| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Hooliganzo:
(Monahan's Reply)
The lack of search criteria for solo hardcore/sofcore etc is true but I usually go for Soft-core anyway so it was an issue I overlook.
I think the inaccuracies in cup sizes have to do with returning models who previously did not have implants returning to do more photo sets with them.
I would have liked to see a search criteria for implants and I did mention that some models have implants but overall it is a minor complaint for me.
|
10-16-12 08:17am
|
Reply
177
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Hooliganzo:
(Monahan's Reply)
Most of what I liked is already listed in the pros. The negatives were just nitpicking.
You can find big discounts for the site like the $65 annual offered here or $9.95 monthly which are a steal. I took the annual discount almost a year ago. Just from a price to content ratio, the site is worth it at the full price. The fact that you can subscribe at a 66% discount makes it a must especially with the high production value and content updates.
Aside from content site is well organized and the search is great. The amount of different models on this site is huge. Most I've seen in any site I've been to.
Like mentioned before the production value is high. The models have their hair and makeup done in a glamour fashion which I don't see in many other sites. The pictures are well shot, high resolution, crisp and full of color. There are no Jpeg compression artifacts like in some other sites.
Twistys live, while new and only updates once a month, is a nice addition on top of everything else. I always wanted to see something like this smiler to playboy night calls, Basically naked woman talking with some action at the end. Before that they had and still have model interviews which I also liked.
It is definitely a more generalist site with softcore and straight forward hardcore and no niches. Overall you usually don't get both quantity and quality and this site has both on top of a lot of diversity in its models.
|
10-15-12 07:24pm
|
Reply
178
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from pat362:
(Monahan's Reply)
Or drinks it which sadly I have seen before. There are some things that you should never view if you aren't into this type of fetish.
|
09-23-12 01:06pm
|
Reply
179
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from Cybertoad:
(Monahan's Reply)
Monahan, did you just use a clinical term in the porn group ? LOL
I feel desensitized LOL .
|
09-18-12 12:10pm
|
Reply
180
|
Busty Adventures
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment from Monahan:
One year update...still nothing added since June 9, 2009.
Unless you have never been to the site and grabbed some of it's rather good, but low def content, in which case it's worth the $18 for one month, there's no reason to become a member.
Bang Bros. is promoting this site big time which is why I checked it out again, but nada, bupkus, zilch.
3-1/4 years without any updates and they're still trying to peddle it!
|
09-14-12 10:35am
|
Reply
181
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from gaypornolover:
(Monahan's Reply)
Excellent! I'm really happy you got a good result. We porn users need to flex our consumer power and show we're paying customers like with any other service.
|
09-12-12 01:42am
|
Reply
182
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from pat362:
(Monahan's Reply)
I suspect that they are a victim of their popularity so satisfying such a large group of members is an impossibility. I'm glad that people like you still enjoy the site and I'm also glad that their join price is ridiculusly low so no one can complain that porn is too expensive beause this site proves them wrong.
It's too bad that the few studios that I love don't have a lot of content and aren't updating anymore and those that are tend to have the annoying added loud sountrack.
|
09-05-12 06:28pm
|
Reply
183
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from RustyJ:
(Monahan's Reply)
The split didn't make much sense anyway. There's really little content on sextreme side. Last week sextreme had 3 compared to sextury's 13 and one scene of those from MightyMistress is available under both because it also falls under SexWithKathiaNobili site.
|
09-02-12 09:34pm
|
Reply
184
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from wetandpuffy:
(Monahan's Reply)
Hello Jack,
Could you please email me at wayne@wetandpuffy.com with your username,
I would like to extend your membership free of charge.
Regards
|
09-01-12 09:04am
|
Reply
185
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from wetandpuffy:
(Monahan's Reply)
Hello there,
This is Wayne the site co owner of all 3 sites. May I ask if you are having trouble accessing the other 2 sites. You should have free access to the other 2 sites. And if you do not then Ill make sure I get this fixed for you right away.
Best regards
Wayne
wayne@wetandpuffy.com
|
09-01-12 07:09am
|
Reply
186
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from oldfizzywig:
(Monahan's Reply)
Thanks for your comments. Yes pissing is certainly a small niche market, but between the "wet and puffy" and their related "wet and pissy" site, you will see a bunch of it here. There is some of the drinking and pouring you mentioned, not in all cases, but maybe 10 to 20 % of the videos do include those things. What I like are the clear closeups of pissing, some with lips spread wide so you can really see it streaming (steaming) out.
And I also agree with you on the big taco and juicy cherry stuff. Maybe because SWMBO has a peachy pussy.
It certainly is mostly a solo site, there are a few lesbian vids, and even a few where a guy is in there, but these (from what I have seen) are few and far between.
|
08-31-12 04:35pm
|
Reply
187
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from gaypornolover:
Do they use an independent biller? If so and you've already complained direct to the site and had no joy, contact them and say you want a refund based on the site not giving you what it promised. They often issue refunds in my experience.
|
08-30-12 09:57am
|
Reply
188
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from RagingBuddhist:
I think you should have joined Wet & Puffy then. I signed up there last month and did, indeed, have access to all three sites. Maybe the package deal doesn't come with the other two sites.
|
08-30-12 12:24am
|
Reply
189
|
Hanna Hilton
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from marcdc1:
(Monahan's Reply)
I feel bad for not being able to be more positive, but what can you say about a site that hasn't been updated in THAT long, and is rather small to boot?
I'll be reviewing Ashley Fires site soon (part of the same network), As I'll write in that review - she is worth the joining fee alone!
I do have to say that network includes enough that I definitely got my money's worth. My thing is I want people to know that the site they may really be interested in isn't updating anymore.
Be Well-
|
08-19-12 06:05pm
|
Reply
190
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from rearadmiral:
(Monahan's Reply)
I should probably point out that the problems I had (they seem to be fixed now) seemed to be mostly associated with VB3 and the add-on channels that require VB3.
And I sure agree with you on the content issues. I stand by my position that VB could improve by offering one or two good updates per day rather than five crappy ones. And the constant use of repackaged and reposted scenes in a major annoyance. The only good news is that the other users will usually point out a repost.
|
08-06-12 09:39am
|
Reply
191
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from xexbot:
(Monahan's Reply)
That does sound like so BS. Sorry to hear that. I have had no problems with them, but I did join after the split. In fact, the split is what kept me from joining for so long because I was basically interested in about half of what they offered in each.
I won't try to defend them and I certainly understand your frustration. At the same time as big as these sites and this network is getting, the split was inevitable. The alternative would have probably been to start raising the prices. From a sales-perspective, that very well could have been a death sentence for their business. It's really hard to get people to join sites for over twenty dollars these days. I think they screwed up in how they divided the site. They should have made 21 Sextreme an actual addition, because that's really what it is anyway, and just charged an extra ten bucks a month to add it on. Or they could have made it more "extreme" period so that it can stand on its own.
|
07-30-12 12:33pm
|
Reply
192
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from exotics4me:
(Monahan's Reply)
On the duplicated content, the only place I ran into a lot of overlap was on the biggest known stars. Like Eva Angelina, Jenaveve Jolie, the ones with 100+ scenes. If you search more by the DVD series than individual models, the overlap isn't bad at all and as my comment below about Tainster shows, Tainster's webmaster said they have an exclusive deal with Videosz to have their DVDs of their exclusive content. I'm going to do a multi-month membership this time just because I don't feel like I saw maybe 1/10th of what all they have.
|
07-16-12 02:04pm
|
Reply
193
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from rearadmiral:
(Monahan's Reply)
Monahan - I'm reluctant to give you a definitive answer because I haven't been a member at Videosz for a while and for some reason I didn't review the site so I have nothing to help my memory. My recollection, though, is that while there is some overlap that it wasn't too bad. I recall that I though both sites were still a good value and that both were worthwhile. Consider posting this query on the forum and you may get some better answers.
I wish I could be of more assistance...
|
07-16-12 01:09pm
|
Reply
194
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from rearadmiral:
(Monahan's Reply)
Thanks for the comments. I agree that when a scene is posted as a compilation the users usually identify that and many even note the difference. In a lot of cases one scene has been edited and runs shorter.
I also agree that it is frustrating that the site gets so many performer's names wrong. But again, the users usually step in and provide the name.
And thanks to everyone else who took the time to reply.
|
07-15-12 03:26pm
|
Reply
195
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(Monahan's Reply)
I think your reply was the funniest thing I've read all day. You give me hope that there is a silver lining in every cloud. We just have to look for it.
|
06-30-12 05:25pm
|
Reply
196
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Claypaws:
(Monahan's Reply)
Glad it worked!
|
06-13-12 06:20am
|
Reply
197
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Claypaws:
(Monahan's Reply)
Weird! What happens if you enter the address directly in the browser?
www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=21865
by copying and pasting rather than clicking.
If that doesn't work, it will probably be a matter of things like traceroute, given that it is working for some of us.
|
06-12-12 03:32am
|
Reply
198
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from RustyJ:
Just tried on Firefox, opens ok for me.
|
06-12-12 02:23am
|
Reply
199
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Claypaws:
(Monahan's Reply)
The link is working for me, with Firefox. You are clicking the "visit site" link, aren't you?
|
06-11-12 03:55pm
|
Reply
200
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from Khan:
seemed to work ok just now when I tested it. Let us know if you're still having problems.
|
06-11-12 02:00am
|
