| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
from pat362:
I hope you change your mind and write a review. I was a past member and I'd love to know more about the state of this site. I know that they do not realease has many movies because I almostr never see new stuff except compilation.
|
02-08-10 06:28pm
|
Reply
277
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
from rome476:
How were the download speeds?
|
02-08-10 06:11pm
|
Reply
278
|
Real Teenie GFs
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
from Eldo:
Same thing happened to me, very dishonest business practices.
|
11-01-10 06:30pm
|
Reply
279
|
Real Teenie GFs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from mbaya:
(slutty's Reply)
I once used jettis. I got tons of junk spam but the billing and cancellation went thtough just fine.
|
03-01-10 07:08pm
|
Reply
280
|
Real Teenie GFs
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
from mbaya:
Which billing companies does the site use? Why did you fear they were disreputable?
|
02-28-10 06:56am
|
Reply
281
|
Real Teenie GFs
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
from lk2fireone:
I do not know why, but it seems the common practice for porn sites to charge a higher membership fee when you join through a trial offer than when you join directly without the trial.
But there is a similar type of unfair pricing for "legitimate" businesses. Newspapers, for example, will offer a lower subscription fee to non-subscribers than to subscribers. So instead of rewarding people who are "loyal" subscribers with lower rates, they offer the lower rates to non-members in the hope of increasing the number of members. The difference in pricing can be large.
|
02-25-10 11:26pm
|
Reply
282
|
Real Teenie GFs
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
from Capn:
A worthwhile warning for some, no doubt!
Cap'n. :0/
|
02-25-10 10:43am
|
Reply
283
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(slutty's Reply)
Thanks for the reply.
I was a member of a Japanese porn site that had a download limit. I didn't exceed the limit, but I was blocked anyway, because their download limit counter didn't count correctly. That happened to me a few times, and I got so frustrated, I barely used my 1 month membership at the site. Emotions triumphing over practicality.
So that's why I am hesitant about joining this network, even though some of the videos might be appealing.
|
09-21-12 12:13am
|
Reply
284
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
from rearadmiral:
Great review! It gives me some confidence to know that another person looks at the site independently and comes to pretty much the same conclusion.
Something you wrote made me realize I missed something in my review. You said that you didn't download any HD files because of the limit. Neither did I and for the same reason. So why should they bother having them at all? The regular wmv files can be in excess of 1GB so I can imagine that the HD ones are much bigger. Is it vanity on their part to think that a member would join and love the material so much that they'd be satisfied downloading five scenes a day?
I also agree that they're a bit ass-obsessed. But... not all ass obsessions are the same. I'm ass-obsessed too but none of the RK sites appealed to me. The RK sites promote big asses. I prefer smaller. But I'd only say no to Alexis Texas if Tanner Mayes was in the room... And oddly for a big network, the only anal site (Captain Stabbin) rarely updates. I can see if they think the theme has run out of steam (pun intended) but why give up on the genre?
Anyway, great review and I really enjoyed reading it. Too bad that like you, it won't induce me to join ever again.
|
01-03-12 02:26pm
|
Reply
285
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from rearadmiral:
(slutty's Reply)
No. I went to the biller's site. I'll try the RK site itself. Thanks for the tip.
|
01-02-12 02:53pm
|
Reply
286
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from rearadmiral:
(slutty's Reply)
I agree, file sizes would make sense here. But the real problem is the use of an unreasonbaly low limit.
To add icing to the Reality Kings cake, I can't cancel my membership. They use a biller called Secure Billing Worldwide and when I go through the cancellation process and get to the last screen where I can opt to stay with RK at a reduced price or cancel, there are no buttons that allow you to make either choice. This isn't a Reality Kings problem, obviously, but it adds to the frustration I've had with the membership.
|
01-02-12 02:29pm
|
Reply
287
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from rearadmiral:
(slutty's Reply)
I look forward to reading your thoughts on the site.
I wonder if the cap is something they've always had but just never enforced until recently? That would explain why some people never hit the limits and some of us did. Or else they just enforce it randomly, which is also a reasonable theory.
Like you, this will probably be my last time at this site. It has become stale and repetitive. I still like some of the sites a bit, but the low, low, low limit added to a mostly bland network means I won't be back. And the fact that they didn't have the courtesy to even reply to my email is just rubbing salt in the wound. I had low expectations when I sent the email so at least I could claim that they met my expectations.
|
01-02-12 06:39am
|
Reply
288
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from elephant:
(slutty's Reply)
Hi Slutty
Yeah its still updating and was my fav site of the lot as I like 2 or 3 girls in a scene and not too many with tats on this site. It seems to have 4 or 5 updates a month so not too bad. Theres around 275 vids here and date back to 2004. Glad I could be of some help.
|
08-09-11 02:13pm
|
Reply
289
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from messmer:
(slutty's Reply)
Slutty, officially you could only stream the HD (720p) videos and download in a lesser format, which in my eyes was still pretty good, but by using a Firefox add-on (Flash and Video Download 0.1) I managed to download the real HD contents in mp4. If you should be tempted to go that route just click on the HD button of the videos that have them, wait till they start up and you'll see a little arrow at the right hand bottom of the window. Click on that, click on members-rk (I think) and it will ask you which folder to save it to. You'll have to rename it, otherwise all similarly downloaded HD files will be named members-rk. I think it could also have been done with a RealPlayer but am not sure.
|
10-05-10 01:24pm
|
Reply
290
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
from bjajlt362:
Great review, I'm saddened by the fact that the HD content is streaming only. I tend to like to save clips to my hard drive to watch later.
|
07-21-10 07:48pm
|
Reply
291
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
from messmer:
I read only yesterday that Reality Kings are being sued over copyright infringement when it comes to the music on some videos. The VIP especially was mentioned, with Reality King's lawyers arguing that they could hardly record a party without recording the background music that goes with it at the same time. I have a feeling that's where your glitch comes in. Everyone is being cautious till the whole matter of infringement becomes a bit clearer.
And thanks for a great and thorough review. I was more impressed with their mp4 files than you (see my comment) but otherwise don't see anything in your comments to argue about! :-)
|
07-21-10 06:42pm
|
Reply
292
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
from mbaya:
I also basically liked the site. I found the models to be a bit too slick and overly made up, in other words very much the stereotypical pornstar look. The site itself I thought was also a bit overdone and slick. If I had to pick a single word to describe the women and the site it would be plastic. Yet, a lot of the videos are interesting and grabbed my attention.
|
07-21-10 05:49pm
|
Reply
293
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(slutty's Reply)
I just checked it and there is a message that they are updating their videos.
|
07-15-10 02:58pm
|
Reply
294
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
from pat362:
I just tried it and it works fine.
|
07-14-10 07:36pm
|
Reply
295
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Goldfish:
(slutty's Reply)
It's still good, just not as good as it used to be. The super hot Euro girls are more sporadic and the guys that sub in for Mike (or whoever the original guy is) don't do as good a job directing the action.
|
07-08-10 01:46pm
|
Reply
296
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(slutty's Reply)
I feel it is just another of those plethora of sites from photographers with a somewhat over inflated ego.
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-02-12 12:11pm
|
Reply
297
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
from tangub:
Ron Harris was about the 3rd or 4th pay site i ever joined way back in 2003 and judging by your review it doesn't sound like an awful lot has changed in 9 years. This has got to be one of the most overrated sites on the internet and to this day is still one of the most disappointing I have ever joined.
|
02-26-12 12:59pm
|
Reply
298
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
from PinkPanther:
No, they were sexy aerobics vids - but to tell you the truth, having downloaded them when I was a member of this site a long time ago, I would rather watch Met Art vids than Ron Harris' "sexy" aerobics vids - and Met Art vids are the Gold Standard of boring vids.
Unless you really want to see old soft-core stuff - and not the best soft-core stuff that you could find either - I don't recommend joining this site for the crusty old "sexy" aerobics vids.
|
07-14-10 06:40pm
|
Reply
299
|
Rough 18
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from lk2fireone:
(slutty's Reply)
slutty, the reason I gave the site an extra-low score was because I could not see a lot of the material. I need to download the video file before I can view it. And after downloading a couple of video files, I was not able to download any complete files because the download would stop after downloading about 1 GB (the file would be incomplete). And you can't play a partial file, you need the entire file to unzip it to get a playable file. So my experience with this site was very frustrating.
Obviously, if you did not encounter the problems I did (made worse by my slow DSL download speed of 150 KB/s), then you would score the site higher than I did.
But like I mentioned elsewhere, a site score can depend a lot on the personal experience you (or I) have with that site.
I would be interested in reading your review of this site, or any of the other sites in this network. That would also give PU members further information on the sites, that could be helpful.
There are definitely some good-looking models at this network.
|
09-25-10 05:03am
|
Reply
300
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(slutty's Reply)
On 10/31/12, they posted a vid that was clearly labelled "licensed from Viv Thomas". That was the post of the day, so I wouldn't regard it as bonus, but it is clearly labelled as to whose material it was originally. This site has never mainly done original material, in my experience.
|
11-01-12 08:18pm
|
