Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
Kink Men
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
***** Note I'm a straight man trying to give an objective review to a site included with the kink.com network. I did not reduce their score just because it's a gay porn site.*******
- Includes access to 24 sites each with its own focus. (8 gay sites)
- Over 1,500 videos
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value.
- Great production value. Lighting/sound/talent is all top notch.
- Exclusive content.
- Robust community. Pretty much every shoot has a lengthy set of comments. You can really get a good sense of the content from the comment sheet.
- Updates at least once a week (average is 2-3).
- .zip files of screenshots available
- Kink is known for shooting with top-notch female talent. I'm not as versed in the gay porn side - I'm assuming the same is true here. I do recognize some of the names as shooting straight porn and have wasn't disappointed. |
| Cons: |
- The organization is horrible. You can filter by the amount of circumcised or uncircumcised hair - but can't filter searches.
- Rather pricey - but this may be one of those times that you get what you pay for. I guess what I'm saying is: yes this is more than most sites, but most sites (maybe no other site?) has this high of quality and this many shoots.
- Little model diversity. Most are straight out of central casting.
- With a top-notch site like kink, there really aren't too many downsides.
- This site is the catch-all for all their gay porn (see comments below) |
| Bottom Line: |
This site does not post content under its own. Instead this is a collection of all the gay porn on kink.com. It may help with the organization, but it's not the same as having a dedicated site (to be fair; Kink.com does NOT try to pad their network by claiming this as a separate site).
Again I'm doing this from the perspective of a straight man. I didn't watch many videos just dipped in and out so I could give a fair review. I've reviewed almost the entire network at kink.com so I feel I can give an accurate assessment of this site as well; even though I'm not the target audience.
Kink has high standards for production so there's never a bad scene
An all-around great site for kink/BDSM material. Much of the material is too extreme for some so check out the previews before you buy.
Files are available in multiple quality levels so you can strike the right balance between size and quality.
While they may be pricey you can't beat the production value. talent, catalog, depth. They do what they do very well.
You get 5 previews a day. That gives you enough to explore and see if this is for you |
|
10-08-17 02:39pm
Replies (6)
|
Review
27
|
Bound Gods
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
***** Note I'm a straight man trying to give an objective review to a site included with the kink.com network. I did not reduce their score just because it's a gay porn site.*******
- Includes access to 24 sites each with it's own focus. (8 gay sites)
- Over 500 videos
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value.
- Great production value. Lighting/sound/talent is all top notch.
- Exclusive content.
- Robust community. Pretty much every shoot has a lengthy set of comments. You can really get a good sense of the content from the comment sheet.
- Every guy looks like he has a dedicated gym routine. I guess that's why the title is "gods"
- Weekly updates
- .zip files of screenshots available |
| Cons: |
- Organization is horrible. You can filter by the amount of circumcised or uncircumcised hair - but can't filter searches.
- Rather pricey - but this may be one of those times that you get what you pay for.
- Little model diversity. Most are straight out of central casting.
- With a top-notch site like kink, there really aren't too many downsides. |
| Bottom Line: |
Again I'm doing this from the perspective of a straight man. I didn't watch many videos just dipped in and out so I could give a fair review. I've reviewed almost the entire network at kink.com so I feel I can give an accurate assessment of this site as well; even though I'm not the target audience.
Kink has high standards for production so there's never a bad scene on their other sites they higher top-notch talent, so I assume the same is true here at Bound Gods.
The site delivers on what it promises ripped dudes tied and hardcore action. If that's what you're looking for there are plenty of shoots for you to explore here. |
|
09-18-17 02:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
28
|
TS Seduction
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Includes access to 24 sites each with it's own focus - including a second TS site (I also reviewed that one)
- Updates once/week (pattern is every Tuesday)
- over 550 videos with a catalog years deep
- Good scene descriptions and user comments. You can get a good idea of if you'll like a shoot or not before loading it.
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour
- Lots of different cross kinks for example: "mommy" play/public/domination/humiliation/multiple partners |
| Cons: |
- Organization is terrible for such a marquee site. You can filter by amount of pubic hair - but can't filter searches once they've been run. A feature other big site have had for years. With so much content I'm having a really hard time finding things that I know are here.
- Shoot have some stills that you can preview before loaded the video - but no downloads.
- photo zips have been added back - but when I was last a member they didn't reapply that for the whole back catalog
- Rather pricy - but this may be one of those time that you get what you pay for.
- Cross sells on the member side plus a "buy kink gear" adverts seems unnecessary given the high membership fee. But there is NO BETTER for these niches quality than kink sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
Important note: This is not my fetish, so in all candor I've only explored enough to write a competent review. I hope you find it useful.
With a large catalog and president updates I think this site is a firm buy if this is your kink. I went with a rather high score because I think this is a rather hard to find niche and people who are looking for it will appreciate the hard work kink.com puts in.
Shoots are long (about 45 minutes of action). And varied I'm constantly amazed at the imagination of the "writers".
Kink brings together top talent (on all it's other sites; I'm assuming the same is true here - sorry I don't know much about TS models) and great production value. If you can handle the high price you'll be very happy. |
|
05-16-17 02:24pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
29
|
Hardcore Gang Bang
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Many set ups are witty and interesting. If you remember the clown mania from about a year ago - they have a send up on that.
- Probably the best gang bang site I've ever seen. The lighting and sound are impeccable (as always with a kink.com site). Also you can follow the action. This is the problem with many other sites, the editing is too choppy. Kink avoids this pitfall.
- Updates about ever 2 weeks.
- About 225 scenes
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. Lighting and sound are well done. I give them a lot of credit that especially hard when there's so much action going on.
- zip download pix are back
- more model diversity here than many other places. Mostly in ethnicity somewhat in body shape.
- Lots of big name talent.
- videos run a little over an hour. |
| Cons: |
- Intense. While models make clear their enjoyment and pleasure in a post interview, many of these scenes imply a non-consensual fantasy.
- Search is sub par. This is made worse by the fact that the female talent is often not the 1st one listed in the actors credits in scene descriptions.
- Expensive
- Most shoots don't have images available for download
- Cross-sales on the membership side |
| Bottom Line: |
I liked this site a lot. It definitely needs to be seen as fantasy role play and I'm please they include the model interview at the end of every video to reassure the conceptual play nature of the work.
There's no two ways about it these scenes are rough. Anal is in almost every scene, double and triple penetration. Many shoots have bukkake, double vaginal and/or double anal. Again this is a very intense site and if you're not interested in that you'll be unhappy
There is a preview section that allows 2 minute clips so try before you buy. Plus look for deals (they have an email list and you can sometimes save money with that).
There's a lot of top talent that has shot here. Some of my favorites were: Krissy Lynn, Holly Hendrix, and Kristina Rose |
|
02-22-17 01:21pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
30
|
The Upper Floor
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Great orgy scenes. A lot of times I can't follow the action. Upper Floor doesn't jerk around like some other sites so you can see what's happening.
- About 550 scenes
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. Lighting and sound are well done. I give them a lot of credit that especially hard when there's so much action going on.
- Lots of guy on girl and girl on girl action. Almost always multiple partners.
- zip downloads are back.
- more model diversity here than many other places. Mostly in ethnicity somewhat in body shape.
- Lots of big name talent. If you favorite porn star shoot fetish content she's probably worked for Kink - and UF in particular.
- Updates about 3 times per month
- scene length is usually over an hour I think one of the longest I saw was almost and hour and a half. |
| Cons: |
- While I'm happy to see picture access is back. I'm still frustrated with the user interface. It is deviling to find more of what you're looking for. There are keywords available but they are both very broad and not ever shoot is tagged correctly.
- Cross sells inside the member side. It frustrating to see search results come up for another site offering for you to buy more- especially because Kink.com is not a cheap membership
- Expensive (but high quality)
- Occasionally I feel like the camera is panning too much - but I'm really being nit picky here. |
| Bottom Line: |
The theme of most shoots a "slave" is proving herself to the community and finishing a final ordeal of submission/service. It is certainly hot. Many of my favorites were ones that deviated from this worn route.
Competition is often used - blow job, who can go without coming longer, that sort of thing. It made the site a lot more fun than it might otherwise be.
I give this site a solid buy. The action is hot. There's a lot of it. Updates keep coming. There's plenty of variety. I think kink should keep this site going.
While I have a couple of complaints they really are small. I'm unaware of any better orgy BDSM site. |
|
02-10-17 10:09am
Replies (0)
|
Review
31
|
Charlee Chase Live
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Great quality: newest videos are 1280X720 7.2mbps. Lower quality is 640X480 1.1 mbps.
- Great performer Charlee is not only hot she also has some acting chops so her scenes are more than just "oh baby that feels good."
- Large natural tits (if they're fake they fooled me)
- Weekly cam shows with Charlee (daily shows with other girls as many as 5 a day).
- cam shows achieved as flash videos
- blog with weekly to bi-weekly updates
- lots of off the beaten path fetish content (balloons, bubble gum, tickling as well as bondage, underwater and forced cumming).
- clear video/pix organization with categories for the different "fetishes" (above plus): hair washing, belly buttons, BJs, BTS, boobs, b/g, ear, feets, g/g, handjob, jumping, kissing, JOI, puffy jacket, sprains, smoking, messy (food), wrestling.
- hard to tell how many videos there are but I would guess about 200
- shoots have small descriptions so you know what you're downloading
- shoots with a lot of other talent - variety |
| Cons: |
- .wmv format is often higher quality than .mp4
- pix are not available as zip downloads
- the organization could be better. The categories are cross referenced, which is nice, but there's no search field, or ability to select multiple categories.
- some tattoos (not overwhelming; and I think she's hot as hell, but I know some will complain about any ink) |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined the VNA network last month and took a while to get around to Charlee. I'm sorry I waited her site is a real gem. The organization is clean (which is lacking on many other her sister-sites) and the content is very varied. While I'm not into everything she has her. There's plenty for just about everyone.
The quality is high (and even on older stuff acceptable). And Charlee is a top notch performer. Each shoot is individualized, even when it's in the same genre.
I really enjoyed the diversity. Charlee has a lot of different talent shooting with her. While most of them are performers I've never heard of, that doesn't change how hot they are.
This one is a certain buy. Between the great content and the cam shows (plus a large network of other MILFs) you can go wrong here.
Included with the membership are: Shandra Fay (of filtycuteonline), Gabby Quinteros, Puma Swede, Deauxma, Angelina Castro, Francesca, Sunny Lane, Julia Ann, Carmen Valentine, Vickyathome, Bobbie Eden, Nikki Benz |
|
02-11-13 07:34am
Replies (0)
|
Review
32
|
Clips 4 Sale
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Lots of content. I have no idea how many videos are loaded up here but it's way too many to even estimate.
- If you've got a niche they've got a category. Everything is here from Balloons to cream pies. If you can think of it some body's selling it.
- Nice way to find new talent. I sometimes search the categories for my favorite themes then google the providers that come up, usually they have a website.
- no DRM - downloaded and keep it as long as you want - I'm often frustrated by streaming sites |
| Cons: |
- Organization: "studios" (producers) put content into a lot of different categories so you're more likely to find it - but it also causes A LOT of clutter.
- WIDE variety of quality. Some is HD and beautiful some is left over from when they opened their doors and really poor
- pix sold separately (on a different site even)
- Another organization problem: you can't apply multiple filters to get just what you want (blond AND natural tits for example)
- Lack of differentiated pricing: It looks like the pricing is a dollar per minute of content - really should open that up and let providers set price.
- previews are only 10 seconds long! Look I want you to stay in business - I don't want you to give away the farm. I just want to know if this is for me or not. I guess it's hard since they sell the individual video - but if I'm looking to buy a 30 minute video I need more than 10 seconds. |
| Bottom Line: |
Tough site to do a review for because there's so much variety. PU really isn't set up to do this - So I'm doing the best I can with the tools I have.
Ala Carte can be a great option when you're checking something out - or if you know you only want a couple of videos.
I find I mostly use this as an extended preview. For example, I bought a couple of Mistress T videos as I decided if I wanted to join her site or not. |
|
07-31-12 01:17pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
33
|
VideoBox
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Lots of movies (5 per day)
Good Quality Vids
Good price (although they did just raise it)
Great stock of back vids available |
| Cons: |
Some times hit and miss; some vids are just too out of the mainstream for me.
Like to see them add some amateur stuff |
| Bottom Line: |
Great site for anything but amateur content.
Can't go wrong with this site. |
|
02-15-07 07:50am
Replies (0)
|
Review
34
|
Julia Ann Live
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Julia Ann is a crazy hot MILF (I love MILFs) on top of that she's had a legendary career in porn so it's great to see so much of her content in one place!
- The strength of this site and network is it's cam shows there are several each day and it seems to be where they have their energy
- Mobile formatting friendly
- Good video quality: The mobile version is 1280X720 4.25 mb/s. Desktop is 1920X1080 10.2 mb/s. - I don't think that's 4K but it looks great on my 30" monitor.
- Searching is good (but not great). You can search across the network or just this site.
- Rating and favoriting are supported to make it easy to keep track of what you've watched.
- About 320 videos
- Good range of content: BTS, girl/girl, 3-somes, orgies, studio content, cams, hardcore, interracial, fetish, anal. Can't think of a niche that isn't filled.
- Some of the content is exclusive to only this site (not every video is exclusive)
- pictures available as zips- 43 sites included in the network |
| Cons: |
PRO CONT:
- 43 sites included in the network I'm especially excited for Lauren Phillips (no surprise there - I'm a huge fan!), itscleo, Siri, Penny Pax, Sophie Dee (who doesn't love the accent?), Maggie Green (just found here recently - love her too), Sandra Fay (she is dirty with a capital D), and Kendra James (while she does mostly girl-girl, which isn't my fav - her solo stuff is top-notch!)
- Over 16,000 cam archives. I'm not much of a cam guy but I'm enjoying exploring.
- Cam shows are for members (so you don't have the talent waiting until she hits her minimum to start)
CONS
- limited downloading options (mobile or desktop versions)
- Still updating but slow 1/month is typical
- Dated site format. It's functional but looks like it was designed 10 years ago.
- older content is 640X480 0.9 mbps (it looks like some of that is being remastered for better quality).
- Cam archive is poorly organized
- Cam shows can sometimes be slow to get to the action (not a bad thing sometimes) |
| Bottom Line: |
I've been meaning hit up this network because they have Lauren Phillips here and I LOVE Lauren Phillips. They also have Cleo and some other amateur talent that I've been meaning to catch up on. That PLUS Pornusers has a points bonus for this site, AND there's a special Covid price of 20/month made this a no brainer.
Like I said in the pros this site is driven by their network - both camming and other stars. A lot of these models have had earlier big porn careers and are now repurposing that content here (and adding some more). Based on just how much talent you get for your dollar this site/network is a BUY.
As far as Julia Ann herself she is the full package. She's hot (well endowed - I'm guessing implants). She has enough acting chops to deliver lines with good effect (that means she's great at the dirty talk) and she's got plenty of softer stuff (solo/girl-girl) while still nasty enough for hardcore (anal, gangbangs, threesomes)
The only two complaints I have with this site are it's lack of updates (which is mitigated by its deep catalog) and it's lack of 4K videos (which since I myself haven't upgraded to 4K is hardly a fault). |
|
05-20-20 12:17pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
35
|
Barbi Sinclair
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Lots of hot content. Barbi specializes in the slut wife/cuckold fantasy. There's panty of hot action with just her and her husband while also having the full range of content. There's MMF,FFM, solo, interracial, gangbangs, creampies, public flashing, public masturbation, wife-swapping, and guest appearances from other pro-am models.
- About 250 videos
- Good lighting and sound. The action is easy to see and hear. A real bonus because Barbi and the male talent all talk dirty during sex something I really like
- Good setups there's a plot to go along with the action. Most of it is centered on her husband's fantasy to be cuckolded.
- Stories (both hers and fan submitted). I don't remember this the last time I was a member
- call your husband, dark caravan, cuckold.com included.
- navigation is greatly improved since last time. I had no trouble finding what I was looking for and weeding through the things I wasn't interested in.
- Oldest quality was 720X480 1.6 mbps. New is HD |
| Cons: |
- Limited previews. You can access 5 previews but most of the previews are the 1st one minute of each video which doesn't give you a good feel for how hot the action is.
- Limited updating. In the years since my last review there's hardly any new content.
- Dropped some of the bonus sites that used to be included.
- Little interaction with Barbi |
| Bottom Line: |
***This is a re-review for me****
I really like this site. Barbi has a lot of personality and does a great job of filling the "slut wife" niche - a genre that I really enjoy.
I ended up lowering the score a little bit because there isn't as much new content here. While she is updating the pace has slowed some. That said there is a strong back catalog and more than enough hot stuff to be satisfied with. Her videos have a tag in my hard drive so I can find them easily!
What I love most about her site is Barbi is having a great time. You can see her sexuality and passion in every shoot. There's nothing as sexy as joy.
I love this site for the hotwire/cuckold content. I wish she kept updating more aggressively. I like that she shoot with plenty of different talent (both male and female).
I give this one a buy. You might just stay for a month and download everything that scratches your itch. There a lot to like no matter what your into especially: interracial, public flashing/sex/dogging, slutwife/cuckold, MILF. For $30 (or less if you find a deal/buy multiple months) there more than enough to be satisfied with. |
|
04-22-17 07:58am
Replies (0)
|
Review
36
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Wicked is a major player (owned by Gamma I think?) they have a huge catalog of over 6,250 videos.
- Parodies, Parodies, Parodies. This is probably the best selling feature on wicked. They have a TON of Axle Braun's stuff (maybe exclusive partnership?)
- zips for photos normally about 50 in a set. Often screen grabs of the video action (sometimes promo material thrown in)
- LOTS of 4K (I guess I really do need to update my monitor)
- UNLIMITED DOWNLOADS. This is harder and harder to find especially on the big network sites. If there's a cap - I didn't hit it.
- Video previews available (normally this is just the trailer of the full video not unique to the scene you may be looking at)
- Organization by latest, engaging, views and upcoming
- keywords and search are a lifesaver. With so many great models and so much content, I'm glad to see the search and keyword tagging works great |
| Cons: |
Pros CONT:
- favorite and like video functions (this is good for me I use that as a way to keep track of what I've checked out already)
- So many top models have worked with them. Some of my favs were: Sarah Shevon, Britney Amber, Kimberly Kane, Lacy Lennon, Dani Jensen, Lauren Phillips, Cherie DeVille, Penny Pax and Kenzie Taylor
- Excellent super hero parodies especially: Captain Marvel, Wonder Woman, Batman (all of them!), Super Girl (don't know why but DC movies make for better parodies
- Bonus content from Adult time - this was really good when it came to the pandemic and they brought in stars to do virtual shows.
- feedback is available through comments (with staff responding)
- multiple formats are available so you can pick 4K to lower resolution.
- Excellent production you see and hear all the action.
- REAL MILFs. I enjoy women closer to my age bracket. I'm glad they don't stretch the MILF category to teen moms. |
| Bottom Line: |
PROS Cont Again!:
- Creative! You know with wicked you're going to get hot sex but the writing can be fun and clever. If you did watch through the dialog you typically get some good jokes. You can tell fans are making the content.
- Updates come 1X/week with 4 scenes dropping at once
CONS:
- Cross sales inside (I find this to be the minorest of sins)
- Mainstream porn though and through. Predictable acting/sex positions/etc. Everything is well made but predictable.
- Plot lead-ins can be too much. I'm a plot and dialog person but this was sometimes too much for even me.
- Content rotation. I guess all companies do this but it's a little crappy when it's parodies that should be more timely to take advantage of the zeitgeist.
Bottom Line:
This site was FUN. I'm glad I checked them out but I only hung around for one month (that's unusual for me I normally do nothing less than 3 months).
I know I focused on the parody aspects but that's not all they have. They had some older (looked like older 5-10 years back) stuff from the back catalog. All the favorite stuff - squirting, female-female action, co-eds, and car washes. Mainstream porn - nothing of note which is why I focused on their unique stuff.
Why didn't I go higher with the score? The biggest thing is a lack of creativity. Even with the parody stuff where they shine, I don't feel like they're leaning into that as they could. There's so much more they could be doing. I look at some of the pro-am stuff and they're killing it. I'd like to see the big-budget guys join their unique takes on superheroes. |
|
01-02-22 11:32am
Replies (0)
|
Review
37
|
It's Cleo Live
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Cleo is a young (to this old-timer, that means less than 30) brunette with enhanced perky breasts and a gymnast's body. She does boy-girl stuff, but I think the site leans harder on girl/girl content. Perhaps what sells this site more than anything else is risky public shots.
- STILL updating (1-2/week typically)
- Good range of videos: public masturbation/flashing, solo, car sex, JOI, 3-somes, orgies (girl heavy), cheerleader role play (I read somewhere that she was a Steelers Cheerleader, maybe that's just rumor. She's certainly a Pitsburg Fan and it shows .
- Mobile formatting friendly
- Good video quality: The mobile version is 1280X720 4.25 mb/s. Desktop is 1920X1080 10.2 mb/s. - I don't think that's 4K but it looks great on my 30" monitor.
- Searching is good (but not great). You can search across the network or just this site.
- Rating and favoriting are supported to make it easy to keep track of what you've watched.
- About 320 videos |
| Cons: |
Pros Cont:
- pictures available as zips
- 43 sites included in the network.
- Not every guest start is has a tag. For example, she did some work with Lelu (from Lelulove.com) and I want to find all that content (Lelu is my all favorite amateur!) I can't search just for that I have to look at all the thumbnails and guess where she is (sometimes it's in description sometimes it's not 😞
- Over 16,000 cam archives. I'm not much of a cam guy but I'm enjoying exploring.
- Cam shows are for members (so you don't have the talent waiting until she hits her minimum to start)
CONS:
- limited downloading options (mobile or desktop versions)
- Still updating but slow 1/month is typical
- Dated site format. It's functional but looks like it was designed 10 years ago.
- older content is 640X480 0.9 mbps (it looks like some of that is being remastered for better quality).
- Cam archive is poorly organized |
| Bottom Line: |
I've been a big can of Cleo for a while (mostly on twitter), just couldn't fit another subscription into my budget. I'm really glad I dropped some other stuff to add this in. Cleo is super hot and full of crazy ideas. It's not unusual to see her on a zip line or jumping off a roof and especially doing exhibitionism. Some girls do pretend public stuff - Cleo looks like a true exhibitionist having fun with everything she does.
To me the public content sells the hell out of this site (and the fact that Cleo is exciting and just seems so alive.) She has more personality than just about any amateur girl I can think of. I give this a big BUY |
|
05-25-20 10:29am
Replies (0)
|
Review
38
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Unique niche. Not a lot of sites do exhibitionism. And this site does it over the top. Public Disgrace stages elaborate shoots with many bystanders. While I'm sure all the backgroud people are in on the scene - it makes very hot and believable public humiliation
- Almost 480 videos as of February 15, 2020
- 1 hour long on average (incudes exit interview)
- Video looks great at 1280X720 5 mbps - great production value.
- Allows download managers
- Extreme action models are spit on, written on, called names, etc. (this could just as easily have gone in the Cons for how extreme it is)
- Never the same thing twice. They have a huge amount of variation within this topic
- Easy organization. There's a heart system to easily find what you want to save. There's also a 5 point rating system so you can see what others have been enjoying
- Top talent along with new comers. I find plenty of my favorites and find new gems. |
| Cons: |
PROS CONT
- Good model diversity in every imaginable way: body type, ethnicity, age
- plenty of orgy content, fisting, extremes
- interesting plots and set ups. They have more imagination that I do!
- Models are put in humiliating situations and degraded. This may be too much for some - but if it's what you're looking for, few do it better
CONS
- Infrequent updates: Current schedule looks to be 2/month (although last one was Jan. 21st 2019 - I hope this doesn't mean the end of this site. I'm hoping there was just a break in the action)
- You need to suspend your disbelief a little bit. For example they may be shooting on a bus but it's the same "extras" each time
- Many sets are international - I prefer English so this can be a distraction
- More expensive than most sites (although with excellent production and a wide array of models you are getting what you pay for)
- cross sells inside the member side
- A lot of talent that I've never seen before (this could just as easily be a Pro) |
| Bottom Line: |
- Some of the real standout talent includes doms Mona Wales, Steve Holmes and Mz. Berlin. I'm a big fan of both. I find that anytime Mona Wales is dirty talking I go crazy.
- Some of the best scenes with subs were the vids by: Cadence Lux, Ashley Lane, Cherry Kiss, Isabella Clark, Lilyan Red
I don't think any network does BDSM as well as kink.com does. This site does the humiliation/exhibitionism better than any. The imagination is incredible.
If you are interested I highly recommend looking at their previews 1st. Previews run a minute and a half to 2 minutes and give you a good idea of the action. A lot of this was more intense than my interest.
A lot of the shoots start with a girl being stripped outside and walking around before she goes to a "public" place to be gang banged. The "public" place may be a shop/bar/restaurant/bus/whatever. It seems like the windows are done one way so you see people walking past - but since they have no reaction to what's happening inside I'm guess there's some film magic going on.
Even with a high price, I think this is a solid buy. Enjoy some previews to make sure it's not to extreme for you. If you like that, you'll find plenty to enjoy. |
|
02-15-20 01:27pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
39
|
The Dick Suckers
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Access to network: manojob.com (hand job site) and MrPOV.com (m/f hardcore), Finishesthejob.com (umbrella property for all sites)
- Oral sex focus. (duh 🙄). With plenty of dirty talk. I think this family of sites does the BEST job of dirty talk.
- Consistant theme. Despite that they manage to be rather creative in setups and scenarios.
- Max quality 1080p (1920X1080). approx 5.2 mbps.
- Smaller sizing/streaming available
- Model interviews/just pop shot available
- videos run about 15 minutes. A little set up (introduction to the talent 2-4 minutes, action, cumshot (almost always a facial), wrap-up (girl talking dirty with her facial still in place)
- Good model mix; New girls and established stars. MILFS and "barely legal"
- Amazing models: Larking Love, Anikka Albrite, Christie Stevens, Zoey Nixon, Brooklyn Chase, Dylan Ryder (boy I miss her!), India Summer |
| Cons: |
PROS CON:
- Updates are about once a week, seems to be a 50/50 split of remastering previously shot and new material. I'm not disappointed by the upgrade in quility from old stuff since there are some real gems there
- Great organization. You can favorite content, grade content on a 5 point scale, use tags, search. I was able to find my favorite stuff very easily.
- Commenting is also available, but as these things go seems underused by the membership.
- Responsive customer service. I had a day off and was downloading a bunch of stuff while I had good wifi. I hit the anti-piracy cap. A quick email and I was right back to enjoyment. Any time I've reached out to the site I've recieved a quick and courteaus reply.
CONS:
- About 175 videos as of December 12, 2019
- Not a lot of model diversity. Mostly attractive white women (some racial diversity, some body type diversity, but like most porn it's a little rare.) |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS:
- Not much bad to say. I'm very happy. I'd like to see more of a discout for long term membership, but boy am I streching when I list that as a complaint.
Bottom Line:
After being dormant for a while the site owner has refocused on this property and it shows.
I've always been a fan of the director, Billy. He worked for DogFart.com for a long time and I think he brings out the best in the models he works with. I'll see a girl somewhere else and then see the performace that he encourages and it can be night and day.
I'm a little disappointed in only ~175 videos with as many years that they've been around. But reading the owner's blog it clear that was the result of being at Dogfart.com, now he's focused here and I for one am delighted.
I give this one a solid buy. If you like seeing oral and like dirty talk this site is perfect. For me I'm all about the dirty talk so I couldn't be happier. I've beena member for about 4-5 months, and as long as Billy keeps his focus here, I'll proably stick around for a year or more. |
|
12-12-19 04:08pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
40
|
Gloryhole.com
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Membership includes access to all Dogfart network (23 sites). Across the whole network is over 5,000 videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- Plenty of hot new stars: Kinsley Karter, Ivory Loga, Nia Nacci just to start. As well as favorites like: Abella Danger, Adriana Chechik, Penny Pax, Sara Jay, Krissy Lynn, and Aaliyah Love
- The catalog goes back to 2003 and obviously, that has a lower quality
- most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 10 MB/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive
- as of July 16, 2019 635
- STILL UPDATING
- Organization is good with lots of ways to search. Searching is also connected across the network. Organization done by date, category, model, and most popular. I tried the keyword searching and it worked well. If anything it returned too many hits. (better than missing content I suppose) |
| Cons: |
- Slow updating schedule. On good months there are three most times just one or two.
- The picture downloads are mostly screenshots of the shoot. (However the newer stuff has the model holding posterboard of a hot message or two - some are witty and fun)
- extra fee for 4K content (I'm seeing a lot more places doing things like this maybe it's becoming industry standard?)
- Cookie cutter feel. I guess there's only so many ways you can make a plot for a girl goes into a booth and sucks stranger's dicks. At some point, you have written every possibility (lord knows they tried just about every explanation)
- I wish they would add keyword tagging. When a site/network gets this large it can sometimes be overwhelming. Tags help to find more of what's scratching your itch. |
| Bottom Line: |
It seems the dogfart newtwork is having a bit of a moment here on Porn Users with a slew of reviews in the last few weeks. That's probably a good thing. They've been around since dial-up modems and stay in business by never sacrificing quality and being nasty.
I think of gloryhole.com as being the 2nd or 3rd best site in the network. It has a huge back catelog and I've had a lot of fun looking back at stars who have left the business (Julie Night, Julia Bond to name just two - but there are many.
The theme of GH is a girl (sometimes 2) goes into a porn booth for whatever contrived reason. While there she becomes overcum with lust and sucks and/or fucks whatever cock is put through the hole (it's an interracial site so sometimes a white guy is put through and made fun of for not being what they want).
They do a good job with plot and humor: everything from two girls go in to have a slutty competition to a soon to be married bride wants to have one more wild night (usually while taking a call from her husband/boyfriend). It's not unusual for there to be some kind of joke built into the seen. It's nice to see porn that can laugh at itself.
One of the other things I like is usually the end includes some sort of "walk of shame" - this can be as varied as other parts of the plot with some girls trying to sneak away without notice while others turn it into a "walk of NO-shame". Again they're not afraid to have some fun.
While I wish they updated more (that would have pushed them past the mid-90s). I have no complaints with this site. They do a great job of turning out a high-quality product with good lighting/sound/action and talent. |
|
07-16-19 12:44pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
41
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Membership includes access to all New Sensations network (26 sites). Across the whole network is over 1,000 models & videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- most recent content maxes out at 3840X2160 12 mb/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- loading and downloading is quick even on my basic cable connection
- all content is exclusive (to the best of my knowledge)
plenty of hot talent. Some of the standouts were: Siri, Dana DeArmond, Katrina Jade, and Cassidy Klein (good to find more of her work), Elena Koshka, MONA WALES (I haven't seen her in a while she looks amazing)
- Watch for discounts. I think I'm paying less than 1/2 what my membership started at.
- STILL UPDATING
- Catalogue is currently close to 7,000 videos.
- No capta at sign in
- NOt just the same faces. They seem to balance stars and up and comers well. |
| Cons: |
- Lack of organization is a problem. With this much content, you really need more search capability than star/Date/"popularity" I really can't understand how amateur sites have better search then a company like NS
- Trailers are only available on new videos, so separating the good from the bad is tough
- I couldn't get my download manager to work.
- Ads behind paywall
- Watch out for cross sales when you start up.
- Seems to be a recycling center for their DVD business. |
| Bottom Line: |
I've reviewed this entire network and liked it enough to stick around for about 6 months (maybe even a little bit longer).
I find their lack of keyword search maddening. It also makes me crazy that when I've left the main site for one of the sub-sites I can only see scenes in that one site. With so much content to weed through - it really needs to be organized better.
Despite that bad I give New Sensations a firm buy. They have so much content and so many stars you'll find stuff you like here.
I appreciate that there is a theme and a plot to most videos. I like to know why my porn is happening. Haha. |
|
11-06-18 01:21pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
42
|
TS Pussy Hunters
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
To start, I'm not a fan of transexual porn but since I was reviewing the other parts of the network I thought I'd help out anyone who was interested.
- Includes access to kink.com with its 24 sites
- Most videos are about an hour long
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. Sound and lighting are well done you can see and hear everything
- Allows download managers
- Over 250 scenes. 2 updates/month. Still updating
- Search bar (although limited navigation tools). If you know what you want you can find it pretty easily. If you're looking to browse there are very few tools to help.
- "featured" section give good access to greatest hits. |
| Cons: |
- No way to "favorite" scenes you'd like to revisit.
- Navigation is sub par for a site that has so many resources and such a long history. They've had plenty of time to get this right. I'm really disappointed that they haven't
- Expensive. If it wasn't part of such a huge network it would not be worth the price. Perhaps the price is worth it because this is a hard to find niche? |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm not an expert in TS porn, but it since I don't stumble across it often I'm thinking its a harder to find niche. For that reason I bumped the score into the 90s (from what would have been the high 80s) because I think it's filling an underserved niche.
Another nice plus is the setups. They diversify the action. To be perfectly candid I looked at titles and skimmed about 10 videos so that I could complete a fair review.
This site doesn't have some of the extreme treatment that much of the rest of kink.com has. For sure there's rough sex, but it's not as over the top as many of the other sites.
I think if you're at all interested in TS content you should try this site. Kink has a great reputation and there other work is solid. The production value is always top notch (good camera angles, good lighting and sound, good set ups). Plus they allow 5 previews a day so there no reason to not give them a look. |
|
04-10-17 07:08am
Replies (0)
|
Review
43
|
Elli Nude
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Hot sexy RED HEAD (I do so love gingers!)
- HD video quality 1280X720 8.2 mbps. There were a few older slips that were of lesser quality but almost everything is in stunningly good quality.
- picture sets are all available as .zip files
- Organization is clean. Videos are arranged chronologically with key words to simplify. You can also suggest new keywords to improve the system.
- "You may also like this video" suggestions were very useful
- You can "add to favorites" if there's a video you want to keep easy access too.
- Over 200 picture sets. Each set has 30-90 pictures. Quality is good at 1024X800 pixels.
- About 150 movies. Each movie about 20 minutes long
- Network. Elli is part of the Dreamnet.com network. There are 14 active women (mostly MILFs) and another 50 inactive sites included. |
| Cons: |
- This site was very strong so I don't have many cons.
- Lots of Solo content. I'd prefer to see more partner action
- Elli is on the Mom and Pop side of the amateur spectrum. Most of the filming is POV or tripod.
- Some hardcore, some groups (girl-girl), some flashing/public. But most of what you see is solo action or solo into BJ. |
| Bottom Line: |
Really fun site. Elli posts a daily life set showing off her vacation and travels - she has a lot of personality.
I really liked this site. I wish I had more time with it. It will join my rotation of sites that I keep checking back into.
Elli has a natural beauty that comes across in all of her shoots. There is some dirty talk, but she's not the foul mouth spit-fire we might want her to be. |
|
04-01-15 11:50am
Replies (0)
|
Review
44
|
Brazzers
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- $20/month is a fair price for a ton of content
- over 5,000 scenes
- good clean organization; multiple ways to search - keyword, star, type, etc
- live shows (I skipped these when I was a member so I can't comment about them)
- about 30 sites with a range of genres from interracial to milfs and teens, there just about everything you could be looking for (especially if that's big boobs)
- high res pix and video. Video is 1920X1080 about 5.5 mbps
- videos available in .mp4 and .wmv
- major payer in porn so they shoot most major stars - if you have a favorite I'd be surprised if she hasn't shot for Brazzers.
- multiple updates per week.
- cleaver setups (they follow the basic porn formula but they're also have fun - parodies, holiday setups, etc.)
- long videos (generally 20 minutes or more) |
| Cons: |
- majority of models skew toward big boobs (meaning mostly fakes).
- not all sites are still updating. That may have been clear before I joined, but I didn't notice it. |
| Bottom Line: |
Brazzers is one of the main stays in the online porn game. They're worth checking out if you haven't before; but don't kid yourself about what you'll get. You get mainstream porn. Good quality mainstream - but mainstream none the less. If you're looking for anything off the beaten path, or something that doesn't follow the standard porn formula this isn't going to provide it.
With more than 5,000 shoot you can find something that scratches your itch, but you don't see anything unique here. |
|
05-27-13 07:16pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
45
|
Ashley Fires
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Ashley is the real deal - a porn star.
- 15 site network with Dylan Ryder, Hailey Young, Puma Swede, Tara Lynn Foxx, Bruno B., Devon Lee, Hanna Hilton and others.
- Files available in many formats: flash, mp4, mpeg, iOS, PSP. Zips for pix
- About 110 videos
- About 122 picture sets
- Just under half the videos are in 1920X1080 5mbps.
640X480 1mbps for the older stuff
- Some kinky stuff in addition to F/F, M/F, MM/F, FF/M, Solo. (there's bondage, cuckolding, domination, golden showers, ass licking)
- Lots of variety great to see things mixed up.
- Fun personality Ashley is a great performer and it shows in this site! Ashley does some great POV shoots and can really run with an idea.
- Good BTS content with stuff from her shoots and home life.
- Natural Tits (or at least good enough to fool me)
- Good video quality, good lighting, nice direction. Some of it feels like Ashley herself producing - professional quality all around. |
| Cons: |
- Don't remember coming across any anal scenes.
- Says live shows are achieved, I could not find them :(
- In about a month I haven't seen Ashley doing live cams, though maybe I just missed her.
- Updates about once a week (boy would I love to see her post more often!)
- Ads inside member section.
- Organization could be improved. Site is organized chronologically, with only broad categories to help (for example: g/g, hardcore, solo). |
| Bottom Line: |
Ashley Fires is Fantastic. Hot, Sexy, Dirty, Fun - She's just awesome. I'm always a little surprised her career hasn't exploded more thank it has - she's great.
There's an interactive feature where you can ask Ashley a question the one below shows just how nasty she can get:
asks: Hi Ashley, do you enjoy rimming guys, and if so what do you enjoy about it??Ashley Says: Yes, Rimming a guy's ass makes my pussy wet .Ya know I'm a dirty girl ;-) love to give pleasure as much as I love to get it
Ashley (and Dylan Ryder) carry this network. Along with Aaliyah Love - they carry the network (most of which no longer updates).
While I'm a little frustrated that it's not made clear that most of the network doesn't update - I'm still very happy thanks to Ashley. I've been a fan of here's for a while (her twitter feed is great @AshleyFires)
If you like a good mix of everything Ashley is the girl for you. How many sites can boast they run the gambit from an American Beauty send up to an outdoor golden shower POV? |
|
08-24-12 05:16am
Replies (1)
|
Review
46
|
Mano Job
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- A ton of videos. The lead page says over 250 but I think it's more than that. I usually like to download as much as I can for future viewing, but this overwhelmed me.
- Videos are HD and Mac friendly.
- New girls and old favorites are shot. Fans can request who'd they'd like to see.
- Director doesn't over comment so you're not distracted.
- Filthy talk. I'm a big fan of dirty talk and the director must coach the talent ahead of time because it really is outstanding.
- Also get access to thedicksuckers.com and mrpov.com.
- Regular updates. (Approx. one a week)
- Mix of POV and camera man shootings (no tripod in use here). |
| Cons: |
- Back catalog is not HD
- I think the organization could use some work, better use of tagging for example. The chronological and star search is good but sometimes your looking for a girls with a southern accent for example. It would be cool if you had more flexibility
- Site is formulaic then again you know that going in.
- Doesn't have the social networking integration that's common at this point in time. Maybe that will come in the future. The admin does have a blog/twitter/youtube but that's more about him (and quite funny) and not as much about engaging with the talent.
- There's no live show (ala naughty america for example) - something like that could really be fun on a site like this. |
| Bottom Line: |
I really like this site. It is a bit expensive, but you do get great quality for that price. It would be nice it they found some partners to expand their network.
I think this site's preview page is the gold standard. It gives you a clear understanding of what they're about, you are not surprised once you have joined. The show you how often they update and you can go back and look at years worth of shoots to see who they've shot and how good the shoots were. Each preview is about a minute and a half to two minutes in length. I think this is fair. It gives you a good since of what you'll see without the producer giving away the farm (this is a business after all).
I like this site (as you can tell with the excellent rating) and I'm sure I'll go back to them in the future (right now I'm on an amateur kick - but I'm sure that will come to an end).
As I looked it up today I see they're listing a 3rd site as part of their network (I never made it to it when I was a member, I was too busy with all the content on Manojob!), but now that link is dead so that's a little disappointing.
Bottom line. What you see is what you get and I think what you see is gold. If you like pretty girls talking dirty and taking facials this is a great site - in fact, I don't know of a better one! |
|
07-29-12 06:18pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
47
|
Sharing Paris
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Paris is incredibly HOT. She does a great job at talking dirty, and has a kinky side that I really like.
Downloads are fast without sacrificing quality.
Pix are hot with a lot of finger banging action
While I'm new to this site I would definitely recommend it to those who like amateur sites |
| Cons: |
Still a new site - I look forward to more content!
Site is part of naughtyathome company but you don't get all in one membership. Nor is there any information about getting a multi site discount.
(PS I love naughty at home with Desirae! see my review of her site) |
| Bottom Line: |
Good site definitely give it a test drive if you like Amateur sites with a bit of kink.
I think this will grow into a high quality site and it's best to get in on the ground floor if you stay with a site for a long time (this way you lock in to pricing while it's low). |
|
03-14-07 06:27am
Replies (6)
|
Review
48
|
Naughty Office
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- From NaughyAmerica.com so access to a vast catalog and more updates than I could find a number for.
- zips for photos normally 300-500 in a set. Often model stripping down and then still of the action
- LOTS of 4K (I guess I really do need to update my monitor)
- UNLIMITED DOWNLOADS. This is harder and harder to find especially on the big network sites. Occasionally you have to solve a CAPTA to download.
- Most videos have a preview so you can see before you download (which is good even the 1920X1080 12 MB/S content runs about 4.5 Gigs per file!) My poor hard drive can't handle it - LOL
- Organization by date/recommended (worked pretty well - or I'm not picky LOL)/most popular/most favorite/star/"toy synched - I'm new to that idea!/length
- Some of the best shots were with: Lana Rhoades, Dani Jensen, Holly Michaels, Peta Jensen, Samantha Saint, and anal shoots with Lauren Phillips, and Valentina Nappi |
| Cons: |
PRO Cont:
- Over 40 niche sites so if you like a particular plot device they may well have a few dozen (hundred?) scenes in your favorite.
- Tags (for EVERYTHING you could think of!), search bar, suggested next watch
- feedback is available through comments (with staff responding)
- Star system for rating
- playlists available for organizing
- multiple formats are available so you can pick 4K to lower resolution.
- Normally Naughty America is below average on dialog and directing. This time I give them an above average. Most of the moaning is just repeating the star's favorite line over and over ("OMG!"/"Yeah that's it"). Maybe because these are more experienced performers, the dialog tends to be better.
- Excellent production you see and hear all the action.
- REAL MILFs. I enjoy women closer to my age bracket. I'm glad they don't stretch the MILF category to teen moms.
- Creative setups are always in the setting of the office but they let their imaginations go wild |
| Bottom Line: |
PRO Cont
- Updates about 2/month
- VR content. While this isn't my jam you can stream to a standard monitor with extra control. Fun but too much work - lol
- DEEP catelog. Since they do infinite scrolling instead of pages I'm not sure how many scenes but there are at least: 300 in the last 7 years.
CONS:
- cross-posting. Things now get filed in multiple channels at the same time so you get Naughty Office stuff Naughty Doctors (if the setting was the doctors' office). It just makes wading through this big catelog all the more difficult. I've come to accept I'll never see it all
- "On Demand" shoots inside the members' area (ie buy individual movies).
- Cross sales inside member side
- Too many facials/cum on tits for my taste. I like a good creampie
Bottom Line:
There is so much here it's worth buying and checking out. My plan was to look for a month and I've had my membership since July. It's too easy to stick around and see what they come up with next
In short this site is a buy |
|
10-27-21 05:51am
Replies (0)
|
Review
49
|
When Girls Play
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Launched in 2011. All female action featuring mostly A-Lister talent (there were some short career girls in the back catalog. Some one and dones)
- Decent picture galleries. Normal progression strip then action. I will say the model positioning is better than most. Unlike other sites where several out-of-focus pictures are sprinkled in. Here everyone is a winner
- High-quality video. It's gotta be 1080 at least cause it looks amazing on my old monitor (no 4K for me)
- Some top scenes to look out for: Spencer Bradley, Liv Revamped, Skye Blue, Molly Stewart, Lauren Phillips with Lisey Sweet (I normally don't care for food play but these two were AMAZING together)
- fun silly vibe it seems like the talent all got along and were just being playful and enjoying
- hot dialog. I'm a fan of dirty talk so this put a big plus down when I noticed that
- Tags available
- Good descriptions of each shoot
- Streaming player has advanced controls (skip 10sor 30s, volume, full-screen toggle) |
| Cons: |
PRO cont:
- like/dislike, favorite, watch later allow for flexible scene sorting.
- short plots than straight to the action. There's novelty and for sure a fun vibe that is apparent at every turn
- Professional production the action is always well staged and the direction is good. Staging, costumes and directing are always good. You can tell that they don't cheap out on details.
Good back log at just under 500 scenes
- update schedule about 1X/Week
CONS
- download will cost you extra (one fee gets you both .zip downloads of photo galleries and video shoots).
- ads behind the paywall. Heck, you have to click past an ad every time you log back in
- No previewing/trailer available. So you have to check out the pictures or skip through the video to see if it's your thing
- limited model diversity. Some ethnic diversity but not much. Most body types are straight from porn general casting. Tattoos are common (I think that can be hot but I know some are opinionated. Same thing with boobs) |
| Bottom Line: |
While girl-girl isn't my go to most of the time I really liked this site. I appreciated the high production value. You can tell time and money was spent to make everything look beautiful. The talent is all top of the line. As girl-girl action goes I think this is solid and well done
Everything here is solid. So why not a A+ score (good question). If anything they could go with some more creativity. I'd like so see parody/"public"/Cuckoldress/etc. The site could be better with some series or something on-going.
- To be clear that is really knit picking. This sites is a home run and should be on anyone's buy list |
|
09-13-21 01:43pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
50
|
Device Bondage
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Billing through Rocketpay
- Access to 34 sites in the Kink.com family plus partner "channels" where you get a taste of other sites content.
- STILL UPDATING (2-3/month is typical)
- Approx 950 videos as of December 30, 2019
- Amazing talent. Some of my favorites are LAUREN PHILIPS (I think I join every site she performs on 😂) Lily LeBau, Ivy LeBelle, Riley Nixon (kink is one of the only places I see her still performing)
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. Sound and lighting are well done you can see and hear everything
- Allows download managers
- In general, older shoots have more plot newer stuff tends to do a little get to know you and then straight to action
- scene are typically between 30-45 minutes
- Most orgasams seem real
- scenes can be hearted for finding your favorites or remembering what you've already seen.
- Exclusive, as far as I can tell
- pre & post scene interviews |
| Cons: |
PRO CONT:
- Good organization: There's a star system (although I haven't figured out how to soert by rating). There's a very extensive tagging system, and a search bar that worked well in my testing.
- good model diversity (much better than most of porn). For this site mostly in terms of age. I'm a fan of MILFs and there's no shortage here
- Trailers so you can see what's good before downloading
- Each scene has a description and member comments - with so much content this really help find the things your more into
- Models can be favoited with emails when she does a new shot
CONS:
- Ads behind the pay wall (seems typical for most non-ameature sites these days 😞)
- No 4K videos yet. I'm fine with this since I haven't upgraded to a 4K monitor but I see it's where the industry is headed. |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS:
- Download file names are non-discript. This makes it harder to keep things organized
- Very hardcore domineering.
- Little to no set up/plot. I like an expiration with my porn
- Too much pain looks
I used to really love a lot of this action. Woman conquering fear and mixing the adrenaline of BDSM and the heat of orgasms. Maybe I'm just getting older and my taste are changing. But I don't find this as interesting as I used to. I don't think it's anything on Kinks part they still do awesome work.
I really like the way kink is professional. They describe safe BDSM practice including safewords and signals. They have some of the best talent and are a leader in production. I really don't have anything bad to say in my bottom line. With over 900 videos in this niche alone there's enough her to satify your "kink" device play.
All and all I give this a solid "buy" even if I find it's no longer scatching my itch like it used to. |
|
12-30-19 09:47am
Replies (2)
|
|
