| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Jay G:
(pat362's Reply)
I totally agree with Pat on this one. I've seen so much porn by now that great photography is an essential for me to be interested. I love the "Wake Up and Fuck" Woodman Photography and also enjoy lots of what's available at Legal Porno (Pornbox).
Things I used to enjoy like Rocco are now diminished for me because of the faults in the quality of the photography. I'm spoiled now and need crisp, clear, multiple-angle shoots. My huge collection of what I now consider less quality stuff sits unwatched on hard drives.
|
01-23-17 05:32am
|
Reply
102
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from inthecrack:
(pat362's Reply)
This subject touches upon perhaps my biggest pet peeve. I don’t know why truth in advertising has to be such a foreign concept to most people. Any business that claims to be the greatest “this” and have the best “that” has absolutely no credibility with me, particularly when that claim is coming from within. If 10 competing companies all claim to have the best widget then 9 of them are lying. As soon as one of them volunteers information that some aspect of their product is not as good as it could be then I know every other claim they have is probably spot on. It’s obviously not any different with an adult entertainment website. You know if every single scene on some porn site is claimed to be awesome then something doesn’t add up. Any customer that takes the time to read through what is written on our site will certainly be able to take our word as genuine since we have established some pretty solid credibility with our honesty.
As for blow back from models? If there is any I have not heard of it yet. Off the top of my head I can think of 2 or 3 models in the last 16 years that have ever said anything negative about their ITC shoot and they were all because they didn’t like the camera getting up close, not because of anything that was written. I think most girls just love that they are getting some quality images where they are not getting cum on or smacked around or made to look like a ditzy teenager. I can say that there is no “can of worms” that comes from providing an honest website.
|
01-16-17 05:42pm
|
Reply
103
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from PinkPanther:
(pat362's Reply)
I suppose it could turn into a problem for them. On the other hand, I've seen ALS Scan post similarly blunt assessments of scenes, or shoots, or particular models with no blow-back that I'm aware of.
|
01-04-17 04:53pm
|
Reply
104
|
Your Mom Loves Anal
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from malikstarks:
I see Score Group has taken to spamming us with new sites that using old content. An old trick, not surprising I guess.
At least it seems they are remastering them but that still doesn't excuse it, especially promoting an anal site that has only a handful of anal scenes.
Fact is they have failed to innovate (or even keep up with certain trends) and are now getting ever more desperate.
|
12-31-16 10:33am
|
Reply
105
|
My Free Cams
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from MargulisAZ:
(pat362's Reply)
I don't have a lot of history with camsoda, but it does seem like a lot of pornstars use it from time to time. I'll check it out more I think thanks.
|
12-21-16 09:43pm
|
Reply
106
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Jay G:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks, Pat. Since I do exactly the same as you I won't have to write it up. Great minds think alike.
|
12-04-16 06:36am
|
Reply
107
|
Hot Movies
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from elephant:
(pat362's Reply)
Totally get that, I'm sure I'd see loads I'd like but not owning them is to much of a turn away for me, the high price I'd maybe overlook for a download but not streaming, I'd only join streaming on a membership fee not per minute, it reminds me of them premium sex phone lines when I was a teen, just too pricey. Anyway if I come into money I might give it a look.
|
11-25-16 05:08am
|
Reply
108
|
Hot Movies
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from elephant:
Great review Pat, they do seem to have lots but I myself can't get over the prices so don't think its for me. They also seem very tight on previews I watched one around 10 secs then another one around that then the next one said I'd reached my limit, I then left the site.
|
11-24-16 05:57am
|
Reply
109
|
Hot Movies
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from jook:
(pat362's Reply)
I had problems with the player also. At the time, I think it was a little tricky with a Mac. However, I found customer support to be very helpful and we resolved the problem.
|
11-23-16 11:16am
|
Reply
110
|
Hot Movies
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from jook:
Excellent review. I was rather surprised to see a pay-site review from a veteran, pleasantly so. Hot Movies was the first porn site I experienced, the first review I left on PU, albeit uninformative, and the subject of my first post in the forum. Memories.
I hadn't visited the site though for years. I traded in going to pay sites for downloads. Then I decided to go back and look at Hot Movies a week ago. Your review is a coincidence though it reaffirms my thoughts. I still had 10 minutes left on my account. I forgot how much exclusive and excellent contact it contains. I miss this site and am going to plunge into it again.
Ironically, another veteran member called me a shill after my first post where I mentioned this site (and another site). It was such an unkind welcome that if it weren't for graymane (where is he?!), I was gonna take my ball and go home. Glad I stayed.
|
11-22-16 06:28am
|
Reply
111
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from benmar51:
(pat362's Reply)
It`s prorated DAILY, with the price dropping continuously thru the length of your basic membership. . . One proviso - Not sure you get this lower rate by clicking on the name of the channel you want to add (you might. . .just never tried it). . . For the `MOVIE COMPANY` channels - click on one of their DVD`s. . . scroll to one of the scenes in it. . . left-click one of the download buttons for that scene. . .and a pop-up box will appear with the prorated price. For the `Single Scene` channels (Reality Kings and Kink) - find a scene (best way is to type in a likely pornstar`s name, and check her scenes for these 2 companies). . . . click on the thumbnail for that scene. . .and the same pop-up box will appear
|
11-19-16 06:22am
|
Reply
112
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from benmar51:
(pat362's Reply)
It`s a gradually reducing rate. . . If, for example, a premium channel costs $15, the price will drop fifty cents EVERY day. By the time you have a few days left in your basic subscription, you can upgrade to the premium channel for a buck or two. . . with FULL downloading privileges. Nothing illegal or underhanded about it either - it`s been set up this way since the beginning. . . Not sure if this maneuver is available with longer subscriptions. . . Hope you found this helpful.
|
11-18-16 08:32pm
|
Reply
113
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from benmar51:
Hi Pat. . . Outstanding, thorough, comprehensive review. . . But, we`ve come to expect no less from you. . . Just 2 additional points which should be mentioned - 1) The ability to `custom-clip` your downloads. In the past, one was able to take portions of scenes at Brazzers and BangBros, but not any more. . . Each Naughty American scene is still available split into 5 sections (but, importantly, NOT in HD). As far as I know, no other site besides Videobox allows you the ability to edit out what YOU don`t want in your downloaded HD or non-HD scene. This option is even more important when dealing with some of the newer Evil Angel scenes that can run well over 75 minutes!. . and 2) Speaking of the `premium` channels - On monthly subscriptions, you can `upgrade` to, say, Evil Angel, with a few days left in your subscription at a PRO-RATED price (literally, pennies). . . Download everything you want.. . .and, then cancel the upgrade. . . And, then repeat with the other premium channels (Kink, Elegant Angel, etc.). . . Again, thanks for your superlative review AND for ALL you do for this site.
|
11-17-16 08:56pm
|
Reply
114
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Toadsith:
(pat362's Reply)
Let's hope they listen to the die-hard fans and do just that!
|
11-06-16 01:35pm
|
Reply
115
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Toadsith:
(pat362's Reply)
I agree that Skyfall was truly atrocious. The only positive was killing off Judi Dench's M because she had been really mailing it in for the past few movies. The movie was just very long and wasted so much talent (I mostly mean Albert Finney — Javier Bardem is mostly overrated in my opinion.)
It also never ended, 143 minutes was about 53 minutes too long.
Spectre is 148 minutes, because apparently Sam Mendes felt 143 was really cramping his style. I've yet to see it either.
Daniel Craig keeps hedging his bets on if he'll do another one or not. I'd rather he don't but I wouldn't be shocked if he turns around and signs up for Bond 25. He's currently listed as the Odds-On Favorite by the strange folks betting on the casting for Bond 25. We shall see.
Regarding Brosnan: Apparently he was all set to do a fifth Bond film, was told they'd be starting pre-production soon and all that, and then got a call from the producers saying they were going in a different direction. Word is was that they got scared by the Bourne Identity (Budget of $60m) with it's June 2002 release to a $27m opening and a $121m final gross after 5 months. The odd thing is that November 2002's Die Another Day (Budget $142m) had a $47m opening and grossed $161m in only 4 months. Sure Bourne's profit margin was much higher, but Bond was pulling in a ton of money none-the-less.
They are such different films and when they retooled Bond to be younger, leaner, and meaner — they didn't save any money. Casino Royale (2006) cost $150m and grossed $167m, and it's opening was smaller than Die Another Day at $40m.
The simply need to go back to what made the Connery, Lazenby, and Brosnan films fun and get rid of the idea of James Bond being a brash, barely-harnessed, thug. Bond is the secret agent with a sparkle in his eye and a one-liner always ready-at-hand.
|
11-04-16 08:18pm
|
Reply
116
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Toadsith:
(pat362's Reply)
I 100% agree with your second paragraph. Daniel Craig's Bond reboot never sat well with me. It was like they tried to turn Bond into a humourless Jason Bourne — we didn't need that. Bond can have badass action and a sense of humour, the two aren't mutually exclusive.
I must say that Connery is an awesome Bond, but I'm one of those crazy Lazenby fans. He's my favorite. I just wish George wasn't an asshat and had instead agreed to do another movie. Instead he worried about being type-cast.
I personally feel like Idris Elba would be a fantastic choice. He has the elegance, he is comfortable with humour and he has that size and tough-guy power that would make him for a formidable Bond. As for the age, Roger Moore was 46 when he started as Bond. Timothy Dalton was 43. Pierce Brosnan was 42. Only Connery (32), Lazenby (30), and Craig (38) were in their 30s. Dye Elba's hair black and you've got an easy 15 years out of him.
An unknown could be nice, but with the money behind the current Bond films, I don't see it happening.
|
11-03-16 07:09pm
|
Reply
117
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
So what are you using the other hand for pat??? :-)
|
10-19-16 11:56am
|
Reply
118
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from skippy:
(pat362's Reply)
That's a good point. There is something oddly nostalgic and somewhat comforting about going back to your old material. I tossed nearly all of my magazines and will probably never see those 1980's models again.
|
10-08-16 06:54pm
|
Reply
119
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from EverNight:
(pat362's Reply)
Wow, if so that must be new. Can anyone else confirm EA has downgraded and now maxes at 720p for downloads?
According to TBP it is 1080p:
https://www.thebestporn.com/review/evilangel/
|
10-04-16 10:30pm
|
Reply
120
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from EverNight:
I'm pretty sure the resolutions have been 1080p for many years. It doesn't top out at 720.
|
10-03-16 10:50pm
|
Reply
121
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
from lk2fireone:
Excellent review, as usual.
However, one nitpick:
When you combine "the cherry on top of the sundae" with the emphasis on anal scenes, I am less than enthused about the imagery.
LOL.
|
10-03-16 09:04pm
|
Reply
122
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from elephant:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks for that Pat, I'll leave it, can't think why you would mess with memberships like this, it should be simple and you in return get return customers and make more money.
|
09-14-16 04:14am
|
Reply
123
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(pat362's Reply)
Actually pat, New Sensations has been big into this kind of porn for a while. When they first started they did it really well and created some intensely hot scenes. What I've seen lately isn't as hot but it is still good porn and a good value.
I'd also recommend Desperate Pleasures. This is a more amateurish site but if you like stepfather/stepdaughter porn and even (acted) father/daughter porn this is a great site.
|
09-13-16 01:26pm
|
Reply
124
|
Sins Life
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from vipguy:
(pat362's Reply)
please note this person has not joined this site and is only speculating and I can confirm downloads are available.
|
08-29-16 01:46am
|
Reply
125
|
Sins Life
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from vipguy:
(pat362's Reply)
well all you've achieved by sending me this is i will not bother doing it again.
|
08-27-16 12:06pm
|
