| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
376
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from rearadmiral:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Thanks for the link. I have a couple of index sites bookmarked but I was looking for one that tracked by website. I guess I'm stuck in the Dark Ages with IAFD, though, to be fair, they are listing websites now.
|
11-07-16 04:42pm
|
Reply
377
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from rearadmiral:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
You're right... I have been a member there. It's a great site too but I like to follow specific models and Russian models change their names so often they don't make that easy. I guess I'll just have to be happy with the flood of old/young videos studios are putting out as stepdaughter /stepfather.
|
11-07-16 03:47pm
|
Reply
378
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from rearadmiral:
Very thorough review. Thanks for posting it.
It's disappointing that Jurassic Cock no longer updates as it was among the best old/young sites on the 'net when it was active. I know it isn't a niche that most people are interested in but old/young sites that feature top U.S. talent are few and far between.
|
11-06-16 06:15am
|
Reply
379
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from elephant:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Yeah I agree we've do have similar tastes, after all the years I've been into porn my tastes have switched a little and some things like solo vids I used to hate I can appreciate these day. I still am no fan of solo masturbation though, never quite sure why but it does nothing for me lol.
I do have a varied taste though and love beautiful wow girls blacked and tushy stuff but then I also like really old fashioned stuff too, my best porn I feel is around 10 years ago when Sasha Rose, Benta, Zanna, Yuki were in their prime, there was some great Euro sites around producing some really hot porn, sadly few euro stars I see these days, not to equal the beauties that used to enter porn. I'm more into American and Aussie girls these days. So yeah porn in my eyes comes out with gems but no site seems to be what it was 5 or 10 years ago.
I also like reality porn lots were not much direction is happening but filmed well still.
Yeah you are correct, not much commenting going on these days on reviews, its a shame.
|
11-04-16 10:04am
|
Reply
380
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from elephant:
Really good review mate, I've been recently there too, I just didn't get why they think not speaking much or at all in some vids is the way to go, it just lacks something I felt, you are right seemed very repetitive and no need to edit them so much, lave the undressing parts and sexual positions changing in.
|
11-04-16 03:34am
|
Reply
381
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review from lk2fireone:
CONTINUED REVIEW:
In spite of the large amount of content, and the large number of attractive models, my main negatives are:
-Being charged for a pre-checked trial subscription, when I unchecked the trial subscription, meaning I said no.
-The jerky editing, which destroys the flow of the videos.
-The lack of heat of the videos. These are fine-looking girls, having hardcore sex, but it doesn't hold my interest, or passion.
|
11-01-16 02:18am
|
Reply
382
|
Wow Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from host2626:
I'm not sure if it's worth its own new comment, but they all seem to redirect to 18onlygirls.com now. As a side note, normally I'd welcome this kind of consolidation, I never considered networks with multiple sites like something with extra value, they are just like folders on the same hard drive (if doesn't matter if you say you have 10 of 50 sites in your "network" if there is one update per day over all of them).
Anyways, now if you click on "Updates" on the new consolidated url, you won't see any actually, just a page touting some kind of awesome "Venus 4K" technology. I don't know if it's a mistake or if they are hiding something, it was the same about a month ago, but to me it looks like they are dead and not updating anymore, and I don't join sites that don't show me what they were really up to these past months. It's sad if they are really dead.
|
10-27-16 09:39pm
|
Reply
383
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Thanks for the comment. Keep in mind that as the site grows they are likely to increase the price so it may be worth considering a membership now or in the near future to take advantage of the $10 price.
|
10-20-16 04:21pm
|
Reply
384
|
Mormon Girlz
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from rearadmiral:
Wow! This site looks great. I don't know how I missed the review that A.K. posted at TBP a while back. This site has a lot of what I like: redheads and a bit of the creepy factor to name a couple. I'll definitely be joining this site soon.
Thanks for telling us all about this.
|
10-17-16 09:06am
|
Reply
385
|
ATK Archives
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from standard:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
The issue is less the armpits and more the forced and obvious focus on them to the point of nearly being comical.
Replace "armpit" with "inside of the knee" and imagine joining a site where you notice many, if not most, of the hundreds of sets you click through have the model showing the inside of her knee from different angles for multiple shots within the first 10-12 photos. Then you notice quite a few of the shoots involve the model pulling at the skin or licking the inside of her knees later on in the sets (yes, I know the latter is not physically possible, but it's just for comparison's sake).
I'm fairly indifferent to armpits overall. Even hairy ones. Attractive women are attractive women, period. However, armpit licking and/or pulling at armpit hair is a different thing entirely, and definitely catering towards a fetish.
|
10-16-16 04:57pm
|
Reply
386
|
Twistys Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Twistys-Samantha posted that this is a technical issue and they are working on it - a technical issue where downloads were all done away with for non-VIP members on all videos? That's a hell of a technical issue. It will be interesting to see if they fix this or hope that members stop complaining and just accept it.
|
10-12-16 06:31am
|
Reply
387
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from skippy:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Interesting find. I'm guessing that my new review just superseded my old one and that everybody can only have one review of a site. So if you search by site, you only see one review. If you search by user, you see both.
Thanks,
Skippy
|
10-07-16 07:08pm
|
Reply
388
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Amanda:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I agree, it would be nice to easily access them instead of them disappearing from that page.
This doesn't change anything, but the date of his previous review is 08/30/2014 if you want to quickly find it under his list of reviews! :)
|
10-07-16 07:00am
|
Reply
389
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Amanda:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
When a reviewer re-reviews a site, the admin system appears to just replace it under the site listing. When I approve pending re-reviews, I see the previous review and the new one in the system (one marked previous and one marked re-review). It will "overwrite" the previous review by that user in that location. I guess the site builders didn't see a point in listing an older review if the initial reviewer was just going to write a whole new one. :/
|
10-07-16 05:35am
|
Reply
390
|
Teen Sex Couple
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from ljohn41:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Cannot get CCBill or teensexcouple to respond so I cancelled my subscription. I guess you live and learn. How pathetic!
|
10-05-16 09:01pm
|
Reply
391
|
Tiny 4K
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from skippy:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Thanks! I try to be thorough. Never enough time (or space) to go through everything.
|
10-05-16 08:55pm
|
Reply
392
|
Teen Sex Couple
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from ljohn41:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I've never had a problem with either CCBILL or EPOCH before. That is why this has been so frustrating. Thanks for the advice. I'll try your suggestions.
Well, just tried chat and it is down due to "high volume". Really?!
|
10-04-16 08:55pm
|
Reply
393
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Now that you mention it. I should have picked a different metaphor. One that does not involve chocolate sauce and the words cherry and anal.
|
10-04-16 03:19pm
|
Reply
394
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Amanda:
Thanks for the head's up! Price has been fixed.
|
10-03-16 06:38am
|
Reply
395
|
She's New
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Seen som Team Skeet material. But a bit more to my liking, I remember - in the ol' days: Teen Mega World - as you also mention - and it was kind of great - at least then. Have not been there for quite a while.....
|
09-27-16 09:07am
|
Reply
396
|
She's New
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from Denner:
Excellent review, lk2 - Definitely worth considering a join, here. Thumbs up!
|
09-27-16 08:25am
|
Reply
397
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I think waiting is probably a wise decision at this moment but I'm sure you know that the 10$ join price is unlikely to remain as is. At some point they will raise it.
I like the company responsible for this site but not sure if it will ever make it on my wish list. Now if they were to do a lesbian site than they would have me as a customer.
|
08-23-16 05:46pm
|
Reply
398
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from pat362:
I think the problem you have is that you used the PU link and for whatever reason that does not bring you directly to the site but to a tube preview version of the site. A legal tube version of the site since it is only showing content from Vixen and you can only join vixen but that said I do find that this is in some ways a little bit of false advertising as only one of the clickable icons will bring you to Vixen.com where you can clearly see that they currently have only 14 updates with one coming up tomorrow. The join price is only 10$ so I don't have any issue with what they are doing.
|
08-21-16 10:27am
|
Reply
399
|
Pornstar Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Wraith0711:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Already have. They even tried the old and new login info I was given, didn't work for them either.
|
08-15-16 04:44am
|
Reply
400
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from elephant:
I wonder why change now.
|
08-11-16 05:17am
|
