| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from messmer:
(The Bishop's Reply)
You wrote:
"The model you refer to I've no idea which one you mean. There is certainly more ladies with tattoos, but that's reflecting the current trend (in Britain anyway) of getting tats."
Just found her again: Eris Vespera!
|
03-25-13 01:56pm
|
Reply
2
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(The Bishop's Reply)
Just a little addendum: I just got finished giving Melissa in today's update a five .. after all she is beautiful, she wore satin, was shot by SeanR, how else could you rate her and then, after I had downloaded her set I discovered that her hairy legs would do a man proud! Score reversed to one. Today's update is a classic indicator as to why I no longer like ATK N&H ... stressing that I can only talk about my own personal taste: Luca and Melissa, disgustingly hairy legs, two hardcore sets which always rate an automatic one with me. Among the videos, bath tub scene (a one) for a) being in the tub and b) one of the hairiest bodies I have ever seen. The new model was great, though. I would have liked to see her in more lingerie than a pair of cotton panties but she is sweet!
|
03-23-13 11:13am
|
Reply
3
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(The Bishop's Reply)
Thanks, Bishop. That was plain enough! :-) I, too, was a total fan for many years but this last subscription finished it for me. Sorry! Maybe your tastes are not as jaded as mine yet and you can still find joy in what has become not only bizarre but mediocre .. TO ME!
It seems that one set imitates another too much .. forget about the horror of home made tattoos and hairy legs ... we get the same outfits, the same poses, as well as very ordinary looking models compared to the past. And the site has most definitely been taken over by the extra hairy crowd and that includes the web owner, see his statement in my comment above.
Last week ... yes I do look in again as long as the subscription lasts, despite my pronouncement to the contrary ... there was one day when only two updates made the "hot" list and both of them contained extremely hairy legged, not so great looking models. How can you say hairy leg lovers are not a decisive influence on what is uploaded to ATK's pages on a daily basis?
However since I am old enough to realize that tastes differ we'll just have to agree to disagree. Glad you still have a site to enjoy. I can no longer find one because sexy lingerie (MY niche is a nice strip complete with erotic lingerie) has gone out of fashion and all you get these days are drab, every day outfits on women who don't care to tease but simply get naked as quickly as possible and then spread.
But I guess many like this just fine, their sets get high marks and ATK are still in business. :-) Cheers!
|
03-22-13 02:17pm
|
Reply
4
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#15
from greg909:
(The Bishop's Reply)
Yes Bish, I've seen those gals, and agree that some are gorgeous. It's just that in the last 3 months or so, they generally haven't been, or else it's someone we've seen far too much of already. But I look forward to when there are!
|
04-26-11 02:06pm
|
Reply
5
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
The Bishop's Review
from greg909:
Yes, I think that Sean R remains the only true professional photographer used by ATK. Sadly, most of his more recent sets are either of models that we've seen a million times already, or they're tattooed slags with makeup like a hooker. I'm hoping he gets some fresh, young, unspoiled talent again soon.
Oh, and I find it strange when people refer to hairy content as "niche", since most of the women in the real world have pubic hair. It's only niche in the porn world where models feel they have to be shaved like window dummies -- that's the REAL niche as far as I'm concerned. But everyone to their own fetish :-)
|
04-08-11 11:28am
|
Reply
6
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
The Bishop's Review
from dracken:
Good review. Keep them coming.
This site is not really my niche, but the info is appreciated.
Just curious, does the site have some hardcore stuff? From the other reviews and the tour I gather it's mostly a softcore photo site. Would you say it's main competition is sites like Met-art and such?
|
04-07-11 05:18pm
|
Reply
7
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
The Bishop's Review
from Denner:
Just want to add a thumb up and agree with my esteemed fellow PUs here - a fine and helpful first review - though I'm not much into the hairy material. Still it gives a good picture of another ATK site - so also a Yes-trust from this user...and keep up the good work - look forward to future dittos - and of course: welcome!
|
04-07-11 07:06am
|
Reply
8
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
The Bishop's Review
from tangub:
Ditto what Capn said...a nice first review and welcome to PU. I've been a member at the other ATK sites Exotics, Galleria and Premium but always been a bit hesitant as to whether the hairy niche will appeal to me. If you like the "hairy" niche the We Are Hairy site is highly thought of by other reviewers here.
|
04-07-11 02:15am
|
Reply
9
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(The Bishop's Reply)
Thanks for the response, Bishop. For me, the raunch factor went way down when compared to the past. Actually I shouldn't call it raunch, there was just something more erotic and exciting about many of the sets offered by ATK , and this excitement was lacking (for me) during my most recent subscriptions.
I don't think it is a question of getting jaded over the years because I still look at sets of some of the earlier models with great interest. I believe that the emphasis changed over the years and that most photographers now have developed a style that is more in demand by a new generation of porn users. Minimalism, you could call it: get down to nudity as quickly as possible with as few clothes as possible to get in the way .. don't mind me, it's my favorite not so pet peeve! :-) They seem to survive nicely despite the loss of my custom and my taste is becoming progressively more different from that of the majority anyway.
I won't squabble too much over the higher score, it is still a good site for many and the improvements they have made since the beginning of 2011 SHOULD up their average. They also give me hope that eventually I can return to the site and enjoy it this time around. So, again, thanks for the review and that hope!
|
04-06-11 06:35pm
|
Reply
10
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
The Bishop's Review
from Capn:
A detailed & reasoned review. A very good start, welcome to PU. :0)
I think you may have set the score a little high, but given your views & reasoning, I can understand why you did.
Like yourself, I am a photo guy, & agree that the lack of customised zips is a notable failing given the protracted length sets are getting to these days.
You list 'No sets numbers at model level, can be hard to keep track/count.' as a con. I don't know how you tend to navigate, but I tend to use the Alphabetical model index when I am playing catch-up after a lapsed membership, in conjunction with the Recent Updates index.
Cap'n. :0)
|
04-06-11 09:23am
|
Reply
11
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Capn:
(The Bishop's Reply)
Yes, I think a lot comes down to personal preference.
I find a lot of models shot by Sean R to be less than attractive.
Largely, I find a lot of his shots focus is detailed gynacology, which really doesn't appeal to me at all.
Cap'n. :0)
|
04-06-11 09:07am
|
Reply
12
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(The Bishop's Reply)
Posting well over half a dozen repeats of the same pose in the same set is just laziness & bulking the set out for the sake of it. We are typically seeing sets of around 250 photos
IMO a properly edited set need not be over 100 phots & cover the same ground.
Cap'n.
|
04-05-11 11:34pm
|
Reply
13
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
The Bishop's Review
from messmer:
I am glad that things are finally improving on an old favorite site of mine that went bland on me. Are photo sets and videos still stored in volumes or have they done away with that?
One thing that baffles me in connection with the 90 (ninety): why such a high score if, as you wrote, "Only a few of the contributors are producing crystal clear quality work with great angles."
That was one of the reasons for my relatively low score: too few good photographers!
I agree with you on Sean R. His sets were always crystal clear but most of the others were either too garish (colorful) or not clear enough.
An excellent review, though. Thanks for giving us an update on this site.
|
04-05-11 07:58pm
|
Reply
14
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
The Bishop's Review
from Maines Own:
Nice to see a qualified update every once in a while, especially when it comes with this sort of good reviewing skill.
Good mentioning of things that make a collector's life harder - even though I am not a "stills"-man, same thing applies ever so often when collecting vids.
|
04-05-11 07:19pm
|
Reply
15
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(The Bishop's Reply)
Quite agree.
:0)
|
09-06-09 11:59am
|
Reply
16
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Basil:
(The Bishop's Reply)
Bishop, as per your request we've put amount of content for each model in the top right corner of the model page. Just go to any model page you like and you'll see there: Home » Models » Susane 7 photo sets + 3 videos - hopefully it'll make your and others lives a little bit easier ;)
WeAreHairy.com Basil
|
04-06-11 10:17pm
|
Reply
17
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Basil:
(The Bishop's Reply)
You can check all models by clicking the link Models on the tour to see what models we've got and what sets to they have.
Thanks,
Basil
|
03-09-10 08:38pm
|
