| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
301
|
Cash For Sex Tape
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
from graymane:
Nice review, Slutty. Got right to the point and gave us what we needed.
I like these self-shot videos. The fact the girls are as pretty as you state certainly makes it more appealing. But because you did such a good job, I'll be by-passing this one.
|
12-01-10 09:43am
|
Reply
302
|
Student Sex Parties
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
from elephant:
Yeah thanks for the update about the new hardfucktales Slutty, 11 scenes doesn't seem many so I guess I'll wait a while before I rejoin the network. I love the attractive girls they use on their sites but just wish they had an option to have an edited version of a shorter more action version of some of the SSP stuff, I mainly watch a little at the beginning and then forward on to the girls getting naked stuff and sometimes it's well into the movie. I guess it has an element of surprise and non directed realness to it. Files are getting huge these days though, on my last sites I did end up thinking do I really need this HD version and ended up seeing not too much difference with the medium download option with half the size, if its getting into 1gb territory I kind of think it has to be an awesome movie to warrant taking that much space on the hard drive.
|
11-28-10 01:52am
|
Reply
303
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from turboshaft:
(slutty's Reply)
You're right there are decades of 1.85:1 and similarly wide aspect ratios of films, but there are some 4:3 films (silent era) or 1.33:1. Later films widened a bit to 1.37:1 which looks very close to a SD fullscreen 4:3 TV so it gets confusing (1.37:1 should have a little bit of letterboxing).
Interestingly I remember a few widescreen "standard" definition TVs back in the 1990s before most consumers ever got wind of the coming HD formats. I guess the point of those sets were for the letterboxed VHS and DVD movies though TV signals and video games of the time would be boxed in with vertical bars--not much of an advantage if you ask me.
The number of different film formats is really crazy, though given a century of film it's understandable. Makes the number of formats in only a few recent decades of porn seem not so bad after all...until one won't play on your computer!
|
11-27-10 12:49pm
|
Reply
304
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Capn:
(slutty's Reply)
I disagree there.
Striptease, when performed properly involves a full ration of nudity.
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-27-10 08:27am
|
Reply
305
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from lk2fireone:
(slutty's Reply)
My guess is that platin is short for platinum blonde. Platinum blonde would be a whitish blonde. Sometimes you will see young children with platinum blonde hair, which might be natural. But most adults with platinum blonde hair are probably dye jobs. And people today are often dyeing the hair of their children, or the kids are doing it themselves, which was not common when I was growing up in the 1950s and 1960s.
Jean Harlow was a platinum blonde.
|
11-27-10 06:11am
|
Reply
306
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from turboshaft:
(slutty's Reply)
Have you ever checked the link on my signature? Secondhand smut is apparently a growing problem (insert erection joke here). Though I don't if people will be in the mood to check out a [ignore]Hustler[/ignore] after experiencing one of the new fingerbangin' TSA security pat downs. : - O
|
11-23-10 07:11pm
|
Reply
307
|
Teen Pink Videos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from slategrey:
(slutty's Reply)
I have no idea, the site isn't that well organized. But if i had to take a guess it will be recycled.
|
11-23-10 04:02pm
|
Reply
308
|
Class 3Some
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
from lk2fireone:
Another solid review.
|
11-23-10 03:11pm
|
Reply
309
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from lk2fireone:
(slutty's Reply)
I personally like Win XP better than Win 7. Win XP just seems easier to use. But the new computers all come with Win 7, and I'm not going to pay extra (a large amount of dollars) to add Win XP to my PC.
Microsoft charges a large amount of money if you are buying an OS separately from them. Nowadays, the cost of the Microsoft OS is what, maybe $200, and you can buy a low-priced PC for $500 with all the hardware and software that comes with it.
The price for buying items separately instead of bundled with a new PC has always been high, but it seems even higher nowadays. Unless you really know where to buy, and can do it yourself, instead of having a PC tech guy do it for you.
|
11-07-10 01:49am
|
Reply
310
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from lk2fireone:
(slutty's Reply)
There's also supposed to be a Black Screen of Death and a Red Screen of Death out there, but I've never seen either one of those, that I can remember. The Blue Screen of Death pays me a visit every so often, and has ever since I started using a home computer.
|
11-06-10 01:39am
|
Reply
311
|
Real Teenie GFs
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
from Eldo:
Same thing happened to me, very dishonest business practices.
|
11-01-10 06:30pm
|
Reply
312
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from BadMrFrosty:
(slutty's Reply)
Agree 100%, any woman that uses the availability of sex as a reward / punishment mechanism is not a woman that I would be with for very long.
|
10-21-10 07:26am
|
Reply
313
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
from RustyJ:
I can confirm this. It can get very pixelated from time to time just to return to decent quality right after it.
|
10-19-10 11:05pm
|
Reply
314
|
Young Courtesans
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(slutty's Reply)
I've read some comments/replies at PU that state that some of the sites in this network have stated they are/will be streaming only for the newer updates. But I've also read PU comments/rep;lies that seem to indicate that streaming only has not yet actually been put into effect.
If I definitely knew streaming only was in effect, I would not join, even at a lower price. I like the idea of being able to save a copy on my hard drive, even if I don't own it legally. I'm not really sure of the correct wording here. When you download a photoset or video from a paysite, you don't "own" the file, you just have the right to use it. Or something like that. Or maybe you do own it, but you don't have the right to sell it. I don't know what the legal interpretation is on this area. Just like, when you pay for a copy of some software program, I don't know if you own your copy, or what your legal "ownership" means.
|
10-11-10 12:47am
|
Reply
315
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(slutty's Reply)
Slutty, I thought your review was good, I was not trying to criticize it in any way. Please understand that. It's just that I thought you would be more enthusiastic or satisfied with the site when you gave it a score of 82. We seem to have similar tastes, because I have enjoyed many of the sites you have reviewed, and I thought your scores for those sites I knew about were close to what I would have scored them.
So I am not quibbling with your score. I just thought you didn't personally enjoy the site very much. But I was just trying to read more into your review than what you wrote.
But like you say, there are good and bad points to the site, and how much you enjoy it is a personal matter. Even though we are writing a review that is supposed to be a guide for others.
I keep flipping from one side to the other, which can be annoying. LOL. I keep saying the same thing in my own reviews, that "how much you enjoy a site depends on your personal reaction to the contents, and not just the contents themselves".
|
10-08-10 04:41am
|
Reply
316
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
from lk2fireone:
Nice review, but I get the impression that you scored the site higher than you actually enjoyed the site contents. Or maybe you are trying to become a professional reviewer and giving an "objective" score/rating instead of one based on what you feel. Or maybe I've read too many reviews lately, and need to take a break. :)
|
10-07-10 09:42pm
|
Reply
317
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
from pat362:
I think that Pierre wants it to appear as real as possible. Since quite a few of the girls on his site only do an interview and don't really have sex with him or another guy then the tampon is not too much of a problem unless she takes it out and then the go at it. In that case it's a pretty weird fetish.
My biggest issue with this site is that there are certain girls that haven't done hardcore anywhere else except for Pierre so if you are a fan than you probably will have to join his site to get that scene.
|
10-05-10 03:15pm
|
Reply
318
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from messmer:
(slutty's Reply)
Slutty, officially you could only stream the HD (720p) videos and download in a lesser format, which in my eyes was still pretty good, but by using a Firefox add-on (Flash and Video Download 0.1) I managed to download the real HD contents in mp4. If you should be tempted to go that route just click on the HD button of the videos that have them, wait till they start up and you'll see a little arrow at the right hand bottom of the window. Click on that, click on members-rk (I think) and it will ask you which folder to save it to. You'll have to rename it, otherwise all similarly downloaded HD files will be named members-rk. I think it could also have been done with a RealPlayer but am not sure.
|
10-05-10 01:24pm
|
Reply
319
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(slutty's Reply)
Thanks I really needed that visual. Now I'm never going to have premature ejaculation problems because I'll never be able to get it up again.
|
09-28-10 02:45pm
|
Reply
320
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
from pat362:
I was a member in May of this year and I had no problem with the billing company when I chose not to renew. Some of the content can be found at Videobox and if you have bought any of Pierre's DVD's in the past then even more so.
A large amount is from is old Woodman Casting series that were released by Private and Hustler. I can't fault Pierre's decision to retain some exclusive material for his site because he does have a few scenes that have never seen the light of day anywhere but on his site and Pierre has always bbeen good at getting girls to do stuff for him that they haven`t done elsewhere.
The membership is a little expensive at 30 Euros and some of the content is just the interviews. As much as I might like to know some background on a favorite star. if there is no sex than it`s pretty boring.
|
09-27-10 07:53pm
|
Reply
321
|
Teen Models
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
from TeenModels:
Thanks for taking the time to review the site. I'm glad that you are enjoying your membership. Just to clear things up the bonus content is 100% exclusive.
As usual, I take your comments and keep them in mind for the next round of shooting.
take care
Mike
|
09-25-10 10:22am
|
Reply
322
|
Teen Models
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
from graymane:
Another winner, slutty. We're gonna have to put you on TV. Maybe sit in with Mr. Ebert.
Seriously though, this was a well written review.
|
09-25-10 10:17am
|
Reply
323
|
Teen Models
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
from lk2fireone:
Good review. The site has a number of attractive teen-early 20s models. But a lot of these models are starting to blur together in my mind. I just don't get the sense of "Wow" that I used to from my early days of looking at nude photos. Metart, which is softcore, and has a huge number of models and photosets, does give me some sets where the model comes across as super attractive.
|
09-25-10 08:40am
|
Reply
324
|
Rough 18
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from lk2fireone:
(slutty's Reply)
slutty, the reason I gave the site an extra-low score was because I could not see a lot of the material. I need to download the video file before I can view it. And after downloading a couple of video files, I was not able to download any complete files because the download would stop after downloading about 1 GB (the file would be incomplete). And you can't play a partial file, you need the entire file to unzip it to get a playable file. So my experience with this site was very frustrating.
Obviously, if you did not encounter the problems I did (made worse by my slow DSL download speed of 150 KB/s), then you would score the site higher than I did.
But like I mentioned elsewhere, a site score can depend a lot on the personal experience you (or I) have with that site.
I would be interested in reading your review of this site, or any of the other sites in this network. That would also give PU members further information on the sites, that could be helpful.
There are definitely some good-looking models at this network.
|
09-25-10 05:03am
|
Reply
325
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from BadMrFrosty:
(slutty's Reply)
When you are one of the owners of the company and also in charge of the IT infrastructure certain allowances can be made :)
|
09-24-10 04:50am
|
