Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
Dorsai6's Comment
from Monahan:
I was damned lucky. I tried to buy 1 year on Twistys and screwed up my credit card number so it didn't go through, so I tried to sign up for a single month. Got the same pitch for the premium service and discovered what that meant. I bit and paid the extra, but just for one month, then canceled.
The download restriction really sucks and should be highlighted in the PU/TBP listings whenever it exists.
|
12-26-16 11:07pm
|
Reply
2
|
Restrained Elegance
(0)
|
Reply of
Dorsai6's Comment from Dorsai6:
I just want to say that I still visit this site 2-3 times a year and the quality was excellent many years ago and continues to improve. They do a fair amount of location shooting in interesting and picturesque places. Videos have improved a lot and they now take requests. The May 2016 review is accurate, but I'd give this site a higher score.
|
07-22-16 06:45am
|
Reply
3
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
Dorsai6's Comment from Dorsai6:
It's been another year and I rejoined for the month. It seems they are done transferring material from the Cyber Club site. In the 11 months I was away, they have added about 500 new sets. Most of these sets include both photos and a video. All playmates from the first issue are now present including the actual gatefold image.
My only complaint is that they do not do a good job of identifying the model in a photo graph when a set includes photos of more than one model. About 1/3 of the time the set description had enough information to figure out the mode's name. The rest of the time it takes real work it identify each model.
I'm a regular. I like the models and I like the photography.
|
05-15-15 09:05pm
|
Reply
4
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Wittyguy:
(Dorsai6's Reply)
Cool. Good to know for future reference.
|
03-08-15 05:28pm
|
Reply
5
|
VirtuaGirl
(0)
|
Reply of
Dorsai6's Comment from Dorsai6:
Sorry, I can get long winded at times
3. The models are getting better in both looks and performance quality.
4. The software now has better support of multiple displays and the ability to show more than one card (in reduced size mode) on the same screen at the same time.
On the negative side, their user documentation leaves a lot to be desired. There are many hidden features not covered by the help/FAQ material. On the other had, the user forum is a great source of advice and assistance
RECOMMENDATIONS
If you want to try it, the software is free. There is a demo tab where you can see short previews of a limited number of cards including some of the 3K cards. If you like the demos, I suggest that you get or buy one or two 3K cards and see if you like them. If you like what you see, buy 50 credits and budget your purchases. Buying in blocks of 50 will save money, but be careful you don't overspend.
WARNING
There have been currency conversion problems for people outside the US and EU. Check the billing site to see what you would be paying for credits in your own currency. I understand that those in Russia have seen enormous price increases.
|
02-12-15 06:56pm
|
Reply
6
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Konrad82:
(Dorsai6's Reply)
I'm facing the exact same issue. I have a very fast internet connection but the download speed on femjoy totally sucks. I escalated this issue to their support with basically no outcome. At this point I'm rather disappointed about this fact and their reaction!!!
|
10-05-14 09:33am
|
Reply
7
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
Dorsai6's Comment
from elephant:
That is pretty abysmal. What's your broadband speed in general. Have you tried to use DownThemAll firefox plugin, this is what I use and speeds most downloads up.
|
07-26-14 01:14am
|
Reply
8
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(Dorsai6's Reply)
I haven't rejoined femjoy.
But if you send an email to their support, they might give you a few free days of membership in compensation.
I've seen that happen at some other sites when a member has problems accessing a site.
And their tech support might be able to help with the connection problem. Or not.
Even good sites seem to have problems every once in awhile.
|
07-13-14 02:37pm
|
Reply
9
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from nostromo:
(Dorsai6's Reply)
Thanks a lot, Dorsai6.
|
05-23-14 03:53pm
|
Reply
10
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
Dorsai6's Comment from Dorsai6:
Well its been another 10 months. There is more content, but it seems they are still moving old material. Some of the multi-model sets now identify the models image by image, but many do not. If you like Playboy as I do, this is a worthwhile site but I wish they'd get it finished and fully organized. Nearly all the videos are now 1080p.
|
05-23-14 12:20pm
|
Reply
11
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
Dorsai6's Comment from Dorsai6:
One day later -- It seems I was wrong about the old content. They seem to be still moving older material from CyberClub to Playboy Plus. It the past two days I've noticed about 20 sets added with much older posting dates. I've also been checking some of the videos. In some cases, about a dozen so far, I've noticed that they've posted a 1990's video that was originally a 320 X 240 QuickTime movie as a 1920 X 1080 MP4. However, the new version seems to be the same as the old with no better resolution, but a much larger file. I can understand their wanting to post the old sets, some of them are great, but the higher resolution just wastes disk space and bandwidth.
|
07-08-13 08:02pm
|
Reply
12
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
Dorsai6's Comment from Dorsai6:
It's been about a year and I rejoined Playboy Plus. They've finished moving all the material from the CyberClub and there is a lot to see. I still have one major complaint. About 25% of their photo sets consist of solo shots of more than one model. About 25% of these identify the models in each image, but the rest leave you to guess who is who. In the CyberClub nearly all the photos were identified by model. Since most of the unidentified images came from the CyberClub, I guess they just don't care to expend the effort.
|
07-07-13 03:09pm
|
Reply
13
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
Dorsai6's Reply from Dorsai6:
This is to update my previous comment. I was not locked out at 177 downloads. It seems they have occasional server interruptions that I thought was a lock-out. I've found that when I get a "Server Not Found" message, if I try again in a few minutes I'll get through. However, there is a 300 zip per day limit as stated in their terms of service and that is enforced.
|
05-23-13 03:07pm
|
Reply
14
|
House Of Gord
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(Dorsai6's Reply)
I'll probably take your advice and join for a month. It does look pretty unique even for BDSM sites
|
12-29-12 01:42pm
|
Reply
15
|
House Of Gord
(0)
|
Reply of
Dorsai6's Comment
from rearadmiral:
I've been checking out the preview pages here for the past few years as I love good BDSM stuff. This looks very innovative and it is definitely unique. One of these days I'll join, but if what you say about the photos is also true for the videos than that might be a problem as I'm getting fussier as I get older and harddrive space gets cheaper.
|
12-10-12 06:47pm
|
Reply
16
|
Restrained Elegance
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Cybertoad:
(Dorsai6's Reply)
Thank You for writting back :-)
|
10-17-08 09:44pm
|
Reply
17
|
Restrained Elegance
(0)
|
Reply of
Dorsai6's Review
from Cybertoad:
New Mmeber rated 100
I always worry when I see new members rate 100 and member rate 40 points lower. Note to new ppl if you really like the site give full technical details , opinions are great, but I will not join a site that doesnt spell out size, content amount, etc. thanks
|
10-17-08 10:02am
|