Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Anal Destruction
(0)
|
Reply of
OttifantSir's Comment
from pouchirory:
I can confirm the review, i was however slightly disappointed in anal destruction's models out of them i'd say only about half if not less looked pretty decent, so i'd give the site around a 60, however the mitza's link you get had a much better selection so if it was me to do again i'd go for a trial run with anal destruction and a monthly membership with mitza
|
10-14-10 01:30am
|
Reply
2
|
Deluxe Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Cybertoad:
(OttifantSir's Reply)
Thats great to be open to new ideas, I too was new once and it helped to get pointers. Great that you have an open mind to this. As giving good and great reviews helps others descide whether to join or not. In the long run you could actually save someone money I know I have based on others reviews. A good way sometimes to tell a movie size is the player many tell you what the default size is for that movie it may say 680x700 or something and that helps too also if they say HD thats a plus. PS there is a forum at PU here too, take a look great place to ask your fellow PU'ers questions or just talk about stuff your curious about and want to share.
Have a Good one.
Cybertoad.
|
10-04-08 10:20am
|
Reply
3
|
Deluxe Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
OttifantSir's Review
from Cybertoad:
This was one of the better "new member" at PU reviews I have seen in awhile.
I would have liked to have read about what size the downloads are in quality 1000k etc ? But gave information that would help some definetly a plus. If you can give a bit more details numbers wise and explain like what kinda niches etc, in your reviews you would do good at them, thanks for a nice review your off to a nice start. Keep em coming.
|
10-04-08 09:33am
|
Reply
4
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
OttifantSir's Comment
from Lionheart:
I would have checked out this site but the DRM is a big turnoff for me.
|
10-05-08 02:38am
|
Reply
5
|
I DeepThroat
(0)
|
Reply of
OttifantSir's Comment
from apoctom:
Thanks for the very interesting update. I really enjoyed Heather's site and was a member years ago. I wouldn't care about her gaining some weight since I thought she was really thin before, but I can definitely understand that having to chase around a child would make it harder to shoot porn. Thanks again.
|
10-17-08 07:55am
|
Reply
6
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
OttifantSir's Comment
from Doug62:
This is very serious because you never joined any site affiliated with this site. Bestporn and pornusers may have have to look into the matter because even though you may have overlooked a site and not know they were affiliated there may be other sites that may be secretly affiliated. Now it seems that no one can join any site on bestporn because any of them can be secretly affiliated with this site and their billing company and also even if a site was ok before the site can change and later be secretly afiliated with the site.
Also were the sites you joined before on bestporn because you can check the individual sites you joined and check out the comments on each site and also google the sites too and look for any complaints about them or the billing companies try something like rip off report and other sites because if you find out who it is you may help other porn users by putting comments on the bad sites and warning them.
|
12-05-09 03:24am
|
Reply
7
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
OttifantSir's Comment
from pornagain:
sorry to hear that another one got bitten. But everyone has been warning each other for months now.
|
10-17-08 08:51pm
|
Reply
8
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
OttifantSir's Comment
from Lionheart:
This has been a problem with other users, this site also was very poor customer service. One piece of advice get a new ATM card! call you back and deactivate the card you are using to make sure no other unexpended charges show up, and keep a close eye on your account.
|
10-05-08 01:08am
|
Reply
9
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
OttifantSir's Comment
from PinkPanther:
It has been multiple years since Porn Pros did any of those fake cum scenes. Now their material is more like Nubile Films, Babe Network, 21 Natural, etc
|
10-27-15 11:22pm
|
Reply
10
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
OttifantSir's Comment
from Divinx:
PornPros is a network with 22 sites. 4 of them (Cock Competition, Cum Disgrace, Lol Cumshots, and Cumshot Surprise) do blatanly show fake cocks & cumshots, but the rest of sites do not.
|
10-22-15 02:10pm
|
Reply
11
|
Ten.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from TrashMan:
(OttifantSir's Reply)
The first set of formats were the AVI XviD/MPG/WMV (example: http://www.videosz.com/movie.php?s=0|0|&lg=us&dvd_id=688), and those I have pegged at 480x360.
The second set of formats were your DRM'd WMV's (example: http://www.videosz.com/movie.php?s=0|0|&lg=us&dvd_id=1366), and those I have also pegged at 480x360.
The third set of formats which shows only AVI XviD as the downloadable format, and which appears to be the current set (example: http://www.videosz.com/movie.php?s=0|0|&lg=us&dvd_id=4413), I have pegged at 576x432.
So I am not sure where you are seeing 640x480. In the all the time I have been to VideosZ I have never once gotten a 640x480 video.
Yes I realize that the one I gave as an example of the third set is from July, which is well before November 5th, but every movie I see added to the site shows only AVI XviD as the downloadable format, and AVI XviD is not H.264. Usually H.264 is an MP4 file.
I dont have membership to VideosZ right now to check this, but from the tour page I can not confirm this claim by VideosZ.
Maybe the streamed vids are 640x480? I don't qualify that as 640x480 video availability since flash streams are not "meant" to be downloaded. Don't know, never viewed a flash stream on VideosZ.
|
01-03-09 09:01pm
|
Reply
12
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from moonbyrd:
(OttifantSir's Reply)
This is somewhat bizarre. The site works as I described with Firefox (both 3.0 and 3.1 betas). Just to make sure I logged in using Opera (version 9.63) and it works with it as well. So I guess we live in different realities. Or maybe there are alternate user interfaces people are directed to based on some weird logic, as I don't see why you would make up what you claim.
Same with the aspect ratio of the videos. (What I described applies only to the newer ones with 720x480 pixels starting from some time in early 2008, the older ones are 640x480 and don't need correction - unless they are widescreen, but I don't feel inclined to try to find older widescreen videos just for testing).
|
01-03-09 02:49pm
|
Reply
13
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from moonbyrd:
(OttifantSir's Reply)
It still seems to me that the Videobox interface is already doing what you want: start with the whole collection, pick Asian > brunette > gangbang > double penetration > blowjob > cumshots and you end up (in this example) with exactly one scene: in this case, Explosions #1, scene 6. If the tags are describing the content correctly, that will be what you want.
As for the aspect ratio: the files are encoded as 720x480 pixels which is what the source material is; however, for example Windows Media Player assumes the pixels are square although the actual aspect ratio should be 4:3 or 16:9 and the files should contain this information (for some reason this seems to work only in the Barely 18 series, which is widescfreen and shows up correctly). This is mainly an annoyance. I can use VLC media player and set the aspect ratio manually to 4:3 or 16:9 as the case may be.
|
01-03-09 09:43am
|
Reply
14
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
OttifantSir's Review
from TrashMan:
VideosZ seems to have more of an emphasis on tagging, especially after making it possible for users to edit tags. So yes, I agree that VideoBox lags VideosZ in this category. However, for people who are more interested in collecting content from specific actresses, VideosZ lags VideoBox. Yes, I do agree with your comment that VideoBox should take a page from VideosZ and have actress pages with head pics (it would make this a hell of a lot more organized), but VideosZ has some major issues in leaving out cast lists and not tagging videos with actress names. It would be nice to see VideosZ open up tagging to actress names.
I think if you are going to do a direct comparison between the two sites (which is what I also did in my review) you also need to look at technical aspects of the site. This is where VideosZ is playing a major game of catchup.
*VideoBox offers more friendly download formats (640x480 WMV, 480x352 WMV, 320x240 WMV, 640x480 MP4 and 320x240 MP4) than VideosZ (480x360 AVI), and VideoBox's streaming capabilities are much more preferred than VideosZ's.
*Also note that VideosZ has the remnants of older download formats. Everything is not standardized. They still have downloads in the very old AVI/MPG formats, and downloads in the previous DRM-WMV format (the most annoying of all)
*The VideosZ login process requires image verification while VideoBox does not.
*VideoBox helps it users make decisions in downloading content as they allow users to rate every movie and and scene, as well as comment on each. VideosZ has neither.
*VideoBox does a better job in linking users to other videos in a series with the pull-down menu available on the video page, where as with VideosZ you have to click a link to get a list of the movies available from a series.
|
01-03-09 03:30am
|
Reply
15
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
OttifantSir's Review
from moonbyrd:
Either I misunderstand, or the comment about not being able to compound categories is not correct. At least I can narrow the listings down in whatever view by clicking the categories on the left.
However, it could be useful to be able to also exclude categories, which is not possible in the Videobox interface or on any other site I have visited - say, if you want gangbang but not anal, if that makes sense. Or brunettes but not big boobs. etc.
Also none of the males are identified, and here the exclusion could be actually useful. You could want scenes with a certain female pornstar but without a certain male whom you do not like. Or vice versa.
There are some genres that are singularly useless, such as gonzo, which the Videobox crew uses to tag almost everything including things that are not actual gonzo, e.g. vignettes and wall-to-wall sex in general.
My biggest problem with the videos is the aspect ratio which is currently always incorrect unless you use a software that has a manual setting, but apparently no one else is bothered by that.
|
01-03-09 02:31am
|
Reply
16
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
OttifantSir's Review
from badandy400:
I like that they keep the site dull. It makes if very easy to use. This way I spend more time enjoying the videos or doing other things, and less time spent actually on the site trying to build up my download queue.
Having pictures would be nice, but the only way they could really do with would be to use screen shots, which would be pretty pointless. Besides, with a name like Videobox, one must expect that videos would be the focus.
I do like your point of compounding genres. It would be nice to say "teens" then reduce to "teens" and "blondes" for example. But what the hell do I know, I am trying to download their whole site!
|
01-02-09 08:46pm
|
Reply
17
|
VIP XXX Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
OttifantSir's Comment
from Cybertoad:
Many sites have different access pages, often designed to entice the vistors. While I am not a member there. My guess is it just two entrance pages , and you can access through either site. Key is its only one charge not two charges, this a pretty major site I couldnt see them trying to double charge a scam. But again I am not a member anyone else a member here????
Cybertoad.
|
10-04-08 03:23pm
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
