| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from turboshaft:
(pat362's Reply)
Yeah, I remember a few fleeting moments of android-assisted pleasure followed by unstoppable Yul Brynner murderousness--we've been warned!
Of course such things never seemed to have stopped anybody once they get an erection, though count me out as I'm still having nightmares from this fucking insane Japanese robot mouth of terror.
|
04-14-14 06:58pm
|
Reply
277
|
Bree Olson
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from marcdc1:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks Pat.
I knew Dylan Ryder was retire, and suspected Bree must be as well. I know Ashley Fires has flirted with retirement - thankfully she has decided to stay!
I figure Devon Lee and Sunny Leone are retired as well, do you know for sure?
All the best to you-
|
04-13-14 03:14pm
|
Reply
278
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from turboshaft:
(pat362's Reply)
I was watching something recently that was shot only a few months ago with Amber Rayne, and I guess I'd kinda forgotten she's been in the business for nine years now. And amazingly in that time--a veritable eternity in porn careers--she's bucked the trend of so many veteran performers and hasn't destroyed her body, gotten married, or softened her performances one bit! :-)
|
04-10-14 08:52pm
|
Reply
279
|
Anal Educator
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Tree Rodent:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks for the info Pat. So it sounds as though this is not under new management after all? Rarely do I stay with a site for more than a month or two, and have never signed up for anything longer than a month originally. The material looks good even though it is old, and they don't seem to use scummy pre checked cross selling. Be interesting to hear if this is a standalone or whether it comes with the rest of the network.
|
04-09-14 06:41pm
|
Reply
280
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from elephant:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks for the reply Pat. Yeah you'd think when you get the chance to work with these incredible girls that you can't fail to make money, especially when they agree to do the hardest type of anal porn on the net. I guess some people must be buying into their site as they keep going and hiring girls so somehow they are making it work, dunno how like.
I do agree with your statement its like circus porn and they could learn lots from watching other successful studios to how to setup lighting and filming techniques. I also like and find it much hotter when models are enjoying it too, hate anything when it looks like the model is really looking sad and just going along with it to get some money. I guess most of the Euro girls are as they come and go so fast and don't have the long careers like some of the American girls.
|
03-31-14 03:08am
|
Reply
281
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Comment
from elephant:
Cheers for the warning Pat, I've often wanted to join this site and really wish they'd see sense and make it a normal membership site, would make heaps more money.
One of the annoying things is they have some really great looking scenes there. I'd join in a shot if they'd make it a normal website, but if you read all about their progress (On EBF)on even getting the site they have now up to see daylight I won't be holding my breath on them making it a normal membership.
99%of other sites on the internet can't be wrong with the pay and be a member and have access to all movies system. Ticket base system are so flawed in my opinion.
|
03-30-14 04:29am
|
Reply
282
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Abel Semen:
"*Sorry but facials should never be included in glamorous porn because there's nothing glamorous about shooting cum all over the face of the woman you had sex with since there's no way you are going to kiss that mouth and obviously neither do the guys in these videos."
It may not be a surprise given my nick, but I couldn't disagree more. Facials are, for my money, easily the most visually interesting element of mainstream porn (on the average), and it constantly frustrates me that otherwise high-quality "glamour" sites tend not to include them.
And, post-facial kissing is very much a thing, and one that if anything I wouldn't mind seeing more of. Seems only fair on the part of the guy if he wants/expects his girl to take it in face. I don't want it in every scene, but it would be a good occasional inclusion, *especially* in scenes with a bit more of a romantic feel.
|
03-24-14 07:37pm
|
Reply
283
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from Schirm:
Hi Pat
I noticed you put a remark about video quality in the cons list. Would you mind elaborate on this a bit?
Taking aside newer hd scenes, would you say that files suffer from too hard compression, low bitrates etc? What filesize would a typical 30 min full frame (4:3) scene be, roughly?
I figure the main alternative would be Videosz, where I found the quality to quite satisfactory overall. Is Videobox on the same level?
|
03-23-14 02:42am
|
Reply
284
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Schirm:
(pat362's Reply)
Dear Pat
You are so right and obviously we dont agree.
Yes you are wrong - rehash a video and call it something else to inflate a site does not score quality points with me.
And no, I dont have to give you such comparison sites for a very simple reason: I review DDF that for what I see and I dont know that many other sites yet. Unlike you, I found their search system lacking and not that helpful when I used it.
As for content on the their other sites - no I didnt like those much.
Regarding their platform being outdated: may I please refer you to the comment/question I made which Ace replied to state my point.
To be frank, pat, I really dont understand your need to raise the score for DDF, a site that in some sense tries to cheat its customers by unsecure billers and a customer support that sucks when their customers ask for help to cancel. Just because you never had a problem does not entitle you to be forgiving when it happens to others.
And finally Pat, please show better respect for those opinions that differs from yours. Im not here to make you happy or promote DDF, and I am entitled to my own opinions just as you are.
DDF is in my opinion really not a good site and you seem to overrate it. Thank you for finding some of my points valid.
|
03-22-14 10:43pm
|
Reply
285
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Schirm:
(pat362's Reply)
Well.... 60 is still a recommendation score.
And I think I was pretty clear about the downsides: rehashing a scene to fit a site and then not easy to find the original is for me a downside.
And even if some scenes are really good, the total does not really represent quality to me. Lots of rehashes and solo scenes dont justify the price.
But the decisive point is of course the cancellation problems I faced. I really mean it: there is NO excuse to ask for credit card details on an non-encrypted connection.
In my opinion it reflects back on DFF since I cannot choose billing company and the one selected for me was not secure.
DFF support failed this time and it of course reflects on my review
Porn sites is not just about content - its about customer care. The sites lacks and is outdated in my opinion.
Since pat has not shared my experience I see no problem for him to be more postive. But please respect that my opinion is sincere.
It should be up to the customer to choose biller - when a site like DDF makes that choice for me then there is simply no excuse.
Overrated is my experience, if pat is happy with what he gets then we are both helping the site the best we can.
|
03-22-14 12:19pm
|
Reply
286
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from cjd2004:
(pat362's Reply)
Another new article.
http://therealpornwikileaks.com/twistys-...test-sparks-outrage/
|
03-15-14 07:34am
|
Reply
287
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from sonofzog:
(pat362's Reply)
I'm totally with you on facials (and for that matter, on money shots in general). Like most porn fans, I enjoy video that plays into my own fantasies about sex and beautiful women. Of all the lovers I've had over the years, from marriage to one-night stands, I never felt a desire to come on her face, and I'm reasonably sure it would never have been received graciously. I have always preferred internal release regardless of orifice.
The whole cliche of shooting onto a woman's back or belly or face is an archaic throwback to porn producers who wanted to prove that it was real screwing with a real ejaculation. I'm pretty sure we've gotten past that but I still see many comments from those who want to see a huge load on the woman's face. Don't get, never will.
|
03-14-14 09:33am
|
Reply
288
|
Seymore Butts
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
I agree. If a site offered all his movies that would be worth a membership.
|
03-12-14 04:00pm
|
Reply
289
|
Seymore Butts
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
They don't look so much better than what VB offers to justify the membership unless you're going for the three day trial. Even then, you may be better off with a VB membership because you have access to more of Seymore's stuff - and you get a lot of Shane's stuff on VB too from after she and Seymore parted company. You'd need a separate membership for Shane's titles if you joined SB.
|
03-11-14 04:51pm
|
Reply
290
|
Seymore Butts
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks pat. This site does have two advantages though: the file resolution is better (though I haven't been to VB in a long time and they may have improved) and with a decent internet connection and a lazy day you can get everything you want in a day.
It is disappointing though to know that so many good titles and scenes have been left out.
|
03-10-14 02:45pm
|
Reply
291
|
Kscans
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from littlejoe:
(pat362's Reply)
i remember having a few clips back in the day and loving it. just wondering if its worth it for a single month?
|
03-09-14 04:09pm
|
Reply
292
|
WCP Club
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from joekramer08:
(pat362's Reply)
thanks for the review. I've been a fan of West Coast Productions for a long time. Their camera work is great - I just love how they film their scenes...and this is the only place where you can get their scenes, so I was excited when I found out this studio finally created their own membership site. It does suck that they have so few of their dvd's available here, but I imagine it takes a while to add all of those dvd's, considering that they only just recently created this site. Hopefully they'll add a lot more of their dvd's in the coming year.
|
03-01-14 11:36am
|
Reply
293
|
Harmony Vision
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks for the information pat. I'll probably check them out.
|
02-11-14 12:18pm
|
Reply
294
|
Harmony Vision
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from rearadmiral:
Thanks for reviewing this pat. I didn't know that this had been spun off as a separate studio site. I like Harmony's stuff and have a lot of it, but I'd like to get it in higher resolution. The TBP stats say that the files are 1920x1080 but the other reviewers say that 1080 is the highest and most are 720 even if they're labelled as 1080. I'm particularly interested in the early titles in the [i]Slam It series and the [/i]Young Harlots series. Any advice will be appreciated.
|
02-11-14 07:49am
|
Reply
295
|
XX Cel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from fiou:
(pat362's Reply)
80-89 Very good. I am not making this up, it is written. For the last time, this site is not very good. Period. I'll turn off the notification now. This is stupid.
|
02-04-14 01:27pm
|
Reply
296
|
XX Cel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from fiou:
(pat362's Reply)
I don't have a PHD in mathematics, but I really really think that 80 % is not "bordeline moderate". Anywway, I just hope my comment will warn others before giving $30 for that 60 % paysite.
|
02-04-14 05:13am
|
Reply
297
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Monahan:
(pat362's Reply)
Ditto pat362.
|
02-01-14 11:19am
|
Reply
298
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from XArt:
(pat362's Reply)
Hi pat362 - Thanks for your message. Happy to hear you prefer the mp4 format. The reason we removed the .wmv is that we're about to launch a totally new and improved version of X-Art, which will be way faster and even easier to navigate and use. We've streamlined the interface and we're switching to a new hosting and CDN infrastructure for screaming fast downloads and ridiculously fast streaming! We did a survey of downloads and found that the wmv and quicktime formats are rarely used anymore. Always open to your feedback and suggestions. All the best, ~ Cindy, X-Art Customer Support
|
01-20-14 04:36pm
|
Reply
299
|
DVD Tube
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pantsmulligan:
(pat362's Reply)
The Truth Is That For The Moment I Have Downloaded All I Wish To Download From Those Sites. Being That DVDtube Is An Older Site That Hasn't Been Updated Means It Probably Has Some Older Items (and Oddball Foreign) I Tend To Look For...And Guess What? It Does.
I Always Consult TPB Before Signing Onto Any Porn Site. Nothing In Any Reviews Mentioned This Problem. Just That The Site Wasn't Updating blah blah blah...And I Tend To Think Of Epoch As A Trusted Go Between.
Hope That Satisfies Your Curiosity.
|
01-19-14 01:41pm
|
Reply
300
|
WCP Club
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from graymane:
I'm not big on reading reviews, but this one caught my eye, not only because of it's initial appeal, but simply because you're the author.
Based on your popularity for comprehensive and very informative data putting together excellent reviews, I'm left with self-disappointment because I haven't read as much of your work as I now wished I had.
This review. for an example. The only part of it that interest me is the interracial aspect, less because its hardcore but mainly because most interracial scenes are done with the missionary position being paramount, as are many of the usual moves that accompany that position ..... all of which fits well with my niche having women doing their thing ON HER BACK .....and what I look for, regardless of which race, in what's out there.
A cyber applause, Pat. for another superb showing of that rare offering that's got something for everybody.
|
01-16-14 11:54pm
|
