Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
151
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from PinkPanther:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Yes, Amia has a tat on her neck - I like it, personally - tats on necks mean that the girls who have them REALLY like having their necks kissed, licked, bitten, etc
|
06-27-09 01:59pm
|
Reply
152
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from PinkPanther:
(turboshaft's Reply)
The only girl that had been on a previous trip was Jana Jordan
Amia Moretti now Amia Miley was there, though she was a disappointment - in a pissy mood the whole time, unfortunately
Jayme Langford was there, though I'm not terribly into her and she let Jana carve that wound into her wrist right before the trip - just to give me another reason to turn my head whenever she was around
Jana herself was fucking amazing
Blue Angel - first Caribbean trip - was fantastic
Tanner Mayes - first Caribbean trip - was as amazing as Jana
Hailey Young -first Caribbean trip - was a real revelation for me. I hadn't been into her before but she's got terrific sexual energy and is a really fun girl
Anita Pearl - first Caribbean trip - haven't seen much footage of her, but every pic I've seen is gorgeous
|
06-27-09 09:04am
|
Reply
153
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Fuck yeah! They just posted a new model the other day - Tanner Mayes - that is one of the cutest girls they have ever had on the site. Rebecca Blue is new in '09, I believe and is also gorgeous. Oh, and Sarah Peachez going ALS style modelling - who'da thunk it?
|
03-27-09 10:16pm
|
Reply
154
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Comment
from CactusJack2:
I agree with everything that you said, but I've always been really mixed about this site.
Let's all get honest for a few minutes about the millions of photo sets and videos they are "remastering" (reselling back to us). Chances are that if you ever looked at any porn during the last decade, you subscribed to ALS and already download all this "old stuff" the first time around. If you think about it, most of all those models who were young and beautiful in the 90's are more than likely fat old housewives with a ton of kids now. Plus, the quality of the remasters really isn't that great, and is not even close in quality to 2009 technology. ALS just doesn't have the amount of material you'd expect someone to have for being in business for over a decade. The remasters to me are just a poor attempt to try and make it look like they have more material than they really do.
As for their new photo sets, the size and quality really can't be beat anywhere on the web, but again, they are so few and far between.
As for the new videos, the quality and download speeds are great but to me they get boring really fast. I mean how many videos of a girl sitting in a chair using a vibrator (that's louder than hell) can you really watch? Especially when most of the girls all look the same. Some of the Caribbean stuff is okay but to me like most of all the other sites they've just fallen into a rut. $100 says I can join a year from now and still see the exact same stuff I'm seeing today.
I swear one of these days I'm going to start my own damn porn site and show everyone how to do it right.
|
02-27-09 05:00am
|
Reply
155
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Someone had e-mailed Alex these commments - he responded to them in his Director's Blog today, so I thought I would post them where the comments originated:
"In response to the first comment: We are not going to change this. In a photoset of 200-400 pictures there may be 5-10 photos where we will step back and show the crew helping out. Whether it is Jimmy holding the video light or Jeremy videotaping the model, or maybe just an overview shot of the entire set, there are so few shots like this that I do not understand how it can be a problem. So my response to that comment is: get over it, man. If that bothers you, "wow!" Just delete those few shots from your set. The value in providing those behind the scenes shots is greater then the possibility of it upsetting a few uptight people. Especially when it is so easy to just delete the pictures that you do not like.
In response to the second comment: I see your point. Not everything we do will appeal to everybody. That is impossible. But we use baby oil in 1 or 2 (out of 7 or 8) sets that we shoot of a model because those are the sets that consistently get voted the highest. Not to mention I constantly receive emails from members saying how much they like that wet, baby oil look. Again, we try to please the masses but we cannot please everybody. As for the lollipops: yes, we have been using them for no more than one (1) set with each model lately. They offer the perfect prop that can give the model something to play with and it can be inserted nicely into the pussy and looks great going in and out. We are always open to new ideas on different things that we can have the models play with and insert, but the lollipops work so well and the models love them. Remember ALS Scan is about finding the hottest models in the world that are willing to insert the craziest things, presented in the highest photo and video quality on the internet, everything from glamour to hard shots. Anybody can find pretty girls and photograph them dancing around and posing, but get them to spread their pussies, or even better, stretch them to the max and insert wild and crazy objects, well THAT is what we do like nobody else can. Keep the ideas coming but they have to be reasonable and not hurt the model in anyway. Is everybody going to like everything we do? NO! But we do try our best and are open to new ideas such as finding something better to insert than lollipops.
My response to the third comment is simple. No worries, it is an extra feature and will never take away from any of our normal updates or offerings. It merely presents more material to our members at no cost that they may not have ever seen."
|
12-23-08 07:05pm
|
Reply
156
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from messmer:
(turboshaft's Reply)
I just can't swallow some of the fantasies or understand some of the fetishes, even though I have my own. I have the same "credibility" problem with those so-called MILF sites when the "young man" is obviously almost the same age as the "older woman." So, it's not the lollipops and uniforms etc. that turn me off, it's the incongruity of the scene. My requirement for enjoying any scene is that it should be reasonably believable.
|
12-19-08 01:33pm
|
Reply
157
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Comment
from Drooler:
I don't care to see the guys, but those pics just wind up deleted from my stash anyway. The "guest" galleries don't bother me, but that's because ALS Scan puts them in as "extras" along with their own updates on the same day, which is unlike 1byday, which replaces what could have been one of their own with an ALS Scan thing.
But the lollipop business has definitely gotten old. Each time I see a new set of a girl playing with one, I imagine a parody version of that song from The Wizard of Oz being performed by a chorus of ALS Scan girls:
We represent the lollipop shtick
The lollipop shtick, the lollipop shtick
We represent the lollipop shtick
That shows up too much at ALS Scan
I guess that's been my coping strategy. It's helpful as I just saw that Sarah Peachez has been added to the group.
The remasters have been great. The bonus with Zoe was something I'd been looking forward to for a long time. Wish they'd do that with Monique Alexander!
|
12-19-08 02:31am
|
Reply
158
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Comment
from badandy400:
About the guys in the "behind the scenes" scenes, I would have to say it is okay for them to be there. It is behind the scenes after all, and that means pretty much anything goes. It is not like they have their cocks out or anything! They absolutely keep them out of the normal shoots, so they are not breaking any promise here.
Lollipops are nice, but to a point. I agree they should not be used a lot. A few scenes is great, but it should be a small percent.
1080.....sounds great. I might just have to start thinking about updating from them! Funny thing, I was just watching some of there videos right before i seen your comment.
|
12-18-08 09:58pm
|
Reply
159
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Comment
from messmer:
Ah, now you've hit upon another one of my pet peeves: lollipops being licked by women over eighteen. That's a little girl thing and doesn't belong on a porn site. It looks ludicrous too. That and pony tails and school outfits on women in their twenties.
Thanks for the positive information as well!
|
12-18-08 03:32pm
|
Reply
160
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from MargulisAZ:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Yeah, that's one of the things I mentioned and wanted people to keep in mind with my comment and updated review. While I am talking about things that I believe could use with a change, it is still a good site. It could be even better in my opinion, but it is in no way bad.
Franziska is a good example, and I agree with what you have to say. And it wouldn't be a big deal to me if she was an anomaly. The scary thing to me is that she is one of 5 out of the last 6 "new girl updates" that are similar in the "not extreme" nature. One here and there and I'm not going to complain, but this is a lot, especially when a "new girl update" only comes once every two weeks, and even then you never know when you'll see a specific set.
Enough about my bitching about the release format, onto solutions. I believe that the way to handle the situation is to completely scrap the current system and move onto something more organized and reasonable. So a new model is added every two weeks right? Well then I propose her content to be COMPLETELY released within 2 weeks to a month. That is still longer than some other sites who fully release all girl's content the second they come on (FTV for example), but it's much better than what it is now. You can still have remastered material take up half of the updates, so that leaves the need for about 15 new vid and pic sets per month. As it is 2 new girl's content (the amount of girl's released per month) wouldn't quite fill that quota, but it would be close. With the remaining updates to fill the month they could continue to release unreleased material from past girls, or maybe even say take a Sunday off of updates. Maybe update Monday-Saturday, or at worst Monday-Friday. That would fill the update requirements, get a model's content out in a reasonable and dependable amount of time, and still leave room for all the remastered material. Voila, problem solved. :)
|
08-03-08 11:53pm
|
Reply
161
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Yeah, she was also very beautiful with the shorter hair, but she didn't need the boob job (which got her migrated to ALS Angels). I just loved her natural breasts. Didn't seem too small to me!
|
07-09-08 02:27am
|
Reply
162
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Comment
from Drooler:
I noticed that Zoe is in the lead. She is very fine! I'm glad, though it might not matter anyway as far as who gets reposted first.
I once joined the Kathryn Lee site, and that was quite a while back. Would certainly like to see some of that stuff up again, all nicely curated, restored, and enlarged to 3500px or so. What a doll babe!
|
07-08-08 03:18pm
|
Reply
163
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from TheRizzo:
(turboshaft's Reply)
I just joined the site a few days ago and put up a review of the site. Thanks to those who provided me feedback on the content and convinced me to sign back up. Well worth it!!
|
06-26-08 06:18pm
|
Reply
164
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Review
from williamj:
excellent review once finish ALS try ALSAngels not as much matter but worth a few month membership I like their stuff...
|
04-03-08 05:57am
|
Reply
165
|
Club Sandy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from exotics4me:
(turboshaft's Reply)
I don't know if Zoli still returns emails, but I used to joke with him back in 2005 or so about his "charm". He's a genuinely funny guy too. I never really found out if a comment in my first review of Zoli had any impact on it, but the comment was, "Some of the new models are just...well...ugly" And went on to say that maybe he should just take their clothes and cover their heads. A few weeks later, the main page on Zoli changed to him standing beside a naked model with a bag over her head!
I really can't say that I've looked at much of the newer content. I saw one where the girl was gagging and that was it for me. You can look at the archives and notice when it became a much more extreme site. Early content had non-extreme models like Eve, Sandra Shine, Aneta, then the models out of nowhere started being the C-list level models. I've always wondered if they made the right move by making it more extreme.
I thought the old sets were some of the most entertaining sets on the internet. He has Eve completely worked up in one of her sets. She even asks him, "You like seeing girls do it for themselves don't you?" complete with a sincere but seductive smile. And it shocked me when she then moved her hand and let him use a pen vibrator on her.
|
11-03-09 01:46pm
|
Reply
166
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Monahan:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Thanks for the tip. I will give it a go. I dropped $74.95 on the deal because there's so damned much GOOD content there's no way I can D/L what I want in just one month, and it is over my budget to spend $34.95 a month on just one of the sites.
I'm guessing (hoping) they get smart at DDF Prod and offer network deals in the future as well.
So far I'm also impressed with the quality of the vids. The older ones are not so good but anything 2007 and later are great.
|
08-30-09 06:59pm
|
Reply
167
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from largeun:
(turboshaft's Reply)
So, just out of interest and before I sell an organ to fund the membership, is there a lot of content repeated?
I have been a member of HOH and HLF and really don't want to spend the money for a membership that simply repeats content across sites.
I took a tour of their sites and there does seem to be a lot of repeated content but I am happy to join if there is substantial new or 'other' content as I love their quality and some of their models are true boner awakeners.
Thanks
|
09-28-09 05:08am
|
Reply
168
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from wiild1:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Yeah you are right, the ones I listed are the ones I consider worth joining. I have been a member for two weeks now......I must say that I am not THAT impressed, lots of content, but lots of repeats and similar shots/videos.....I you have seen one of these sites, you know how the next one will look....but if you like one or a few of these sites and considered joing before...now it's the time.
|
08-26-09 10:37am
|
Reply
169
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Review
from mbaya:
First class review with a lot of helpful information and opinions. Keep up the good work!
|
03-08-09 06:23pm
|
Reply
170
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from mbaya:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Thank you for your nice words and the trust rating. At the same time as I was reading yours I got a totally incoherent negative trust from anonymous, calling me stupid. I was expecting disagreements with my review, but not such childish nastiness. C'est la vie as they say.
|
03-08-09 06:19pm
|
Reply
171
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Review
from BostonPJR:
Considering I gave it a much higher review I still do have to agree with your frustration of some of the pointless "waiting for crap to happen already" segments of the video. I may have reviewed the site with stars in my eyes, but I still do love it. But thanks for your honest review. Gave me something to consider.
|
07-26-08 11:11am
|
Reply
172
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Review
from Drooler:
I definitely agree with you about the photo sizes. I don't understand why some sites are still stuck in the "hey, wow, these are some really BIG pics, y'all, which makes them special, so we have to create some scarcity for them" mindset. It's what turns me off to Photo Dromm and Xisty as well, 'cause they do the same thing.
There are some fine pics at FTV that I'd love to have in full size, but probably never will. And on their site, the "huge" pics area can be kind of tough to keep track of. Plus, you don't even know what pics you're going to get unless you download first. I think a lot of bandwidth gets wasted because of that.
Great review, by the way! It makes the right points on both the pro's and the con's. I don't understand why it gets such raves from some other people. Femjoy and MetArt are a lot better, I think.
|
04-03-08 02:36pm
|
Reply
173
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Review
from Denner:
Fine review!
Great to see a new fellow PU with a review like this.
I agree entirely on this kind of points - the 90 and more is way too high.
Especially the quality of videos - technical and editorial - lacks a lot.
|
04-02-08 08:49am
|
Reply
174
|
Futanaria
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from GCode:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Yeah it is really eccentric and different than anything I've really seen. As I said in the review, I really thought the girls were gonna be taking the scenes with zero seriousness which would result in garbage. But, they do a good job of mix and mashing the seriousness with fun which creates some interesting and well done scenes. Thanks for the kind words about the review and let me know if you need any more information about it, I am still a current member for a little bit.
|
06-05-09 12:55pm
|
Reply
175
|
Hotkinkyjo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(turboshaft's Reply)
I have nothing to go on but reason here, but it seems to me that smaller niche sites like these would be more impacted by piracy. This is exclusive material and there isn't anything else like it out there so having it stolen would be a real disappointment. I contrast that with a site that makes porn where a girl gets picked up by some guys in a van and talked into sex. Those are a dime a dozen so I suspect that even pirates tire of those. Having said that, I still feel penalized for something that I've never done nor would do.
While this stuff would certainly even push my limits, I don't have to dig too deep in the collection for evidence of how I really, really need counselling... ;-)
|
07-24-12 07:45am
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
