think about it, depending on one's body position ......the term could still be a valid one after all.. :=)
|
01-14-11 04:20am
|
Reply
78
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from jberryl69:
(turboshaft's Reply)
The entire topic of respectful porn seems like an oxymoron.
I see this interview and sex act by Brandi Lyons who talks about getting out of the business cause she thinks her 10 year old will find out what she does, then gets fucked sucked and analized as a finale.
It just seems crazy.
I try not to over think it, but am willing to pay to watch sex acts without thinking badly about the performers. Seeing a two GF's fist each other, or a married couple screw, or a female degrading herself at Facial Abuse, I realize that this is what they've chosen as a venue. I can only take so much of any of these, but I could watch Rebecca Blue, Gracie Glam, Jesse Jordan or Kasey Chase choke down deep throat all day.
But in the end, whatever a person uses to justify watching is okay. If they think the make it okay with themselves as the type of porn is respectful well, who's to say. Not me, though I still feel it's an oxymoron.
|
11-30-10 07:03am
|
Reply
79
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from lk2fireone:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Masturbation used to be called self-abuse. Maybe it still is. The idea behind that is that you are injuring yourself (psychologically?) if you masturbate.
So if you masturbate, you are not respecting yourself as a "normal" person would.
Then again, homosexuality was considered a mental disease when I was growing up. Plenty of people still think of it that way.
And regarding porn, I'm sure many people would consider all porn "degrading and objectifying." Objectifying seems to be some kind of curse word that labels whatever I don't like as "poo poo".
|
11-30-10 03:23am
|
Reply
80
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from slutty:
(turboshaft's Reply)
not to start any kind of fight, but movie companies have been using aspect ratios larger than 4:3 for decades. I'm no film historian or anything, but I believe most movies starting in the 70s were shot in 2.4:1 panavision. I'm sure there are some films that have been shot in 4:3, but I doubt it is very many. Just because a movie was 4:3 when it originally came out on VHS or Betamax or whatever doesn't mean that was the aspect ratio that it was shot in.
You have it a bit backwards, in that most films were "pan and scanned" to fit the 4:3 aspect ratios of televisions, the widescreen releases of older films are not cropping the original film, they are actually returning to something closer to the orginal aspect ratio, it is the 4:3 film that has been cropped.
In fact Blu-rays of modern movies still have black bars on the top and bottom because they are preserving the original aspect ratio which is greater than 16:9. A full screen HD hollywood movie has likely still been cropped to conform to 16x9, although somewhat less than it would have to be for 4:3.
I looked around for a bit for a resource on this and this is the closest I could find:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspect_ratio_(image)
They even note Ben Hur was shot in 2.76:1 - crazy-ass widescreen. doubt they'll be releasing TVs in that ratio anytime soon...
Sorry for the longwinded response, no disrespect, just trying to clarify.
|
11-26-10 11:10pm
|
Reply
81
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from graymane:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Doggone well said, Turbo. One certainly couldn't argue the merits of anything about that anology. The combinations even turned around my thinking on the matter.
|
11-23-10 09:55pm
|
Reply
82
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from slutty:
(turboshaft's Reply)
yeah I saw that, pretty funny. and you never know, the pat down might put some folks in the mood for porn.
a friend of mine swears he saw porn playing on the TV of some SUV in bumper-to-bumper traffic.
|
11-23-10 09:44pm
|
Reply
83
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Jay G:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Really good point about the potential "bait and switch" of some tours. Any info I can get before joining a site is helpful to me.
|
10-25-10 07:20am
|
Reply
84
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from pat362:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Women don't need to get bigger vaginas because Mother Nature took care of that. If not, then they could never give birth the normal way. That said most women prefer a smaller penis than 12" eventhoug they can handle it. Case in point are all the porn movies with guys that are hung like horses.
Very good suggestion about loosing weight and even if it doesn't make your equipment look larger. It's still a very good idea to stay healthy.
A large bank account will get you plenty of women and that`s a fact but I think kind and generous ersonality will get you just as many women and you won`t have to worry about them dating or marying you for your money.
|
10-17-10 10:42am
|
Reply
85
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Monahan:
(turboshaft's Reply)
That's my answer as well. I really don't get scenes that focus only on some dude's wang and no shots at all of the babe doing the job.
BJ's are good for the recipient but not as the prime (only) subject of a video.
Conversely, I love watching cunnilingus (or is that "cuntilingus") especially when the babe has large labia lips.
And I prefer babes doing babes but am OK with guys doing the slurping as well.
|
10-08-10 08:50am
|
Reply
86
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#22
from pat362:
(turboshaft's Reply)
I always expect more but I realise that I'm likely to be disapinted.
Who knows maybe one day coporations will look at their actions ahead of making another million.
|
09-13-10 05:50pm
|
Reply
87
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from pat362:
(turboshaft's Reply)
I agree that parents should take a much larger role when it comes to the sexual education of their children but there comes time when a society has to look at itself and say we are over sexualising our youth and at the same time promoting bad role models. I know sex sells but shouldn't corporations have somekind of morale obligation to try to promote the best quality and use the best possible people to do that?
I don't consider myself prudish but I don't want to see a nude beach anywhere I live. I don't want nudity to be readily available on TV.
I think fashion magazines should be classified in the same way that Playboy or Hustler is. If their is a single nude or semi-nude pictures than you have to be 18 to buy it. I don't want any singer, actor or sports personality to advertise anything intended for children. I kow that last one is a stretch but if you think about it. These are the people speaking to our children on a daily basis and they don't even have to use a single word to get their point across. Their actions speak louder than words.
Sorry for the rant.
|
09-12-10 07:07pm
|
Reply
88
|
Piss Bank
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from artnoir:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Hey there! Thanks for the comments.
1. There are no DRM what so ever.
2. Lenght varies. Most of the videos are around 3-4 minutes, some are shorter and a few are longer (up to 20 mins or so).
|
08-25-10 10:48am
|
Reply
89
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from mistresskent:
(turboshaft's Reply)
It was submitted by me... so basically.. from the results, I have a 36% chance that my viewers WOULD jump into a scene!
Not bad at all. xx
Thanks for voting peeps. Was interesting. xx
Thinking up my next poll.....
|
08-05-10 05:17pm
|
Reply
90
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from GCode:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Ahh you're totally right. I don't feel too guilty though but I was a bit surprised that I am in the minority in the poll as far as owning a sex toy. Lol at my collection being found by a family member, I think I'd rather be dead than them finding that lol...I think I'd be more comfortable with them finding a fake vagina than my collection haha.
I find it interesting you bring up the girl sex toy thing. I bet they are uncomfortable about it but I think it's more 'normal' for mainstream people to expect a woman to have a dildo or whatever. Men who have a sex toy are probably seen as more creepy than a woman having a toy. But, I'm totally in agreement, what really is the difference? Well, I think that's what you are trying to say. I feel that a man would feel more ashamed in having a sex toy than a woman. However, I'm sure it's still embarrassing for each to get caught with one, but I just have a feeling for most that a woman having one would be more laughed off or 'understanding' than a man having one. I could be wrong though.
|
07-13-10 09:31pm
|
Reply
91
|
Teen Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from exotics4me:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Hey Turboshaft,
There isn't any boy/girl hardcore in the main content. The bonus content has a lot of boy/girl hardcore though, Silver Sinema if I remember correctly produces most of their bonus content. The main content is similar to say FTV and ALS. They have big insertions, anal masturbation, fisting, it's about as hardcore as it gets in solo porn. They also have some lesbian sets that involve everything from general lesbian sex to big dildos to anal play. If I was to compare it to a site it would be ALS since they do have the high quality photos and videos combined with the style of the action ALS usually has. If or when you try it out be sure not to miss the bonus sections. It's like having a bonus DVD site with HD content built into the main site.
|
06-16-10 10:12pm
|
Reply
92
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Thanks,ts..
The price is certainly high, but I think the site has something others do not: That very special way of making most of the models appear more sexy, erotic and maybe more elegant - than you see them elsewhere.
I really like the starter scenes from dressed to nude - and most of the masturbations ditto - here some of the girls are doing a great act without things getting too repetitive. And what a fine viewing video quality.
But I'll probably only stay one term - and BTW: thanks for the thing with desk/disk - hope I'll get it right in the future...
Cheers!
|
06-16-10 12:36am
|
Reply
93
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from badandy400:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Pornographers must also satisfy customer like myself who have a 24/7 download operation. They are filming hot naked women, I do not think I would share much pity for them if they had to work overtime. Besides, if they are short handed all they need to do is come on here or post a sign at the mall or something and ask for volunteers. Guys would line up for a mile to get a chance at that!
Updating once a week does not cut it. Updating a couple times a week is okay so long as they are large updates. Daily is ideal and is what is needed to keep me coming around.
Updating it small videos or pictures does not count either. HD has been out for a while now and most of us consider 720 to be par for videos. Pictures at just 100% zoom should offer tits on my screen bigger than my head. The 1000 px pictures are only for amateur "post your ex" sites. Long story short, frequent updates are important but they need to be worthwhile updates.
PS
I volunteer myself to aid overworked, or underworked, pornographers!
|
06-15-10 09:54am
|
Reply
94
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from james4096:
(turboshaft's Reply)
yeah, that too.
I would never meet with a hooker in America because I'm afraid to get robbed and killed.
|
06-07-10 05:11pm
|
Reply
95
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Denner:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Good point, turboshaft - Good point!
|
06-07-10 05:35am
|
Reply
96
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from artnoir:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Haha! Good call, man.
|
05-15-10 04:18am
|
Reply
97
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from rearadmiral:
(turboshaft's Reply)
I went ahead and took a membership (and added ALS Angels for $9.95) and I'm pretty impressed. You're right that public nudity isn't all that common but there is some. For what little is there I think it is still a decent value because the quality is so good. I think that part of my appreciation of the site is that it feature almost exclusively young, petite women. I'll let the rest of the PU gang in on more details once I've had some time to look around a bit more.
Thanks for replying.
M
|
04-22-10 05:03pm
|
Reply
98
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from WeeWillyWinky:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Public toilet, at work many many moons ago. To a small pitcure of a female golfer I snipped from a newspaper. Wow, what a picture that was!
**this message was supposed to be a general reply, not specifically to turbo.
|
04-22-10 01:24pm
|
Reply
99
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Review
from rearadmiral:
turboshaft - just a quick question about ALS Scan:
Based on your review of ALS Scan and a look at the little bit offered as a preview on the site I am thinking of taking a membership. I'm normally more into hardcore sites, though some of the solo and girl/girl sites I've had memberships to I quite liked. One thing I noted on the website is that they say there is some public nudity there. Apart from hardcore, public nudity is probably my second biggest interest. In your experience, is there much public nudity on the site or is it few and far between? I took a membership to FTV Girls a while back based on the possibility of some public nudity and I was really impressed. I know that FTV Girls isn't a public nudity site, but I think the webmaster could be missing out on a potential market for those of us who like that. It turned out to be an excellent site overall, and excellent for public stuff too. So is there any detail or advice on public nudity at ALS Scan you can offer? Would that apply to their sister site (ALS Angels) too?
Thanks for any advice you can provide.
|
04-14-10 01:59pm
|
Reply
100
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Duante Amorculo:
(turboshaft's Reply)
ye Audrey Hollander, Belladonna and Sandra Romain were the anal queens of the 2000s if you ask me, hands down! don't see Audrey as much any more and Sandra retired but Bella's still around (if you ask me Belladonna is the number one porn star in the biz) and though she does a lot more directing for her own company and hence less scenes overall and basically none outside of her company, i still dub her the queen.
ur also right about many of them doing anal. so that being said it's hard to really point out anyone within the last 2-3 years that stands out. of course there was the legendary Naomi but again she;s retired so .... keep your eye out for Kelly Divine, and Marie Luv to me is definitely up there in the talks for anal queen. in fact she's definitely top ten
|
04-11-10 10:11pm
|
