| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from badandy400:
(Jeffrey99's Reply)
Must agree here. Sites above a certain level, say 95, should be worth slaying a member for a long time.
Hard to give in the high 90s to a site that has members complaining about infrequent updates.
|
01-05-09 08:03pm
|
Reply
52
|
DOMAI
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Review
from messmer:
I knew I gave you a positive trust rating for a reason, Jeffrey, because once again you provided exactly the information I needed NOT to subscribe. :-) No matter how high quality the models and picture sets may be, starting out nude is a sure fire turn off for me as well. I like the "art of stripping," so thanks for the warning!
|
01-05-09 03:58pm
|
Reply
53
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from TheRizzo:
(Jeffrey99's Reply)
Good point about the number of updates.
|
12-30-08 09:19pm
|
Reply
54
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Review
from Monahan:
As a current member at the "please stick around" rate of $19.95, I could have written this review exactly as Jeffrey99 did. The site is all original content and has stayed high quality in terms of the professional photography and videography, but it really needs a search feature to find a model and/or specific features, such as fisting, peeing, bottles, beads, public nudity and extreme public nudity, blonde, big tits, large labia lips, etc.
One other potential improvement would be to post the aliases of its models. (FTV lists everyone by a first name only).
For example Andie Valentino (I get hard just thinking about her) has a lot of good stuff on FTV under the name Andrea; Jana Jordan appears as Yana, Gianna Michaels is named Becky, and so on. If a model isn't that popular with FTV members she won't be brought back for more...and that's a good reason for those of us who want to see more of a babe to know her full name so we can do a search on the web.
A major plus that has kept me on as a member is that the webmaster/photographer does two things I really like. First, he is superb at making the model look spectacular and shoots lovingly lingering of a model's body parts with perfect lighting and camera angles. Second, he responds personally to emails I've sent him that are candid and very interesting.
|
12-30-08 06:16pm
|
Reply
55
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Review
from TheRizzo:
A number of top sites are lagging behind in photo size these days. I wonder if they pre-process the images so far in advance for updates that they are always a step behind those that process their images more closely to update day and can make file sizes bigger on the fly easier?
I don't mind the $29.95 price point for a site that updates 6-7 days a week with lots of exclusive content, but I surely wouldn't complain if they lowered their price by $5 or something!
|
12-30-08 05:36pm
|
Reply
56
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from mr smut:
(Jeffrey99's Reply)
I wouldn't say so because both sites are running for many years now and Alex surely has a lot of expenses. Anyhow this was a thought I also had this morning after I've read your review ... why not merge both sites together or give at least long term members like me the chance to get the second site for a few bucks more. I'd be happy to spent some extra $ to be a member of ALS Angels too :-)
|
12-12-08 09:37am
|
Reply
57
|
Playboy's CyberClub
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Review
from Drooler:
To get the exact size of an image file:
In Windows, you can usually just mouse over the pic icon and it will tell you. Failing that, right click and choose "properties."
On a Mac, click and choose "Get Info." If you happen to have a two-button mouse, right click and choose get info (you won't have mouse up to the menu).
|
12-12-08 01:59am
|
Reply
58
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Review
from mr smut:
Hi Jeffrey,
are you sure that there's at least one girl with cup size C featured on ALS Scan? I think that B is the maximum because they have ALS Angels for the busty models :-)
Pissing is in fact a big niche. I started a poll on All Over 30 for the most favourite fetish and peeing is #1 even with those that love mature girls!
As for the number of pics per set it's not 100% correct for the new shoots. I'd say that around 200 is a normal number but there's a lot of sets having +300 pics and even some with more than 400 pics for one series.
Thanks for your thoughts on ALS Scan.
Cheers,
Eddie
|
12-11-08 10:00pm
|
Reply
59
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Review
from PinkPanther:
They update 5 days a week, actually - monday through friday - 6 updates a day, I believe.
|
12-11-08 07:30pm
|
Reply
60
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Review
from badandy400:
You are dead on with respects to the site's navigation and look. 10 year old kids do better than this site with their Myspace pages! They need to wake up and realize that this will not cut it and it does not do justice to the good content they produce.
|
12-11-08 04:24pm
|
Reply
61
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Review
from rome476:
Thanks for the summary. I'm pretty interested in the site; any idea as to the split between HC/softcore?
|
12-11-08 02:45pm
|
Reply
62
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Comment
from elephant:
I like the site too, stunning girls on there, I only am not keen on vids of photoshoots and don't really see the point in them, just seems fake watching two girls together posing for snaps when I'd much rather just watch the girls having sex
|
11-09-08 03:12am
|
Reply
63
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Comment from Jeffrey99:
After doing some testing it appears the site has probelems with Firefox. If I download any images using IE or the IE Tab of Firefox, it'll download just fine. It's just I lose all my features that make downloading soo much easier in FF. And if I download the full zips, then it works fine too.
Webmaster has replied to my message board thread. So if if they figure something out, I'll add it to here.
|
11-08-08 06:38am
|
Reply
64
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Comment
from williamj:
Sarah is right on target. The site is worth a peek and ALSAngels too I plan on another tour this winter.
|
11-08-08 05:36am
|
Reply
65
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Comment
from Drooler:
I don't know if this sheds any useful light on things, but I just tried and could download a single image by clicking the thumb and right-clicking, saving as ... That's in IE 7 with no download manager.
I agree it's a chore to pick through the images when there are so many and when some are similar. But it's probably a chore no matter how you approach it. And, IMHO, sometimes the subtle changes in facial expression or body language are interesting.
Too many images vs. too few images, I've finally decided that too many is the better of the two evils, because there's more choice and less missed, but of course that means more time tossing and/or more disk space being used. Oh, well ...
|
11-07-08 09:59pm
|
Reply
66
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Khan:
(Jeffrey99's Reply)
Jeffrey, Technically, Trust Ratings are for the user, not a specific Review/Comment. Though in practice, it's often a single one-sided Review that will cause the Trust Rating to be submitted. We've found this is especially true for those who give exceptionally high scores.
But to answer your direct question ...
No, unless the person who's rating you specifically mentions a specific Review, there's now way to know what prompted their rating.
Of course, you can always reply to the rating and ask. There's not guarantee you'll get an answer but then again, it doesn't hurt to try.
|
11-07-08 07:24am
|
Reply
67
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Comment
from Sarah:
Hi Jeffrey99 -
About 80-85% of the pictures are glamour like
http://www.alsscan.com/bios/franziska2/a...ska2_pr_032hires.jpg
and then every scene ends with some kind of crazy
object insertion. There is plenty of soft and harder
shots to please everybody. Photo are released in
full sets and are very large, usually between 200-400
hi-res pictures per scene.
Hope this helps.
Sarah
|
11-07-08 05:37am
|
Reply
68
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from IKnoPorn:
(Jeffrey99's Reply)
Hi Jeffrey,
I was a member of this site a couple of years ago - and totally agree with your comments. I don't understand why TBP gives this site an 87.1.
The models are HOT, but like you said, HE WON'T STOP TALKING! Plus the camera is constantly jiggling around everywhere, very unprofessional.
I remember being so disappointed with this site. I remember watching "20 minute workout" back in the 1980's (Ron Harris production) and thinking how extremely hot the models were working out and how excellent the photography was. Ron got famous from this as well as his Aerobicize videos.
But with his website, the videos are very amateurish. If he would just buy a tripod, and close his mouth, and zoom out just a little further (so you can see more than the upper left corner of her mouth and the lower right corner of her pussy) it would be awesome.
The photo quality however is top notch, he really is a gifted photographer. Perhaps if he hired someone else to do the videos?
It's so hard to find really good solo content these days, one thing or another always seems to spoil it. Usually it's over-production or too much makeup. In this case, it's the guy holding the camera.
|
11-06-08 10:18pm
|
Reply
69
|
Playboy's CyberClub
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Review
from Wittyguy:
Thanks for the very good review. I thought about joining here but was a pit put off by the fact that it looked like most of the photosets topped off at around 20 pics. Is this the case or do they have more pics than that per set?
|
11-06-08 12:57pm
|
Reply
70
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Review
from Cybertoad:
Review a little short,
Hi, what size videos ? How many etc?
Thanks
|
11-06-08 07:29am
|
Reply
71
|
Playboy's CyberClub
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Review
from Cybertoad:
Can you download movies now??
If so how many are available.
Thanks
|
11-06-08 07:28am
|
Reply
72
|
Teen Stars Magazine
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Comment
from WeeWillyWinky:
Agreed. The vids are useless but the pictures are top-notch, and the girls are beautiful. A good pic archive.
|
11-05-08 09:32pm
|
Reply
73
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Cybertoad:
(Jeffrey99's Reply)
I hear ys, thanks for the info, do not think I would want to join a site that has as much nidity as a victoria secret add. But thanks for helping possible save some of us money :-). If its any help, I too have taken a few bullets here but it helps others. Good review , thank you
Cybertoad
|
11-05-08 12:27pm
|
Reply
74
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Review
from Cybertoad:
Nice review, but you said in your Cons too soft core ? The site says Only Tease! I mean lol its called that as well.
I was wondering what was expected by you as a customer in the site? Does it say in signing up there is nudity? Would be interested in knowing if there is deceptive advertising.
I have seen sites that say or hint one thing and do the exact opposite.
Thanks
Cybertoad
|
11-05-08 12:03pm
|
