| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
151
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Tree Rodent:
(Monahan's Reply)
I thought maybe I was over reacting but looking at the latest replies I don't think I am. This whole thing is starting to get ridiculous with some sites getting nastier and more dishonest. We're hearing about this all the time now on PU, and it's getting worse.
Yes it is dishonesty, and it should be stopped or some people will stop buying online porn altogether, because a cheap membership could end up costing you $100-200. If you can't distinguish between the conmen and the honest sites, it's bad news for everyone. If a veteran like Pat, who knows what he's doing, gets caught, it's a very very bad sign.
|
09-02-13 06:20pm
|
Reply
152
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from gaypornolover:
Wow that's awful. I genuinely think this site should be removed from PU and TBP until they quit this. It's more than just cross-selling.
I think people should boycott this site until it quits this and pledges never to do it, or anything similar, again.
Anyone who is a current member should leave and tell them the reason why.
|
09-02-13 02:52pm
|
Reply
153
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from Tree Rodent:
I have just cancelled my membership with TMW even though I was going to stay at least another month.
|
09-02-13 10:06am
|
Reply
154
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from Tree Rodent:
This just isn't on. This is why so many, including myself, are now so leery of joining a site because of worries about being ripped off, and all the hassle of putting it right, it's not worth joining. For the record I rejoined Teen Mega World because of them getting rid of pre checked cross selling, and so nearly nearly pressed those buttons to see what the special discount sites were like. NA and TMW You are going cause online porn serious harm because you are acting like scum bags.
I was going to do a Teen Mega World review for the new PU site, and had most of it done. Because of this new trick I'm not going to. In fact I think I'm not going to do another review, until PU/TBP highlights and distinguishes between the honest and dishonest. You need to be standing on the side of righteousness and honesty. This sort of thing has to stop before all porn sites have the same reputation as those rip off places in the 80's run by organised crime.
NA and TMW are acting like criminals, or at least like conmen. It's the same to me. It's trying to trick people and rip them off. It has to stop. You wont stop it yourselves so someone like PU/TBP has to stand up and do something, or they/us will be tarnished too. That's the way I feel. You cannot and should not lump all the networks and porn sites together. Some are plain dishonest, some are genuinely honest and customer oriented. We need to distinguish between those who are and those who aren't.
This is not a small thing, it's the difference between crook and honest citizen. TBP/PU, stand up and do something now before credibility is lost. I feel I should stop contributing for a while, because not enough is being done to stop this behaviour.
|
09-02-13 09:56am
|
Reply
155
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from pat362:
The same thing happened to me when I was a member of teenmegaworld. I went on their discount page and clicked on one of the link to see what the site looked like and boom I was charged for that site. I did the same thing you did and got the charge reversed.
|
09-02-13 08:01am
|
Reply
156
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from pat362:
(Monahan's Reply)
Face is always the first thing that I look at and more important than some of the other choices. I can't pick only that one because the rest does come into play when if I'm going to save the scene.
|
08-28-13 03:32am
|
Reply
157
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from RagingBuddhist:
(Monahan's Reply)
Glad to see someone else who subscribes to "If it ain't broke, don't fix it". I was pissed when I found out I couldn't get a motherboard with W2K drivers, but XP works just fine for me too.
|
08-18-13 12:11pm
|
Reply
158
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from pat362:
(Monahan's Reply)
Seeing as there's another case of syphilis then can you imagine what a condom would do for the women currently working in the industry. It's not the be all and end all of STD protection but it's better than nothing. We may never know what most performers really think about condoms because their overlords make sure that they don't say anything or say that they hate them. You know that is a lie when even the performers that have always worked with condoms say they don't like them.
Wicked which is a condom only company is on the no condom side. How fucked up is that? Mind you maybe they don't want any competition?
|
08-07-13 02:35pm
|
Reply
159
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Ace DDF:
(Monahan's Reply)
Hello Monahan,
Thank you for your Positive comments. We really appreciate that! I just wanted to let you know that our yearly Price has dropped dramatically since you last utilized this option. It was $269.99 in the past, but now we have lowered the Network Price to $149.99, and all of the single sites are $119.99. Much more affordable :) For the Network that Breaks down to $12.50 per month for 20 + Exclusive Updates each week. Less then 50 cents a day for 4 Movies per day. Pretty Sweet Deal! Hope you will come back to us soon and enjoy your week!
Best--Ace
|
07-22-13 01:54am
|
Reply
160
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Tree Rodent:
(Monahan's Reply)
Absolutely right Monahan. In the past shady dealing porn suppliers made money out of ripping people off by not having what they claimed, then took the money and ran, or delivered absolute rubbish. This lot have great material and should in my opinion, be charging more for it. They certainly don't need to resort to dubious practices (or maybe they do). I dunno...strange very strange.
|
06-14-13 10:22am
|
Reply
161
|
Bikini Riot
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from KET924aab:
(Monahan's Reply)
Monahan, I was referring to general softcore porn sites like MPL Studios and Femjoy, etc. Bikini Riot is the only bikini site I've joined (I'm not counting Microminimus because its not really a porn site). I searched "beach" at Met-Art, and it returned 346 photosets, which is probably an underestimate because not every beach set gets tagged with beach. ALS Scan and In the Crack also have some good beach scenes, including video.
|
05-30-13 05:28pm
|
Reply
162
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Khan:
(Monahan's Reply)
Not sure what to say on this one. I asked the editor to try visiting the site (from our link) with MSIE, FireFox and Chrome ... all three worked (and correctly showed our discount). So, I don't know if it's just certain versions of those browsers or if there's something else that's causing the problem for the two of you.
Sorry I couldn't be of more help with this one.
|
05-23-13 07:57am
|
Reply
163
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from stingerxxx:
(Monahan's Reply)
Thanks for that Monahan. I'm using Google Chrome and that seems to be the problem. I tried using Internet Explorer as you suggested and the "issue" has gone away.
|
05-22-13 10:40pm
|
Reply
164
|
Nicole Peters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(Monahan's Reply)
She is an attractive woman so I can see why you might get distracted.
I don't think the difference in score makes too much of a difference since sites in the 60's are normally the ones to be avoided at all cost. The ones in the 50's are the same but the person feels even more cheated and/or is royally pissed.
You gave sufficient data that anyone curious will know whether it's worth trying or avoiding.
|
05-07-13 03:34am
|
Reply
165
|
Nicole Peters
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Review
from pat362:
You are a generous man because I don't know if I could have given this site a score in the 60's. The preview section is pathetic so anyone thinking that the good content is inside would have to pay to discover that it isn't.
|
05-06-13 05:32pm
|
Reply
166
|
Mandy Roe
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from pat362:
(Monahan's Reply)
Yeah but you're an old pro at it. My comment were for the newbies who still make those fatal errors. I really wish TBP and PU had existed when I first started surfing the net. I would have saved so much money that it's not even funny.
|
04-20-13 10:49am
|
Reply
167
|
Roxy Raye
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(Monahan's Reply)
She is an attractive young womean and anyone who's into her and the more extreme kinds of anal penetration should join her site because you'll mostly get that. If you aren't into the extreme penetration thing then you'll want to avoid her site and probably most of the stuff she shoots.
|
04-15-13 03:42pm
|
Reply
168
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from RLane:
I could have access to both sites with payed membership to Wet and Puffy and I didn't have to pay an additional membership to get any of the two sites. Maybe there was something was wrong with the link.
|
02-23-13 05:38pm
|
Reply
169
|
Wasteland
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Jay G:
(Monahan's Reply)
No....That was a quote from the page itself (cut and pasted)
|
01-21-13 12:49am
|
Reply
170
|
Pornstar Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from Khan:
I just had one of our editors check and she's still seeing the special price we have listed.
So ....
All I can suggest is that you clear your cache (temporary Internet files) and any cookies associated with that site, then revisit diesctly from one of our links.
That should do it.
|
01-11-13 07:17am
|
Reply
171
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(Monahan's Reply)
I had no idea that they arbitrarily assigned a site to their members at the time. That's terrible! I had had a long term subscription but it had run out when they made the change and I decided for 21Sextreme when I re-joined because I always found that 21Sextury was geared more to the taste of younger people. My personal feeling at this time is that they are on their way to becoming extinct. They won't keep their members with a slew of dormant sites plus a handful of updates a week.
|
12-21-12 10:11am
|
Reply
172
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from pat362:
(Monahan's Reply)
Me too. What I often do is if there is one site that I'm curious about but that there is no review then I will check the company and see if they have other reviews and that will help me decide if I want to try that site based on the score given to the other sites.
|
12-20-12 06:44pm
|
Reply
173
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from oldfizzywig:
I am deeply saddened that your results with Wet and Pissy, were not as good as mine with Wet and Puffy. I had tried my best, it was my first review, to be as accurate as I could at the time that I wrote my review. I had joined Wet and Puffy, and was able to access all three of their sites. Yes, I did have to sign into each one separately, if I remember correctly, but I did access all three, and was happy with my results.
I see that after 7 comments you were able to resolve your issues with the web host and it appears that things have been worked out. That is good, and I hope long term that you are not upset with my having given what I believed then, and still believe was my honest opinion of the Wet and Puffy site.
|
12-19-12 08:33pm
|
Reply
174
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from gaypornolover:
(Monahan's Reply)
Thanks for the reply - I did wonder how it would be enforced and yes those inspectors are gonna have one hot job!
If I did it I'd happily offer to put the condoms on the male actors myself!
|
11-22-12 04:29pm
|
Reply
175
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(Monahan's Reply)
I was surprise about the name thing. I think you are right and they are just too lazy to fix it. Although it's true that the older stuff is not very good. I can't give them a score below 90 plus because they have so much content that you do get your money's worth.
It would be nice if they trie to remaster their older stuff like Bangbros and Dogfart do but we have already established that they are lazy so doing that would really be too much work.
|
10-26-12 01:52pm
|
