Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from plan b:
(turboshaft's Reply)
What I did was keep multiple browser windows open. One with the model index by name, one with whatever search results I ended up with and then one for the actual model's page. Clunky, but it worked.
I'm also right there with you as far as all the European models. I just signed up for In The Crack, which has a fairly decent mix of American & European. But the content might be too extreme for most folks.
|
07-15-08 12:15am
|
Reply
177
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from plan b:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Yeah, well I hit the limit so what does that say about me? :-)
My suggestion is to use the search. They're really good about tagging videos & photo shoots so you should be able to fill up with what you really want.
|
07-08-08 05:51pm
|
Reply
178
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from plan b:
(turboshaft's Reply)
That's interesting, I hadn't bothered to dig into their site for that statement. What I can tell you is that I did hit a DL limit despite what that says. I don't remember the exact wording of the message but the error page I saw said that I'd downloaded 30 gigabytes over the last 24 hours and that I wouldn't be able to access the site until another 24 hours had passed from the time I hit the limit. Note that it didn't tell me exactly what time I hit it, I just had to go w/ a best estimate and try back a few times until it let me log in again. Regardless, it's a very generous limit and I doubt that too many subscribers run into it.
|
07-08-08 04:54pm
|
Reply
179
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Thanks,ts..
The price is certainly high, but I think the site has something others do not: That very special way of making most of the models appear more sexy, erotic and maybe more elegant - than you see them elsewhere.
I really like the starter scenes from dressed to nude - and most of the masturbations ditto - here some of the girls are doing a great act without things getting too repetitive. And what a fine viewing video quality.
But I'll probably only stay one term - and BTW: thanks for the thing with desk/disk - hope I'll get it right in the future...
Cheers!
|
06-16-10 12:36am
|
Reply
180
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from MDmd:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Thanks turboshaft. I switch from FDM to Getright and have been able to get the getright download manager working. Took some playing around though. The site seems to discourage using any download manager to work
|
11-20-09 08:04pm
|
Reply
181
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from MDmd:
(turboshaft's Reply)
I am using FreeDownloadManager too, but it doesn't seem to work with this site, which is a real shame. Instead of downloading the specified .wmv file, it downloads login.php. How did you configure it so that it worked?
|
11-13-09 11:45pm
|
Reply
182
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Comment
from inthecrack:
Note to those who are concerned about Lexa not being hardcore enough.... your assessment could be somewhat accurate based on the 4 sets that are currently on inthecrack. There is some finger masturbation in these sets but it is not her forte. As with many girls any genuine masturbation action requires the right atmosphere and frame of mind to pull it off successfully. As she has become more comfortable with us she has somehow cleared this hurdle with some of our more recent as yet unreleased sets. You may not yet see it in her next few sets but some later ones she does use dildos and even has real orgasms. Additionally her personality really starts to shine in some of these as she gets over being shy about her broken English and she becomes really very charming. We may not see her peeing or using a speculum any time soon and we respect her for knowing her boundaries. You have to admit that the girl has great quality and integrity for not caving to pressure to perform certain acts. We actually like her for this. As for those hardcore sets she had previously done it was only done when she was young and inexperienced with productions telling her this is the only way she can make a decent go of it. She soon found that not to be the case and has regretted doing this ever since. We at inthecrack want no part of pressuring or convincing her that she will need to do certain content. Neither do we consider our most hardcore content to be the ultimate goal. With Lexa she is just plain gorgeous and sometimes just feasting your eyes on that beauty is pleasure enough.
As for the sister site, at this point it is only an idea that we wanted some feedback on. We're only considering it because we'll likely never tire of shooting Lexa and she really deserves to have her own site. It's one way we can shoot as much of her as we like without over saturating inthecrack with one model. However the only way it can happen is if it is financially feasible and inthecrack does not suffer because of it. Early indications are that it is not financially feasible and we'll likely keep adding her sets to inthecrack.
Another note of interest. Survey results indicate that a full 70% of members consider Lexa to be in our top 10 models. 20% consider her to be our number one most beautiful model. She is a goddess! Perhaps most appealing of all, she doesn't seem to know how beautiful she is. With any suggestion of this she will adamantly deny it and think you are oddly disillusioned.
|
08-23-09 09:22pm
|
Reply
183
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Review
from lk2fireone:
Another great review. A wonderfully complete description of the site. Clear and easy to read.
|
08-23-09 08:38pm
|
Reply
184
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Review from turboshaft:
(Bottom Line continued.)
This site is a marriage made in heaven, a perfect match of technology and perversion, and its for a good purpose. These are hot and happy models, the smiles seem genuine, and scenes come about only as a result of a girl's willingness and comfort level with the possible task at, or sometimes even in, hand. This means that some girls only really like to show off their smile and might wink at you, while others will show virtually everything and then some, and only wink at you using their asshole. Let me at least say that I know my smile is genuine.
Models are fit and thin, many with fully shaven pussies, few tattoos, and I have yet to find any breast implants (I still have a hard time believing this myself, so if I am wrong please say so). The first two dozen or so are Canadian girls (who I have yet to see anywhere else, but I like them), and the rest are a mix of amateur and somewhat well known Americans, eastern Europeans, and a few more Canadians. This really is not the place for the well-worn veteran, or high figure star, but most know how to show off the goods. The vast majority are white, which didn't really bother me, but I have to mention it, as I know there are prospective members out there looking for some diversity, and this site may not have what they are seeking. Still, much of the content may have you focused less on the outside than on the inside, in which case every model is pretty much the same color.
Nobody's perfect, and this site comes at a high price: $35 per month, with no rebilling or multi-month discounts. I will say you get what you pay for as there is much to enjoy and download here, but it is still a somewhat high price, though it has never risen in all the years I have been a member. Navigation is easy as the site is cleanly laid out, but the search engine is a little too simple. It only searches videos using whatever term or keywords you choose and/or a category out of a list of twenty-nine categories, with categories as diverse as “Beautiful Bums” or “Cervix Views” or “Treadmill”.
If you like your girls to have fun by themselves and view the fun at few inches distance or less, this may be Crack that's worth an addiction. There are no guys taking up the frame, and virtually little input from the crew – hallelujah! I mean little to no talking, no interviews, no heavy panting by the cameramen, and very little behind the scenes fantasy crushers. When anything even close to this happens in a video, the descriptions give ample warning – “male hands involved” or “you do heard the crew talk in this one” – and these are minor infractions compared to many of the other sites' self-centered douche bags as they guffaw and add commentary through countless photo and video shoots. Hey, that's our job!
|
08-23-09 07:37pm
|
Reply
185
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Comment
from Denner:
Another PU who do not get the picture here.
ITC is in itself a unique site - with very fine content in a good variation of models - why do an extra solo site for one model - and maybe later others model...it may seem like a question of getting more customers for the company, only...instead of having the same material at ITC.
This feedback could be a trial - if it works - then other model could follow - and customers at ITC may want to spend extra bucks for this models new special site...
|
08-23-09 07:52am
|
Reply
186
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Comment
from Drooler:
ik2fireone had a lot of thoughtful comments on Lexa, as she's called at the 'Crack. She has done hardcore, btw. A small sampling can be found at her page at SportyOne. And yes, she's known most often as Melisa; sometimes as Carrie Du Four.
Anyway, softcore does seem to be her main bread 'n butter, but I haven't been terribly thrilled with the way ITC has presented her. They just don't do poses and thigh-up pics of her amazing ass like the one of her at Twistys, or better yet at Stunners, standing at a post and looking back amorously with both cheeks in glorious bilateral symmetry.
The typical way ITC does all of the models is side angles, full body standing without a view of the girl's face, and all manner of closeups. They seem to do EVERYTHING but the kind of pics I'm after: You can at least see the girl's face; she's looking horny; the top of her head is all there; her butt is completely there and "evenly cheeked" and unwatermarked. (A tall order, I know!)
Lexa will probably look great at her own site through ITC, but I doubt I'd care much for it just the same.
|
08-23-09 02:29am
|
Reply
187
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Comment
from lk2fireone:
I am not a member, but I love giving my opinions, even when I know little about what I'm saying.
I do like eye candy, and the tour pages of inthecrack has some lovely models.
If the owners start a sister site, they could charge separately for the new sister site, or make membership in the new sister site part of the basic membership for inthecrack. There is obviously additional expense for opening a new, separate site, but the amount of content for a new site would probably be small, and even if current/former members of inthecrack really liked the Czech girl named Lexa for her looks, it doesn't seem likely the new sister site, by itself, would generate enough revenue to pay for its costs. Especially in the current economic downturn, when porn revenues are supposed to be dropping, and even major sites are supposed to be hurting financially.
So I think the best approach would be to offer membership in the parent site, inthecrack, and the new site (call it Lexa, for simplicity), for the same basic fee. And then, if the new site does become popular (measured by membership hits or whatever), the owners could possibly consider raising the membership fee, instead of spinning the new site off as separate membership fee.
Am I just spinning my wheels, or am I saying anything useful? Not really sure.
But even if the main focus of the new Lexa site is Lexa, I would assume she would have "guest" models on the site, because that is what many solo model sites seem to do. And if the sister site increases the amount of content available for your viewing pleasure, as long as the membership fee is not increased, I don't know why members would object to the new site.
Sorry, I don't really understand what your objection is to: Is it the creation of a new site, because you think the model Lexa will appear less frequently on the old site? Or is it that you wouldn't mind a new sister site, if they chose a good-looking model that did hardcore action instead of the mainly softcore Lexa? Or is it something else?
|
08-22-09 11:20pm
|
Reply
188
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Spreaditwide looks like a site with a similar focus and comes in HD. Gcode asked yesterday if anyone knew more about it.
|
07-08-09 12:49pm
|
Reply
189
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from mbaya:
(turboshaft's Reply)
I feel the price is fine considering the quality and quantity. I have never paid this much for a site, so I was also skeptical. In spite of its flaws, this is one of the best investments I have ever paid for porn.
|
03-15-09 04:34pm
|
Reply
190
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Monahan:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Interesting. TBP, today (7/3/08) still says the video is PPV.
I've never signed up for a site that wants more than $29.99 but this one really looks like it might be the first. But a PPV program sucks.
I'm counting on TBP being wrong on this because I'm about to spring for a one month membership.
|
07-03-08 08:09am
|
Reply
191
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from JBDICK:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Thanks for the reply turboshaft.
One day their turn will come up but for now I'm finding others to harvest. I do like what they do though...
God Help if we ever get to the level of Virtual reality like in the movie Lawnmower Man.
Cheers
|
04-08-08 04:05pm
|
Reply
192
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Review
from JBDICK:
Hi turboshaft
IntheCrack is one of those sites I've been thinking about for ages but never got around to. Always seems to come out bottom of my list, cheap pun, sorry.
I liked your review, thanks. Could I just ask about a couple of things.
1) I take it by the absence of the word hardcore there isn't any.
2) The other thing I wasn't sure about from your review. Is it still the case that joining the site doesn't give you access to the video content?
Thanks in advance.
|
04-05-08 03:25pm
|
Reply
193
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Jay G:
(turboshaft's Reply)
I couldn't agree more. What I want is lots of information before I spend my time and money.
|
03-12-09 01:54pm
|
Reply
194
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from badandy400:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Check the reply page. It seems we have yet another new member just raving about this site. KinkyKarl joined only a few hours ago and is continuing the advertising for them. Hell is profile does not even add up. He says he is 52, but it lists him as 49?
So by our count that is four account created to place this site up into the heavens! This makes me not trust the site either.
|
03-09-09 11:53pm
|
Reply
195
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from badandy400:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Yes. I believe I remember that one too. Seems something a bit fishy is going on here.
|
03-09-09 09:00pm
|
Reply
196
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Tree Rodent:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Hmmm - that's exactly what I was going to say!
|
03-09-09 12:58pm
|
Reply
197
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Torque:
(turboshaft's Reply)
The girls are gorgeous and posed in terrific poses..... Some of the girls are on other sites, but they don't look as beautiful on the other sites.....Also, you can vote for the individual girl, and you can vote for each episode....
|
03-12-10 01:18pm
|
Reply
198
|
Melissa Ashley
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from MargulisAZ:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Hmmm, I didn't know that, I wonder if whatever problem came back. Unfortunate and sad to see.
|
07-04-09 12:49am
|
Reply
199
|
Nadine France
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from bacardiancoke:
(turboshaft's Reply)
I wouldn't like to speculate as to the exact reasons, for that I'd recommend e-mailing the webmaster and asking them directly.
Judging by the content and the time span that it covers, it is simply a case of the site coming to a natural end. Which with a site which is exclusively personal content, it is incredibly impressive that Nadine has been so busy to have such a varied range.
I'm very respectful of the decision, there are many out there who would simply keep things going without update until dwindling subscription fees no longer covered server upkeep costs. I would be very surprised if NadineFrance was no longer profitable for two reasons. Firstly, in many respects it sets the benchmark for others to follow in this particular niche. Secondly, there isn't that much said about the site in English speaking nations (in fact I only fell across it by accident.)
There is still material being uploaded though this is now on an "as and when" basis and there will no doubt be notification of the final date of shutdown.
|
10-28-09 11:54am
|
Reply
200
|
No Rest For The Ass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(turboshaft's Reply)
The only ones out of the 9 site that are really not worth it are Interracial Eurobabes and Gags Girls. The first because there are only 7 videos videos and the other because that does not appeal to me at all. I will be reviewing a couple of the sites later today or tomorrow. The key point with these sites is that the sex is more extreme than in some others. A couple of the scenes in some of the sites involves face slapping and that's not my cup of tea. Regardless that the girl might enjoy that. I do not.
|
07-01-09 08:30am
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
