| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
Priya Anjali Rai
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from ace of aces:
(TheRizzo's Reply)
i tried it out and i would w8 if i were you. (to less videos 10 no extra`s working, fotos lot`s but who cares about fotos :) )
|
02-21-09 04:11pm
|
Reply
102
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Cybertoad:
(TheRizzo's Reply)
Hey Rizzo,
But my brother, I am not easily impressed by solo's either.
Nor am I a cougar fan really.
But this site mind you is a solo and natural.
At her age well wow. Body of a 20 year old worth the visit even with some site flaws.
I was impressed.
|
07-02-08 07:39am
|
Reply
103
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Wittyguy:
(TheRizzo's Reply)
Pretty much everything I have heard indicates that 800x600 is as much as they can muster. Pretty pathetic considering the other content that is available ... maybe someone will by them a digital camera that can take pics bigger than 1 megapixel ;) I'm thinking that I'm going to pass on this site for now.
|
06-11-08 06:36pm
|
Reply
104
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Comment
from zijaanzicht:
Almost equal but this site has slightly better resolution and a little more edgy b/g scenes that are sometimes very rare even for being leased (if applicable).
I personally like this site more than twisties due to the clarity and less compression artifacts often seen in some sets at Twisties. They appear to no longer show if the other sites update (at least to non-members). My guess is NO and they have simplified the site to the flagship sites.
|
07-25-08 01:39am
|
Reply
105
|
Summer Banks
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(TheRizzo's Reply)
I was tempted to sign up for the trial, but not at that price. There are no reviews to be found anywhere, not even on outside links. The girl is quite attractive, but is that enough? Not for me. Solo sites are often weak and I fear this may be a limited trial of content that is just not much.
|
01-21-09 01:32pm
|
Reply
106
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Comment
from Jamesy:
At present VERY SLOW - takes 1.5 to 2 hours to download a 600 Mb video
|
09-01-10 05:13pm
|
Reply
107
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Comment
from dracken:
I've never complained. With a good connection I get a 600mb video in 2-3 minutes.
However, almost all new videos are only available as huge files (500-700mb) Make sure you have a large hard-disk available :)
|
03-04-10 04:29pm
|
Reply
108
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Denner:
(TheRizzo's Reply)
I agree to some extend (there's fine licensed stuff at Teendreams once in a while) - just getting tired of finding similar stuff on different sites - and that's kind of paying for the same thing more than once..
|
02-21-09 04:00pm
|
Reply
109
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(TheRizzo's Reply)
Exactly, Rizzo .. this site has some of the best stuff - just wish the updates - especially videos - would come more often - and yes, if so, this user also would rebill much longer....
|
01-07-09 03:18pm
|
Reply
110
|
Teen Pink Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Review
from ace of aces:
when and where did you see the special price?
all price i saw until now was 29,95$ :(
|
07-07-08 05:46am
|
Reply
111
|
Tera Patrick
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Jay G:
(TheRizzo's Reply)
The price can get even better for the next months. I went to quit (as I usually do after a month or two)to join another site and they offered me the next month and so on for $9.95/mo USD, so I took it. It's less than two cups of coffee around here.
If I download one scene, it's usually about 350 KB/s and takes about 8 to 10 minutes. That's slow compaired to other websites, but not too bad if you're looking for quality over quantity. I find when I download too fast, I end up with more stuff than I could ever watch anyway. Now I actually usually watch it before I download more stuff.
|
05-04-09 04:18am
|
Reply
112
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Wittyguy:
(TheRizzo's Reply)
I think when it comes to the hardcore material, which is what I'm primarily interested in, the sets seem to be mostly duplicates from what can be seen on other sites. I do believe that there is some exclusivity but not enough. Also, I think some of the stuff that appears to be exclusive on their site tends to show up later on some of the other mega sites.
Like I mentioned Blue Fantasies is not a clone but it is total softcore glamour. Naughtystaff is a new addition and mostly exclusive but with only 12 sets so far its not big enough to justify joining at this point.
For me, Sexy-babes and it's network is superior but that's just one humble chimps opinion.
|
07-27-08 07:42pm
|
Reply
113
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from badandy400:
(TheRizzo's Reply)
I have had Video box download at 50 MBit/s for many hours at a time even during afternoons and evenings. So I must agree that their speed is actually pretty good.
|
07-07-08 07:47pm
|
Reply
114
|
Virtua Girl HD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from asmith12:
(TheRizzo's Reply)
> Seems like a unique thing, something I feel I need lately!
BTW, I'm in the same quest to find something unique most of the time, and I've just checked, 9 of my own "top sites" are unique in one way or another, so please feel free to check :-). While some maybe not "your cup of tea", you MIGHT be able to find something, as they're pretty diverse.
|
09-27-08 08:42am
|
Reply
115
|
Virtua Girl HD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from asmith12:
(TheRizzo's Reply)
> To you which do you prefer the buying the girl you want or the $15 option?
Both :-). Buying a bunch of girls is good to make initial collection, but then $15 option is nice to keep things interesting without much effort.
|
09-26-08 12:02pm
|
Reply
116
|
Wasteland
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Wasteland:
(TheRizzo's Reply)
Actually, the email link for customer service, cancellations and tech support is clearly displayed on the join form, the terms and conditions page, in the membership confirmation email sent out upon joining, and in the customer service area inside the members area. We also have links to netbilling's self-service area in which you can cancel.
We aim to please, but please be kind and look before posting to the boards. The email links are right next to the phone number...;-)
Cheers,
Kiko at wasteland
|
01-11-09 02:51pm
|
Reply
117
|
Xisty
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Comment
from Drooler:
I believe the people have spoken -- by not paying attention to this site for a whole year until now.
I've lurked my way over there occasionally, but saw nothing in the previews of photos that couldn't be gotten at Babelicious or other sites in larger pic sizes. And I've been a member once or twice, too.
If Xisty would post 3000 px size images at least of all of their photos in the future, then they'd be competitive again. But what they do is just post larger than 1800 only of the ones they find to be the most popular, meaning there's a time lag between the original postings and the 3000's.
Or, if you're a first timer, you have to go to the 3000's, then find the complete set in smaller sizes if you don't want every pic at 3000.
So it gets complicated. And who wants that?
|
01-16-09 08:01pm
|
Reply
118
|
Xisty
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Comment
from exotics4me:
Hey guys, this has been one of my favorite sites over the last few years. I was a member last in November 2008, and I'm checking the newest sets I have from there to get the specs.
I have a newer Eve Angel video from xisty that is 852x480 with a 2049 bitrate.
One of the oldest videos I have from there to show the lowest quality they have is of Jenny Sanders, it is 640x428 with a 1272 bitrate
The picture sets are 1800x1200, 1200x1800, and then there are the mega picture sets that go up over 3000, though those are not available on all picture sets and do come zipped.
The updates as of November were coming just as advertised, and did include some models that I'm not familiar with, so I would assume those are exclusive.
Site navigation is still a real strong point of the site. Not for sure if any of you were around that much back when this site first took off, but their webmaster at the time, Brad, might still be the WM not for sure, really listened to the PU members input and I always thought it showed, very easy to use site. I would still rate it as high as my original review.
|
01-15-09 11:24pm
|
Reply
119
|
Xisty
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Comment
from williamj:
Honestly it has been on my radar. Any current member feed back from PU would be appreciated.
|
01-15-09 06:13pm
|
Reply
120
|
XL Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(TheRizzo's Reply)
It's a constant beef of mine, Rizzo. As far as I know all their sites suffer from over-sized logos. It's a puzzle to me that they keep any subscribers at all. Unless I'm too nit-picking about it and other users just aren't bothered by those abominations. I really wish a webmaster would look in on this one and give a reasonable explanation.
|
07-12-08 06:47pm
|
