Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Adult Movie Max
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(JBDICK's Reply)
Well, they call their site:
Adult Movie Max - Your Adult Library Online!
It sure is some kind of a library for old stuff - and boring.
And about TBPs review - see the thread Reediting TBP-score at Forum - they have something new in the line of updating reviews in the future.
|
04-09-08 12:59pm
|
Reply
27
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Comment
from Sarah:
Again, great comments JBDick. We can do this. I assume that you
are talking about our masturbation style videos and not our photoshoot
videos - correct? What we will do in future videos is allow the
models to be playful and tease the camera more. Please realize
that some models will be better at this than others and we will have to
adjust our filming to what the models can handle.
We have both men and women guiding the shoots and picking outfits and we like to use the clothes that the models bring.
Their own clothes will always fit their particular body type
better than anything than we can throw on them.
Given production turnaround times and schedules, please allow some time before you actually see the results of this new technique.
|
05-08-08 11:25am
|
Reply
28
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from badandy400:
(JBDICK's Reply)
Certainly true. I can not find a single model that I would say is less than a 7 in my book. A 7 to me is fairly decent, a 9 is jaw dropping, and extremely few 10s around. ALS has some really good stuff and with the new format of the site I just might have to join again in the near future. There are few other sites that have THAT many good looking girls and no uglies mixed in just for filler. That alone is worth joining the site for, plus the content that is there is pretty good to boot. I hope that when I rejoin the clothing tease will be full addressed. If it is I think my porn hotness meter would burst!
|
05-07-08 08:44pm
|
Reply
29
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Comment
from Sarah:
Excellent thoughts and this is why we have changed this approach
over the last two years. If you look at the more recent HD video
releases we do more glamour (and leading up to) shots in the
photosets and the video only scenes have a slower build up as
well. You are 100% correct about the older videos – no or little
clothes and then bam right to the toys. But we think that if you
take a closer look you will notice that our newer material, has everything that you are looking for :-)
Especially our latest Caribbean trip (Tropical shoot 2008) which
was just shot and will be coming out this month on www.alsscan.com
|
05-07-08 09:52am
|
Reply
30
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Comment
from Drooler:
I agree that more strutting of the stuff as the clothes come off would help some, but it's not only that. Once the clothes come off, they too often go straight to the toy play, fisting, pissing, whatever ... with little or no fully "just nude" fantasy stuff. There are exceptions, such as the most recent set of Britney in the bath, which has a scant few choice ass poses (my personal obsession).
I'm a "marginal" fan of both sites for the reasons given above. Most of the girls are way hot and the photo quality and size have gotten really good, but they're so immediately into the pussy workouts and cervix displays that they could practically have the girl strip down to reveal the banana, cucumber, "Rocket," or speculum already pre-inserted!
|
05-07-08 03:09am
|
Reply
31
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Comment
from badandy400:
My thoughts exactly for ALS. I have always had a thing for two girls undressing each other nice and slowly...then shoving their fist in the other. :)
They really need to address this. Perhaps make the videos each two part. The first part being the teaser section, then a ssecond video for the normal. This way those who do not want to see the teaser can just download the normal part. But this would let those of us who want that part to be able to see it. I frequently will watch videos just for that part, especial if it is a girl/girl scene.
You have good tastes JB.
|
05-06-08 08:41pm
|
Reply
32
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from TheRizzo:
(JBDICK's Reply)
I appreciate the feedback and kind words. I try to provide as much info as I can so my fellow users are as imformed as possible.
|
07-03-08 09:00pm
|
Reply
33
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(JBDICK's Reply)
Thanks for the info. I've been tempted a few times because they have some truly gorgeous looking girls on there.
|
04-12-08 05:50pm
|
Reply
34
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Review
from pat362:
Hi JBDICK. I was curious to know if what you see on the preview pages is all available in photo and video? The reason I'm asking is that there is a note at the bottom of each models page that "scene release order is based on members request" Does that mean that you don't get everything???
|
04-12-08 08:54am
|
Reply
35
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Mr Fountain:
(JBDICK's Reply)
like Hi def, teasing vids; I am going to add a review of another site shortly. They just recently added hi def feeds to their site; so you only get about four months worth of the updates with the hi def feeds. But if you like teasing vids with beautiful women prancing around watching them climb stairs, seeing booty jiggle in their tight skirts; upskirts; bathroom undressing and primping, walking and strip down in public places- then this may be one for you to check out. The pics are secondary; good but not as many as ATK.
I've paid for a lot of porn so man its like I have a rotation where I switch sites month to month lest I miss out.
|
04-13-08 07:20am
|
Reply
36
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Mr Fountain:
(JBDICK's Reply)
In a nutshell, its mostly photos. The upskirt and panties come updates of 16 new girls per chapter. 4 chapters for each softcore gallery. Right now you have available softcore galleries 55 through the latest softcore gallery 78; and there are 5,000-7,000 pics per gallery. Thats well over 150,000 upskirt pics total. Really amazing number. Some of them stand right over you on a chair and you see it almost as if your face is between their legs. They look down at you with their crotch in your face. Others pose on staircases or sit in a chair an open their legs; pose on a tabletop. They lift that skirt up and you get to see booty, everything. Its like you are laying on the bed face up with them standing over you looking up at them in their skirt and panties. Every angle imaginable is covered/ you will not be missing out on pics of their booty. Each set they take their panties off and end with a big dose of their pussy.
Though the recent updates -starting with galleries in the early 70's do you get the big pics 1536 x 1024; 1024 X1536 the rest are 1024 X 680; 680 X 1024. .. Atk gives you a big dose of pussy so if you got hi speed then you probably will get through some but not all of this section.
The movies are in Quicktime, or WMV- no hi def- of masterbation scenes,between sex scenes mostly man on woman with both clothed and then stripping for sex; some lesbian, a few interviews; you get to see some taking off clothes to take a shower; sitting on a bed or couch to begin to touch themselve, strip and masterbate. So you can get some softcore as they sit down and open their legs to begin to masterbate before they strip their panties off to use a dildo. But no prancing around on stage in stripper heels.
|
04-10-08 04:07pm
|
Reply
37
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Review
from exotics4me:
Have to say that I agree with Panther. I had been planning to change my score after just finishing a month's membership for the 4th time in the last year, except my score is going up.
You might want to check some of those things you questioned. Like the HD videos, the ones I have downloaded that say HD are 1280 high end, 3000+ bitrate, I have several here of Ginger, also Regina Ice, that are HD, the bitrate could be a little higher like on some sites that are hitting 8000+ bitrate, but the resolution is still HD standard. If the bitrate was 8000+ there would be people complaining that the files are too large to download.
As for bringing the original models back, I couldn't agree with you more. I miss Eve and Sandra and Aneta, but the truth is, Eve isn't even doing material for her own site anymore. Sandra is doing her own site, Aneta seems to come and go like the seasons, and she was in a car accident recently. Just to name a few of those originals. You have to remember, many of those originals are getting older, getting married, having kids, etc..
While I am a big fan of alsangels and alsscan as well, Alex has a lot of his content stored. If you get a new Eve video for example, it may have been recorded in early 2007, as was her last video that I saw on alsangels, even though he didn't release it until near the end of the year.
I think the biggest strengths of babelicious, is that even if you have the sets, the babelicious ones are usually a much better resolution. Also, having great customer service like babelicious has, has to count for something, since we have all ran into the sites that don't have any customer service, throw in the multi-daily updates and I just have trouble seeing this site as going down. I also read the memo that they were considering combining some of the sites onto the sexybabes.tv site and think that is a great idea too. Site is always up, fast downloads, simple navigation that will be even easier once those sites are combined, not requiring a separate login, and I don't know JB. Those are many steps forward in my opinion.
|
07-01-08 08:57pm
|
Reply
38
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Review
from PinkPanther:
You're mis-understanding the history of this site. This was not a stand-alone site that then added other sites. This site was a new addition to the SexyBabes.TV network of sites - and a great addition. Every single update isn't a stunner, but there are a whole lot of them that are. Overall, the network is a great deal. It should be even better when they start consolidating the updates that are currently spread among SexyBabes.tv, EuroBabes & DreamBabes.
|
07-01-08 06:41pm
|
Reply
39
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Drooler:
(JBDICK's Reply)
I have to agree that in general, there is something more genuine (and uninhibited) about the European girls. It comes across. In addition to pay, I think there's a cultural difference, too. I find that around actual European women I can be more relaxed, whereas I have to watch what I say around the Americans more. Anyway, it would take tomes to read to explain it all, if I even could!
There are exceptions, of course. I find that Tiffany Brookes is more "genuine." Maybe it's that Texas thing. I don't know for sure.
|
04-05-08 04:49pm
|
Reply
40
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(JBDICK's Reply)
Hey JBDICK,
We have similar tastes, as most of the girls you list are among my favorites. I'd put Peaches, Susana Spears, and Aneta at the top.
If you ever join MetArt, there's a nice bunch of Peaches stuff there, and galleries of most of the other girls you list.
I remember when I first saw Peaches at KarupsPC (as Elena), back in its 1024px days. She was younger and looked a bit "green" compared to now, but I was instantly struck by something about her. I'm really glad she's stayed in the game. I cannot get enough of Peaches.
Happy browsing!
|
04-05-08 03:21pm
|
Reply
41
|
CL Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Review
from badandy400:
That is too high of a price. A few months ago was there and I thought paying $30 was too much. Even the newer "HD" videos are no where near up to par. The photos are kind of a pain to download. Another case where Download Them All comes in handy.
Some of the scenes do have a sexual hint to them, but others are more like watching a gymnastics practice. That can be hot, but it could be a lot hotter!
|
04-07-08 08:46pm
|
Reply
42
|
CL Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Toadsith:
(JBDICK's Reply)
Haha - indeed I'd probably have to bring along my opera glasses to see the dancers as closely as the websites can provide.
On the other topic though - it is indeed saddening to actually converse with some of these impoverished girls, it was the main reasons I stopped dealing with pay-per-minute live cam sites. It was all very depressing. The girls really didn't have a lot of choices for income and they were rather uncomfortable with the whole deal.
On the other hand, I did like the cam service Met Art provided - there the girls did whatever they wanted and would simply chat with whomever they found the most interesting. Much happier environment - I'm guessing the girls got paid better as well.
|
04-07-08 01:10pm
|
Reply
43
|
CL Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Comment
from Khan:
Thanks but the real credit goes to the TBP Editor
Thanks again for the site suggestion.
|
04-07-08 10:11am
|
Reply
44
|
CL Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Review
from Boobs4ever:
nice one there prewiev site looks really tempting but the prize turns me off. If they would go down to $19.99 I would probably not hestitate when it looks diffrent to what I normally see
|
04-07-08 09:31am
|
Reply
45
|
CL Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Review
from williamj:
$39.95 is a bit expensive for average porn quality.
|
04-07-08 07:46am
|
Reply
46
|
CL Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Review
from Toadsith:
I don't know if it is actually the case, but Porn Users lists all these sites as Non-Nude porn. I've just never quite grasped the point of NN Porn - that is like trying to buy one of those cheesy softcore pornos from Blockbuster, save your cash. I was a member of CL Erotic a long while ago - but even half of that site was NN Porn, if I wanted to see attractive girls doing splits and what not, clothed, I can just go buy a ticket to a ballet and watch it live.
I know what you mean about the odd props and uncomfortable expressions on the girls, CL Erotic had the same problems. I feel like these are ballet drop-outs that decided it was a better gig than unemployment. Some of the girls were exquisitely beautiful, but the cringe factor could be pretty high.
|
04-06-08 01:58pm
|
Reply
47
|
College Uniform
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Sam Jordan:
(JBDICK's Reply)
Look each to there own, there are thing onthe interent that just don't intreast me, but I would comment on some I have not tried as I wouldn't be qualified to do so.
we have a very cheap trail membership to which people can make up their own minds. but I am going to point out two things.
1) “College-Uniform”, that is itself to explanatory, not as if the site is called "college-pussy", "nude-college-chicks" or "college-arse-fuck". We have full taken good care to show and demonstrate what you can expect in the site, with a brief, but clear description. unlike some other sites who class themselfs as uniform site and on getting in you find that it further from the truth.
Nudity includes topless girls, hence nude, and the term "fully nude". Even a traditional striptease act, you never saw the full Monty, the light would go out or the curtain came down etc.
Quote
"College Uniform is a striptease "School uniform and schoolgirl fantasy fetish site, college uniform fetish and school uniform fetish and British school girl uniform"
Endquote
we are true to our niche and members!
I understand about the giant pants, I’m not keen on them either, however if you where a member you get your chance to have your say, it also the members who have asked for them, so to repeat, each to their own, everyone has their own little turn ons.
2) This section this is called "users feedback" you have admitted that you are not a user or member of the site, so please tell me how you can comment on a site.
In most cases I think people DON’T read before they join up without reading what the site is offering, Sites like Onlytease, Panty Maniac’s etc are in the same class as us, ok we are smaller, cheaper but I yet to see anyone comment on those sites, being soft, striptease fetish site without delivery any site of pussy or hardcore action.
If you don’t like the site, because it not you thing, I can understand that, if you been a member of the site and been frustrated as there was something you want to see and there wasn’t there, then my answer to that is, why have you not emailed me or used the forum to state a request. We have given plenty of oppertunity for members to contact us.
|
04-24-08 03:43am
|
Reply
48
|
College Uniform
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Comment
from ace of aces:
..as you see, the webmaster don`t like critism and is getting personal :)
..man how lucky we are, that he don`t give a damm about the reviews of the pornusers.com (as he said in the reply to my comment) LOL
|
04-22-08 09:29am
|
Reply
49
|
College Uniform
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Comment
from Sam Jordan:
We are not just a non-nude site, and the site review is in no way “Dangerous” I have no idea what has made you make that accusation.
I will sate this again, because clearly some don’t understand, the site is a clothing fetish website. Therefore our members want to see the model(s) in the uniforms etc for as long as possible. If they strip out of their uniform within 5 shots, then the site would just be like another porn site.
Maybe the site is not for you, but I sure the outside of the site really drives it home that the focus is on the uniform side and not the nude side, is there any point of having a uniform fetish site, where no one is wearing uniforms?
The website clearly says strip tease.
|
04-22-08 12:45am
|
Reply
50
|
College Uniform
(0)
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Comment
from Lionheart:
I saw some sites like these and really would wish that would make it clear to the users that the site is non-nude. Most of the users expect nudity, unless it's a specific fetish
|
04-21-08 06:06pm
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
