Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
Lustful Goddess
(0)
55.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The site appears to be a sex-positive countercultural one with an emphasis on empowerment and a very amateur, natural approach. Much bodyhair if that appeals to you. |
| Cons: |
This site has been nothing but trouble for me. 2 of the 3 browsers I used were unable to download any videos. Safari worked. I downloaded 12 videos and was suddenly denied any further access to the site. (TBP says there's no download limit.) They haven’t contacted me.
The “support” link leads to a site (Zombaio) which denied any knowledge of my account. CCBill handled billing, and when I contacted them they reset my user name and PW. Access is still denied. I am requesting a refund.
Other stuff: the “Models” and “Terms & Conditions” pages are both empty. Search is all but broken: very primitive (you can’t search for models). I had to re-enter my user name and pw for EVERY VIDEO downloaded. A very large number of the zip files I managed to download for image sets refused to decompress, even after repeated download attempts.
Videos seem to cap off at 640x480 WMV's. Images were generally 1200 pixels on the long side (or smaller) |
| Bottom Line: |
I cannot reccomend this site. I would not have joined if I knew I would spend the next day massaging and pleading with it to download content, only to be cut off arbitrarily twice, without warning. (It appears that there IS a download limit, in contrast to TheBestPorn's writeup.) I have requested a refund from CCBill.
I would suggest staying away from lustfulgoddess, a real shame given the nature of their content and the fact I (was) a serious fan of Oksana/Carmen/Gypsy Taub. |
|
07-15-13 05:56pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
2
|
Wet And Pissy
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Gorgeous models performing exactly as advertised.
Expert videography and photography
High quality files, both video and audio
No download limits
The free membership to the other sites is a real value. |
| Cons: |
Most of the sequences are too baroque for my taste: too many odd toys and props.
Ghastly-poor file naming habits: costs the user a lot of time cleaning up. |
| Bottom Line: |
ON EDIT, May 2013: I remained a member of this site for several weeks until my membership lapsed. File names were never improved in any way at all. Excepting his public posts here, he owner/webmaster never responded to any of the messages/emails I sent concerning the filenaming problem, or on other topics.
ORIGINAL REVIEW: Wow, this is a fabulous site for those who take an interest in the subject matter. Gorgeous models, excellent images- soaking wet. Most of these models are familiar from other European sites and at times it's a surprising pleasure to see a famous star get down and dirty with herself in this way. While updates are not frequent, given the availability of willing models and the quality of the output this is understandable. Free membership in the sister sites is a major bonus.
(FWIW my very fast late-model Mac can have a hard time playing some of the largest "MP4 HD" videos. I find the .wmv files to be more reliable and of perfectly good quality.)
If it weren’t for the file names I’d give WAP a much higher score than it received here*. However, videos and pictures are so badly named as to require a lot of time at the back-end, so to speak, and this really needs to be corrected.
Image zip files all decode to folders named "Images". Not "Goldilocks - Three Bears": "Images". The images in that folder are named "001.jpg", "002.jpg" and so on. The next zip expands the same way, and the next. You can imagine the mess this creates: a pile of folders named “Images1” “Images2” and so forth, with no idea what's in them.
If all of these "001.jpg" files ever get intermingled by user error (trashed accidentally, for example), it's game over for you. The image files should carry the model's name and shoot title.
It's easy to create a zip file which expands to a folder's real name; perhaps it takes a little more effort. Given the slow rate at which content is produced at WetAndPissy, that effort would be nothing at all.
The net result of this is spending a LOT OF TIME back on the site, figuring out what the real name of what you've downloaded is, so you can file it away correctly. (I just happened to download my files in update sequence and thus had a chance at figuring out the real names of all those "Images" folders from the updates webpages. If I'd chosen any other method (favorite models, random choices), it would have been much much worse.)
As to video files, they are inconsistently named and because of this almost equally hard to square away after downloads.
Prepare to spend a lot of time 'on cleanup' after downloads from this site.
If WAP puts a bit more effort into this one serious problem, they'd be a really fabulous place to visit.
*This is the second site I've joined on the basis of a good TheBestPorn review, and the second where the owners can't be bothered to properly name their files. Given the trouble this can cause, I feel TBP needs to make this matter a review criteria. |
|
04-07-13 02:20am
Replies (12)
|
Review
3
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Some hairy models are forthcoming and natural. Many are attractive or beautiful. There is no download limit. Videos are mostly solos, which is fine, and there a fair amount of time is devoted to closeups, which I like. |
| Cons: |
Files have a different name than they appear in at the site. Thus the site might refer throughout to “This Model playing with hairy pussy on bed” but delivers “ThisModel_HiddenPinkPanties”. This, combined with a URL system that disarms cookies, makes it all but impossible to keep track of which files you’ve downloaded and which you haven’t.
Videos plagued by artificial masturbation with lots of sighs and moans: really irritating. Also the site often instructs women to ‘masturbate’ by snaking their hands around their thighs from behind, a move as artificial and labored as it sounds.
Despite assurances to the contrary, downloads break under any Macintosh download manager I’ve tried.
Too few women of color (or age).
Minor- files are named according to some object in the room, not by date, so there’s no sequence to the files, as is the case at a major competitor. |
| Bottom Line: |
Not a naturalistic site, which I prefer, especially for hairy models. If you don't mind very artificial masturbation videos with -lots- of ooooh's and aaaah's for no reason, you'd do fine here.
Hint to somewhat improve your ability to see your download history- delete the nonsense string ahead of "members" in the url and reload before downloading. |
|
03-10-13 05:31am
Replies (8)
|
|
