| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
226
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from elephant:
(slutty's Reply)
Yeah I took a look at the site the other day as it seems to of launched now and it does look like it might be good, you get a month free if you join for a month I think it said. Its early days, I'll join maybe when they have been going a while, hopefully they will update like metart. I do agree with you though sometimes metart was a little too repetitive and arty for my liking, I rarely ever look through any metart content again.
|
04-15-12 12:30am
|
Reply
227
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
from Drooler:
I don't think they're too big, even the ones that exceed 5600 pixels. But I don't download zips of that size myself. Mid-res and/or low res usually does fine. The largest size I get just of my favorite pics.
|
03-02-10 05:35pm
|
Reply
228
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
from Drooler:
I'm a current member and the ads are VERY annoying! I'll be right in the middle of something and I'm about to click and this ad is about to get it instead of what I came and PAID for.
So it helps to keep on your toes.
For this kind of pop-up, click-ass bullshit, I could just as well check the weather page I use. At least there I'm not PAYING to have promotions twisted up my nose.
What is this, freakin' cable TV?
|
03-26-12 07:50am
|
Reply
229
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Khan:
(slutty's Reply)
We just got a new link from them so it should go to a better landing page now.
Sorry for any inconvenience.
|
01-03-12 11:28am
|
Reply
230
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(slutty's Reply)
Thanks for the info. I'm not sure why it does that.
|
01-02-12 06:08pm
|
Reply
231
|
Moms Teaching Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from elephant:
(slutty's Reply)
Thanks also Slutty, I'll maybe join in the future but if they are not of good quality which the guy says in the other comment maybe I'll leave it.
|
06-16-12 01:08am
|
Reply
232
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from graymane:
(slutty's Reply)
Thank you, slutty for your insightful commentary. I've gleened a lot from what you've so kindly brought to my attention.
Let me say, however, that you have to be a member of skin video in order go deep into the site to find whatever you're looking for. You're right about the "hardcore" thing -- one of my major dislikes about the site. However, the content is so vast that it touches on just about every genre...softcore, met art, girl-girl, gay, barely legal, non-porn, solo... the list goes on.
skinvideo possesses complete clips from so many porn sites that many isn't even known by our PU's Review staff. I'm paying only $7.00 for Mr. Skin....I'm paying just $10.00 for skin video. I've had skin video for ten years...Mr. Skin for five days. I'm divesting myself of one of those before renewal......you already know which.
|
07-13-10 12:19am
|
Reply
233
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from graymane:
(slutty's Reply)
Thanks, Slutty, for your input. Let me, if you will, address what You said: "You probably are getting full access if you can download stuff, I can't imagine how the site could be set up to give you any kind of limited access."
Well, let me give you an example to the contrary. If you were able to go to their site and pull up Liv Tyler ...the movie she stared in was "Stealing Beauty," in which she did a very hot scene of being seduced by a sexually inexperienced young Lad. It was the first sexual encounter for both and it sizzled. Mr.Skin had only three clips of the scene, all less than twenty seconds each. That means he allowed slightly less than a minute for an original three minute scene ...compounding the problem with breaking them up into the three parts. I went to another site of which I'm a member (skin video/ see my review) and found the same scene immediately. I downloaded the whole three minute clip without a split. I rest my case. Take a look at Skin Video....its bigger and better by far.
|
07-12-10 01:30am
|
Reply
234
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(slutty's Reply)
Thanks for the additional info.
Appreciated!
Cap'n. :0)
|
06-29-10 02:04pm
|
Reply
235
|
My 18 Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(slutty's Reply)
I'm sure the downloading speed was much better when I fisrt joined. It's only in the last week that it;s started to go down. Mind you I'm having some internet issues with the new modem my ISP installed so I don't know how much is me and how much is the site.
I have at least a dozen good videos that are keepers and a few others that might make my long term list.
|
02-21-11 07:03pm
|
Reply
236
|
My 18 Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
from artnoir:
Great review. Sums it up really. I think the unreliable servers are the biggest drawback of this site. I havn't got more than 240 KB/s since I joined last week so you're lucky getting 1 MB/s.
I agree somewhat with the bonus site idea. However I think there should be bonus sites to this one instead of the other way around.
Another thing that is bothering me is the model names. They are clearly made up as many of the girls are known as their real (or more popular model names) on the net.
Also the full videos are named the same so you have to rename them one by one when downloading. Very irritating.
|
02-18-11 09:20pm
|
Reply
237
|
My Sexy Kittens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from OneMan:
(slutty's Reply)
Absolutely, as I said, in 2 years this will be a great site, as they appear to be re-encoding their older stuff. But, of course, so will many other sites !
|
03-04-10 12:23pm
|
Reply
238
|
My Teen Video
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(slutty's Reply)
In this early state I'm not sure - they claim daily updates - must have missed one or two...?
Still - they site looks better with that deal (too) since I was here last - maybe one and a half year ago. Anyway: the content, quality and the amount has improved a lot in that time...
May get back with a reivew. (I'm a little 'rusty' in writing reviews at the moment)
|
01-28-10 05:48am
|
Reply
239
|
My Teen Video
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from ace of aces:
(slutty's Reply)
hwo many videos are on that site? is the quality and the download speed good?
|
03-03-09 11:51pm
|
Reply
240
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from jberryl69:
(slutty's Reply)
Haven't really checked out Brazzers at all. I think I mentioned my fav is Evil Angel.
|
02-09-13 09:42am
|
Reply
241
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
from jberryl69:
Excellent review Slutty -
I recommended it for reading in the review I just posted since mine was 180 degrees from yours.
My feeling about this site is, "I have gotten so frustrated that I just let my subscription lapse without returning after the first week." Well, I did go back to check some figures I listed but that's it.
Funny how two porn pros can see it so differently.
Kudos.
|
02-08-13 03:03pm
|
Reply
242
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
from messmer:
Excellent review, slutty. And I see the reason now why I ran into so many "dead" links. I lined up my downloads with DTA, for one download at a time and must have run into your "file location shifting!"
I was going by the "file location error" message when I wrote my review assuming that the files were not there (dead). Learn something new every day! I never even heard of file location shifting.
|
01-21-13 11:27am
|
Reply
243
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from lk2fireone:
(slutty's Reply)
I just checked the email from NALive. And it shows that my password to that site is the same as my password to Naughty America.
Since that is a new (unique) password I just made up for Naughty America, that proves that the two memberships are related.
|
12-31-12 01:14am
|
Reply
244
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from lk2fireone:
(slutty's Reply)
Like I said, I found an email in my inbox saying I had joined the NALive site. This was immediately after I had joined the Naughty America site, because of the special $5.00 for 1 month promotion for Naughty America. So I assume the NALive join was directly related to the Naughty America membership, even though the email stating I was now a member of NALive did not mention Naughty America.
The NALive email specifically states that there is no charge to the NALive membership.
It also states that there are free, and paid, chats at that site. And that any pay chats/offerings are clearly marked.
I haven't really explored the NALive site yet. Not enough time, with the holidays, and the other pay sites I already belong to.
But I haven't been charged anything from the NALive site.
NALive is a cam site. But it's not entirely pay-to-play. The email states there is a lot of free chats you can watch. And there are also the chats you can pay for.
PU says NALive is a re-branded version of Streamate.com.
Streamate charges $15/month to join. But the NALive membership is free. If you go to the NALive site, you will see that it states (on one of their hot links): Join Free.
I didn't join through the NALive site. I never heard of NALive, before I got the email, stating that I was now a member of the NALive site.
|
12-31-12 12:55am
|
Reply
245
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from hodayathink:
(slutty's Reply)
For many people here, I can see how it would feel like a large percentage. But the more I look around at other sites, the more I don't think it's seems like that much to a majority of the market. And, like you said, compared to most American porn sites that aren't specifically trying to focus on young and/or natural girls, it really isn't. They all seem to live somewhere between 30/70 and 70/30, as far as the fake to natural ratio goes, and the bigger the site, the more likely it is to fall on the 70/30 side of that spectrum. And if you stick to just the young sites on this network (for example, just My Sister's Hot Friend/Naughty Bookworms/Fast Times), you end up with a ratio around 85/15 natural to fake, and about 2-3 scenes a week (120 so far this year over 50 weeks). And for the most part, even if you completely ignored the updates with implants and pretended they didn't exist, you'd still have a site that posts somewhere between 4-8 updates every week.
I can definitely understand someone like messmer's issue, where he's specifically looking for older natural women and the majority of the most popular American mature models have implants, so he's not gonna be able to find much that he likes. But, like I was kind of trying to say, to say something along the lines of it being difficult to find natural models at all almost goes beyond hyperbole into saying something that is flat out incorrect.
Also, as an aside, why did you bring up the large breasted natural women? I don't understand it in the context of this discussion.
|
12-21-12 10:01pm
|
Reply
246
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from rearadmiral:
(slutty's Reply)
Definitely. But even the $10 deal we usually get is a good deal too.
|
11-07-12 01:30pm
|
Reply
247
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(slutty's Reply)
Thanks for the comments slutty. With the $5 membership offer I didn't really take a big risk when I hoped to find some scenes that I'd like. I think with the standard discount offered here it is still a great deal. I suspect that I'll actually come back to the site again but not on the same frequency as I do with other repeat memberships.
|
11-06-12 08:10am
|
Reply
248
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(slutty's Reply)
Thanks slutty, I didn't even know about the renew price. I have a cycle I use with types of sites and usually am joining the reality networks each year in June-August, so that may be why we're having the similar subscriptions. Which is also why I didn't know about the renew price. I rarely stay with a reality network for more than a month at a time because I know I will get bored with the same theme. On the models with the fake boobs, I'm with the anti-fake boobs beliefs as much as anyone is and while I do agree that the sites do choose which models they hire, there is still another side to that too. Not all natural models do hardcore. There are so many twists to sites hiring models that I do think they are still limited under the "damned if we do, damned if we don't" position.
|
07-26-11 03:49pm
|
Reply
249
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Monahan:
(slutty's Reply)
Slutty nailed it. They have a lot of "altered ladies."
Bogus boobies are a real bummer, but NA lets you find the God given tits vs. the aftermarket enhancements.
Extracted from their (outstanding) search function:
Big Fake Tits (676)
Big Natural Tits (266)
Big Tits (1379)
Fake Tits (1312)
Natural Tits (1448)
|
07-17-11 12:18am
|
Reply
250
|
Naughty Athletics
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from marcdc1:
(slutty's Reply)
There update schedule is a little erratic. Katie St. Ives is the most update (December 10) Before that the most recent update was August 31st. They seemed to averaging about 1 a month currently over the summer and late spring of 2012.
Sporadic might be another good description of their update cycle for this site.
Here's to an improvement!
|
12-18-12 03:30pm
|
