| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
301
|
Suburban Amateurs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from SimonSubAms:
(Monahan's Reply)
Sorry I can't post links here but always feel free to e-mail me with any questions or requests you may have.
Simon
|
01-16-11 11:03am
|
Reply
302
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Khan:
(Monahan's Reply)
I'll have to defer your question about the videos to your fellow users.
With regards to the yearly pricing ...
Yes, we were made aware (last night) of some recent price changes. I've notified the TBP Editors and I suspect they'll get the listing updated when they return from the weekend/holiday.
|
01-02-11 06:39pm
|
Reply
303
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Khan:
(Monahan's Reply)
With regards to your #2, I can only suggest you read some of the reviews that have been submitted for the site. I think both graymane and Denner addressed this question.
|
01-02-11 01:00pm
|
Reply
304
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from tangub:
That's disappointing :-(
|
01-02-11 07:38am
|
Reply
305
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from Khan:
Just a quick followup ... we have been contacted by Met Art who says the price will be $29.99 from now on so I guess that answers this one.
Sorry. :(
|
01-02-11 07:06am
|
Reply
306
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from Khan:
I don't see it working at the moment.
I've flagged this one for one of our people to contact the site owner to see if we can get the special price reinstated.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
|
01-01-11 08:33pm
|
Reply
307
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Capn:
(Monahan's Reply)
Yes, there needs to be at least some variation, to maintain interest.
I soon tire of the artsy fartsy stuff! ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-06-10 08:55am
|
Reply
308
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Capn:
(Monahan's Reply)
Yes, it is not so much the huge volume, which is not a problem in itself, it is more the artsy thumbnails are so similar it is difficult to pick out galleries that are likely to appeal.
For instance, last time I was a member, I found no more than 2 dozen galleries that appealed enough to download. Seemingly no more than one or two per model. For such a huge site that is very few. Typically I have half a dozen sets of each model that appeals at the end of a months subscription.
I just found it too tiresome:
Click....'No, that doesn't appeal.' x100
1 'Ah that is a good one.'
Too frustrating!
Cap'n. :0/
|
12-05-10 02:45am
|
Reply
309
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Review
from dracken:
Thanks for the awesome review. I was really looking for a more softcore/ boob focused site and this sounds nice, however do these download problems persist even when using a download manager? That is a big No-No for me...
Thanks,
|
11-08-10 09:12pm
|
Reply
310
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from tangub:
(Monahan's Reply)
I was struggling to remember but your reply jogged my memory that my first experience of porn could well have been the Russ Meyer film Beneath the Valley of the Ultra Vixens in the local cinema around 1980, if it wasn't that then its likely to have been one of the Emmanuelle films
|
11-07-10 03:34pm
|
Reply
311
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from lk2fireone:
(Monahan's Reply)
I actually saw "I, a Woman" back around 1966, which was considered an extremely erotic movie. The Mr. Teas series was erotic comedy, I think, but I'm not an expert on these classificatons. Depends on your definition, I guess, because the novel "Ulysses" by James Joyce was banned as porn for many years after it was written, but I studied that novel in college in the 1960s because it was then considered a classic. But in the 1960s movies (unless they were real porn) did not show actual penetration or pussy shots. But just watching a guy stick his hand under a woman's skirt and feel her crotch (without actually seeing the hand or the crotch) was considered massively erotic. That's about all I remember (or think I remember) from "I, a Woman". There was also the idea that an unmarried woman was having sex, and with more than one man!
This was before VHS tapes (and DVDs), so I saw it in a theater, but I don't remember if it was a mainstream theater or what.
Even then, I did not consider "I, a Woman" as porn, but as an extremely erotic movie. Today's audience, especially the PU members, would not consider it porn. Today's younger PU audience would laugh at the idea that "Ulysses" was considered porn.
|
11-07-10 11:08am
|
Reply
312
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#16
from Ray O:
(Monahan's Reply)
Advent was true to her word and made some accommodation for me to return as a member and some bonus stuff. Very, very fair.
That being said, I let my membership lapse this summer as ATK was no longer doing to for me.
Too many repetitive set of the same model. There have been fewer and fewer girl-next-door types. Tobe Garret, a long time photographer seems to have quit the biz. The cute new gals were becoming fewer, the porn-star wanna be's were becoming frequent and the style of the site has changed. The adult boy-girl section was a complete turn off for me, but that is where they have been putting their resources and money.
I may return one day to see if things have gotten better, but I kind've doubt they would make the changes needed in the last couple of months.
|
10-19-10 02:17pm
|
Reply
313
|
Busty Brits
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(Monahan's Reply)
Yes I did, a while back.
At the time the site was a bit clunky & dated.
It has since been revamped.
If you are into softcore photography of well endowed pretty ladies, it is worth a whirl.
If you do, please let me know your opinion.
I haven't been a member post revamp! ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-13-10 08:58am
|
Reply
314
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from messmer:
(Monahan's Reply)
Glad it worked out for you, Monahan, but I agree they should have given you an extension of time for the loss of service and frustration. The site itself is very good but between tech support and censorship they don't seem to be doing so well in those areas!
|
10-10-10 11:57am
|
Reply
315
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from turboshaft:
(Monahan's Reply)
It might have saved the girl's life that you didn't associate her nudity with sex. Fortunately you chose reality over fantasy (whether good or bad fantasy).
|
09-26-10 01:07pm
|
Reply
316
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from malikstarks:
(Monahan's Reply)
Just now read your message. Only thing I'd caution you is if you go back to RK and use the link, make sure you are using internet explorer as your browser. I had problems getting the link to work in Firefox.
|
09-23-10 12:31pm
|
Reply
317
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from malikstarks:
(Monahan's Reply)
Monahan just do a Google search for Bangbros $9.95, also works for RK, and Brazzers.
|
09-13-10 10:28pm
|
Reply
318
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from messmer:
(Monahan's Reply)
Sorry, it's a one month subscription for me. Just wanted to try out BB and see what their videos were like so I don't know if it would renew at $ 26.91 but I can tell you that ever since I canceled I've been bombarded on a daily basis with email asking me to come back at the reduced rate.
|
09-06-10 06:45pm
|
Reply
319
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from messmer:
(Monahan's Reply)
Once you're back to BB just click on models, Monahan, there is a very large amount of choices. You can really narrow your search. Just keep an eye on the date when the various videos were released. I notice that even though many videos of 2007, 2008 vintage are marked HD they are not HD quality. All the new ones (2009, 2010) are 720p HD and downloadable.
|
09-06-10 11:57am
|
Reply
320
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from messmer:
(Monahan's Reply)
Well, you've been away from them long enough, Monahan, that it would be worth your while to go back to Bang Bros. If you are someone who subscribes fairly often to this site (I'm not one of them) then you might get a bit aggravated with the updates. Last week, I would be willing to bet, there were are least 3 scenes out of 5 that contained "enhanceds."
|
09-06-10 09:07am
|
Reply
321
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Jay G:
(Monahan's Reply)
My life experiences agree with you completely, and the "bumpkin" response is the only way to survive. You are so smart. I had to get burned a few times before I caught on to the "bumpkin" reply.
The only thing worse than a neighbor and mayor being pissed at you is a woman next door feeling "scorned"..."Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned."
|
09-06-10 05:41am
|
Reply
322
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from slutty:
(Monahan's Reply)
I gotta say, all three are pretty bad from my perspective. Last time I joined RK I was quite surprised by what seemed to be a significant increase in plastic.
|
09-06-10 02:10am
|
Reply
323
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(Monahan's Reply)
Just a couple of tours through Brazzers did it for me. Never have I seen so many inflated breasts! Bangbros. actually does have a search function now that lets you pick natural breasts only but last week's updates have been mostly "enhanced". so slim pickings!
|
09-05-10 06:08pm
|
Reply
324
|
Big Tit Hooker
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from atrapat:
(Monahan's Reply)
Most likely, not.
FWIW, the free tour claims they are currently releasing scenes but, if you check the headers sent by their server, all images from these updates were last modified back in 2008.
|
08-30-10 10:46am
|
Reply
325
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from anyonebutme:
(Monahan's Reply)
Then from their perspective, you're trying to download the full site on a trial subscription, of which after the affiliate fees, billing fees, hosting fees, etc., she's bringing in like a dollar maybe two for a life of naked photos. People who attempt site rips on trial subscriptions piss off webmasters just the same, probably even more so.
Sites cannot survive off those who just want to queue up as many downloads as their internet connection can handle.
If the speacial deal is, $15/mo. & 14 zip files per day, then each zip file downloaded is less than 4 cents. If you want to agree that a photoset is a ripoff at 4 cents then be my guest to do so.
If you're a fan of Sarah Peachez and still don't think she's worth even a nickel of your hard earned cash...
|
08-29-10 03:58pm
|
