| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Vivid
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from Amanda:
Hi Monahan! The review is definitely overdue for an update. We're on it! Thanks for the head's up.
|
09-26-16 06:05am
|
Reply
27
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from Amanda:
Hi Monahan! Thanks for the head's up. We will get that link fixed up.
|
09-21-16 06:13am
|
Reply
28
|
Hayley's Secrets
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from exotics4me:
I've almost joined this site no less than 5 times. They have several models I really like, but haven't seen anywhere else. Think I'll put it on my list of sites to join.
|
09-08-16 12:28pm
|
Reply
29
|
Hayley's Secrets
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from Amanda:
Hi Monahan! Thanks for the head's up! We'll get the review modified ASAP. :)
|
09-08-16 05:50am
|
Reply
30
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from lk2fireone:
(Monahan's Reply)
I don't think I ever went to a porn movie house.
I saw Emanuelle and The Story of O in a 'regular" movie house, which normally showed regular, commercial theatrical movies.
At the time I was living in Augusta, GA, which didn't have any porn movie houses.
This was back in the 1970s.
Augusta didn't have any porn shops, although it did sell X-rated novels in some of its bookstores, back then.
I believe Hugh Hefner worked for Esquire before he founded Playboy.
I never read Esquire, but I'm aware it was a sophisticated men's magazine (still is, as far as I can tell), that was similar to Playboy without the sexy nude photos (high grade fiction, interest in fashion, lifestyle, etc.)
I'm surprised Esquire is still around, when so many other magazines have gone out of business.
The internet is wonderful, but it has killed a lot of newspapers and magazines that were very important.
|
08-11-16 01:18am
|
Reply
31
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from pat362:
(Monahan's Reply)
All great examples but these women all have on thing in common and it's that they never really did a lot of hardcore (if any) porn. I'd also like to add that they were all pre-2008 when it was possible to have an long term porn career without doing hardcore. I don't think that is possible now and hasn't been for many years. You can still do solo and softcore with a some midcore stuff but the opportunities will be few and far between so making huge sums of money will be next to impossible.
The harsh reality for sanyone who is considering a career in the porn industry and only doing stuff that is not more intense than midcore is likely doomed to fail which is too bad because once upon a time you had many studios that were dedicated to the more artistic aspect of porn (I think using the term porn is incorrect when talking about these sites) because they don't really exist all that much anymore.
If a girl wants any kind of porn career than hardcore has to be an option. Otherwise she will get plenty of offers in the beginning but these will quickly disappear and the money she will make on those softcore jobs will not be all that great.
|
08-07-16 09:31am
|
Reply
32
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from skippy:
(Monahan's Reply)
Monahan,
I understand where you are coming from, but I don't think you can compare softcore modeling or even European porn to mainstream US porn. Very few models make the transition to hardcore easily because the traits needed for the two are different. Those who do make the transition may simply be starting in softcore with a plan to move on as they gain popularity. Also, European and some american nude models make a shitload of money, probably as much as or more than US porn stars do. Sidney Moon started with Playboy, made a lot of money modeling and was able to retire without going into porn videos (although she did a couple of girl/girl videos back in the Danni's Hotbox days.) Marketa Belonoha never did a single porn or girl/girl scene, often had two shootings a day and retired fairly wealthy in her early 30s.
There are a lot of European models that have done what I'll call European porn but will probably never progress beyond sex with their real life boyfriends on-screen. Connie Carter, often seen in Met-Art is a good example of that. There are also a lot of softcore models that are lesbians and won't do boy/girl sex scenes. This gets back to the traits thing I spoke of earlier. (i.e. Sydney, I think.)
So, my point is that nobody HAS to progress to freaky porn to be successful. There are plenty of very, very successful nude models that don't and plenty of their followers who appreciate it.
Just sayin' :-)
Skippy
|
08-06-16 10:07pm
|
Reply
33
|
Twistys Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Thanks for the update.
Always nice to get more clear details on a major site.
|
08-06-16 08:52am
|
Reply
34
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Toadsith:
(Monahan's Reply)
Fluffers are a weirdly persistent myth for the majority of the porn industry. In normal shoots the dudes just jerk off to keep themselves hard when lights need to be moved around or whatever. Sometimes the actress will lend a hand or mouth. A lot of guys use chemical aids like viagra.
There is the exception of bukkake / massive gangbang shoots which will indeed hire porn stars for the sole purpose of giving blowjobs to the guys next in line, as sometimes visible in the Czech Gangbang videos. In Gangbang 17 the "fluffers" and the host are grabbed by some of the men and brought into the action, while I doubt that it wasn't staged, they do a good job of making it believable.
|
08-02-16 06:46pm
|
Reply
35
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Stanky:
(Monahan's Reply)
Same thing happened to me. I was just browsing one of their sites to preview it and next thing you know I am a member. There was no email confirmation, no indication how much I was going to get charged. Bangbros can be a very dangerous site to join, it could end up costing you a lot of money if you're not careful.
|
06-04-16 10:17am
|
Reply
36
|
Brooke's Playhouse
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from Amanda:
Thanks for the head's up, Monahan! We'll take appropriate action! :)
|
05-31-16 05:35am
|
Reply
37
|
The Life Erotic
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(Monahan's Reply)
I live in California.
Micky D charges about $1 for their coffee or iced tea. With free refills.
So if you add a lot of sugar, it's OK to drink.
Except I've been reading lately that sugar is bad for your health. Bad for blood pressure and other problems.
The older I get, the fewer things I find that are good for you. Except porn?
Stay well, buddy. :)
|
04-20-16 03:17pm
|
Reply
38
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from rearadmiral:
(Monahan's Reply)
I hope you're right that Mofos will see the error of their ways and allow downloads again but my worry is that this is the future and guys like us are just dinosaurs. Maybe the average under-40 porn buyer is perfectly happy with streaming only. I know I'm not. But with internet access becoming so widespread maybe streaming is the future.
I read a comment on another forum where a commenter wondered if this was a trial balloon floated by the parent company to see what the reaction would be and if Mofos survived then maybe the other sites would go streaming only too.
The only consolation I have is that I own enough porn that I could plan to watch it all starting now and probably sluff off this mortal coil before reaching the end. But for me, as a collector, it is more about getting the porn than having the porn.
|
04-04-16 02:54pm
|
Reply
39
|
Club Met Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(Monahan's Reply)
I'm not sure what the deal is with Club Met Art but it isn't worth joining because it is smaller and more expensive than Met Art.
|
03-26-16 03:34pm
|
Reply
40
|
Hey Outdoor
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(Monahan's Reply)
No.
This site is part of the JAV HD network.
In every site in the network that I've looked at, none of the videos or photos are pixillated (have the mosaic effect) for censorship.
I assume that if you join any site in the network, you get access to all the sites.
But the best way of joining is to join through the JAV HD site, since that shows on sign-up that you get access to all the sites in the network.
|
03-07-16 09:15pm
|
Reply
41
|
Busty Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from Amanda:
Thanks Monahan! We'll get that fixed up. :)
|
12-29-15 05:33am
|
Reply
42
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Divinx:
(Monahan's Reply)
Unwanted suscription even happens when you are not logged into BB. Just visit a site they control (for instance, Brandi Belle), and as soon as you click anywhere in the page, you get suscribed to the site. I guess they keep a browser cookie that allows them to do this; deleting their cookies should be enough to avoid it.
|
12-19-15 09:40am
|
Reply
43
|
Hard X
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Amanda:
(Monahan's Reply)
Hey Monahan! Drop Mike an email at michael@rabbitsreviews.com and we'll see if we can help you out. :)
|
12-17-15 01:05pm
|
Reply
44
|
Hard X
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment from Monahan:
I lost my case with Gamma, but at least they were quickly responsive. The sign-up was for a 3 day trial so I didn't lose much...but it sure has souered me on the site I did want to join, HardX.com.
I still feel like a sucker for not having spotted the cross sell, but stuff happens.
|
12-17-15 10:48am
|
Reply
45
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Jay G:
(Monahan's Reply)
Yes, I always thought that if a site had a monitored forum which rapidly responded to customers thoughts, complaints, and ideas, it would certainly keep many loyal customers. I remember back in the very early days of Kink.com being given the opportunity to provide feedback which ended up in them actually creating a new site. Even though I was only a small part of the new idea, I felt wonderful about their listening and working with that idea. Probably spent a lot more money over these many years at Kink.com simply because I felt a loyalty that I wouldn't feel from webmasters who don't listen.
I love the idea of the customer service supervisor caring enough be an "undercover boss." I used to teach customer service representatives and did phone work myself just to show that even with difficult customers (and there were many), shutting up and actually listening to their angry complaints was more important than anything else. Often listening and a small showing of generosity at the end would win the loyalty and good words of customers who otherwise would have gone away in disgust.
|
12-14-15 07:05am
|
Reply
46
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from TheBrickster:
(Monahan's Reply)
I remember the music tracks. :-)
I can hear the saxophones and funky bass lines in my head.
There are some sites incorporate music well (I strongly recommend you check out New Girl POV), but I think now it's mostly used to cover up outdated/European porn.
|
12-10-15 11:10am
|
Reply
47
|
Busty Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from MikeC:
Hi Monahan,
I logged in to give a quick status update on the site. It appears the site hasn't updated since January.
There are about 60 scenes in total, but membership does grant access to the HDV Pass network, which includes some sites that are still updating.
On the performer front, you'll find that standard mix of popular stars (Bridgette B, Raylene, Sophie Dee and Tori Black have multiple scenes, for example) and those who are on the lower rung of the notoriety scale.
|
12-10-15 10:58am
|
Reply
48
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from sonofzog:
(Monahan's Reply)
Well, I missed that entirely, thanks. I had a DD subscription for several years and always loved the way they photographed the models. Better control of makeup and lighting than anyone else, IMO, and Stephen Hicks had a great eye for models and a long-time weakness for full-figured girls. Entirely wrong that he was taken at such a young age; I see they're including some hardcore now which he never would have tolerated for a second. Ah, well, $40 for three months is irresistible.
|
12-08-15 11:48am
|
Reply
49
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Jay G:
(Monahan's Reply)
Amazing.... I do the same "screenshot" thing.......
Great minds think alike LOL
|
12-01-15 09:30am
|
Reply
50
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Amanda:
(Monahan's Reply)
For some reason, the system wouldn't let me approve Graymane's reply in our system. I was able to see it, but not take action on it. I hope GM doesn't mind me copying and pasting it here:
"Sorry, Monahan ...... most of the stuff you're asking me about has ridden out Of Dodge ....not uncommon at my advanced age wherein brain-cells are departing amass with one-way passage.
In decipherable context that is to say I'm delighted to give you all I can remember that'll be of genuine help to you.
From the numbers you've given me I have to agree that indeed the price is right. And yes, I'd do it all over again. The site is that good.
I think I did mention there's no hardcore. As much as I welcome but a very limited dose of hardcore ..... I didn't miss it at all. Too much other good stuff just left it in a cloud of dust.
The search functions? ..... well, I simply don't know. Maybe that's because it wasn't that important to me.
Epoch? I can't praise that billing outfit enough. They cover your back right from the get-go. Unlike much of what we find in a lot of the other guys we shell-out to ......Epoch will also take on any injustice you lay in their laps.
Good sailing, Bro .....I hope it meets your expections."
|
11-24-15 05:40am
|
