Your post is from ten years ago, and I think it still applies. Very soon, I will have reviews for all the sites I joined in the last few months. Then I imagine I will review a lot less.
I read the summary under one of Clover's most recent videos, and I'm wondering if the description is misleading. Does she really give the guy a blowjob or is it basically a hand-job video? Thanks.
I really like the Nubiles network of sites. It's a great value for some really excellent porn. Unfortunately my favourite site in the network is now dead - Nubiles Casting. I can't fully explain why, but that site really worked for me.
REVIEW(CONTINUES):
Analyzing the Chloe Cherry-James Deen video: James Deen gives his usual performance of treating the model rough: he forces her to gag on his cock deep in her throat, smear her dripping saliva over her face, shove his fingers into her mouth to dominate and show her who's the boss, choking her, grabbing her hair and pulling, etc.
Chloe is a cute girl, and she seems to go along willingly with her abuse.
So the video features Deen's style of dominance and sadism, while the model submits to his rough treatment.
I would categorize Deen as a slightly softer version of Pierre Woodman, who seems to enjoy forcing women beyond their normal limits to submit to his rough treatment.
In some videos, I've seen Woodman forcing the model to drink his piss, which, along with his slaps, forcible anal intercourse which often seems like rape, and other rough treatment, just adds to Woodman's enjoyment. But models put up with it, and even smile and kiss Woodman at the end of most of his videos.
So I have some trouble watching James Deen or Pierre Woodman perform in a video.
There are too many stories about James Deen abusing porn performers.
And Pierre Woodman built his reputation forcing women to have rough sex. Sometimes against their will, which might or might not be scripted.
But both performers seem to get off treating the women they work with as pieces of meat to be degraded and/or treated roughly, in a domineering fashion.
Their attitude seems to be: I'm big, tough, and will fuck these women harshly, and the women will enjoy it and worship me.
I remember one video where the woman tells Woodman she doesn't want to be filmed, so he tells her he is stopping the video, and he shuts off a light, but continues to film her anyway.
So, Woodman can tell you one thing, and do the opposite. Which is common in real life.
But it drains my enjoyment of any scene with James Deen or Pierre Woodman because I believe they enjoy degrading women: on the other hand, I do enjoy sites like Pure Taboo, where there is a twisted pleasure in abusing women, but that seems more scripted, and I believe the sex is more consensual, so that's just me, where I don't believe the models are being treated harshly in real life.
Fantasy BSDM is fine, but when it moves into real life, the boundaries blur, and I have a problem watching or enjoying it.
The New Sensations network does not have a lot of BDSM videos, but I guess they add a few to give some variety to the storylines.
My preference is more in the heartcore line, where the performers are trying to please each other, hopefully with some affection or tenderness and lots of kissing.
At the same time, the Pure Taboo site at Adult Time is one of my favorite sites in the network, because of the element of tension in some of the videos, as well as the offbeat, twisted stories and the cinematic-style of the videos which is first class.
Giving the site a score or 85. Good site, but network access raises the score.
It's beginning to seem that by chasing technical "upgrades" a lot of sites are making their interfaces more and more difficult to use. It's a bad business model to piss off your loyal and repeat customers.
We used to have warnings on sites that PU/TBP does not do business with. It was never clear why, but we all knew that something was up.
Sometimes complaints from PU members have been effective. For many years GGG has not done business with TBP/PU. I don't think there was any reason except that we complained to management at PU.
I see some old comments here about exactly these billing practices. It appears to be the way the do business. We don't need this crap here, period.
I have had trouble with billers, but have never heard pf Aeron Pay. Are they located on Cyprus? A lot of shady sites are located there, undoubtedly after they were kicked out of another place.
Thank you, I have read a lot of reviews here and hope it shows. I do not like admitting it, but I can be closeminded in the genres I like. I am trying to expand my breadth of interest in porn. I enjoy all naked parts. I just do not like some of the actions once naked lol!
I really like most of the Mad Cheddar sites and I joined Deeper thinking it would be similar. This may be the only Mad Cheddar site that isn't a Greg Lansky site and I had wrongly presumed that Mad Cheddar and Greg Lansky were one in the same. But from what I determine most of the scenes on Deeper are by Kayden Kross and come from a site called TrenchcoatX. i'm not familiar with that site.
Oh well, live and learn. It's a decent site and I will recommend it but it just isn't for me.
LOL! You might not call me a shill after I write a review. I should have done a bit more research on this site. I joined on the strength of it being a Greg Lansky site (Tushy, Blacked, Vixen, etc.) and expected big things. So far I'm less than impressed. It turns out that most of the videos aren't exclusive and not even produced/directed by Lansky. At least they scenes are all 'new' to me.
I'll post a review over the next few weeks as I explore the site more and watch more of the videos.
I should have followed your advice and spent my money on Adult Time!
REVIEW(CONTINUED):
-The massive improvement in the site navigation, quality of the content (money spent on nice-looking sets, photograph and video equipment to film the content in excellent lighting and professional technical standards).
-The attitude of the models: they are there to explore their sexuality: so the sex is hardcore, but without cruelty: teenage girls getting their rocks off, by themselves (masturbation), with one or more other girls (lesbian), one girl and one or more guys, whatever. These girls are up for anything, and I wish I had a few of them in my home.
I would die happy, because I couldn't possibly keep up with these sex-crazed teens.
Or maybe I should admit that these attractive teens have a healthy appetite for sex that far exceeds my body's capacity.
AT&T screwed me on charges to my account.
Before and during the signup process with AT&T, the ATT customer rep told me that AT&T would waive the $99 installation fee.
That same salesperson also told me that AT&T no longer has contracts (in response to customer desires).
However, when I cancelled my AT&T accounts, I found that I could not depend on what the AT&T rep told me when I signed up.
AT&T told me I would have to pay a penalty of $125 for early cancellation.
I told them I was told by the AT&T salesperson that AT&T no longer had contracts.
I spoke to several AT&T reps, and they all told me I would have to pay the $125 penalty, and that either I was confused, or did not properly understand the salesperson when I signed. (AT&T does not have a contract for cell phone service, but does have a contract for the internet service.)
Also, I was charged $99 for installation of internet service, even though the salesperson I signed up with told me the fee would be waived.
One AT&T rep later told me the salesperson made a mistake about the $99 installation fee waiver.
A different AT&T rep did not say the initial rep did not make a mistake, but said they were definitely charging me for the $99 install fee.
Sorry for the details on how I got screwed by AT&T.
But I'm pointing out that you can't depend on what customer service says, or what a salesperson says, even from a company as big as AT&T.
At the AT&T signup, I asked for copies of what I agreed to, the sales person talked to a manager, and she said AT&T does not give out copies of what I signed for.
I was signing on an electronic device, that accepted my signature, but did not give me a copy of what I signed for.
And the salesperson said the office would keep a record of what I signed for, and that it would show the $99 install fee would be waived.
Except when I cancelled my AT&T contract, the salesperson I spoke with said the copies of what I signed for were no longer at the office I signed at.
So it was my word of what I was told, versus AT&T policy, and AT&T can't take my word over AT&T policy.
So I now think AT&T has the morals of a used car salesman.
End of rant.
But useful in knowing that you can't take the verbal word of a sales clerk or a sales person.
It has to be in writing.
And you need to get a copy.
And if you don't get a copy, you are signing at your own risk.
REVIEW(CONTINUED):
BOTTOM LINE(CONTINUED):
In my opinion, the Pure Taboo site is one of the premier sites for twisted-desire porn.
The stable of models is outstanding. Quoting from a PU review I did on 04-09-19 on the Pure Taboo site:
"Excellent, high grade visuals. An artistic use of darkness and a gritty feel to the videos that emphasizes the darkness of the plot."
I'm giving the Pretty Dirty site a score of 94: that is because you should get free access to the Adult Time network.
If you don't get access to the Adult Time network, because of some screw-up, the score would drop significantly.
Note: In the latest update to the Devils Film public site, they make it very clear that Devils Film is now part of the Adult Time network; and that membership in Devils Film gives you access to the Adult Time network, and vice versa.
Whereas, as I explained earlier, I've been a long-time member of Devils Film, and I should have been given access to Adult Time a long time ago, but I was not given access until late 2018, when I joined 21 Sextury (another site in the Adult Time network).
So screw-ups can happen.
Agreed, It was freakin huge when it started and even bigger now, Thinking of signing back up and putting in for vacation just to have the time to properly explore that site lol, but back to topic site, yes web young is a great site. My only gripe about it is I wish they would use more toys and strap-ons.
05-09-1904:53pm
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
