Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
551
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Wittyguy:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
I was trying to be a bit cynical in my post and I guess it didn't quite come off right now that I look at it again. I guess I was under the impression that you could at least stream the HD vids before the six month waiting period expired. If you can't even stream then it is a 100% rip off as opposed to a 90% rip off.
|
06-26-09 07:24pm
|
Reply
552
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
from rome476:
Despite all the hate for Brazzers in the forum {some probably justified} I think it is a great value. I just finished a year@ $96 and got a another @ $80. There is a lot of good and some great porn at less than $7 a month.
|
06-26-09 07:08pm
|
Reply
553
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
from Wittyguy:
I took a quick peek and yup, they advertise 1080 p HD vids. You have to be admit that they don't promise downloads in HD but it's still deceptive marketing. I also see that they are advertising "100% satisfaction guaranteed or money back" on their sign up page. I wonder if that's a scam too or if they're going to dooling out some refunds soon.
|
06-26-09 06:49pm
|
Reply
554
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
from wiild1:
They must be kidding, this will clearly backlash.
|
06-26-09 11:51am
|
Reply
555
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
from james4096:
Very lame of them.
6 months! That's ridiculous. How about if you buy a 6 month membership?
I've been a member for a long time, but I do believe I let my membership lapse to get cheap sale prices. I haven't even logged on in weeks anyway.
Oh well.
|
06-25-09 09:31pm
|
Reply
556
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
from mbaya:
I have never been a member, but this is convincing me that I never should join. This policy is the opposite of what a site should do. In today's business environment, making your best product available is an absolute must. Publicising such a policy will get them what they deserve-fewer customers.
|
06-25-09 09:15pm
|
Reply
557
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
from badandy400:
Oh that sucks so bad! My membership just ran out a few weeks ago because my credit card numbers changed after having been a member for about 2 years!
Now lets think about this for a moment. They are claiming more demand on their system. So they make you stick around for half a year downloading all the while then make you go back and redownload everything in HD. This is a waste for us and them. Basically we either wait half a year to begin downloading or download everything twice. If this were my company I would have fired this person for being retarded and bring this idea up in the first place.
I always though people running large network sites where stupid, and here is yet more proof. I swear when the people do something right they actually try to dampen the impact of the good news by counteracting with something incredibly stupid.
|
06-25-09 09:08pm
|
Reply
558
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
from RagingBuddhist:
That's no surprise to me.
What's it going to take to get more people to see them like I have all along? A money hungry porn mill.
|
06-25-09 08:11pm
|
Reply
559
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from turboshaft:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
She trusts you enough to make sure it's not too painful and then makes a casual comment that hurts guys, and our precious egos, everywhere. Ouch!
|
06-23-09 11:49pm
|
Reply
560
|
Club Kayden
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from ace of aces:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
i quite didn`t get the point why you don`t understand the last phrase of my review.
yes there is a live chat (as far as you told so) but the periodic show is imo so selden that this is not a real extra.
even if i want to see other live channels, i have to join the dangerlivenetwork, therfore not included in the membership.
the post of vids is in the movie area, therfore no extra, isn`t it?
|
06-23-09 04:46am
|
Reply
561
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Torn4do:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Thank you! I don't know how the site used to be, but it was certainly impressive recently.
|
06-19-09 01:59pm
|
Reply
562
|
Kedra Alliard
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Kedra:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Yessir, you can save the individual pix. I just need to find a "safe" way to get the sets on for download.
I don't like the idea of just adding a random url link because I've heard too many people talk about the ease of grabbing them without being a member.
I'm a mom and more concerned about random yung'uns grabbing pix they don't need to have than I am about anything else, to be honest.
If anyone has any suggestions...PLEASE give a shout out. I'm more than happy to listen to ideas, if someone knows a way that I can make sure the members can have more ease of use and I can still keep the kiddies out.
|
06-17-09 08:07am
|
Reply
563
|
Kedra Alliard
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
If I had a pet talking bird, I would certainly teach it to say, "Elegant design with ease of navigation."
|
06-16-09 07:25am
|
Reply
564
|
Kedra Alliard
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Kedra:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Yes, I fully admit that the CMS on my site blows in the way of downloads. I've been trying to find a work around to be able to post zip files in the member's area.
All my members have to do is shoot an email and I'll send them a zipped set.
|
06-16-09 06:42am
|
Reply
565
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from largeun:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Oh, the old bat vision read the tiny molecular print hype yeah?
I hate sites that do that shit and thus Brazzers is always low on my list.
This is why I caned the review.
|
06-12-09 09:18am
|
Reply
566
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from largeun:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
I completely agree.
However, it is better to be upfront than to make silly excuses.
Being straight up with your members is a good service protocol and it will only help business.
I just received a discount offer from Sex and Submission as I have been a member before.
They included links to all their new updates. So, my decision could be an informed and balanced one.
DDF have been glancing excuses about their updates and have made some silly offers to me to resubscribe.
This is the type of business I am not too fond of.
And the money plays a huge part in the equation.
If you make a ton of money then some of it should be put back into the business to improve it.
I am a one man business and pride myself on the service I provide to my customers, no matter how overwhelming it gets.
If I had a better turnover I would employ staff to make sure the level of service is maintained.
Like you said: lets see what happens and our wallets will do the talking.
Take care
|
06-12-09 06:47am
|
Reply
567
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from largeun:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Thanks Pinkpanther,
I am fed of the way some of these sites treat us.
And what is amazing is they make an absolute fortune.
On the last count Videobox had over 2 million members and at the lower rate of $9.99 that equates to 20 million dollars a month.
They keep scamming us.
DDF have not even updated their site and after a ton of emails between me and them they then blamed the global recession for their lack of updates.
Can you believe that?
Probably best to wait it out and see what happens.
Thanks again m8
Large
|
06-12-09 12:55am
|
Reply
568
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment from PinkPanther:
I finally received a reponse to my actual question saying that they have no option to join both Brazzers & Mofos.com for one year. I went back through the original search and links that I had joined through and.... I found that they are correct, though it's rather deceptive, I believe.
First you get this page touting Brazzers Plus
http://www.brazzers.com/tour3/?action=packages
Then you click on the "Get More Porn For Less Money" link and you get this page:
http://enter.brazzers.com/signup/signup.php?nats=Mzk3NzExOjU0OjI0
,43,0,0,0&step=2&qualify=1&tpl=join31
If you have very good vision you'll read all the tiny print that says that the one-year deal is for "All Brazzers Sites" and the only deal that includes Mofos.com is the 1 Month Membership of $34.95/month, but when you're starting from a page advertising Brazzers Plus and have clicked through from there and one price is advertising "you save 30% off Regular Price" and the price at the top is advertising in big letters, Best Value - You Save 70% Every Month - well, it's easy to miss those small letters.
I'm glad that they eventually answered my question. I'm not happy about how long it took and I have no compliments for their business practices, which I consider to be as close to Bait and Switch as you can get without actually being there.
|
06-10-09 06:06pm
|
Reply
569
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
from RagingBuddhist:
(Insert my usual rant against this site here)
|
06-08-09 08:40pm
|
Reply
570
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from GCode:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Oh, I think I might have read the comment wrong. My mistake. Give us an update on your situation if you can actually get through to customer service on the phone or if they give you a valid response. If it is a direct sale from the merchant and they do not honor the sale, then that is extremely shady business and should be looked at more closely.
|
06-08-09 07:44pm
|
Reply
571
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
OK, I'm expecting a second vote of no confidence from Mr Fountain, on my opinion that femjoy models would be improved by more makeup.
But are there any PU members that agree with me? Or is this too much of a niche/nitpicking idea to concern my fellow PU members?
I don't have anything against natural. But makeup can bring out a girl's beauty. If you compare the photosets of the models below, I think the photosets of those models are, in general, better looking at met-art than at femjoy.
Photoshop is used more at met-art. As long as it's not overdone, it can add.
But that's a matter of personal taste. Just as two people looking at a list of models will probably not rank them all in the same descending order of beauty/attractiveness.
Angelina B(femjoy) aka Indiana A(met-art)
Anina(femjoy) aka Anna AO, Anna AS(met-art) aka Sinner and other names at metmodels
Brigita(femjoy) aka Natalia A(met-art)
Desiree (femjoy) aka Desire A(met-art)
And there are a bunch of other models that are featured at both femjoy and also at met-art, where you could compare the relative attractiveness of the photosets.
|
06-08-09 07:43pm
|
Reply
572
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
from GCode:
Ouch, I hate it when sites have an automated response to questions in support or just seem so damn thickheaded that they give an answer to a clear, concise question with complete vagueness. I've had this happen to me quite a few times and I do feel it does affect my overall experience with a site in general.
As for the place where you got the deal, I'm guessing it was a link out to the site which then offered this price at their billing processor (like how TBP discounts work?). Maybe, you can attempt to contact support or someone from the site that gave the discount link to confirm the discount is still in effect or had success? Good luck with this adventure, I hate the waiting process when shit goes wrong and I know what you are feeling right now :(
|
06-08-09 07:35pm
|
Reply
573
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from GCode:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Thanks for the the highly detailed information to my question. Appreciate it a lot man. With that being said, I can't wait till I can join !
|
06-08-09 06:47pm
|
Reply
574
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
from mozzerellachick:
Im very sorry you had this experience at Private, your email must have slipped thru the grid.
We have a CS team around the clock dealing with queries, cancelations etc.
Im sorry you had this experience.
We have now removed DRM I will be happy to give you a months free membership to make ammends.
MOzzie chick
|
06-08-09 01:51am
|
Reply
575
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from highparkman:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Just revisited the site. You will NOT EVER see the word 'censored'. Only uncensored. If you think customers will make the connection that by using the term uncensored implies that there are censored areas in this site, you're mistaken. Why not just be clear and state the truth: a majority of the best quality photos are video ARE censored? Wouldn't that be more honest?? It sure would. But that wouldn't sell, and that's why the wording is deceptive.
Speaking of deceptive, you're so defensive about this site, you must have a commercial connection, or be an employee of jsexnetwork. Otherwise why take such an interest in defending obvious behaviour and shady sales tactics?
Enough of this banter. Let potential customers decide for themselves.
Peter
|
05-31-09 02:50am
|