Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : rearadmiral (0)

Feedback:   All (3011)  |   Reviews (248)  |   Comments (194)  |   Replies (2569) Other:   Replies Received (1579)  |   Trust Ratings (0) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 251-275 of 302 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 251 Water Bondage (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 274 scenes - Approximately 70 scenes available in HD - Most available in three formats/sizes - Pics available (singles or small sets of zips) - Part of the Kink network - Good support service (a question was answered via email within a couple of hours on a weekend) - Good mix of known and less known models - Very high production values - Very innovative Cons: - No longer updating - No major quality improvements from 2003 until 2007 - Scenes are no longer dated - Last update in 2007 (I think, scenes aren’t dated) - No discount price offered Bottom Line: I had last joined Water Bondage in 2008 and it hasn’t updated since then, but I wanted to get more scenes and higher quality now that I have a faster connection. The fact that I went back to a site that offered me nothing new probably says a lot about what I think about this site. For BDSM fans, this is an extremely well done and innovative site that offers lots of material. Its part of the Kink.com network, which, in my opinion, sets a high standard for other internet porn sites. The site offers 274 scenes dating back to about 2003. Older scenes tend to be fairly simple and short, with many at about 15 mins long. Older scenes are a lot more complex with different setups and are usually over an hour long. As you would expect, the resolutions for the older videos isn’t great by today’s standards. The videos are available in two formats: wmv and mp4. For most of the time the site was updating there was only one resolution of wmv available: 640x480 / 1900kbps. There are two sizes of mp4s available. One is for IPods and such, while the other is labeled as ‘best quality.’ I don’t know how to find resolutions for mp4s, but subjectively the larger file wasn’t much better than the SD wmv. At some point towards when the site stopped updating they did start to offer higher resolution videos. For most of the last 70 or so updates on the site there is the option of wmv HD at 1280x720 / 7150kbps. SD is still available, as are the two sizes of mp4. There are pics available too. The resolutions for these didn’t change through the whole run of the site: they are 1200x865, not bad, but not particularly sharp. Zips are available, and in the longer scenes the zips are broken down into the themes in the scene. For all the dated technical issues, this is still a very interesting site. I’m not aware of any other like it where models undergo BDSM treatment in water. In most of the videos there are several ‘scenes’ within the video, with bondage while being sprayed with water to machines and toys being used, and in most cases some complete immersion in water tanks while bound. There is a good mix of models too. There are surprisingly many A-listers here, as well as some well known fetish models and also some lesser known girls. There are body types for every taste. Given the size of the site, I don’t consider that it isn’t updating to be a serious drawback. There are issues though: for much of the life of the site there were no real technical improvements until the very end. One pet peeve of mine too is that the scenes used to be dated, but they aren’t now. That troubles me since I wonder if Kink is trying to hide the fact that the site isn’t updating. Finally, Kink doesn’t offer any price discounts for members of other Kink sites like they do with most others. Paying $30 for a site that doesn’t update seems a bit steep. But… it is still an amazing site and a decent value considering the quality and quantity. 06-23-11  08:55am Replies (0) Review 252 Innocent High (0) 89.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - TBP Discount ($17.95) - 291 Scenes (approx 30 mins each) - Appears to be all or mostly exclusive content on this site - Videos available in multiple ways - Pictures and screenshots available - Bills through CCBill - Good mix of well known and lesser known models - Supports download managers (I use Free Download Manager and it works fine) - Part of a network (8 sites in total) Cons: - Definition of HD is pretty flexible - Download speeds below average - Updates aren’t dated - Hello??? Have the directors never heard of anal sex? Bottom Line: Innocent High is a site within a network that features young, though fully legal, models in various school-oriented scenes. All the standard clichés are here, the most common being teacher and student, or principal and student. I could complain that these are repetitive and overused, but I couldn’t come up with anything better. Regardless of the setup, the goal is the same in all the scenes: show off the youthful model in a well-lit, well-shot scene with good camera work and editing. If all porn sites did those basics this well the porn world would be a better place. As for the models, there is a great mix of well known models like Aubrey Addams (looking mind-numbingly beautiful in her pre-surgery days), Ashli Orion and Eden Adams. There are plenty of less recognizable models too, though they are all young and very good looking. Most are petite and small-breasted, though there are lots who are better endowed too. There are 291 scenes now on the site with 171 of these advertised as being HD. The problem with that claim is that the site’s definition of HD has varied a bit over time. Some are 1280x720 at 4500kbps while others are 960x540 at 1800kbps. They all look good on a monitor though I haven’t tried them on a TV yet. The site offers more options to view the videos than I’ve seen elsewhere, so there will be something for all tastes and connections. Streaming is available in various resolutions, though I can’t say anything more than it looks good. Downloads are available in different ways and resolutions. Your download options are to download the full video, download a ‘best of’ clip, download it in 3 segments or in 1-minute segments, or the trailer. Nobody can complain that they can’t get the scene how they want it. For downloads, the ‘full’ offers the most choices with WMV (in up to three resolutions), Quicktime, Mpg and IPod. “HD” is as listed above and the next lower resolutions come in at 640x480 or 640x360. I assume this depends on when the scene was shot and added. I can’t give a clear picture on when the uploads were because they aren’t dated. Also for that reason I can’t give an indication of the update schedule, though it certainly looks like it is updating. Pictures are also available, as are screenshots. The pics are available as zips and come in at 1050x700. They look good, but obviously not hi-res. There are no big negatives to this site. If I had to pick on one I’d point out that the download speeds are lower than I’ve seen at other big sites. Using Free Download Manager I get 1100KB/s, which is 700+ lower than with most sites. Also, TBP has a warning about download managers. They don’t specify what the issue is, but I had no problems. This site has the quality and quantity to make the TBP discounted price an excellent value – even without being part of a network. Couple it with the 7 other sites in the Team Skeet network and it becomes even better. 06-18-11  12:21pm Replies (2) Review 253 HD Porn (0) 85.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: - 472 scenes - 215 HD scenes (exclusive) - 257 SD (non-exclusive) - Photos and screenshots available - Pics in zips - Screenshots not available in hi-res or as zips - SD scenes have photos only in 683x1024 - Supports download managers - $4.95 2-day trial - Bills through DHD Cons: - Limited (and inaccurate) navigation - Many non-exclusive, non-HD scenes Bottom Line: This is my second review of this site, the first being about a year ago. The site continues to grow, having added approximately one scene per week for the last year now giving them a total of 472 scenes. That number is a bit misleading since they continue to add some SD video as well. The good news is that in the past year the number of HD scenes has grown a lot faster than the number of SD scenes. If there is a serious drawback, it isn’t the resolution but the fact that the SD scenes (and some of the HD scenes) aren’t exclusive so if you already have a large collection you’re bound to see some repeats. Navigation is simple, but on a site this size there isn’t any real need for complex navigation. You can sort the exclusive/mostly HD stuff from the non-exclusive SD scenes. The search function is limited too, which may not be bad in a site this size, but it is also inaccurate. I used the ‘category’ function to sort for anal scenes and discovered that a number of them weren’t sorted in to the category search. Video quality is very good on the HD scenes. The HD scenes are 1280x720 while the SD scenes are in either 720x480 or 640x480 depending on when they were added, the older ones being the lower resolution. This site made me an HD convert last time and there’s been no turning back. I don’t normally collect photos but I did download a lot from this site. There are photos and screenshots available for most scenes. The photos are available in ‘hi-res’ (683x1024) and ‘ultra-high-res’ (1366x2048) for the HD scenes and just the ‘hi-res’ for the SD scenes. Only the photos (not the screenshots) are available as a zip, and a quirk is that when you download the zip the folder of photos is buried about 10 folders deep. And once you click through all the folders you’ll see that you have both resolutions of photos with only a minor name difference, so you’ll need to do a bit of editing. The last time I had a membership here I complained that the download speed was slow. I don’t remember what I was getting then, but using Free Download Manager now and a 15MB/s fiberop connection the speeds are much better. I get 2MB/s, but I may have that capped in FDM. One advantage to this site is that they do offer a 2-day full trial for $4.95 and they do offer the ability to see what they have to offer without a membership, so you can browse the site and may decide that you can get everything you want for the trial membership. And with the biller being DHD you can have confidence that you’ll be able to cancel your membership easily. That makes the site an exceptional value. If you’re new to the site, it might be better to go for the full membership as it does have a lot more to offer than you can get in 2 days. HD Porn continues to grow and offer some great exclusive HD scenes for a fair monthly price. I’d recommend it for anyone looking for HD video. 06-14-11  08:42am Replies (2) Review 254 Everything Butt (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 140 +/- scenes - Usually some extreme ass play - Some anal fisting - Some enemas - Very innovative - Videos available in several formats and resolutions - Pictures available - Regular updates - Good mix of solo, girl on girl(s) and girl(s) and guy(s) - Supports download managers Cons: - Seems to have lost some of its edge - Not many ‘fresh’ models Bottom Line: While there are countless sites dedicated to anal sex, there aren’t many dedicated to a wider appreciation of all things related to the female ass. This site is one of those rare ones, and without having seen many others I’d be surprised if this wasn’t the best of them. This site obviously isn’t for everyone, but the same can be said for most of the sites under the Kink umbrella. I last reviewed this site when it was fairly new and it has continued to grow. There are now approximately 140 scenes on the site, most of which are about an hour long. So even at full price, this is a great value. Even the oldest of the scenes (which only date back to 2009) are available in ways to suit all preferences. There is streaming (which I don’t use and can’t really speak to, though it looks good) and there are downloads. Downloads are available in mp4 HD, wmv HD, wmv SD and mp4 for portable devices. My experience is only with wmv HD which, while excellent quality, isn’t as crisp as some other sites that offer HD. The resolution is 1280x720 with a bitrate of about 7500kbps. Photos are also available (1200x800) individually or as zips. Frequently the zips are broken down into themes so if you want all the photos there may be a couple of zips to get. The scenes mostly have a common theme: extreme ass play. There is some variety in that there are solo scenes, all girl with two or more models, and some scenes with a mix of women and men. The latter aren’t as common as the others. The scenes involve anal penetrations of toys and other large items. Fisting does occur, but it (sadly) isn’t as common as one might hope for on such a site. Many of the earlier scenes involve a lot of enema play, but that seems to have mostly disappeared from the newer scenes. Since fisting and enemas aren’t common, that was always a big selling point for me, so I’m disappointed to see it dialed back. Another change I’ve noticed is that it isn’t as edgy as it once was. This is highly subjective, but it seems to me that a lot of the newer scenes are more mainstream, if you can call any of this ‘mainstream.’ The older scenes are amazing to watch, with a lot of enema action. Many of the newer scenes are styled more like an anal scene you’d expect from Evil Angel, for example. All the technical bits are the same, but the newer scenes just seem more tame. Many of the scenes have a BDSM undertone, and this could be a factor for a prospective subscriber. There isn’t a huge variety in models, which is a bit of a negative for me, but then again there probably aren’t that many models willing to do scenes like this. The fetish models you might expect to see are here: Dana DeArmond, Amy Brooke, Bobbi Starr and Amber Rayne all make multiple appearances, and they always give 110%. But it would be nice to see some fresh faces more often. This fetish isn’t for everyone, but if you have an ass play interest this site will certainly satisfy you. 06-09-11  01:11pm Replies (1) Review 255 Hogtied (0) 98.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Huge collection (approximately 840 scenes) - Top quality material - Very innovative - Excellent customer service - Excellent value for money* - Beautiful models - Models are a good mix of known, unknown and fetish - Multiple download options - Photos available (with zips) - Download speeds are great - Supports download managers - Membership gives discounts to other Kink sites *I know that there are complaints that there is no ‘network’ access. I agree, but fully understand why not. The material is so well done that it must cost a fortune to produce the unique material for so many sites. Cons: There really are no cons. This is likely the best (excluding other Kink sites) BDSM site you can find on the internet. And to make it better, it is a great value too. In my opinion, it would a great value at twice the price. Bottom Line: As big of a fan of Kink.com sites as I am, I can’t believe that I never took a membership to Hogtied before. This is the site that started the Kink empire way back in 1998. Peter Acworth started this site shooting scenes out of his apartment and eventually progressed through a series of locations until buying the San Francisco Armories a few years back. You can see that transition as the scenes progress. Even though this was the beginnings of Kink, the business model that they continue to use is already in place: the shoots are very well done, and the videos and photos meet, and probably exceed industry standards. Sure, the 1998 videos aren’t up to 2011 standards, but to expect that is unreasonable. What is noticeable, however, is that there are sites today that barely achieve the technical abilities that Hogtied did in 1998. Another interesting thing to note in this walk through Kink history is how the seeds of several other Kink sites were sowed here first. Water Bondage obviously has its roots here, and you could easily argue that sites like Device Bondage and Public Disgrace do too. As it is a walk through history, the initial scenes are fairly tame and feature unknown models and use little plot. Eventually the scenes shot at the Armories become BDSM spectacles, many times with a plot too. An interesting side note is the models. At first, they appear to be largely unknown models, maybe girls dabbling in adult picking up some extra cash. They then go through a phase where some well-known A-list porn stars not normally known for doing fetish work show up. The more recent scenes tend to feature models well known in the fetish world. Models like Amber Rayne, Dana DeArmond and Madison Young. The premise is simple and hasn’t really changed much – with the exception of some plot-based scenes: the model is tied up and sexually tormented. Sex occurs, but not often. If you want sex in every scene, see another child of this site: Sex and Submission. As simple as the premise is, it works. If you watch a lot of it, it can seem repetitive, but lay off for a while and the innovation becomes apparent again. Technically, as with all other Kink sites, they are excellent. Videos are offered in multiple formats to suit your wants and capabilities. Photos are available too, with zips on offer. Download speeds are good and managers are supported. The bottom line is that this is another excellent site from Kink. It is huge, offering well over 800 scenes, many of which are nearly an hour long. The average scene is probably closer to 30 minutes, especially on the newer scenes where the intensity is pretty high. If BDSM is your thing, you owe it to yourself to get a membership here. One bit of advice: if you’ve not done so before, create an account at Kink. It’s easy and free and you will get email offers for excellent deals. When you’re a member to one site, you get a discount on others. 05-26-11  03:46am Replies (10) Review 256 Public Expose (0) 60.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - $5.95 2-day trial membership with no restrictions - Bills through CCBill - Approximately 120 videos - Multiple video download options - Some attractive models - Supports download managers Cons: - Mediocre quality videos - Videos are all short duration - Very small photo sets - No photo zips available - Small site - Not part of any network to improve value - No known models (to me, anyway) - No updates since January 2010 Bottom Line: I’m a big fan of public nudity and I’m always looking for sites with good material. Unfortunately, Public Expose isn’t one of the better ones I’ve seen. It’s small, with only about 120 videos. The TBP review says that there are 148 videos, and it is correct that there are 148 videos on the site, but for some reason, there are many duplicate videos that even use the same name. There are approximately 120 unique videos here. Having access to 120 public nudity videos shouldn’t be anything to complain about, but these videos are all quite short. They range in length from under one minute to just over five minutes. Most of the videos follow the same format in that an Eastern European woman is seen in some sort of an outdoor setting (fully dressed) and she flashes for the camera. If full nudity exists on this site, I’ve yet to see it. There are several scenes of two women flashing and making out a bit. This may be subjective, but I found the scenes to be almost un-erotic: the models are mostly shy about flashing and many of the shoots are simply outdoors near other people. When I contrast some of the Eastern European public shoots available on ALS Scan and Public Disgrace, those on Public Expose come off looking pretty shabby. Certainly the women on Public Expose aren’t bad looking, but they aren’t great either. I don’t follow many Eastern European models, but I still didn’t recognize any of them. Technically, the site was probably average when it was started several years ago, but it is well below what the average porn customer would expect today. Video resolution is quite low. It varies depending on which type of file you want and ranges from a low of 320x240 for a very low-res mpeg4 to ‘high’ of 720x540 (at 128kb/s) for a DivX avi file. I downloaded the DivX files simply assuming that since they were the largest they’d give the best quality, but if this is the best, it isn’t very good. There are photos available, but the photo sets are very small – less than two dozen pics in some cases. That may be good news, though, when you learn that there is no zip option available. If there is any good news about this site, it’s that they have a full trial available for just $5.95. Given that there are only 120-ish small videos on the site anyone with a half-decent internet connection can download every video in the five day trial period. And further taking from the value is that the site hasn’t updated in over a year. Unless you’re a huge fan of public nudity and want to add this notch to your belt, I’d avoid it. It isn’t a bad value at the trial price if you go in with your eyes open and realize that you don’t get much for that fee. Just remember to cancel your membership before the trial ends. 05-25-11  12:32pm Replies (0) Review 257 Bikini Dream (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Exclusive content - Part of a small network - $9.95 5 day TBP/PU Trial - Photos and videos available - Good value if you join through the trial - Updates weekly - Bills through Epoch and CCBill - Some variation in body type among the models - Download managers work (I use FDM) Cons: - Most sets are photos only - No zips for photos - Video quality is average - No HD or hi-res options - Network is small with no other exclusive content - Videos are all short duration (less than 5 mins for most) - Download speeds a bit slower than industry standard (I got 1MB/sec on a 15MB/sec connection) Bottom Line: I’ve been wanting to join a bikini site for a while now, but never bothered because I’m not really into softcore. I was browsing through sites with a TBP/PU discount or full trial and Bikini Dream popped up. I figured that risking $10 for a small network (through a reputable biller) wasn’t a big deal. Subjectively, I’m a bit disappointed, but that’s my fault. The site is more softcore than I even imagined it could be. While all of the models are beautiful, many of the bikinis aren’t all that revealing. With very rare occasions, there is no nudity at all, and that is usually just breasts. But… having said that, the videos are still good once you recognize that this isn’t a nude site. The videos all follow a simple theme: put a beautiful young model in a bikini and let her pose at a beach or some other outdoor venue. It’s simple, but it works. There are about 5-6 videos shot on Miami-area beaches of girls just sunning themselves. My biggest complaint with the site is that approximately 75% of the models have only photos available. That alone isn’t a deal breaker, but the fact that the photos aren’t available as a zip doesn’t make sense. This isn’t 1999 any longer. The photos that you do take the time to download aren’t all that impressive. They aren’t terrible, but they are lower resolution than customers would expect in 2011. As for the technical bits, the site is very basic. There is no search function, but one really isn’t needed given the volume of the content. There are approximately 250 sets available, dating from 2005 to current (there appear to be weekly updates). Of those sets, less than 70 have videos. The videos are in 1280x720 resolution with all having approximately 3500kbps. Subjectively, the quality looks good and is up to industry standards, but they should consider offering higher-res videos or HD on new shoots. Bikini Dream is part of a small network, which certainly increases the value of the membership. None of the other sites have exclusive content though, and most of it is readily available elsewhere. The additional sites are grouped around a common theme, like “Stunners” for beautiful women or “All Anal XXX” for anal sex. All of the additional sites are fairly small and have the same technical specs as Bikini Dream. So is Bikini Dream worth the price of the membership? If you join for the 5-day full trial at $9.95, definitely; if you sign up for the full month membership, probably not. I’m not interested in many of the sites on the network and I was easily able to download everything I wanted in a day. Thankfully the site supports download managers so I was able to queue up all the scenes I wanted and let FDM do all the work. If you have a specific interest in (mostly) non-nude bikini modeling, this site is worth looking at. If one of the other sites on the network tickles your fancy, the trial is still a good value but keep in mind that it isn’t exclusive. 05-22-11  08:32pm Replies (0) Review 258 Massage Creep (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Part of PornPros Network - Discount through TBP / PU - Multiple download options - Streaming available - No DRM - Watermark is small enough to be ignored - Pics available (both separate and screecaps) - Pics available as a zip - Supports download managers - 60 exclusive scenes (as of review date) - Site updates weekly Cons: - “HD” doesn’t look like true HD Bottom Line: I wouldn’t normally review two sites within the same network, but I have to make an exception here because of the quality of this site. I recently reviewed Jurassic Cock from the same network but think Massage Creep deserves a specific review. I’m not normally a big fan of sites that use a narrow and limiting set-up. I find that the repetition gets boring. With a site featuring a male massaging a female, how much innovation and difference can you bring to each scene? Not much. But… even with the limiting set-up, the scenes on this site just seem to work well. I’ve never had a membership to a massage site and I didn’t join this network for this site, but it was a pleasant surprise to find to be as good as it is. The set-up is predictable: the male masseur brings his equipment to a scheduled appointment at a girl’s house or apartment. He sets up and instructs the girl to undress and slip under the sheet on the table. The camera gives the viewer a ‘hidden camera’ perspective as the model undresses and gets under the sheet. Then the massage begins, with lots of baby oil being used. The massage eventually progresses to where the sheet is removed and towel placed over the model – with camera angles giving the viewer some nice views. Eventually the model rolls over, with towels being strategically placed for modesty. Eventually the naughty bits get massaged with oil, and then the “deep tissue” massage begins. And in a bit of marketing genius, the masseur always includes a “free facial” at the end of the session. While using the same set-up over and over again for all of the 60 scenes sounds boring and repetitive, it still works. In my opinion, it works for two reasons: the acting is good and models are stunning. There isn’t a lot of variety in the types of models, so this could be a deal-breaker if you like older (25+) or fuller-figured models since the majority of the models are young and petite. This site is part of the PornPros network and the technical bits are the same as I listed in my review of Jurassic Cock. The highlights of the technical stuff are that there is streaming and download available. Downloads are available in MPG, MP4 and WMV HD. I’m not convinced that the HD is true HD. (1250x702 and 2651kbps bitrate.) Photos are available (both actual photos and screencaps) and zips are available. The photos are hi-res and look great. One complaint I have that is purely subjective is that the entire network, including this site has very little anal sex. There is one scene listed as including anal, but I think that’s in error. I didn’t see any buggery in the scene. If you’re interested in a massage site I can definitely recommend this one. I don’t have experience with any other massage sites, but this one is definitely worth the price of admission. Joining through TBP/PU gets you a discount too. Plus you get access to the rest of the network with some other excellent sites. 05-17-11  08:10am Replies (4) Review 259 Pamela Spice (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Super-cute, young model - Video and photos available - Photos available in zips - Multiple options for downloads - Part of a small network of similar sites - Some girl-girl scenes - Supports download managers - Decent download speeds Cons: - Not updating - Many of the other models on the network are topless only - The only B/G hardcore scene costs extra Bottom Line: First, please note that I agree with everything that exotics4me wrote in his recent review. Read that first if you want to join this site. My review will attempt to expand on a few things. I’m not normally a big fan of solo girl sites. I find them boring and repetitive and they tend to have a shorter lifespan than many other kinds of sites. I’ve also been burned by a couple (notably Little April and Little Summer) due to the terrible quality of the videos. Then one day I noticed the picture that accompanies exotics4me’s posts on the forum and I was hooked. Pamela is an amazing looking young South or Central American model. She can’t be much over 18 in many of the photos and videos and her youthful appearance is further accentuated by her braces. She appears solo in many scenes and also does a lot of girl-girl scenes. Both the pictures and videos are well lighted and shot. The other models she appears with in the girl-girl scenes are also attractive in the same way that Pamela is. There is one boy-girl hardcore scene available, but in a greedy marketing twist the site sells that separately. I like Pamela, but not enough to spend $20 for a 13 minute video of her having sex. Exotics4me notes that several of the videos feature some exhibitionism. That’s correct, but I’d characterize it as ‘exhibitionism-lite.’ It isn’t promoted as being one of the reasons for joining, but there are some scenes of her teasing a bit in public places. But the exhibitionism is fairly tame and I wouldn’t recommend taking a membership for that reason alone. The site is part of a small network of that includes access to six similar sites. The additional sites are also small and don’t appear to be updating. At least two of the sites (Selena Spice and Spice Twins) don’t even feature full nudity. They’re topless only with a thong or some other covering on the naughty bits. The additional models are attractive and young, but I think that Pamela is the best looking of all of them. The technical bits are pretty simple given the small size of the site. There are 68 photo sets (zips available, 798x1200 resolution) and 108 videos. The videos are available in three formats: Super HQ, MP4 and Low Speed Video. I downloaded only the “Super HQ” size and found that while they may have been industry standard when they were shot, they certainly aren’t now. They’re all 720x480 with the bitrates ranging from 2000 to 8700kbps. The technical description mostly applies to the other sites on the network too. Pamela Spice is definitely good looking and fits my usual style of model that I like. If you like young looking models you might be happy with a membership. The girl-girl stuff, the minimal exhibitionism and the additional sites all contribute to the value of the membership, but given that there are no updates I wouldn’t call this a good value. That’s not to say you shouldn’t join, but just join with your eyes open. 05-15-11  11:55am Replies (9) Review 260 Jurassic Cock (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Part of PornPros Network - Discount through TBP / PU - Multiple download options - Streaming available - No DRM - Watermark is small enough to be ignored - Pics available (both separate and screecaps) - Pics available as a zip - Supports download managers - 77 exclusive scenes (as of review date) - Site updates weekly Cons: - “HD” doesn’t look like true HD - Not enough anal. (Yes, I know that’s very subjective.) Bottom Line: I realize that the niche of having old guys fuck young women is not for everyone, but if it is something you like to watch, this site is definitely worth checking out. Many of the girls on this site are a “who’s who” of A-list porn starlets today, and the format is one that definitely accentuates their youthful appearances. Girls such as Ashlii Orion, Jaelyn Fox, Amai Lui and Jada Stevens all make appearances. Some lesser known (but hopefully up-‘n’-coming) girls like Cheyenne Cooper are also here. Each scene is approximately 30 minutes long and there is usually a stereotypical setup for a scene with a young girl and an older guy: teacher, supervisor, driving instructor or something similar to further accentuate the age difference between the girl and the guy. The guys are obviously a bigger part of the scene than would be acceptable in most porn scenes, BUT they never really get in the way of scene like many younger, self-indulgent male models do. The guys seem to know that they’re there to help show off the girl. And they should know that since the guys have a lot of experience in the business. Since there aren’t too many geezers still actually working in porn today, the talent pool is pretty shallow. Rod Fontana is here, as are a few other ‘seniors’ who I can’t name. One of them looks like Adolf Hitler and another looks like a slightly younger version of Col. Sanders. Perhaps the biggest male name here is also the most polarizing: Ron Jeremy. You either love him or hate him. Ron appears in a large number of the scenes. That may be a testament to his reliability. As for the technical bits, the site is pretty standard for a good porn site. There are 77 scenes posted (with updates being added). Each scene offers a trailer to get an idea if you want to download the scene. If you do want to download, you have three options: MPG, MP4 and WMV HD. The HD doesn’t appear to be true HD though. (1250x702 and 2651kbps bitrate. I’m not sure if that qualifies as HD, but it doesn’t look as sharp as I’m used to with other HD stuff.) The site also offers photos. Both screencaps and actual photos are available, either individually or as a zipped set. The photos I looked at were high-resolution and looked great (3000x1996). This is purely subjective, but there aren’t enough anal scenes here. Anal sex is a turn-off for some, but it is pretty mainstream and it is apparent in its absence here. It may be that most of the models don’t do anal (yet!), but of the 77 scenes there are only 4 or 5 anal, which seems low. This site is part of a network that offers some interesting and innovative other sites, though for the $17.95 TBP discount price, this site alone is worth it. The network and individual sites are fairly simple and straightforward to use. There is no reliance on gimmicks. The search function is limited, but simple to use and effective. If you like this kind of niche, I’d highly recommend this. 05-14-11  09:09pm Replies (2) Review 261 Real Slut Party (0) 93.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Part of the Mofo Network (10 sites in total on the network) - Approximately 80 scenes - Scenes are lengthy (most around an hour) - Multiple download options (HD, SD and mobile) - 2 levels of HD available 1080p and 720p) - Streaming available - Some amazing looking girls - Better than average download speeds - Discount through TBP - Updates weekly - Interesting mix of known porn girls and lesser-known models - Photos available - Download managers work - Lots of fun to watch Cons: - As with most ‘party’ sites, most of the guys are annoying (but not as bad as with other sites) - Hand-held camera can be a bit shaky in some scenes Bottom Line: It goes without saying, obviously, that a large part of satisfaction in a site is subjective. If a site does all the technical bits well, it isn’t going to matter too much if you just don’t like the theme of the site. So having stated that, I really like ‘party’ sites like these, and this is one of the better ones I’ve joined. The site is probably big enough to be a decent value on its own, but it is part of a bigger network. This specific site has about 80 videos posted and each of those is about an hour long. Each of the scenes has a unique setup that is actually interesting to watch. I didn’t find myself constantly skipping ahead to the sex. There is a mix of indoor and outdoor video shoots, with the outdoor scenes usually being shot by a pool so there are lots of skimpy bikinis around. The first half of the video is taken up with the set-up and the second half is the sex. The lighting is usually very good – the outdoor scenes aren’t washed out and the indoor scenes are mostly lit properly. The camera work is better than average for these kinds of sites. Adding to the professional look of the scenes is the fact that this obviously isn’t a group of self-centered guys who decided to make a porn site – the director always makes sure that the girls are the focus of the attention. This site, and the Mofo network generally, have the technical bits right: all the scenes are available in three different sizes. The HD is available in 1080p and 720p (and they look great!), the SD video is available in MPEG4, MPEG and WMV. And there’s also an option for mobile users. I didn’t list this as a con above, but given the length of these videos the files sizes are huge. Some top out at over 5GB for the 1080p. There are photos available too, with zips as an option Another possible issue for some people is that there is very little variation on the type of model in each scene. If your tastes are like mine this is no issue here because the overwhelming majority of the models are petite and young. I don’t think there are any black or ethnic models, and no one over 25 either. But if you’re a fan of models like Tanner Mayes and Micah Moore and girls who have that body type, you’ll certainly like the girls here. This site alone is a good enough value to justify the membership, especially when you join through TBP/PU and get the discount. But there are nine other sites (including a MILF site and a gangbang site) that only increase the value of the membership. If you like watching petite young lasses party and enjoy themselves, then this is a site definitely worth checking out. 05-08-11  03:46pm Replies (2) Review 262 VideoBox (0) 93.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - One of the biggest and best sites on the internet - Low monthly price - Huge variety of material available, from mainstream to fetish - Many fetishes represented - Excellent download speeds - Many options for downloads available - Streaming is available - Editing the clips is an option - No download limits - New material added daily - Some HD material being added - Access to ‘premium channels’ for a small fee (note that if you don’t want to pay the fee the basic VB membership is still the best value on the internet) - Added premium access to some Kink.com scenes and some Reality Kings scenes - Seem to have improved the quality of their updates since my last review - Daily updates seem to all occur at once now, no more checking in every few hours Cons: - While not as obvious as in the past, there is still some reliance on lower-grade porn to make the daily updates - Still adding compilations where the original scenes are also available - The Evil Angel and Vivid premium channels are no longer bundled for one price - Kink.com and Reality Kings only available on VB3 - VB3 seems like a change driven by marketing rather than a genuine move to improve the site Bottom Line: This is my fourth review of VB since becoming a PU member many years ago. I had hoped to focus on the new, ‘improved,’ VB3 but I’ll have to leave that to someone else. I’m sure that VB3 is fairly easy to use and straightforward once you get used to it, but with VB2 being as simple and straightforward as it is already why bother changing it? I’m familiar and comfortable with VB2 so I used that. Unless you’ve been living under a rock you know about VB. This has to be one of the best, and probably the best, DVD site on the ‘net. It offers a huge amount of material for the low price of a membership. I can’t imagine that there is another site that offers this kind of value. There are a lot of good reasons to join VB: size and variety are the two biggest ones. There are almost 10,000 DVDs on the site now, with more being added daily. The site doesn’t concentrate on serving one fetish or niche to the exclusion of others either, but it serves many very well. There are members who complain when they don’t like an update, but I think that approach forgets that there are probably a lot of people who are pleased with the update. Also good are the options available to view the scenes: there are multiple download options depending on the quality you want or the size you can store, and streaming is also available. Download speeds are better than average. The downsides to the site are pretty minor and probably mostly subjective. I find that they still seem to push quantity over quality, and I find a heavy reliance on lower-grade European material. VB now offers four ‘premium channels.’ Evil Angel and Vivid were added quite a while ago and both now have a decent library available. These two were bundled for a while, which made for a great value, but now they are separate add-ons. That probably makes more sense given that these two studios offer vastly different material and likely have few customers who seek out material from both. The two newest premium channels are Kink.com and Reality Kings. I didn’t add either of them on. I’m not really familiar with Reality Kings (though I have had a membership) so I can’t give a good opinion. As for Kink.com, if you’ve never been a member of any of their sites this would be a good way to access some stuff to sample it. There is a good sampling from many of their sites, such as The Training of O and Water Bondage. Even with the few things I don’t like, VB is still likely my favorite porn site. It has so much to offer at such a low price that it is a no-brainer to join. Unlike other sites you don’t get a staggered membership at first – you get access to the probably the largest porn stash on the ‘net with no download limits. A membership here for a few months will give you a better collection than some porn shops have. It really does have something for everyone. 05-04-11  01:33pm Replies (10) Review 263 Adult Empire.com (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: - Huge collection of titles (close to 60,000) - Affiliated with Adult DVD Empire – a company with a long history and good reputation - Various options for viewing or downloading (PPM, download and stream) - Two or three (depending on the age of the title) quality options - Speeds are up to industry standards - Excellent customer service Cons: - Can be an expensive way to collect titles - Limited search capabilities - Least expensive option (1 day rental) is streaming only - Web name is very similar to a blacklisted site Bottom Line: First a quick warning: this site is Adult Empire.com. Don’t confuse it with Adult Empire which has been blacklisted here at PU. That confusing name is unfortunate since this PPV/VOD site is very good. I have a love/hate relationship with PPV/VOD sites. On the love side, a site that offers a lot of titles is an excellent opportunity to view titles that aren’t available anywhere else. On the hate side, they can be like crack for the pornuser in that you only get a quick fix and then have to dig out your wallet again. PPV/VOD sites aren’t like other porn sites. They don’t offer exclusive material, and unlike sites like Videobox, you have to pay for everything you watch. So why bother? Because a good PPV/VOD will have a huge number of titles that aren’t usually available elsewhere,. It’s a great option to see some titles that you otherwise wouldn’t have access to. This site is relatively new and appears to be a spin-off of Adult DVD Empire. I say that because my wish list at the older site was migrated to the new site. But the old site still offers PPV/VOD, and some of the titles are the same on the two sites though the new site has better pricing options. Of the PPV/VOD sites I use, my favorite has always been Adult DVD Empire, and the new site offers all the same quality and variety at a price that is often lower. As with most PPV/VOD sites, there are many options available depending on how you want to view the title. You have a pay-per-minute option, the option to buy a download (most with no DRM) and then there is a streaming rental option. The big advantage that this site offers is a one day streaming rental for just $1.99. If you’re familiar with PPV/VOD sites you’ll know this is a great deal. My preference would be a one day download rental, but that’s just a personal preference. There are negatives, but to be fair, I suspect that most of those are beyond the control of the site. What the site can control is generally great. The one big flaw is the lack of an advanced search function. The parent site has a great search function, so why that wasn’t just migrated over is beyond me. What the site can’t control (I suspect) is what studios will do business with them, and what those studios will charge to the site. Many studios offer decent pricing, but a few (I’m looking at you, Jules Jordan) seem to think that their material is worth a lot more than other stuff. Obviously the site has to pass those costs on. But as a consumer, I can just choose to not pay those high prices. (Up yours, Jules!) PPV/VOD sites have their limitations, but if you really want to see a title that isn’t available elsewhere, this may be an option. If it is an option, I’d recommend starting at this site because the rental prices can be very low. There may be lower prices at other PPV/VOD sites, but unless the price difference is huge I’d recommend doing business with this site as the quality is excellent. 04-03-11  03:35pm Replies (2) Review 264 Club Amber Rayne (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Fast download speeds - Pics available for most scenes - For Amber Rayne fans, it has a lot of behind-the-scenes and interview scenes - Some scenes have several download options - Video quality is very good Cons: - I seriously doubt that Amber has any connection to this site - Only 40 scenes (a mix of hardcore, lesbian and BTS stuff) - Doesn’t appear to be updating - Tour pages are misleading – they suggest a much bigger site Bottom Line: I’m a big Amber Rayne fan and was hoping that this site would give me access to a lot of unique content but it doesn’t do that. My suspicion is that this is simply content licenced from a studio that the webmasters lumped together under the “Club Amber Rayne” title. As a fan of Amber’s work and being pretty familiar with her career, she certainly seems like a model who wouldn’t give less than 100% on a site she actually had some control over which leads me to believe that pat362 and mbaya are correct in assuming that Amber really has no hand in this site. As any fan of Amber knows, her career is pretty diverse – with some serious fetish stuff going on – and this site gives no real indication of that. Apart from a few anal sex scenes there is nothing to even hint that Amber has a side to her that is anything but mainstream. For a site that has been operating for a while it is extremely small. When mbaya reviewed the site over two years ago he reported that it had 28 scenes. In the 25 months since that review there have only been 12 scenes added. There are no dates given with the scenes so it may be that the site stopped updating quite a while ago. The scenes that are available are fairly good, though they aren’t really representative of Amber’s career. There is a mix of solo material with toys, some b/g scenes, a couple of b/b/g and b/g/g scenes and several behind-the-scenes and interview clips. Most of the hardcore material doesn’t appear to be exclusive though I can’t say that for certain. The technical bits are okay, but not great. Most videos are only available in one format (wmv) and in two sizes (low and higher resolution). Navigation is pretty basic, but then with only 40 scenes there is no need to have anything that is more than basic. Thumbnails for each scene are really small and not of much use. Many of the scenes also have photos available. The photos are available as a zip. Bottom line is that even though there are no other Amber Rayne sites out there, this one isn’t worth the price. There isn’t much material here and what is here doesn’t give a good example of how diverse Amber’s career really is. The only real advantage to this site is access to some interview material that is interesting, but maybe not exclusive. This is only a site for die-hard Amber fans. 03-13-11  04:20pm Replies (1) Review 265 Facial Abuse (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - If you’re looking for hardcore, misogynistic face-fucking, this is your site - Download speeds are up to or exceed industry standards (1.2-1.4MB/sec) - I didn’t have any of the problems that other reviewers reported (inability to log in or slow download speeds) - Newer scenes have a wide varity of download and streaming options - Mostly amateur models (this can be a con too – see below) - Some mainstream porn stars (Amber Rayne, Veronica Jett, Amai Lui, Tory Lane and Tiffany Holiday, among others, make an appearance) - Pics available (zips too) - 240+ scenes on the site as of the review date - Updates approximately once a week Cons: - Older videos are very poor quality - Many of the models aren’t very attractive, many have huge tattoos (I’m not even sure that some of the models were born female…) - Navigation is very simplistic - Thumbnails on video pages are too small and too few to get a sense of whether you want to download the scene. You have to go to photo page and download a photo or two to get a good look at the model - Very misogynistic. (Yes, I know this is subjective, but this isn’t Sex and Submission. These guys seem to be trying to outdo Max Hardcore.) Bottom Line: I’ve scored this site fairly high based mostly on an objective look at it. If I were to rate it more subjectively the score would be lower. This site is well done for a small niche site, but it isn’t perfect. But like some other reviewers (pat362) I didn’t really like the material. This was a bit of a surprise to me since I do like BDSM and rough-sex sites. But most of that material I have I get from sites that are part of the Kink.com network. Facial Abuse is no Kink.com site. Facial Abuse’s theme is extreme face fucking. I think that it is possible to do this while still treating the models with some respect, but these guys don’t do that. I find rough sex to be a turn on when it is staged properly, but this is staged in a way to make it degrading. If you’ve ever seen more recent Max Hardcore scenes, or the degrading scenes from Meat Members you’ll know what I mean. Each scene follows a set formula. There is a brief interview where the model eventually undresses. She then kneels on the floor and gets her face fucked by two men. The face fucking continues with her upside down on the couch, and there is usually a scene where one of the guys is sitting on the couch and she is giving him head. The scenes have sex as well, usually anal. Most scenes have a lot of drool with some models vomiting. Most scenes end with facial cumshots. One issue I have is that many of the models (at least half) are VERY unattractive. Yes, this may be subjective, but not entirely. There are some standards of beauty, and these ladies don’t meet them. Some of the models are downright scary, which I suspect is a product of the extreme nature of the site. Some mainstream models do appear, though their scenes tend to be a little less extreme. From a technical standpoint, the site is reasonably well done. Navigation is rudimentary and the biggest problem is that the thumbnails are so small that there is no way to get a good look at the model before you download a video. The only way to get a look is to go into the photo page and download a photo. So you see a tiny thumbnail of a girl you might like to see in the video and you have to go into the photo page and click on a tiny thumbnail there and make your decision. And trust me, you’ll want to do this because otherwise you’ll get some very ugly women on your hard drive. Once you do decide to download a video you have a lot of options available for size. I find that downloading the file called “broadband” rather than HD to be sufficient. This site’s ‘broadband’ scenes are better than what most sites consider HD. The downside is that file sizes are large. Download speeds are good. The bottom line is that this site is well done for what it is, but I suspect that market may be small. I like material like this and figured that I’d like this too, but even I found it to be over the top. I had no issues that others reported, but think carefully about a membership – it's EXTREME 03-09-11  03:52pm Replies (1) Review 266 Device Bondage (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - A very unique niche - Part of the Kink.com network - Over 500 scenes - Updates several times a week - Multiple download options - Pictures available (individual or zipped) - Fast download speeds (1.4MB/sec on a single download) - Interesting mix of amateurs, BDSM models and mainstream porn models - Excellent value Cons: Can get a bit repetitive Bottom Line: I realize that Device Bondage might not be for everyone, but if you have a bondage interest this is an excellent site. The site’s claim to fame is that they don’t use traditional rope bondage, but, as the name suggests, they use a variety of other means to bind the models. The most common is a set of pipes and clamps that can be used in countless ways. It all makes for quite a unique site. Most of the scenes follow an effective formula: first there is an interview (to make it abundantly clear that there is full consent – this isn’t Max Hardcore). Then they move to a bondage scene with some S+M thrown in. Usually a second bondage and S+M scene follows. At some point there will be forced orgasms. Finally, the scene closes with another interview. The basic formula is also followed where there are multiple models. As of this review, there are now well over 500 scenes on the site. They continue to update several times a week. Adding the uniqueness and creativity on the site to the volume of material makes this site an excellent value. On the tech side, this site meets the high standards of all other Kink.com sites. There are both HD and SD wmv files, an HD mp4 and a format for IPods. You can download the entire scene as one file in the listed formats, or you can download it in segments. Pictures are also available individually or as a zipped set. My only two criticisms of this site are subjective. First, at its core, this is really a non-sex site. Mostly the only sex is forced orgasms on the models while in bondage. This is excellent stuff, but it isn’t something that I’m really into. Kink.com has sites, like Sex and Submission that are more to my liking. Second, I’d really like to see the women being bound, either as part of the scene or part of a behind-the-scenes view. All the scenes start with an interview, and then move immediately to the model in bondage. Please Kink, add some BTS here! Finally, the listed price may seem high, but consider the cost and effort that goes into the site when deciding to join. This site doesn’t hire a male a female and stick them in a bedroom setting to fuck. There is a lot of creativity that goes into these scenes. It is definitely a good value at full price. Having said that, there are ways to avoid paying full price. Kink.com usually offers a discount on a second site and having memberships to two Kink.com sites isn’t a bad thing. Also, register as a Kink.com member (free) and get on their mailing list. They regularly email special offers and deals on this and other Kink sites. The bottom line is that this is an excellent niche site. It is unique, it is creative and it exceeds industry norms for the technical stuff. If you have an interest in BDSM, you owe it to yourself to have a look. 03-06-11  06:30am Replies (2) Review 267 Public Disgrace (0) 99.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Part of the Kink.com network - Approximately 140 scenes available - Updates weekly - Good mix of scenarios - Videos available in a variety of formats and sizes - Pictures (with zips) available - Unique – I’m not aware of another site like it on the ‘net - Excellent value for price Cons: - As with the last time I reviewed this, there are no negatives. If you have an interest in this niche (BDSM and public nudity), then this site is sure to satisfy. Bottom Line: Public Disgrace is one of the Kink sites that I join regularly. Like the other sites in the network, this one has a fairly unique niche. Like other Kink sites, the folks at PD really have an excellent product. I’ve re-read my past two reviews and what I wrote continues to be valid. The biggest change is that the site is getting bigger by the week. They are now up to approximately 140 videos, most of which are about an hour long, The basic formula remains unchanged since the site first opened: they combine some pretty intense BDSM (with a lot of humiliation, which is a sub-genre in BDSM) with public nudity and sex. The two broad categories that I said existed are still there: scenes shot in the U.S. (mostly) in the Kink Armories and scenes shot in Europe. The scenes shot in Europe are far more daring (obviously due to a more relaxed environment re public nudity) involving bondage and nudity actually out in public in front of regular people going about their business. The scenes shot in the U.S. still involve public humiliation but it is done in a more controlled setting with a group of people who obviously are in on the whole thing. Having said that though, there have been several U.S. scenes posted since my last review that really push the envelope. There are no scenes that compare to those shot in Europe for full outdoor public nudity, but there are some scenes that push the limits. Regardless of where the scenes are shot, the underlying formula is unchanged: take a model, put her in bondage in some public setting and add in a heavy dose of humiliation. That takes up the first half of the scene, and then the model is bound and fucked. While that may sound like a recipe for all the shoots to look the same, the site does an excellent job of keeping the scenarios fresh and interesting. As with all Kink sites, the scenes are available in a variety of formats and sizes to keep everyone happy. There are both HD and SD wmv files, an HD mp4 and a format for IPods. You can download the entire scene as one file in the listed formats, or you can download it in segments. Pictures are also available individually or as a zipped set. I’ve said before that Public Disgrace is an excellent value, and it continues to be, especially now that the site has grown. The site continues to update weekly. To make the site a better value, register as a Kink.com member (free) and get on their mailing list. They regularly email special offers and deals on this and other Kink sites. The bottom line remains the same: this is an excellent site if you have an interest in this very specialized genre. (Some may quibble with the ‘99’ score, but I stand by it. The scoring guide recommends scores in the 90s for sites that are “near perfect, best in it’s class. Highly recommended.” That is definitely the case here.) 03-05-11  08:18am Replies (2) Review 268 Pornstar Network (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - When you join through TBP/PU you get full access to the entire site - Huge archive of material - Large volume of DVD porn - Large volume of semi-exclusive stuff - A lot less overlap with other DVD sites that you might expect - Wide range of genres covered - Decent collection of 1990s porn - Good download speeds (not extremely fast, but slightly better than average) - Excellent customer service - new scenes added daily Cons: - Navigation can be confusing - Search function doesn’t work well - Many DVD scenes are listed under a created title that can be confusing (instead of listing it as Taylor Rain in Taylor Rain Gets Fucked in the Ass Volume 74, the scene might be listed as “hot teen brunette fucked in the ass.) - Download limit of 100 files per day (which for most people isn’t too bad, but some of the older scenes are broken down into smaller files so that might cause more of a problem - No HD options on even the newer stuff - Some of the exclusive sites aren’t updating (I can’t and won’t fault PSN for this since the most likely cause is that the model has left the business) Bottom Line: In the past when I’ve had friends ask me how they can turf their collection of 1980s Hustler mags and join the new world of internet porn, I steered them to Videobox. I’ll still do that, but I’ll also tell them to get a membership at PornStar Network too. This is a great site with access to a great mix of DVD porn and some seemingly exclusive stuff too. Many of the best models from Quebec are here. (The site is run out of Quebec, so that makes sense.) The site also features access to over 130 porn studios, some major, some smaller. Some studios have almost 600 DVDs here. The smaller ones less. What surprised me was that there was not as much overlap with Videobox as I expected. Even in the studios that both have, there were titles here that I couldn’t get elsewhere. One factor that could have been a serious negative has been turned into a positive and is a reward for those of us who hang out at TBP/PU. The membership for those who stumble in from the open web is tiered: your basic membership excludes access to “MovieZ” files that make up about 50% of what is on the site. That sucks, unless you join through TBP/PU. Doing so gives you full access to the entire site, and there is a lot of material here. All the extra material that you get is accessed through PSN but it is all watermarked as VideosZ. I can’t say for sure that PSN gets you access to all of VideosZ stuff, but it must be close. If you’re considering a VideosZ membership this might be the better value. Many of the files have some options for download, though the premium stuff through MovieZ is only available as AVI files. Download speeds average about 650MB/sec, though that can get higher on occasion. One problem I encountered several times was that while download speeds remained the same, the navigation speed dropped off to the point where it was frustrating to use. That didn’t happen often, but it was annoying when it did. Pictures are available on most of the exclusive sites, but I don’t download those so I don’t have a lot of detail. Zips are available. Search and navigation functions aren’t up to standard, but once you figure it out you can muck about. Sometimes DVD scenes can be catalogued using a description that makes it harder to find if you’re looking for a star or a title. This probably isn’t relevant now, but when I joined they were in the process of giving PU members full access and I was missed somehow. The customer service was excellent and fast. (Two thumbs up to the TBP staff for their help with this too!) The bottom line is that not only will I recommend this site to porn buddies, I already have. The video quality and navigation are about industry standard, but the sheer volume of porn here makes this an excellent value whether you’re just starting out or whether (like me) you have enough titles to rival the best porn store in the country. To top it off, the material is a good mix of DVD and more exclusive. 01-31-11  03:03pm Replies (0) Review 269 Cherry Petite (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Very beautiful and petite model - Mix of softcore and hardcore - Full trial with low price - Decent quality videos and pictures - Good download speeds Cons: - Smallish site (89 video scenes, 49 photo sets) - No longer updating - Beware of pre-checked cross-sells - No zips for the photos - No HD option - Some of the scenes can be a bit repetitive Bottom Line: I’m not usually a big fan of solo girl sites, but I’ve always liked other models that I’ve seen from Quebec so I thought I’d give this a try. Cherry Petite is a beautiful young brunette model. She’s petite too, as the name would suggest. She’s done some mainstream stuff under the name Cherry Potter too. She has one scene on Videobox under the name Sherry Potter. The most recent of her videos seem to be a lot more tame than the ones she posted back when she first started her website. The later videos are mostly just a bit of tease and some masturbation as she lies on a bed. The camera is on a tripod so there is not much variety in the shots. Personally, I find these videos a bit boring and repetitive. As you work your way back into the older videos they certainly get more daring. I was pleasantly surprised to see some girl/girls play and some hardcore boy/girl scenes, some with just oral, some with vaginal sex. There is no anal. There are also some videos that can be classified as public nudity or exhibitionism. These and the hardcore scenes make this a much better site than if all she had were softcore videos. There are 89 videos on the site of varying length. The last video update was in October, 2008. The videos are 720x480 resolution. There is a lower resolution available but I didn’t try that. The download speeds were better than I have seen at other similar sites. If I was downloading only one file I would see speeds between 1.2 and 1.5 MB/sec. There are pictures too. I’m not big into pictures but I would probably have downloaded all of them since I really like Cherry’s look. But there is a major flaw on the site: there is no option to download a zip. There are 49 photo sets of varying sizes. The last photo set update was in June 2007. Obviously the site isn’t updating any more. IAFD lists Cherry as having left the business in 2007. So is Cherry Petite worth the membership? If you like her look, then it is. 89 videos and 49 photo sets isn’t a small site for a solo model. There is enough variety in the videos and photos to keep it interesting. What makes it a great value though is that it offers a full trial for two days at $2.95. The site is small enough that you could easily download the stuff you want in two days. I cancelled my trial membership early to ensure that I’d have no problems doing so and the membership stayed active until the end of the two days. One problem to note is that there is a pre-checked cross-sell on the sign-up page. I missed it. Don’t make the same mistake because it took me over an hour to cancel that to avoid a full membership being triggered. 12-19-10  07:08am Replies (7) Review 270 POV Porn (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Good quality POV scenes - Part of a bigger (but relatively small) network - Mostly amateur models - Some porn stars, before they were stars - Good selection of scenes - Updates (I’m unsure of the schedule though) - Pictures (but no zips) - The scenes aren’t over-produced; they have a ‘fun’ feel to them - Good value when joining at the TPB / PU price Cons: - Download speeds aren’t up to industry standards Bottom Line: Two things to start: 1) this review pretty much applies entirely to Peter Girls too. They are part of the same network. POVPorn.com is hardcore-themed, while Peter Girls is more softcore, with some oral and handjobs. 2) I wouldn’t normally submit two reviews for a network, but I joined through Lap Dance Gone Bad which turned out to be just a small secondary network site. POVPorn.com and Peter Girls are the main sites and deserve a separate review. I drafted this review a few days ago but didn’t post it. I’m glad I gave it some time since I’ve completely changed my position on this after watching many of the scenes again. This review may be a lot more subjective than I’d usually write. I really like this network. Peter Romero makes some excellent porn. It isn’t technically superior, but that adds to some of the amateur allure. He reminds me of the early days of gonzo porn when it was being shaped by guys like John Stagliano and Joey Silvera. This porn looks like it was fun to make, and that makes it fun to watch too. (Peter – If you read this, PLEASE make more Lap Dance Gone Bad scenes! That is an under-served niche.) It is difficult to say precisely how many scenes are on this one site because there is a lot of cross-linking between the two main sites. The sites appear to date back to 2001 and some of the scenes date back to then. Needless to say, the quality of those scenes is low as was the standard then. Most of the older scenes are also broken into smaller files. Between the two sites there are easily over a hundred scenes. The site says they update frequently and they do update though I’m not certain as to the schedule. The newer scenes are available in three sizes, with the best being 3300kbps. Download speeds aren’t up to industry standards. Average speeds are 250KB/sec. I can report that the medium quality scenes (1000kbps, 640x480) look good. There are also photos available for most of the scenes, but there is no option for zips. The best feature of the site is the models that they have. The site is not skewed to professional porn models, though some are here. Of those, most of them seem to appear very early in their careers. For example, Taryn Thomas appears in 2004 (her career began that year) as Brynne. It’s fun to see her and others so fresh in the early days of her career. Many of the other models are unknown to me and appear to be true amateurs. I’m not a big fan of the POV genre, but Peter makes it work and is able to capture the action well without making himself the star of the scene or shaking the camera so badly that the scene is unwatchable. For POV, this is well done. Joining the network through TPB / PU gets you a reduced price. For that price you get some really decent porn. It has a true amateur feel to it – and I mean that in a good sense. If you like amateurs, porn stars before they were stars or POV, this site is worth a membership. 12-18-10  07:18am Replies (0) Review 271 Lap Dance Gone Bad (0) 60.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Interesting niche - A few great dancers - A few well-known porn stars - Discount for TBP/PU members - Part of a small network of other sites - Photos are available - Files sizes come in two sizes Cons: - Very small site (only nine scenes) - No updates - Looks to have last updated when George W. Bush was still president… in his first term - Scenes are broken up into smaller files - Download speed would be considered fast only back when George W. Bush was president… in his first term - No zip option for photos - Trial membership is no longer available Bottom Line: EDIT - after spending time on the main sites of the network, I think the network is a decent value. See POVPorn.com review for more. What PU doesn’t like strippers and lap dances? Certainly not me. I love the stripper niche, and I think lap dancing should replace that silly ‘sport’ where women dance around waving long ribbons at the Olympics. With lap dancing as an official ‘sport’ I could then double the amount of time spent watching the Olympics since I now only watch women’s beach volleyball. So when I discovered Lap Dance Gone Bad it was a no-brainer for me to give it a try. This site is a pretty big disappointment. This is an under-served niche, and it isn’t exactly difficult porn to make. Hire a girl, put her on a set with a small stage and a pole, and let the fun begin. You’d think that they could churn this stuff out regularly. But they don’t. There are only nine scenes on this site. That’s nine, as in the number 9 and nothing else. To make matters worse, of the nine scenes only one is available as a full-scene download. The others are made up of various smaller files. The files may have met industry standards when they were shot, but they certainly aren’t up to standard now. Most of the files are 480x360, so they are far from HD. Photos aren’t my thing, so I don’t really have any comments except to say that they are not available as a zip file. The biggest technical issue that I have with this site is the download speeds. It was rare to see anything over 250KB/sec, which is well below what any of us would consider reasonable. Apart from the small number of scenes and the slow downloads, if you like this niche these are fun scenes to watch. Most scenes feature porn stars (Haley Paige, for example) and the scene involves a blowjob and in a couple of cases, vaginal sex. There are no anal scenes at all. A couple of the scenes feature real strippers. I’m sure of this because of the talent they display on the brass pole. Unfortunately, the best dancer (Kylie) doesn’t use the other ‘pole’ in the room, leaving the guy to have a bit of a wank while she gyrates on him. This isn’t so much a lap dance gone bad, it’s more a lap dance gone wayward. While I had hoped for a much larger site, the fact that there is a TPB/PU discount helps, but even the $19.95 price can’t nudge this into being a good value. If you really have an interest in this niche, you might consider it, or consider the additional material available on the bonus sites. Lap Dance Gone Bad appears to be one of the ‘bonus’ sites to the primary site, which is either Peter Girls or POV Porn. I’ll post a review of those when I have a look at them, but they aren’t really something that I’d join purposely. The bottom line is that this is really buyer-beware. If you like lap dancing and don’t mind spending $20 to get nine scenes you might like this. Otherwise, the site is a poor value and I can’t recommend joining for this site alone. 12-12-10  01:57pm Replies (2) Review 272 Public Flash (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Among the best in the niche - Mostly amateurs with a few well-known porn stars - Updates regularly - Exclusive content with U.S. flashing - Some European flashing (which likely isn’t exclusive) - Wide variety of body types, from full-figured, to large-breasted to petite - Some variation in race and age, though most are younger white models - Two options for file size - Currently 105 full scenes - Pictures available - Excellent value for price ($14.95 USD per month) Cons: - Videos broken down into smaller segments - No option to download complete videos - Some models are a bit too tame - Highest resolution video isn’t up current standards (the best is now 1280x720 which compares well to the older videos at 630x470) - Pictures not available in zip format - Picture resolution is average (1024x768) - Site isn’t well organized Bottom Line: I’m a big fan of public flashing and nudity and there are few sites that do it like I like it. There are sites that offer European public nudity that offer more videos and are better organized, and there are sites that have American public nudity that are more risqué (Nude in L.A. comes to mind). This is a personal opinion, but those sites lack or don’t show the models being nervous and excited at the same time. Those sites treat public nudity as being an everyday occurrence. Not so with Public Flash. This site has a bit of a corny set-up for each and then moves into various open or public venues. Panties and bras are slipped off and then the model walks through various locations and flashes. Full nudity happens, but is rare. This may sound simple, and it is, but for fans of public flashing and nudity this is a site worth looking at. As for the models, there is a decent variety. Most fit the typical porn mold by being young (18-25) white and petite. But there are some models who are fuller-figured, larger-breasted, older or different skin tones. Most of the models are amateurs (or at least that I haven’t seen before) but there are a few big name porn stars who appear, presumably early in their careers. This includes Aubrey Addams, Amber Rayne and Faye Runaway. The site, like the models, is fairly amateur. Searching isn’t really an option, but since each segment has a big thumbnail you can see whether that model might be to your liking on the main page before you click the link. My biggest complaint is that there are no full length videos: each of the scenes is divided up into smaller segments. I realize why they do this for updating purposes, but once all the segments are posted I wish they’d offer a link for the full video. The videos are offered in two resolutions, but only in wmv format. The best format isn’t bad, but it isn’t HD. The current best is 1280x720, though older videos haven't been updated and are still at 630x470. There are pictures available too, but they are not available in a zip format for easy capture. Updates are fairly regular – appearing every few days – but each update is only two segments of the full video. It takes a couple of weeks for an entire video to be posted. Still, for all the flaws, I’m willing to cut this site some slack. I may be wrong, but I suspect that this is one of the hardest niches to work in due to the risk. This isn’t filming sex in the back of a panel van or on a set in someone’s living room: these scenes put the models and crew at some legal risk in our Puritanical culture. The outcome is some fun video to watch as nervous young women flash in public. This site offers decent value for the monthly fee if you like this niche. 11-24-10  06:09pm Replies (6) Review 273 VideoBox (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - It’s Videobox, dammit! - HUGE collection of DVDs - Probably the largest DVD site on the internet - Excellent value - Wide variety of material available - Premium (extra cost) channels are worth the price Cons: - Selects for quantity, not quality - Heavy reliance on European videos - A lot of Grade-B, C and D material - A lot of B/B/G scenes - Heavy reliance on compilations where the original is also available - Poor search function Bottom Line: Yes, I realize that this is probably the most reviewed site here at PU, and yes, I also realize that this is the third time I’ve reviewed this site, but I wanted to update my opinion of the site and I figured that a comment wouldn’t suffice. I also added the premium channels this time too. I’m a big fan of Videobox. I’ve had friends who’ve asked for recommendations on porn sites and I’ve sent them to VB. VB is an excellent way to build a large, good quality porn collection. It has enough variety to satisfy all but the most unusual tastes, though the search function (or lack thereof) makes finding what you want more difficult. A site this large needs a better means of searching. VB is big enough and well known enough that one bad review won’t hurt it. I’m still a fan, but less of a fan than I have been. The thing I think that is dragging VB down is, ironically, what is one of their big selling points: five updates a day. The problem with having five updates a day is that this emphasizes quantity over quality. When they’re putting five new DVDs up per day, every day, regardless of your tastes there will be an awful lot of crap being uploaded. To fill their daily quota VB relies heavily on European porn. I prefer American porn, but that’s not my motivating point here. There is good European porn and there is bad European porn. (Same with the U.S.) The problem is that VB seems to rely on more bad European stuff than good stuff. Take Private – they are (or at least used to be) a high-quality studio. I only learned that they also crank out complete crap thanks to VB. This is grade-B and C Private stuff. Another pet peeve of mine that is also caused by the daily update schedule is the use of a lot of compilation DVDs. The problem is that with many of the compilation DVDs VB has already posted the original. Luckily someone usually points out the duplication. But VB gets to count another update without really updating anything. On the plus side, VB has recently been adding older Seymore Butts titles. These are great to see again. They’ve also started adding some Diabolic titles too. There aren’t many up yet, but these certainly move the quality balance in the right direction. For the first time, I also added the ‘premium’ channels. These really add to the value of the membership now that they are bundled for the fee. They are a bit pricey, but they do offer good value with both channels having just under 400 titles posted now. A new title gets added to each channel every two or three days. Is VB still a great value? Definitely. But they should modify their business model now that their so far ahead of the competition and focus on quality rather than quantity. I’d be satisfied with one update a day to have better quality. 10-09-10  08:42am Replies (5) Review 274 Legend Movies (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Offers a wide range of movies from their studio - Full-access trial - Membership gives access to a network of sites - Multiple download options - Decent quality and download speeds - Good variety of videos available - Many older titles (from the 90s) available Cons: - Not the full Legend catalogue of videos - Some content is shared between the sites in the network Bottom Line: The Legend Video site certainly looks like it is the official site of the well-known studio, but I have my doubts. While the quality of the site is very good, I would hope that a big studio like Legend could do a better job and would also make more of their catalogue available. But it might actually be an official site since most other studios don’t do a spectacular job of their own sites and also aren’t very generous with their titles. Having said that though, this is still a good site. It is well organized and finding specific titles isn’t a big problem. Many of the titles available aren’t widely available on other DVD sites so this is a good opportunity to access them. One thing I particularly liked was the opportunity to access some of the older Legend series’ from the 1990 and earlier in this decade. Series like American Cocksucking Championship, All About Ass and POV Casting Couch. However, while there are a lot of older titles available, there aren’t too many of their newer titles on this site. That’s another reason why I suspect that this isn’t a Legend-operated site. I suspect that they’ve licenced some of their older material to a third party. The site is reasonably well organized with menu selections that help you narrow movies down by theme, or series name. I particularly like being able to sort be series. There are several download options available and during my membership I found download speeds to be slightly faster than I’ve seen with other adult sites. Not blazing fast, but somewhat faster than the industry norm. One big advantage to this site is that it offers a full trial. For $4.95 you get unlimited access for two days. This is a great option if you’re only looking for a few titles and get in, get them and get out. I’ve used this option with this site and cancelled my trial almost immediately to avoid the recurring charges and the membership remains valid for the two days (unlike some other trials we’ve heard about from other PUs). This site is also part of a small network. I’ve had memberships at several of these sites in the past but haven’t really spent much time at them so I can’t really comment. They certainly add to the value of the site though. The bottom line is that this site offers a lot of older (5+ years old, approximately) Legend titles that are not widely available elsewhere. The site is easy to use and the download speeds are good. The site is a moderate value for the monthly fee when you take into account the other sites on the network but is an exceptional value when you take advantage of the full trial option. If you’re looking for hard-to-find older Legend titles, I’d recommend starting here. 09-16-10  09:43am Replies (0) Review 275 18X Girls (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Some very hot young Russian and Eastern European models - Good quality videos - Multiple download options - Zipped photo sets - Mix of hardcore and softcore - Updates regularly - Discount offered through TBP/PU - 2 small bonus sites included - Looks to be exclusive (but maybe not given pat362’s comment) Cons: - Small site - Mostly unknown models Bottom Line: First off, please excuse my ignorance of Eastern European and Russian porn. If I say something that’s incorrect, don’t take offence. I have nothing against European or Russian porn, I just prefer American porn. And not for any tangible reason. It’s mostly because with American porn I get to follow the careers of specific models and I find that more difficult with European models. That said, I was lured into this site when I say it listed on TBP as a “What’s Hot” site. I checked it out and the first model, Natalie, had me reaching for my credit card. The ‘hook’ of the site is the young models. Given the title, the assumption is that they are all 18, and I’m inclined to believe that. I downloaded and watched every video on the site and enjoyed all of them. If you’re into hardcore, they have that (with some anal as well), and if softcore and toys is your choice then you’ll be happy too. There is some G/G material too. The site is still pretty small. When my membership expired there were still fewer than 30 scenes available and several of those were the same models (not that that’s a bad thing though). The good news is that there were regular updates throughout my time there and the updates were all good quality. The site says it updates on Sunday, and they seem to add several updates at the same time. Given time, this site will grow into a decent value if they continue like this. For people who like photos, this site won’t disappoint either. Each video set has an accompanying photo set with between 100 and 150 photos. These are available in high-resolution and can be downloaded as a zipped file. The bottom line is that this is a small but growing site that delivers what it promises: fresh, young (18+) models. The videos are good quality and there are photos available too. There is a mix of hardcore and softcore. The site isn’t yet what I’d call a good value for anyone who doesn’t specifically want to see one of the models, but if they continue to add to the site at the rate they are now it will become a good value soon. I’d recommend this site to anyone who likes younger models. (BTW - I read pat362’s comments and I’m not sure how that impacts this review. I’m not aware of the smackmybitch site or the adultlabs company. It may be that this content is just purchased. I don’t think that this would substantially alter my view of the site if it were true.) 09-12-10  08:01am Replies (20) Shown : 251-275 of 302 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.61 seconds.