| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#17
from lk2fireone:
(slutty's Reply)
They use many of the same models at 18 Only Girls, Young Legal Porn (those are Diesel Access network sites) and Wow Girls and Wow Porn (the Wow sites).
The furniture and locations and settings are usually minimal for the photosets and videos.
Back in December of 2012, the 18 Only Girls and Young Legal Porn sites were using the same preview pages. A PU member noticed this, and asked if the preview pages reflected what was inside the two sites accurately. I said the public preview pages did not show what was inside each separate site, but was a mixture of what was inside both sites. And the PU member thought that was false advertising.
Since then, they have changed the preview pages of 18 Only Girls and Young Legal Porn to show what is inside each individual site.
As far as I can tell, the public preview pages for Wow Girls and Wow Porn are different, and probably reflect content that is inside each site, and not a reflection of what is in both sites combined.
|
02-09-13 10:42am
|
Reply
52
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from jberryl69:
(slutty's Reply)
Haven't really checked out Brazzers at all. I think I mentioned my fav is Evil Angel.
|
02-09-13 09:42am
|
Reply
53
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
from jberryl69:
Excellent review Slutty -
I recommended it for reading in the review I just posted since mine was 180 degrees from yours.
My feeling about this site is, "I have gotten so frustrated that I just let my subscription lapse without returning after the first week." Well, I did go back to check some figures I listed but that's it.
Funny how two porn pros can see it so differently.
Kudos.
|
02-08-13 03:03pm
|
Reply
54
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from t9chome:
(slutty's Reply)
And this WAS in the 70 & 80's. We hadn't entered the government for profit age yet. These days, they'd probably book us for 30 days in the hole. hmmm Humble Pie!
|
02-06-13 08:16am
|
Reply
55
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#15
from lk2fireone:
(slutty's Reply)
The content of the two sites is similar. But I believe that each site has its own exclusive content. What I mean is, the content of each site is exclusive to that site. They do not share content (although both sites do use the same models).
|
02-05-13 06:59pm
|
Reply
56
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from t9chome:
(slutty's Reply)
Caught, of course. Three times. We just couldn't wait to get home, so...
I thought this is pretty common.
|
02-05-13 09:44am
|
Reply
57
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from lk2fireone:
(slutty's Reply)
slutty, an expert or connoisseur could tell you the difference between 18 Only Girls, Young Legal Porn, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn.
But in my opinion, basically, all four sites feature the same type of porn. Mostly the same models. The same approach to good quality photosets and videos.
They are marketing the sites (Wow Girls and Wow Porn) separately to make more money.
I'm not knocking them. All four sites are good. And, as a marketing decision, you have to promote the sites, and try to show that they are different, so the potential customers can think there are differences.
But in truth, if you merged all four sites together into one big site, the main difference would be the owners/operators would make less money from running them.
|
02-04-13 11:09pm
|
Reply
58
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from dieselman:
(slutty's Reply)
Hey Slutty!
WowPorn is created for lovers of hard porn filmed in our WOW quality. This project is being filmed by new directors, specially assigned for the project, under my supervision to control the highest quality our members used to. The guys are very talented and I don't push myself into production too much, just tweaking them a bit to keep the quality of WOW standards and deliver them all critics of our members.
Right now, it's not a very big site but it features already lots of new models and it will grow madly fast soon. Right now, we release 3 new updates a week but by the end of this month it will turn to daily updates.
I hope you will love it!
|
02-04-13 09:49pm
|
Reply
59
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from lk2fireone:
(slutty's Reply)
I just re-installed Firefox.
And now I can stream videos at X-Art, which I couldn't do before.
I can also stream videos at the Diesel Access sites, which I couldn't do before.
So that seems to fix the problem.
Thanks for the tip.
|
01-26-13 03:49am
|
Reply
60
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(slutty's Reply)
Actually, checking some more, some YouTube videos load and play easily.
But there are other YouTube videos that don't load at all.
I've often said that computers were supposed to get easier, less complicated over time. At least for the user.
But in real life, computers can have all kinds of glitches. And that's apart from any malware/virus problems.
|
01-25-13 05:23am
|
Reply
61
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(slutty's Reply)
I can load and play YouTube videos with no problem.
CNN videos don't load. I click on the hot link for a video at CNN, and nothing happens. The video does not load at all.
I go to cnbc.com, click on the hot link (which is an image) to play a video, and the image turns to a black screen, and nothing plays.
But it's not the end of the world. At pay porn sites, even if I can't watch a streaming video, I can still download it, and then watch it. It's not as convenient as being able to first stream it to see if I want to download the video.
I'm guessing that some sites use some kind of hardware/software for videos that my PC is having a conflict with. What is causing the condition is beyond me: I am certainly not technically savvy.
This problem just started a few days ago.
Maybe it will just go away. Or maybe if I try cleaning out my cache it will go away.
But if the problem persists for a while, I will remove all my porn content onto external hard drives, and take the PC in to have it checked by some computer guru. That would be after I tried your suggestion of re-installing my Firefox browser, and maybe whatever else I might try.
But thanks for your suggestion.
|
01-25-13 04:50am
|
Reply
62
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RustyJ:
(slutty's Reply)
Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately it seems to be very erratic. The first download may start slowish under 1 megabyte per second and when I eventually start another, it might max out my band up to 12 megabytes per second while the first one keeps on trickling. Or it may trickle even slower. Or never start and timeout.
Oh well, at least everything eventually comes through without corrupted files or anything.
|
01-25-13 04:41am
|
Reply
63
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
from messmer:
Excellent review, slutty. And I see the reason now why I ran into so many "dead" links. I lined up my downloads with DTA, for one download at a time and must have run into your "file location shifting!"
I was going by the "file location error" message when I wrote my review assuming that the files were not there (dead). Learn something new every day! I never even heard of file location shifting.
|
01-21-13 11:27am
|
Reply
64
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from pat362:
(slutty's Reply)
I think you'll have to wait until you get some cash because I don't think he will ever drop his price.
|
01-19-13 09:54am
|
Reply
65
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(slutty's Reply)
He is all gonzo but I would consider him more of an intense type of director/performer rather than an extreme one. The sex can often be a little raunchy but for the most part is your basic b/g gonzo porn with an emphasis on anal. I could be wrong but most of the girls that shoot with him seem to be into what he is doing to them so you don't really get what I call the look of pain on their face.
The one thing I will say is that if you like this one then don't necessarily assume that his other site ass factory is similar. I don't think they are and I know that I will never join the other one.
|
01-08-13 06:28pm
|
Reply
66
|
Barely Legal
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(slutty's Reply)
Correct. ;0)
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-03-13 11:33pm
|
Reply
67
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from marcdc1:
(slutty's Reply)
Busy Busy, that's the buzz word for December.
|
01-02-13 02:36pm
|
Reply
68
|
Barely Legal
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
from Capn:
It doesn't inspire much confidence when their site is so poorly maintained it has different prices all over.
It always irritates me when you get an offer a different lower price when you click away from their site.
If they are happy with that lower subscription rate, why don't they just have the honesty to put it on the main join up page?
Cap'n. :0/
|
12-31-12 03:30am
|
Reply
69
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from lk2fireone:
(slutty's Reply)
I just checked the email from NALive. And it shows that my password to that site is the same as my password to Naughty America.
Since that is a new (unique) password I just made up for Naughty America, that proves that the two memberships are related.
|
12-31-12 01:14am
|
Reply
70
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from lk2fireone:
(slutty's Reply)
Like I said, I found an email in my inbox saying I had joined the NALive site. This was immediately after I had joined the Naughty America site, because of the special $5.00 for 1 month promotion for Naughty America. So I assume the NALive join was directly related to the Naughty America membership, even though the email stating I was now a member of NALive did not mention Naughty America.
The NALive email specifically states that there is no charge to the NALive membership.
It also states that there are free, and paid, chats at that site. And that any pay chats/offerings are clearly marked.
I haven't really explored the NALive site yet. Not enough time, with the holidays, and the other pay sites I already belong to.
But I haven't been charged anything from the NALive site.
NALive is a cam site. But it's not entirely pay-to-play. The email states there is a lot of free chats you can watch. And there are also the chats you can pay for.
PU says NALive is a re-branded version of Streamate.com.
Streamate charges $15/month to join. But the NALive membership is free. If you go to the NALive site, you will see that it states (on one of their hot links): Join Free.
I didn't join through the NALive site. I never heard of NALive, before I got the email, stating that I was now a member of the NALive site.
|
12-31-12 12:55am
|
Reply
71
|
Exxxtra Small
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from rearadmiral:
(slutty's Reply)
It isn't a large site yet, but it is growing. Being part of a good network makes it a great value even though it is a small site.
|
12-23-12 05:24am
|
Reply
72
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from hodayathink:
(slutty's Reply)
For many people here, I can see how it would feel like a large percentage. But the more I look around at other sites, the more I don't think it's seems like that much to a majority of the market. And, like you said, compared to most American porn sites that aren't specifically trying to focus on young and/or natural girls, it really isn't. They all seem to live somewhere between 30/70 and 70/30, as far as the fake to natural ratio goes, and the bigger the site, the more likely it is to fall on the 70/30 side of that spectrum. And if you stick to just the young sites on this network (for example, just My Sister's Hot Friend/Naughty Bookworms/Fast Times), you end up with a ratio around 85/15 natural to fake, and about 2-3 scenes a week (120 so far this year over 50 weeks). And for the most part, even if you completely ignored the updates with implants and pretended they didn't exist, you'd still have a site that posts somewhere between 4-8 updates every week.
I can definitely understand someone like messmer's issue, where he's specifically looking for older natural women and the majority of the most popular American mature models have implants, so he's not gonna be able to find much that he likes. But, like I was kind of trying to say, to say something along the lines of it being difficult to find natural models at all almost goes beyond hyperbole into saying something that is flat out incorrect.
Also, as an aside, why did you bring up the large breasted natural women? I don't understand it in the context of this discussion.
|
12-21-12 10:01pm
|
Reply
73
|
Naughty Athletics
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from marcdc1:
(slutty's Reply)
There update schedule is a little erratic. Katie St. Ives is the most update (December 10) Before that the most recent update was August 31st. They seemed to averaging about 1 a month currently over the summer and late spring of 2012.
Sporadic might be another good description of their update cycle for this site.
Here's to an improvement!
|
12-18-12 03:30pm
|
Reply
74
|
Strip Clips.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from kensmith:
(slutty's Reply)
I would hardly say something funny going on. Its a newer site that has something so different that I think there are other user like myself that really enjoy the content. Like I stated in my review they have some cool features that I have never seen on any other site I am a member of. You should go check it out.
|
12-18-12 02:29am
|
Reply
75
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from exotics4me:
(slutty's Reply)
A big part of my overall liking of a model comes from either pure confidence in herself or pure innocence. These newer models seem to have neither. I think they may be trying to cut back on costs by hiring the truest amateur models, right off of college campuses. Most of the girls are cute at least, but their personalities are poor once on camera. They set such a high standard in those earlier years and I do think that is the biggest problem they have now. If they were a new site, say just for the last 2 years, I would probably be talking about how daring and risky their sets are. Compared to their past work though, it seems like they are just going through the motions.
|
12-10-12 03:15pm
|
